RACE:
DON'T GET OBSESSED WITH IQ
|
|
By now almost everybody, including many Jews, have
been labeled naziswhowanttokillsixmillionjews.
One of the Jews who was labeled anaziwhowantstokillsixmilionjews
was the co-author of The Bell Curve, Harvard professor
Richard Herrnstein. The Bell Curve talks about the
importance of innate racial IQ differences so liberals
said it was just part of an Evil Racist Plot to get
money.
This is unlikely in Herrnstein's case.
Herrnstein was at Harvard, where talking about inborn
IQ differences between races is pure heresy. All The
Bell Curve could get him was fired.
Worse, Herrnstein was dying of cancer while the book
was written. A person with a terminal illness is seldom
an Evil Opportunist.
So we are left with three choices, 1) Herrnstein
was just doing the book to get paid by the right-wing
conspiracy, 2) he, a Jew, was anaziwhowantedtokillsixmillionjrews
or 3) he was an honest man making an honest point.
Liberals insist on 1) or 2).
To deal with The Bell Curve, liberal psychologists
are called in to disparage IQ tests and say that they
mean nothing when applied to race. This sounds good
because everybody knows IQ tests are psychological
tests and it makes the psychologists sound like they're
being modest.
That's not the point. IQ tests may be as bad as liberal
psychologists get paid to say they are. But even a
poor dumb psychologist's test can tell whether a person
is smart or dull.
IQ tests are not all that good but basic intelligence
is too obvious to miss when you are dealing with large
numbers of people. It is not demonstrated on the tests
because the tests are good but because, if you go
into the real details of the test, consistent results
are simply undeniable.
That is what Herrnstein used hundreds of pages to
demonstrate -- again. It is what his fellow Harvard
professor Arthur Jensen has demonstrated repeatedly.
But while liberals have tried to say IQ tests are
too rough to be valid, those on the side of Jensen
and Herrnstein have gone overboard in the opposite
direction. They have erected IQ into something very
like a god, a piece of perfection which tells the
whole truth.
|
IQ
TELLS US LITTLE ABOUT DIFFERENCES IN RACIAL HISTORY
|
|
Japan recently went right up to the economic level
reached in the West, and Japan is now stagnating.
Throughout history, Mongoloids have reached a certain
level and then stagnated. Japan did it quicker because
history moves faster today.
I discussed this point on July 7, 2001 -- THE
WHEEL IS NOT A PRIMITIVE INVENTION. My opinion
is that without the white race, humanity will stagnate
and fall back.
White empires only go down when they turn brown.
Leftists, who never get anything right, assure us
all this is naïve, unsophisticated and everything
else they say about things that turn out later to
be right. They demand that respectable conservatives
agree with them or they will not be respectable.
Respectable conservatives agree with liberals on
this, as they do on everything liberals insist on.
IQ-obsessed people whom liberals call racists also
agree with this. They say that Mongoloids have high
IQs so you don't need whites.
I don't agree because that is not the way the world
looks to me. In the end, everybody bases his worldview
on how things look to him no matter how much time
he spends marshaling his facts to prove it.
|
|
AS
A MATTER OF FACT, RACE MAY BE ABOUT SKIN COLOR
|
|
"Third World" is the code word for "colored" and we all know
it.
There is a rich white world and a poor colored world. Every year
thousands of academics are paid billions of dollars to pour out
rivers of ink arguing that this is an accident.
I seriously doubt that deep down they or anybody else really
believes this.
Meanwhile back on earth the color line is the line which divides
lands that are high in infant mortality, hunger, disease, and
poverty from the opposite. People of color all over the world
are desperately trying to get into countries which have white-skinned
majorities.
The only countries today that are both white and poor are those
which until recently were Communist. That is to say that the only
countries today that are white and poor were ruled by those same
Leftist Intellectuals who now insist the color of the Third World
is an accident.
Oddly enough, both liberals and the IQ-obsessed people liberals
call racists agree that skin color means nothing. The Jensen-Herrnstein
worshippers say that the color of the skin is really something
that happens to overlap with IQ. They all agree that skin color
is just superficial, and that something Deeper and More Profound
is involved.
Meanwhile, I see a world in which reality is divided by skin
color.
I suggest that what you see may well be what you get, which is
why we have eyes in the first place.
White people do not have black skins and sickle cells in their
blood as a defense against malaria as do blacks.
White people do not have the epicanthric eye folds that Mongoloids
have. These are the eye folds that make their eyes look "squinted"
-- "slant-eyed" -- to outsiders.
What whites do have is decoration. Whites have blond and red
hair and different eye colors, which helped them compete with
each other for mates. Unlike other races, whites developed less
to compete with the environment and more to compete with each
other.
I think that a race is white because it takes the climatic high
ground. Other races developed to deal with extreme cold (Mongoloid)
and extreme heat (the black races).
TURNING
THE OLD THEORIES AROUND
|
|
Historically, people have tried to explain the accomplishments
of white people as being unrelated to skin color. They have
tried to explain how the northern climate forced whites
to accomplish things.
But in the world before air conditioning, Northern Europe
was the most desirable ground on earth. Wave after wave
of invasions have tried to take Europe even within the years
of written history.
Wave after wave of ever whiter people succeeded in taking
and settling Northern Europe.
There are two ways animals and people survive. In the case
of Eskimos, they were stopped from moving south into warmer
and more desirable lands by the American Indians who were
already to the south of them. To survive, they had to adapt
to live on the Arctic ice.
There are other groups, like the Indians themselves, who
took and held desirable land -- until whites got there.
Some animals, like buzzards, find niches to live in that
others have not adapted to. But others like the lion take
the ideal places at the top of the food chain.
Like supply and demand and other now-obvious rules of life,
the facts of race and history may be so simple that we have
overlooked them. Wave after wave of people took the most
desirable territory. They therefore look like the people
who took the most desirable places.
Finally, the race that conquered the genetic high ground
conquered the rest of the world and science and went on
instead of stagnating. Looking at history from a distance,
this is, like most rules that work, predictable with common
sense.
It should be understood that this is not my reason for
opposing the idea of letting the entire white world be overrun
by the third world. Each race has a moral right to exist.
If you say that about any other race it is simple decency,
but if you say it about whites you are anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
All I am offering here is a possible explanation of why
"third world" is a code word for "colored." In the real
world "It's all an accident" won't cut it.
|
| |
|
|
|
| MENU |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Current Issue |
Issue: Nov. 24, 2001
Editor: Virgil H. Huston, Jr.
© 2001 WhitakerOnLine.org
|
| Email List |
|
|
|
