ARCHIVE ARTICLES

 

 
WHAT AMERICA IS ALL ABOUT


Most of us have seen the ad where dozens of nonwhites tell us, in heavy accents, "I am Mellican!" (It means American). An American is a person who has certain documents.

There are "undocumented workers," who are just as American as we are but who happen not to have the papers they need. These are the folks you only call "illegal aliens" if you are anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

That ad was put out by the Ad Council, but it didn't make the whole point they wanted to make. So there's a new one that has the same type of "I Mellican" plus Harry Bellafonte and one critical addition that no American Patriot could do without.

This ad has a very dark Asian guy and a very white blue-eyed girl wrapped up together in an American flag. It is shown twice in fifteen seconds, so you don't miss the point. All you can see is their eyes and their complexions. The rest is the American flag they are wrapped in.

If you are not anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews, this illustrates What America Is All About. Anyone who is not anzaiwhowantstokillsixmillionjews has one aim above all: the end of "racism."

Ending racism has to do with only one race. It means the mixing of whites wth other races. Those who fight "racism" only want nonwhites to immigrate and be integrated into white countries. Nobody pushes Japan, which is less crowded than the Netherlands, to bring in non-Japanese immigrants, but any criticism of nonwhite immigration in the Netherlands is Evil.

So this ad, where only the American flag is draped around a colored guy and a white girl, takes up where the old "I Mellican" ad left off. Both are products of the Ad Council.

I have not seen this latter one repeated. Is this one too blatant for even the dumbass white gentiles to swallow?

 

ONE-WAY UNITY


For many years, we tried to get Republicans to go after the George Wallace vote. They finally did in 1980, and the "Wallace vote" was suddenly renamed "Reagan Democrats." National Review, the organ of respectable conservatism, now tells us they wouldn't go for that Wallace vote until it cleansed itself of Racist Evil.

For National Review, conservative victory is nice, but insulting white working people and Southerners is nicer.

Actually, a person with a memory - which means only me - remembers that National Review used to reject that Wallace vote for an entirely different reason.

I remember that all those years before 1980, the Republicans said something entirely different. For decades they said there were just very few Wallace votes, and what they wanted was those black voters who were now ready to vote Republican in 1960, 1962, 1964, 1966, 1968, 1970, 1972, 1974, 1976, and 1978.

I have been told that blacks were ready to vote for Reagan in 1980, but the Evil Wallace, I mean Reagan Democrat, Strategy drove them off.

In 1980, when Republicans finally went for the Wal--, sorry, I mean Reagan Democrat, vote, they won the presidency from a sitting president and they gained control of a House of Congress for the first time since 1952.

But National Review now tells us they were not being stupid all those years before 1980, they were just being Shrewd " - January 26, 2002 - WHEN DUMMIES TRY TO BE "SHREWD".

 

 
SOUTH HATING AND WHITE HATING ARE THE ONLY BASES OF AMERICAN UNITY
 


I wrote a column on September 11 saying that if they attack America, they attack me. But let us all understand that this is true ONLY of a spokesman for white Southerners like me. NO NATIONAL SPOKESMAN, in the United States, RIGHT OR LEFT, thinks like this.

Senator John McCain, hero of the Southern Partisan, told it exactly like it is. McCain said that those of us who are white gentiles born in the United States owe our loyalty to this country, i.e., to getting rid of whites and so forth. But, he added, Hispanics in the United States owe their first loyalty to foreign Hispanics (January 26, 2002 - WHEN DUMMIES TRY TO BE "SHREWD."

Arizona eats that kind of Americanism up.

National Review is American only if America maintains its dedication to getting rid of whites. National Review is anti-Southern and pro-Lincoln first and foremost, and it never spares any effort to make that clear. It demands that all Confederate flags come down and there is no "South" in National Review." There is only a "south."

National Review now makes a major point of never capitalizing South or Southern. That is their idea of National Unity.

As always, any white gentile American and especially any Southerner who gets all excited about American Unity is being a sucker.

The south is not the South.

Actually, saying "southern states" is not even geographically accurate if you are referring to the states of the American South.

The most "southern" state in the Union is Hawaii, which conservatives do NOT include in the term "southern states." California borders on Mexico, but it is not considered a "Southern State" although it is undeniably a southern state.

If William Buckley had his way, the most southern state would be Puerto Rico.

When they say "southern states," it is clear that respectable conservatives are referring to the "Southern" states, the Old Confederacy. But insulting the South is more important than accuracy.

 

 
WHAT AMERICA MEANS TO ME
 


This is not some sort of secret conspiracy. They could not be more blatant and open about the fact that hating white gentiles in general and white Southerners in particular is What America Is All About.

We have national TV ads and Senator McCain saying this as clearly as any human being can POSSIBLLY say it. There is nothing subtle here.

The Ad Council said it loud and clear and on national television. Senator McCain said it, also on national TV. National Review, which is always talking about the importance of words, spends a lot of effort making it clear that hating the South trumps verbal accuracy.

"John Brown's Body" is our real national anthem.

National Review makes it very clear that Reagan's victory was nowhere near as important to them as rejecting George Wallace's many millions of supporters.

They hate you, and I don't know how they could possibly make this any clearer.

And that, dear Virginia, is What America Means To Me.

 

 

Home | Current Articles | Article Archive | About Bob Whitaker | Contact Bob | Links | Privacy Policy

MENU

Home

Current Articles

Article Archive

Whitaker's World View

World View Archives

About Bob Whitaker

Contact Bob

Links

Privacy Policy


Current Issue
Issue: May 25, 2002
Editor: Virgil H. Huston, Jr.
© 2001 WhitakerOnLine.org


Email List
Sign up for our email list to be notified of site updates:
E-Mail:

© Copyright 2001, 2002. All rights reserved. Contact: bob@whitakeronline.org