|
|
| |
WERE SOUTH CAROLINIANS STARVING CHILDREN?
|
|
Jane Fonda told the world several years ago that
"children are starving in upper South Carolina."
To her, it sounded perfectly reasonable. According
to liberals, people are starving everywhere because
of evil whites.
The fact is that, for the first time in history,
starvation is NOT occurring in every society on
earth. This, like other uniquely GOOD situations,
is the product of white societies, and only of white
societies (see October 20, 2001 - THE
BIG SECRET REVEALED: WHITES ARE UNIQUE ONLY IN ***GOOD***
WAYS).
Malnutrition is not starvation. You can be malnourished
and be rich. Every single Pharaoh of ancient Egypt
had worms in his stomach and was desperately lacking
in certain vitamins and minerals.
Every Pharaoh was malnourished and not one Pharaoh
was poor.
I doubt there is anybody who could not, by a detailed
examination, be found to be short of something in
his diet, health nuts included.
There are degrees of malnutrition. There are only
two degrees of starvation: dying and dead.
|
IN AFRICA, WHITE RULE IS OUT AND STARVATION
IS BACK
|
|
I have been reading news reports about the fact
that people are starving in Zimbabwe. When I was
there, that African country was called Rhodesia,
and it was ruled by whites. It was one of those
"white minority governments." Back then, the idea
that people might starve in Zimbabwe would have
been funny.
What I called "Rhodesia" was called Southern Rhodesia
when it was a British colony. The area that was
called Northern Rhodesia had become a black-ruled
land called Zambia. Despite the fact that Zambia-based
Communist guerillas attacked Rhodesia, Rhodesia
let food supplies for those starving Zambians go
across its territory on its railroads.
I said Rhodesia should cut them off. They said
that wouldn't be nice. I said you had to be ruthless
to survive. They said it wouldn't be nice.
There is no more Rhodesia. I am not sure what good
they think being nice did them.
So the world finally forced black rule on Rhodesia,
too. It became Zimbabwe, its third name in a few
decades. Now blacks are starving there.
Under white rule it was a farming country which
exported huge amounts of food. Certainly we would
not want what the black Africans there ate. Their
main food was grits, but they managed to make it
inedible for me. It was called mealie-meal and it
was smashed down into such tiny bits that it tasted
like water.
So they didn't eat what I would want to eat, but
they ate. So in order to spread hatred for the white
man, it is necessary to forget how important and
unusual the lack of starvation is in human history.
|
|
| |
DIET
REVERSES ITSELF IN MODERN RICH LANDS
|
| |
One of the people who works at the heart center told me
that gout is a disease that is still prevalent. But it
prevails in America mostly among poor people.
Gout used to be the disease of the rich. The foot would
swell up enormously and painfully among rich people because
they had diets that were rich in protein and fat. Anyone
who has seen Oliver Twist saw the pure vegetarian diet
of the very poor, gruel, while the upper classes ate turkey
and dressing with lots of gravy.
Now vegetarianism is the fad of the rich. Even those
who eat meat have all the fat cut off of it.
When yuppies do decide to have something that tastes
good, it is wine, cheese and bread. Wine, cheese and bread
was the lunch a farmer's wife in Europe used to take out
to her working class husband for lunch.
In Charles Dickens' day, the rich were the fat ones.
Back then, American Presidents like Cleveland and Taft
were enormous. The term "fat and happy" comes from those
days.
Today there are far more fat people among the poor. Poor
people today eat lots of fat and lots of protein in all
the fast-food places.
Poor people may be fat, but they are far less careful
to get the right foods. So they are fat and malnourished.
Jane Fonda would say they are starving.
|
|
WHY
WHITES NEED BLACK RULE
|
|
So how are limousine liberals going to deal with what,
in their more hysterical moments, they might call the
"starvation" of America's working class?
Limousine liberals have one solution to every problem.
They call it regulation. We call it telling people what
to do. In order to win elections for their "regulation"
agenda, liberals "get out the minority vote." This means
that they spend much of their money getting people with
dark skins to the polls on the assumption, an assumption
where they are putting their cash, that those dark skins
will be solidly liberal.
They never lose that bet.
So in Africa every time blacks take over they starve.
And I mean STARVE --horribly, women and children-- and
I mean to DEATH. But it never occurred to any liberal
that this means that black self-rule could be a bad idea
for the blacks in Africa.
On the other hand, the fact that white American working
people don't eat healthy enough diets is plenty of reason
to "regulate" their lives in detail.
It never occurs to liberals that white self-rule is a
right WE have earned. We have the right to self-rule,
not because somehow every human being is entitled to it,
but because we build successful countries with our votes.
|
|
|
| |
Home
| Current Articles | Article Archive | About
Bob Whitaker | Contact Bob | Links
| Privacy
Policy
|
|
|