|
Bob Whitaker's Weekly Articles – February 19, 2005
|
February 19, 2005 –
Behind Every Successful Man...
February 19, 2005 –
NOW What Was I Talking About?
February 19, 2005 –
NOW Who Are the REAL Birdbrains?
February 19, 2005 –
Now I've Learned My ABC's....
February 19, 2005 –
Learning to Read the Signs of the Times
Fun Quote:
Some people have accused WhitakerOnline of being on the lunatic fringe, and this is very offensive.
Fringe, hell! We are at Lunatic Central.
Behind Every Successful Man...
|
It bothers me, though I can't tell them, that so few of the men fighting for our cause have a female anchor at the TOP LEVEL.
They've got good men, but men are theorists. A woman who cares about you takes care of things IN DEPTH, and I can see as plain as day that the "disconnects" in most organizations are the direct result of not having the right woman in the right place.
This is where my extreme disabilities have given me an understanding of something basic.
My first two books were dedicated to my now ex-wife. They could not have gotten done without her. One could make up a theory about how I was Progressive enough to understand the special place of a brilliant woman who cares.
Sorry. I thought this way long, long before Women's Liberation came up with Female Appreciation. I didn't THINK about this at all. I can't do without this kind of in-depth backing.
It goes like this:
"Bob, you are WONDERFUL. I am (sincerely) very proud of you."
"Now, Bob, has X and Y been taken care of? Bob, you answered his point very well, but you didn't deal with his question."
Backup in detail. Deal with the question.
Generally, men are scatterbrained. Some are pretty good at this type of detail, but are no substitute for a woman.
Most men can get by on their own. I can't function without it.
NOW What Was I Talking About?
|
If one doesn't have Progressive Ideas about Female Appreciation, I recommend Attention Deficit Disorder as a far better guide to the subject.
That is, if you're smart.
And I am very, very smart.
As my woman anchor said some time ago, this is called symbiosis. A Women's Libber would say that I am "using" her and that I "used" my wife and that I "used" the woman I appointed as my Assistant Director of Oversight on Capitol Hill.
You're damn right. I used the hell out of them.
What Women's Libbers don't realize is that my woman anchor sees me as "her man." She is "using" me in exactly the way I was born to be "used."
Repeat: that's called symbiosis. As she explained, women have a design function and men have a design function. We don't "use" each other. Nature uses both of us.
NOW Who Are the REAL Birdbrains?
|
Do you notice how, as usual, my entire life has been devoted to over-explaining what any sane person should see as basic to a healthy mind?
Most of our right-wingers tend to see the world in exactly the same way Women's Libbers do.
I am NOT criticizing them. Liberals see the world in exactly the same way, only sicker.
Look, gang, think about peacocks. The male peacock has to grow and constantly preen this huge fan of useless feathers. He has to fight to claim his strutting ground.
Meanwhile, what are the females doing?
They are standing there quietly judging which one of these fighters and strutters wins the only prize that matters.
Women's Libbers say the male peacocks are using the female peacocks. Male peacocks get to do all the strutting, so they are putting female peacocks in a humiliating, subservient position.
According to Women's Libbers, peacock nature puts the female in a humiliating position. The Women's Libbers say women should be out there on the strutting ground, sticking on feathers and strutting.
Do you have any idea how a healthy-minded female peacock would react to that?
A healthy-minded female peacock would react to a female peacock who wants to get out on the strutting ground exactly the same way a South Carolina redneck would react to a guy in San Francisco who feels he has a right to put on makeup and walk around in high heels.
By some strange coincidence, NOW is crammed full of lesbians.
What a surprise.
So who is using whom? There's no point to all those multicolored feathers and all that fighting for a strutting ground if the females don't like it. From one end of nature to the other, we males are battling for power and territory while the females are doing the choosing.
We are USING them.
Yes, I use the hell out of my anchor.
And her response is, "Sure you do. What's your point?"
Now I've Learned My ABC's....
|
If everybody responded to Whitaker's points that way, we could get on to more interesting and, Lord knows, more productive discussion.
Males have a function. Females have a function. It is scary to me that I have to explain anything this obvious. In fact, it makes me feel a little nuts when I have explain these basics over and over and over and over and over.
The Chinese had movable print before whites did. But they didn't DO anything with it. The very fact that scholars have to dig to find out that the Chinese historically did have movable type or gunpowder or a mechanical clock sometime in history shows how DIFFERENT Orientals are.
You don't have to dig to find out whites had gunpowder. You don't have to dig to find out that whites had movable print. You don't have to dig to discover that men use women for their purposes and women use men for theirs.
And while I'm at it, let me also explain that you are carrying around two pounds of various symbiotic beings in your body that you feed and keep warm and provide a home for. These are microbes in your stomach and intestines that are absolutely essential to digestion. They are symbiotic. We need them and they need us. They use us to survive. We use them to survive. They are USING you.
But you can't live without them.
All my life I have wanted to take all these basics and MOVE ON. I want to do some THINKING, something creative in real social sciences.
Instead my whole life has been "Oh, my God, they got it wrong AGAIN. OK, let's get back to A. We will get to B and C later."
It's like trying to explain basic arithmetic all your life. "Every man leads a life of quiet desperation." I am DESPERATE to talk about calculus, but my whole intellectual life is dedicated to finding ways to explain 2 + 2 equals 4 over and over and over.
Learning to Read the Signs of the Times
|
There is no better way to measure the health and vitality of a family, an organization, society, or nation than by its women. Look at the teachings of Jesus Christ on this, compare medieval and Southern chivalry, and our Germanic "barbarian" ancestors who conquered Rome to the present situation.
Here is what Alexis de Tocqueville wrote in a chapter titled "How Americans Understand the Equality of the Sexes" in Democracy in America:
As for myself, I do not hesitate to avow that although the women of the United States are confined within the narrow circle of domestic life, and their situation is in some respects one of extreme dependence, I have nowhere seen woman occupying a loftier position; and if I were asked, now that I am drawing to the close of this work, in which I have spoken of so many important things done by the Americans, to what the singular prosperity and growing strength of that people ought mainly to be attributed, I should reply: To the superiority of their women.
This was written in the 1830's. College professors, NOW harridans, and Respectable Conservatives would all rush in to tell us about all the bad side that de Tocqueville swept under the rug, and how much better off today's women are.
They will tell us this with a straight face, while trying to turn every one of our young girls into aggressive, tattooed, race-mixing, doped-up whores, and DEMANDING that they be "allowed" to serve in combat.
One look at their ideal woman will tell you everything you need to know about the kind of world they are working for. One that fits them just fine.
In religious parlance, it is called HELL.
|
|
