Archive for October, 2004
Someone on Stormfront was trying to deal with all the fanatical pro-lifers. They were trying to explain that their interest was in saving our race, not pro-life and prayer in school.
This was my attempt to back them up:
I am with you. If somebody’s big interest is abortion or Family Protection, Jerry Falwell is their man.
Those people are a pain. I have to sit around and deal with their hangups. It’s like having a white supremacist Jew in your organization.
Some Jews are really fanatical white supremacists. But you always have to be careful what you say around them. You can relax and say almost anything, even if it has nothing to do with Jews, and they suddenly decide you are Hitler.
These pro-life fanatics are exactly like Jews. You never know when they are going to suddenly decide that you are anti-life. You are suddenly Satan Himself.
If I were a baby about to be born into a brown world, I would BEG to be aborted. “Do unto others as you would have them do unto unto you.”
But that was just Jesus who said that.
If you are the Chosen People who own the Law the way Jews and professional pro-lifers do Jesus is just an asterisk at the end of the Old Testament.
They say, “Seventy percent of the Bible is the OLD Testament.”
The Jews and the extreme pro-lifers have a God of their own. They own Him. They represent Him.
So my attitude, my obsession, is pure Satanism.
My aim is to save my race.
It happens that saving my race is critical to making life worth living for all of humanity. But even if it weren’t, I would fight for the preservation of my own race.
I have to humor anyone who has another agenda.
The minute somebody says he is a big pro-lifer on Stormfront, I put him in the Jew category, the “Other Agenda” category.
But not for a second do I forget that this is a wonderful person. In a world where the only allowable opinion is to be anti-white, he is a person who, somewhere among his many priorities, wants to PRESERVE my race.
At the same time I never forget that this person, Jew or pro-life, is one of the Chosen People first. My race is FAR down his list of priorities.
I am grateful that he is a friend of my race. I am happy when a Jew is a genuine friend of my race, despite all the pressures he faces.
Professional pro-lifers are fighting to get third world children adopted into all-white areas, but here is a pro-lifer who resists all that and is still for my race. I appreciate that deeply.
But saving my race is ONE of his priorities.
He is NOT a comrade.
If you treat him just right and say all the right things, he can be an ally.
Bless that person with all of your heart, but keep your distance.
People always say that freedom of speech means you can say anything you want to SO LONG AS IT DOES NOT DO HARM OR OFFEND SOMEBODY.
Every slave on every plantation in the Old South had that kind of freedom. He could say anything that did not offend anybody. He could do anything that did not offend anybody.
His only problem was that the list of things he could not say or do because it would offend somebody was very, very, very long.
Every citizen of a Communist country or the average African country has exactly that kind of freedom. The Soviet Constitution of 1936, the one Stalin wrote, guaranteed freedom of speech. But under Stalin, the list of things that would offend or infringe on other people was a bit long.
The Nazi Gestapo under Hitler genuinely believed that if you said something nice about Jews you were doing an evil thing that hurt people. So they arrested you. The German government of today genuinely believes that if you say anything bad about Jews you are not only being offensive, you are evil. So they arrest you and the minimum prison sentence is one year.
So they have freedom of speech, but there are little “exceptions” you serve hard time for.
To repeat, everybody says,
“Freedom of speech means you can say anything you want to SO LONG AS IT DOES NOT DO HARM OR OFFEND SOMEBODY.”
And only Ole Bob will tell you how ridiculous it is for an adult to say something as silly as that.
Freedom is the right to offend or harm others. There is no such thing as a harmless freedom.
Like every other freedom, a slogan won’t give you freedom of speech. Freedom is BALANCING your rights with other people’s rights, and giving your own rights a LOT of space.
Yes, it sounds nuts.
But I remember that from the 1970s through the early 1990s, Fashionable Opinion said that. A person would look you straight in the eye and say, “Men and women are just alike,” just as people will look you straight in the eye today and say, “Race doesn’t exist.”
Every professor of biology or genetics who hoped to get tenure or get published or get promoted would have to say: “Women and men are just alike.”
As I said in the book you can find at
“If Political Correctness needs for frogs to have hooves, ten thousand professors will line up to testify that frogs have hooves.”
During all those years, because of Women’s Liberation, you had to BELIEVE that if you gave dolls to little boys and toy guns to little girls, boys would act like girls and girls would act like boys.
That fad ended about ten years ago and I am the only person on earth who remembers it. It had nothing to do with Iraq. It has nothing to do with how evil Clinton is. It has nothing to do with Bush.
So it’s gone.
It’s too damned silly for anyone to remember it was once Gospel.
Every con man who has ever lived has fooled the rubes, the suckers, the hicks, with the following phrase:
“Things are not as they appear.”
Did God give us eyes or did Evolution give us eyes? God or evolution, the reason we have eyes is because things ARE as they appear.
What a con man does to a hick, a rube, a moron is to get something from him for nothing.
So he says, “What you get from me APPEARS to be nothing. But things are not as they appear.”
Somewhere in me there is a Bob Whitaker who screams in rage when I take organized religion seriously. That Bob says:
“Preacher, if you mean what you say you will be like St. Paul and make tents for a living. Preacher, if you are serious you will be like St. Peter and work for a living.”
Somewhere in me is a Bob Whitaker who says, “No, Family Values or Equality or We Owe it to So-and-So means nothing.”
When you preach at me, the Diplomatic Bob Whitaker pretends to take you seriously.
But inside me there is a voice saying, “I am not a moron. I am not a hick or a rube or a professor or a New York City provincial. I am Bob Whitaker, and what you are saying doesn’t mean a damned thing.”
Just a few years ago there was a huge fad on television. People would find identical twins who had been separated at birth and adopted separately, and reunite them.
These identical twins were raised in totally different families with totally different Family Values. Some were raised by poor, uneducated families. Their twins were raised by well-to-do, highly educated families.
Some were raised by Catholics. Some were raised by Jews. Some were raised by atheists and others by Protestants.
It was GREAT television. Most of the identical twins didn’t even know they had a twin.
Identical twins have EXACTLY the same genes. They even have the same fingerprints. When the twins met for the first time they discovered there were incredible similarities between them, no matter how different the families were in which they were raised.
Identical twins separated at birth commit the same crimes at the same age. They prefer the same toothpaste, they marry similar women at a similar age.
And on and on and on.
Same jobs. Same intelligence. Same, same, same. On the television shows the identical twins who had recently discovered each other would talk about how the other twin “is me.” It was fascinating.
I saw this this fad of identical twins end with a sudden crash.
A man had gotten together identical TRIPLETS, none of whom was aware of the other. It was such a big deal it was on Phil Donahue.
The whole thing was going great until Phil Donahue dropped a bomb on the guy he was interviewing, the man who had gotten the triplets together. Donahue said, “Doesn’t this favor those who believe that heredity is more important than environment?”
The guy he was interviewing, the guy who had found the identical triplets, looked like he had been slapped in the face.
He knew very well that “heredity” means “Hitler.” Donahue had just accused him of being anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
“No, no, no,” he said. The fact that identical twins raised in completely different families and totally different families were just alike didn’t mean heredity was important.
On that day the identical twin fad ended totally. Before that show there had been at least two dozen national shows about identical twins being reunited. After Donahue reminded the media what that identical twin stuff meant, there was not one more “identical twins reunite” show. The ones already scheduled were suddenly cancelled.
In my book I talk about the greatest identical twins study ever made. A thousand identical twins raised in totally different environments from the time they were less than two weeks old were compared.
In Russia, the environments that children are raised in are VERY different. But the twins were astoundingly alike in every way: crime, talents, intelligence tests.
Same, same, same.
This study was conducted by the Medicogenetical Institute of Moscow.
Heredity is HERESY to the political left.
The Medicogenetical identical twins came out in 1934, when Stalin ruled Russia. Stalin wiped them out. The Institute ceased to exist. The head of the Medicogenetical Institute “confessed his ideological error” and was shot.
All identical twin studies come out that way. So no one talks about them.
“Your life,” they say, “is shaped by your family values and how you were raised.”
That is Gospel on the political left. That is Gospel on the political right.
It’s not true.
“One test is worth a hundred expert opinions.”
That is the basis of Western science.
Every other society depends on absolutely nothing but “expert opinions.”
Aristotle said that men had one more tooth than women did, and every “intellectual” believed it for two thousand years.
If a man did not have one more tooth than a woman, why would Aristotle have said it?
If you counted teeth and found that women had the same number of teeth as men, intellectuals would patiently explain to you that the man’s extra tooth fell out.
But today you could make a valid statistical study and PROVE that, from your one thousand samples, the odds are a billion to one that Aristotle was wrong.
The developement of Western science is a slow movement from Oriental Wisdom to simple arithmetic. In fact, the actual science of statistics was first developed just over a century ago.
But long before statistics was developed in modern terms, the West had learned that if you actually COUNT and TEST, the words of some fat Great Philosopher sitting there babbling while children starve around him don’t mean a damned thing.
Joe R says Californians like him have Southern sympathies. This was my reply:
Joe, that’s why I said the Old Confederacy et al.
National Review KEPT saying Tennessee was a border state, but they stopped that after they published two letters from me asking whatthehell. Buckley’s sister answered me personally on that.
The group that runs National Review now REALLY hates the South, but that statement has not been made since.
Even Senator Baker of Tennessee, turncoat of turncoats, referred to “Our blessed South.”
In a cover article for the Southern Partisan years ago I discussed “Southern Nationalism.” I pointed out that the South IS a nation. It is not a political unit. When Ireland was politically an integral part of Great Britain it was still a nation. When Poland was repeatedly split up into partitions by Prussia, Austria, and Russia, Poland was still a nation.
Less than a year ago the Prime Minister of the Holy Land Jehovists worship said that Hitler “killed six million people of our nation.” Israel did not exist when Hitler was alive, but everybody understood exactly what he meant.
Contrary to what the Jehovists say, white gentiles like the Irish and Poles and Southerners are human, and they have nations too.
A nation exists in the mind, not on a map.
People like you are part of our nation even if they’ve never seen the South.
A capital letter makes all the difference. When you say Southerners, you are being specific. When you say southerners, you are speaking of anybody from the southern parts of the United States.
Puerto Rico is the southernmost large area of the United States. Puerto Ricans are southerners, but they are not Southerners.
Hawaii is south of the Rio Grande. Hawaiians are southerners. They are not Southerners.
Most people think that San Francisco is in northern California. Actually it is about the middle of the California coast. San Francisco is also south of the northern border of the Old Confederacy. So over eighty percent of the population of California is made up of southerners.
The South is something else again. When you capitalize it, you mean the Old Confederacy, et al.
If you say “the south” you are not just being insulting, you are being wrong.
I wrote this to William Buckley a couple of years back, and he actually put it in his “Notes and Asides” in National Review. And he agreed with me! If you say southerners when you mean Southerners, you are simply using bad English.
But the present editors of National Review hate the white race and they hate the South as only a conservative who is desperately trying to be respectable can hate the white race and the South. They always make it southerners and the south for a very specific reason: they mean it to be an insult.
But it isn’t just insulting; it is bad English.
What is particularly ironic is that California liberals and respectable conservatives militantly put the south in the lower case. They are making THEMSELVES southerners, which is the last thing on earth they mean to do.
I let a couple of online casino’s and texas holdem’s aphorisms go into the comments and blocked others. I liked the ones I let in.
My team didn’t like it, so I won’t do it again.
I do note that texas holdem and online casino — probably the same person or spam bot — stopped abruptly for a while when I announced I was editing comments, so he/it must be paying attention.
My team told me that a non-spam quote looks like this:
“So far as the mere imparting of information is concerned, no university has had any justification for existence since the popularization of printing in the fifteenth century.” Alfred North Whitehead, The Aims of Education.
It has to be attributed. And it has to have a purpose.
In many ways I am a very naive person, so when my team tells me something I listen closely.
The next best thing to knowing everything is to be aware of your own ignorance.
Everybody agrees that the Norsemen wrote only a few inscriptions on stone, while the Romans were literate. This means that the Norse and Germanic peoples wrote nothing except when they produced perfect runic script on stone.
All the preachers agree that almost the entire Jewish population in 69 AD was in Israel. Their entire attitude about Jews is based on the idea that all the Jews were driven out of Israel in 69 AD and that someday the Jews will come back to their homeland.
There were six million Jews in the Roman Empire. The total population of Israel, Samaritans included, was a couple of hundred thousand.
When I point out facts that, I show that the professors and preachers are just plain silly.
Nobody says I’m wrong. They say I am being “cynical.”
A cynic makes fun of the people he is criticizing. In almost every case, when you expose the absurdity of today’s accepted ideas, you cannot help but make fun of the people you are criticizing.
The Supreme Court strikes down laws made by Congress because the Supreme Court is the Constitution. But that same Constitution cites only one reason for the United States Government to exist. That same Constitution also cites only one authority:
“We the People of the United States of America … and OUR Posterity.”
Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter got sick of cynics like me a long time ago. Justice Frankfurter declared:
“To say that a law means what it says is a case of PERNICIOUS oversimplification.”
People like me are not just cynical. We are just plain mean.
Yiddish is the old form of German that was spoken in the ghettoes. I speak German, but when I learned Afrikaans I was able to converse in Yiddish. So it is not that difficult a language.
What makes Yiddish seem so alien is that it is written in Hebrew script.
Heiroglyphics disappeared after Christianity took over Egypt because it was considered unholy. When Islam took over a country, the language had to be written in Arabic script. The script was holy to Christians, Muslems and Jews.
When the conquistadores took over all the old picture writings were burned. There are only eight left.
When the Muslems took over Iran all the old Zoroastrian script was burned. When Christianity took over Northern Europe all the old runic script was burned.
And I am the only person who mentions it.
When I was young, the idea that Leif Ericson had come to America was officially “discredited.” That was when J. Edgar Hoover said the Mafia was a myth, just as every professor now agrees that race is a myth.
Something else that was agreed on was that the barbarians outside Rome only wrote stuff on rocks. Norsemen and Germans were illiterate, everybody said, except for writings on rock.
I was all of thirteen when I first heard this, and what immediately occurred to me was all those kids who would later write on rocks LEARNING to write on rocks. There has never been a single primer found on those rocks the Norsemen wrote on. Apparently they just went straight from illiteracy to chiseling complex writings on rocks.
If all the papers were burned in 1900, all we would find today would be chiselling on the Jefferson Memorial and tombstones. Would we really be stupid enough to think the people in 1900 were illiterate except for a few engravings on rock?
I mentioned that there were six million Jews in the Roman Empire at the time of Christ. The total population of the Roman Empire was about sixty million. If one just THINKS about that statistic, it totally changes the whole picture of history the preachers give us.
No one has made it more clear that he dislikes President Bush than I have. But here is another statistic I know that no one but me mentions:
When Bush became a pilot, the death rate for people in pilot training was HIGHER than the death rate for those in uniform in Vietnam. Pilot training was EXTREMELY dangerous then.
I dislike Bush, but I dislike professional veterans like Kerry, and the group that calls itself The Greatest Generation even more.
Joe R proposed a Racial Separatist March of all races.
It would be a good idea. My press man in Washington used to eat regularly with the founder of the Black Panthers, Stokely Carmichael, at an Ethiopian restauraunt because we were all racial separatists.
Carmichel, like the Klan, felt they could trust me — they could. Carmichael also thought I was smart because I had a lot of the same independent observations he did.
But all non-white, non-gentile groups are deeply committed to ridding the earth of white gentiles. Jewish neoconservatives are as dedicated to this genocide as Jewish liberals are. So anyone who marches with whites for separatism, even if they are separatists themselves, will be regarded as a traitor.
No one is more fanatically anti-white than a Zionist. Look at Emma Lazarus.
If we keep making this point, over and over and with discipline, we will get some allies.
When it comes to genocide, Jews and non-whites simply do not have a conscience. But I think there is one in there somewhere. You just have to keep probing.
This editing to cut out spam in the blog reminds me of the the fact that I do the same thing with my e-mail.
Sometimes I get an e-mail with a huge number of other addressees or the indication that it is a group mailing in another form.
Then all it gives me is a link to go to. I don’t go to it.
I think that’s rude. That should be a breach of net etiquette.
If you have a link or an article to send to me, I will not read it if you haven’t gone to the trouble to write a paragraph or two telling me why I SHOULD read it.
If I am supposed to read something, you are supposed to WRITE something.
Jay’s comment on “Lucifer and Promethius” is the first I have had to approve first.
I am cutting out the spam, and this approval process doesn’t take long because I look at the comments several times each day.
I keep pointing out that there were six million Jews in the Roman Empire. This totally destroys the basis on which the Diaspora theory, Israel, and Old Testament Christianity are based.
Most of these Jews were converts. Yes, Judaism was a prosetlytizing faith. It was probably crippled by its requirement of circumcision. You can do that kind of agony to a baby, but a grown man will seldom take such pain. So Christianity with its baptism beat them out.
Actually most Jews did NOT reject Christ. The Greek Jews disappeared entirely during the centuries after Christ. They all became Christian. They WERE the original Christian Church, and it was huge.
No, the Jews in Israel did not become Christian. As Jesus himself said,
“No prophet is without honor save in his own country.”
Those are the Jews Old Testament Christianity worships.
That is the country Old Testament Christians call the Holy Land.
They are not Christians, they are Jehovists.
But less than a tenth of the Jews were in Palestine. The whole basis of Old Testament Christianity is a fraud.
Eric Hoffer, who was a working man all his life and self-educated, wrote short books made up of short chapters. His first was published when he was 65.
Hoffer got a professorship at the Berkeley campus of the University of California in the 1960s. He promptly quit because, he said, “These students can’t THINK!”
He was appointed to the Civil Rights Commission. He soon quit that, too, saying “Civil Rights is a FRAUD!”
Hoffer said he had an odd way of doing research for his writings. He would go to a library, look randomly at things, and if something didn’t apply to what he was writing, he would stop writing it.
I am similar to Hoffer. So when Texas Holdem and Online Casino send me random platitudes, many of them apply to what I am thinking about.
I’ve cut out the rest.
Everything takes a little time with me. Each thing I do requires a new learning process.
I may start a Platitude Corner. I kind of enjoy some of the sayings put out by texas holdem et al with their computer or whatever.
But comments should be for what a person writes himself on the subject at hand.
“Lucifer” means “giver of light.” It became the name of Satan.
Prometheus was the Greek god who gave fire to mankind. For this the gods condemned him to eternal punsihment.
I wonder if there is a common root. Or did “Lucifer” come from Prometheus among the Greek Jews who became Christians.
I was watching a documentary about King Edward I of England. When it came to his expulsion of the Jews from England, the background was a Hebrew hymn of self-pity — they have lots of them.
As I said in WOL, modern Christianity has degenerated into pure self-hatred. Modern Judaism has degenerated into pure self-pity.
Some Jews were burned alive in Europe, and there is not a synagogoue in America which does not talk about it regularly. They were persecuted by the Church. Some were killed because Jews were not Christians.
Meanwhile, what happened to MY ancestors who were not Christian? Every single one of them either became Christian or was burned alive. No non-Christian was allowed to stay alive in a Christian country.
UNLESS HE WAS A JEW.
Talking about this makes me anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
When Mel Gibson got sick of being called an anti-Semite and pointed out that if the Nazis killed millions of Jews, Communism killed at LEAST a hundred million people Alan Colmes said that Mel Gibson, by talking about those mere Russian peasants and Chinese, was “trivilializing the Holocaust.”
Dead Russians are trivia. Jews are important. Odinists burned alive never get mentioned. Only Jews matter. Otherwise you are “trivializing” Jewish Suffering.
I’m sick of Jewish self-pity. I’m sick of gentile self-hatred.
Texas holdem submitted the following:
“I lay it down as a fact that if everyone knew what others say of them there would not be four friends in the world.”
I have cleaned up my act on that. I used to make a lot of people very suspicious of me. When I was in a bad mood I would say something nasty about someone I knew. I finally realized that the people I was talking to had seen me being very friendly to those people to their face, so they wondered what I was saying about THEM behind their backs.
Unless I have to warn somebody about someone else, my rule is never to say anything about anybody that I don’t want them to hear, criticism included.
To my surprise this was very easy. I thought it would take a lot of discipline, but it didn’t.
By the same token I almost never write anything in an email that I wouldn’t let the world read.
We used to have a saying on Capitol Hill and in the Administration, “Never write anything down that you don’t want to see on the front page of the Washington Post.”
That was especially true of conservatives.
It was a rule not a law so we had to violate it sometimes. But we did so very seldom and we used a shredder.
I think my learning not to say what I do not want people to hear also came from my experience as an interrogator. I found that if you let a person talk and you know how to listen, he will tell you everything about himself.
So I learned to listen to myself from the outside.
I not only read each comment a half a dozen times, I also go back and see if there are any new comments on the old articles.
We tried to start a talk page for WhitakerOnline but it fizzled out. Most of those tries do.
Then I thought about introducing a comments page each week, but that would mean I would have to edit it. That’s touchy, as anybody who has done any editing knows.
So the comments here represent the first time I have had a two-way exchange with you.
Writing without anybody commenting on it is like talking to yourself. Hell, it IS talking to yourself! I have explained to people that a writer has to be nuts. A writer is somebody who sits at a computer and talks to himself for hours at a time.
He talks to himself by writing it, but that doesn’t make it any more sane.
Anyway if you put something in the comments I will definitely see it, no matter how far back it goes.
I just answered two of the older ones.
In 1803 the original church of the Pilgrims in Plymouth, Massachusetts became a Unitarian Church.
The Pilgrims, like the Puritans who came in slightly later, were rigid Old Testament Calvinists. They talked very little about Christ’s Mercy. They concentrated on the vengeful, merciless JHWH, what we call Jehovah, of the Old Testament.
But the Pilgrim version of Jehovah didn’t just kill people wholesale as he did in the Old Testament. The Pilgrim Jehovah was merciless in sending almost everybody to Hell for eternity. Christ’s Mercy was a tiny asterisk at the end of the Old Testament.
So by 1803 the Pilgrims gave up Jesus completely and became Unitarians. To Unitarians, Jesus is just another prophet.
I seem to be only person who has noticed that Moslems are also Unitarians. “Allah” just means “God” in Arabic. They accept the Old Testament, and their Allah is Jehovah.
The Christian Maltese called their God “Allah” too.
When you concentrate so much on Jehovah, like so many fundamentalist Christians do, you begin to look at the New Testament as an asterisk on the Old Testament. Many who call themselves Christians are, in my opinion, Jehovists.
I hold to the faith of my own ancestors as my own Old Testament. Odinism was a primitive attempt to find the truth, just as the Old Testament is. The Magi were the clergy of the largest monotheistic faith of their day, Zoroastrianism. The Magi knew nothing of the Old Testament, but they accepted Christ while the Jews rejected Him. The holy book of the Magi was the Vesta.
It seems to me a natural developement that the Pilgrims became Unitarians. The Puritans also became largely Unitarian and then they became fanatical leftists. Their Christianity disappeared, but their fanaticism stayed.
It bothers some of my non-religious readers that I call myself a Christian.
In actual fact, I have very little faith. Most people don’t. If that were not the case, Jesus would not have talked about faith the size of a mustard seed.
But if you ask me my religious faith, such as it is, it is Christian. If it is not wholly Christian, it is nothing.
My religious conviction is summed up by the great Christian writer, C.S. Lewis:
“Either Jesus is God, or He was a madman.”