Archive for November 22nd, 2004

Why Shouldn’t Iran Have Nukes?

Well, I’m totally lost again.

All men are created equal, right? Every country has the same sovereignty as every other, right?

I have heard that all my life. Especially from Jews and people like Tony Blair and George Bush.

Now the United States and Britain and Israel, all of which have nuclear bombs, are telling Iran it has no right to nuclear weapons.

Why?

According to the doctrine of the United Nations, Dahomey and North Korea have all the same sovereignty that every other country has. They have the right to have any weapons they want.

I believe in racial differences. I believe that non-white countries do not the same legitimacy as white countries. And I say so.

That makes me anzaiwhowantstokillsixmilionjews.

But how can someone who does not say what I say claim that Iran or Dahomey have no right to nuclear weapons?

No one else will ask this. So I will.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

5 Comments

If Jesus Had Been a Good Jehovist There Would Have Been No Parables

Every time someone sends me quotes from the Old Testament I am reminded of the fact that the Temple Priests, the Scribes and Pharisees and the lawyers (the only profession He ever specifically denounced) knew those scriptures upside down. They knew them in Greek. They knew them in Hebrew. They could recite them backwards.

The greatest theologian outside of Heaven Itself is Satan.

Jesus went out among the people and said those total experts on the Old Testament did not UNDERSTAND what they knew by heart.

I am told the Jews are saved. What Jesus Himself said was:

“I am the way, the truth and the life. No man goes to the Father but by me.”

Did He say this to Buddhists because they did not know the Old Testament?

No. He said it to Jews.

In fact the first people to accept Christ, according to Matthew, did not know anything about the Old Testment. They were the Magi, which means that they were clergymen of Zoroastrianism.

And Jesus said over and over and over and over that He, not the Old Testament, was the Way.

But all the churches tell me that Jesus is a kind of asterisk at the end of the Old Testament.

The Reconstruction Church says, “The Old Testament is seventy percent of the Bible.” And then they call themselves Christians, though Christ’s words are nothing more than the words of the lowliest prophet, or the words of the snake in Eden, in their arithmetic.

They say that Jesus spoke in Old Testament terms.

No joke? Why on earth would Jesus speak in Old Testament terms when He was in Israel?

Maybe, just maybe, because He was in Israel?

I can’t understand why there is not a church that requires that you learn Aramaic if you are to be saved.

Jesus spoke Aramaic.

Now why on earth did he speak Aramaic instead of Hindi or Persian?

I would say that Jesus spoke Aramaic for the same reason He spoke in Old Testament terms. Nobody around Him would understand Him had he spoken Persian or Coptic.

But if you can only be a Christian if you speak in terms of the Old Testament, why can you be a Christian without speaking Aramaic? Why isn’t Aramaic essential to salvation?

Jehovists would reply that the idea that one has to speak Aramaic for salvation is silly. He has the right to say that to me.

On one condition:

That condition is that every time you spout the Old Testament at me, I have the right to say that the idea that one has to speak Old Testament for salvation is silly.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

12 Comments

11/7/04 Insider Letter

*** Bob’s Insider’s Message ***

(reprinted here from 11/7/04)

In my blog I had an article about AN important aspect of this election.
It is included below, and shame on you who haven’t read it already!

http://www.whyjohnny.com/blog/

The important aspect is the race gap. Whites are in one corner, minorities in the other.

What is more important is that whites are not feeling guilty about it. In fact, whites are getting angry and mean.

At last!

Somewhere in the American pshyche there is a growing realization that there is more at stake here than polite elections.

So I wrote about that. The immediate response was a burst of fury from people who said Bush was no better than Kerry and there was no such change and so forth. I wrote pointing out I was not talking about Bush. I was not talking about Republicans.

I was talking about something more important.

But the whiners wanted to whine. They fought me like tigers over my imagined Bush support. I voted a straight Constitution Party ticket.

Two thoughts:

1) I do not tolerate fools. I was talking about an undercurrent of movement of which this election is a symptom. Nobody else would notice it.

So if all you hear is “BUSH!” or whatever the latest buzz is, you can get a lot more from experts. Bush is a tree in the forest. The news and commentary will tell you about every leaf on that tree, what kind of wood it is made of, and everything else that fascinates the average political moron.

If that is your fascination, then WhitakerOnline is the wrong place to look;

2) If the whiners spent half the time and effort they waste fighting for the idea that all is lost instead of fighting for something worthwhile, a lot less would be lost.

From the Blog: Whites Are Moving Right

As always, what matters in politics is being ignored. That’s why they paid me the big bucks.

Part of professional politics is realizing that a black or brown skin means a Democrat vote. You aren’t allowed to say that, but the Democrat Party spends many millions each year to get out the minority vote.

They put their money where the bigot’s mouth is: a dark skin is a Democrat.

Back in the 1980s, all the media were talking about “the gender gap.” This meant that Republicans were not getting the women’s vote.

But people like me, people who got paid for this kind of thing, were noticing one tiny little fact that meant nothing to the media but meant everything to those of us who did this for a living: Republicans were WINNING.

Silly little point, isn’t it?

In defense of those of us who did this for a living, let me say that winning elections was what we were all about. So while the media were fascinated by Republican sexual oppression and the Democrat capture of women and minorities, we had a forgivable obsession with the fact that Republicans were winning real elections.

I know it sounds simplistic, but remember we were not paid to be fashionable. Our job was to win elections.

When you said “the gender gap” back then, you meant the women’s vote. But professionals like me considered men’s votes important, too.

We had this silly idea that there are TWO genders. So it seemed logical that if the Democrats were getting the women’s vote and losing, the Republicans must be getting the men’s vote and winning.

Silly little point, isn’t it?

My silly little mind would say that since the Republicans were losing a lot of the women’s vote and still winning, and since there are only two genders out there, the Democrats had an even bigger gender gap on the male side.

A political science professor announced to the graduate class I was in – I went back to school briefly in 1992 – that a male gender gap is not a gender gap. Only a female gender gap is a gender gap.

If this sounds stupid to you, remember the fact that nobody but me has noticed the growing RACE gap today.

Brown skins are increasing at a breathless pace. But Republicans have the Presidency and a majority of both Houses of Congress.

Back when whites were a solid and overwhelming majority of the population, Democrats controlled both Houses of Congress.

As brown skins increase, the Democrats are piling up automatic votes. Everybody notices that.

But somebody like me notices that there are TWO groups involved here. There are not just minorities, there are also whites.

All I read on Stormfront is pointing frantically at the growing minority vote. Nobody ever seems to notice what is happening to the white vote.

While everybody else is busy panicking, I quietly note that the white vote is moving steadily to the right. This steady movement is under way, and it shows no sign of retreating.

Whites are ceasing to feel guilty about being on the other side from the minorities.

Whites are getting really angry. They are beginning to see that there is more at stake here than polite disagreement.

Well, DUUH, you say. But if you have been watching this for fifty years, this is a breakthrough.

I thought that whites would never even BEGIN to catch on. But their opinions are finally moving.

So can’t we all cry and wail over the increasing non-white population?

I was raised where whites were a minority, but they were hard right.

We ruled.

No multi-racial society is ever a democracy. So when we move right, and if we are hard right, we will become the ruling group.

Sorry if that doesn’t sound depressing enough.

OK, you can now go back to panicking. I just thought I might mention this.

Bob

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

8 Comments