Archive for December, 2004

“A Nation of Immigrants” is Immoral

Posted by Bob in History on 12/13/2004

The ancestors of today’s white Southerners were here before 1700 AD. They came to America and they TOOK it. Then they had so many children that they doubled their population about four times a century. That NATURAL increase is where most of today’s really white population comes from.

The reason very late immigrants were able to call America a “melting pot” and a “nation of immigrants” is because OUR ancestors let them settle on land OUR ancestors had already taken and made safe.

Indians? What Indians? You just took a boat to New York.

This allows these latecomers to avoid a simple feeling of gratitude to the white Pioneers that every other generation took for granted. So they encourage historians to insult the whites who took over this land and made it possible for the later wimps to just come on in.

This is not only crappy history, it is immoral.

And an American who lets anybody call this “a nation of immigrants” is as immoral as the person who says it. With its usual moral cowardice, the Greatest Generation allowed this “nation of immigrants” and “melting pot” crap free reign.

The pioneers were nobodys, they say. So THEY’RE The Greatest Generation.

The Greatest Generation was despicable.

Peter Was Right, I Was Wrong

Posted by Bob in General on 12/13/2004

I never understood why it HURTS people so much to say something as simple as “He was right and I was wrong.” Even people MY age have trouble with that.

Peter said that Zoroastrianis was the monotheization (?) of the Old Aryan religion of Mazdaism. Just as the Jews had their own God JHWH but took others for granted, Aryans had a chief god Mazda. Mazda became the Only God with the prophet Zoroaster about 1200 BC. JHWH became the Only God and the Good God of the Jews a great deal later.

In the meantime the Jews had a LOT of contact with Persia, including living there.

My mistake was in mixing up Mithraism with Mazdaism. Since I’m pretending to be able to handle all these big words and theological constructs, this should embarrass me greatly.

Sorry, I’m all embarrassed out. As I just pointed out below, you can’t find out if you’re wrong unless you SAY it. From Peter’s explanation, I have learned yet more about the Mazda-JHWH connection.

And I wouldn’t have learned that if I hadn’t been wrong, and I wouldn’t have learned that if I hadn’t SAID it and then sat back and taken the heat.

While You Were Sleeping

Posted by Bob in How Things Work, Politics on 12/12/2004

Let me tell you a little secret about politics. You know those “both sides” everybody talks about? While you are sleeping, they are getting together.

You don’t actually have to be sleeping. You can be going nuts over Prayers in Schools or Six Day Evolution or the Holiness of a Single Cell, but meantime, “Both Sides” are quietly selling you out. I worked on Capitol Hill. I watched it happen all the time.

Issues like this give your so-called “leaders” a wonderful chance to keep your eye on the Golden Ball while they make their deals with no interference from you.

Conservative “leaders” march forth and thunder that they love one-celled “unborn babies” as much as they do their own children, that they stand for prayers in school, despite all the pressures against them (WHAT pressures?) and that they demand the right for creationism be taught in schools.

Liberals yell for the other side.

These things are a godsend for politicians.

The wonderful thing about your wasting your entire political life on that stuff is the attitude of everybody who actually has any power is:

“Frankly, my dear, I don’t give a damn.”

So while you are proud of yourself for marching boldly in favor of holly to decorate your school, the education establishment is working out a nice deal where it will eventually compromise and allow the right a few harmless school vouchers, while shouting all the way. The universities will still use your money to run their liberal seminaries.

While you obsess over Iraq’s borders and Israel’s borders, the third world will pour over yours. But they will be able to pray in your schools. Ain’t that great?

While you are talking about freedom, the right wants to take your freedom away by “protecting the children” from pornography and the left want to censor anything it decides to call “Hate.” Since the right wants to convince the left that it is more anti-racist than the left is, rightists will be proud to join the left in heavy censorship to stop both pornography and anything the left chooses to call “Hate.”

People in real politics like the way you think. While you worry about Creationism and Holy One Cells, they’ll take care of the stuff that matters.

Creationism? One-cell humans? Prayers in schools? The establishment would be far more frightened by one copy of Why Johnny Can’t Think: America’s Professor-Priesthood in a school than by ten thousand prayers, and you know it.

9 Comments

12/11/04 Insider Letter

Posted by Bob in Insider Letter Archive on 12/12/2004

*** Bob’s Insider’s Message ***

(reprinted to the Blog from 12/11/04)

Since we are getting close to Christmas, I want to point out another group that needs the message in Why Johnny Can’t Think: Home Schoolers. More and more people are pulling out of the public schools, which is easy to understand. Sending a child to these schools is tantamount to child abuse.

One thing I hear from people is that Why Johnny Can’t Think may offend the home school crowd because of my use of three or four bad words in the book. This was an oversight on my part, but it brings up an important point. This is a point that is crucial to understanding why so much of “conservatism” has been a dismal failure.

There is only one type of home schooler I can respect for this outlook: Those who refuse to send their kids to public schools because of their values, and who are consistent enough to understand that colleges and universities are just more of the same.

What I can’t stomach are the “respectable conservative” home schoolers, which my staff refers to as “prissies,” those who don’t want Johnny to read my book because of a few bad words, or to read it themselves because they might be “offended.” Yet these same people are willing to send little Johnny off to college to a moral cesspool completely unprepared.

To send a child to college from that environment without brutally honest preparation is about as smart as sending your teenage daughter on a road trip with an NBA basketball team. It is mind-boggling. It is “respectable.” It is damned foolish.

I can take criticism of Why Johnny Can’t Think because of bad writing, or typographical errors, or quibbles about details in some of my historical examples. What I cannot abide is moral cowardice. I don’t think Jesus let people off the hook on technicalities.

Why Johnny Can’t Think is not perfect, nor is it for everybody. But it IS, and we need it out there. PLEASE get a copy for someone you care about today!

We are making it easy for you to do. We’ll even gift wrap it, and put a little note in there from you, and send it directly to whomever you want us to — all for the same cost. (note: we can’t split discounted multiple book orders to different addresses, due to mailing costs).

We are now offering express shipping to make sure the books arrive in time for Christmas.

READBOB.COM

Bob

12 Comments

Modernist Religion is Dead

Posted by Bob in History, How Things Work, Politics on 12/12/2004

The main line churches are all rotting away and waiting to be buried.

They get a little kick from the backlash of evangelical success from time to time, but the only thing that really keeps the United Methodist Church and the like from disappearing tomorrow is the tradition, reputation and the cold cash it inherited.

Modernist churches had a huge crash in membership since the 1960s, but it never bothered them at all. They don’t need ANY members. They have plenty of cash reserves to feed their preachers while they preach to empty seats about Social Progress and Integration and how Marx was actually just like Christ.

If you want to see the future of America’s mainline churches, go to England. There you can sit in a giant cathedral on Sunday with maybe a dozen other people and the preacher, who draws a governmet salary and money from centuries of gifts. He’ll be there next Sunday, and most of them don’t give a rip whether anybody else is there or not.

Mtihraism and Zoroastrianism

Posted by Bob in History on 12/12/2004

Mithraism came long, long, long after Zoroatrianism, which is now agreed to have begun before 1200 BC.

Historians tried for centuries to push it up to 600 BC so it wouldn’t be older than the written Old Testament, but that’s out now.

Mithraism seems to have been a very late outgrowth of Zoroastrianism. It was a serious competitor with Christianity in the early stages, so historians have to talk about it a little.

Mathraism used a ceremony of bread of wine and preached a savior. Second-century Christians, who were as ignorant of history as today’s Jehovists, but with more excuse, naturally insisted these were stolen from Christianity. Actually both ideas had been part of Zoroastrianism log, long before they appeared in the Old Testament, and the Messiah preached in the Old Testametn was a Jewish nationalists, whereas the Zoroastrian one was a close parallel to Jesus.

Islam and Jehovists have called Zoroastrianism “duotheistic.” But the Jehovists, Islamic and Jewish, who do not call themselves Christians say that Christianity is polytheistic: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost.

Jehovists call Zoroastrianism duotheistic because it has the Good God and the Devil. Again, this is a rather desperate attempt to be perfect Jehovists and to insist tha the only religion Cyrus ever had, the Cyrus that the Old Testament says “did God’s work,” the only religion the Magi ever had, was not God’s religion.

Believing in both God and Satan is not polytheism, or else Islam and Christianity are duotheistic.

This debate causd a HUGE problem for Islam. When they conquered Persia, they faced a population that was solidly Zoroastrianism.

The story that Islam is “tolerant” is nonsense. Medieval Christianity allowed only Jews to survive, but it put them under special restrictions. Islam allows Christians and Jews to survive, but it puts them under special restrictions. It had to. The areas Islam conquered had too many Christians and Jews to kill out.

Under Islam, anybody else died, just like under Medieval Christianity.

Islam ran into the same problem in Persia. It couldn’t just massacre most of the Persian population that wouldn’t give up Zoroastrianism. So Islam declared Zoroastrianism to be a religion on the same par with Christianity and Judaism.

Officially, many Moslems wanted to burn the Zoroastrians, but it just wasn’t practical. They called Christians “infidels,” too, which put them in the burning catagory, but it wasn’t practical. Zoroastrianism was subject to heavy legal penalties and was, in well over a thousand years, ALMOST wiped out. There are still some left in Iran.

No one talks about them because any study of Zoroastrianism busts up both Jehovist and secular history.

Sometimes My Questions are Just Questions

Posted by Bob in Bob on 12/11/2004

I have always looked in vain for someone to discuss the Bible with who actually knows the Bible.

People who know the Bible come in two flavors: fundamentalists and theologians. The theologians have heard it all and look down upon me from a lofty peak.

Another problem is that professional theologians are all psychopaths. They answer whatever they need to answer.

When I ask a basic question, fundamentalists go bananas.

Now that I have Hardison and some other rational people who know the Bible, I would like to discuss some stuff.

One thing that occurs to me is that the writers of the Old Testament are a lot more honest than modern Jehovists. Genesis does refer to “elohim,” meaning “the gods,” in one case, and modern Jehovists simply tossed that out of the translation.

One major oversight modern Jehovists made was replacing the Commandment, “Thou shalt have no other gods before me” with the Moslem declaration, “There is one God, and He is God.”

Is there a particular point in the Bible where monotheism began. I have a feeling it was from Zoroastrian influence when so many Jews were in Persia. They were very grateful to Persia and the Persian emperor Cyrus was, I believe, the only gentile inthe Old Testament who was said to be “doing the work of God.”

Today we have a hard time believing in God at all. But in those days, I think they had a different problem. It was hard for any people to believe that the gods of Egypt or Sumeria or even the Greeks did not exist, and they had the only one.

Note that, in the Commandment, there are THREE words the modern Jehovists should have deleted. They are capitalized below:

“THOU shalt have no OTHER gods BEFORE me.”

That could have been a commandment from the Egyptian god Amon to the Egyptians. That could have been a commandment from Zeus, the Father-God, to the Greeks.

At this point, the fundamentalist would be shrieking at me. I had to get a blog going to find some logical people to talk this over with.

9 Comments

The Growing Falwell-Liberal Alliance

Posted by Bob in Politics on 12/11/2004

I use Falwell’s name generically. I have a lot more respect for him than I do for the other right-wing Jehovists.

The other day, Falwell was insisting that “no one is born a criminal. No one is born a homosexual.”

Why? Because of Jehovist Dumb Science. Since crime and homosexuality are sins, so every man has an equal choice about being a criminal or a homosexual.

Liberals love the general idea that there is no such thing as heredity, though the gay libbers like the idea that homosexuality is inherited.

Meanwhile, back in the real world, identical twins raised in totally different environments from birth not only tend to commit crimes, they tend to commit the SAME crimes at the SAME age! But Dumb Science Jehovists stand shoulder to shoulder with liberals to suppress any mention of that fact.

Different people are born with a greater tendency to homosexuality than others. In the Victorian society Jehovists worship, Britain’s boys’ school were routinely hotbeds of homosexuality, with almost every Senior having some young lowerclassman in his bed every night.

There is a tendency and there are ways to discourage that tendency. Falwell denies there is tendency, but he has no idea how much Jehovists, with their crazy attitudes on sex, push homosexuality.

Speaking of suppression, the Jehovists and the left are united in favor of censorship. Conservatives say they want to suppress pornography on the Internet “to protect the children.”

Everything conservatives want to do is supposed to “protect the children.” If you are able to treat the public like children, you can forget freedom.

Leftists want to censor anything they call Hate Speech on the Internet.

Everything liberals want to do is supports to “suppress Hate.” If you can tell everybody that you will allow them to do only what leftists call a “preference” and they can keep you from doing anything they call a “prejudice,” you can forget freedom.

In congress, Jehovists and leftists form a solid bloc in favor of censorship.

And they are getting together in other ways. The weird logic of the left that is evil to execute someone but it is OK to lock them in a cage for life goes right along with the idea that a fertilized cell is morally exactly the same as a newborn baby.

They’re both nuts, and this is the only time in history, and it won’t last long, when people take that nonsense seriously. But right now the anti-death penalty and general “criminals are victims” leftists and pro-lifers is growing.

The problem with abolishing the death penalty is the logic behind it. Once you agree the state has no right to execute, you are on your way to saying the state has no right to punish. But Jehovists couldn’t care less about the future. Right now they are getting patted on the head by liberals.

More and more the only difference between Jehovist conservatives and leftists is how you treat Jehovah. Prayers in schools, Merry Christmas, the Ten Commandments, stuff like that.

And everyday, more and more people, including actual Christians, are realizing that both these groups are actually insane.

9 Comments

I WAS a Conservative

Posted by Bob in Politics on 12/11/2004

I formally resign from being a “conservative.”

Today’s conservative is a Jehovist who is trying desperately to crawl back into his mother’s womb.

I only use the word “conservative” about myself because I am one of the many types of people who opposes America’s Established Religion of Political Correctness, which called itself liberalism until that became so obviously ridiculous they changed it to “progressive.”

Conservatives today are dedicated to Jehovist Dumb Science. They demand that the world be regarded as being created in six days. They violate the Constitution by saying that life is not from birth to death, but from a one-cell conception, something the Pope insists on, just as he insists that it is a sin for a married couple to have sex for any reason except conceiving a baby.

Conservatives are dedicated to the liberal program up to the year 1968. They say they are more dedicated to liberalism than liberals are. Their political Bible is the Democratic platform of 1964, and all they ever do is accuse liberals of heresy.

I despise conservatives.

8 Comments

It IS the Color of the Skin

Posted by Bob in Race Matters on 12/11/2004

I write ideas and, years later, some scholar or heretic uses some version of it. You can read what I wrote in both my earlier books you would see those ideas.

You would SEE them but you probably wouldn’t RECOGNIZE them because they are so common today. It is very hard to know, at this late date, what people DIDN’T think of three decades ago. Most of what I wrote caused a storm at the time, but today you would think it was routine stuff.

So here is another idea that will amuse people. In fact, the first time I wrote it, you thought it was a joke. But someday a Serious Radical or will pick up a version of it and cause a huge debate. It will go through the routine four steps: ridiculed, denounced, debated, and accepted.

Meanwhile, everyody else is arguing about President Carter’s family initiative, or is it Reagan’s intelligence, or is it Clinton’s immorality, or is it Iraq?

I lose track. I’m doing something important.

So the reason white people have dominated throughout history is for the same reason they are white. Any animal can either survive by adapting to a hostile environment or by taking the best environment. Brown and black skin protects one against the sun. Sickle cell anemia comes from a special protection against disease that black people MUST have.

Orientals have horned skin and “slant eyes,” i.e., epicanthric folds over their eyes, because they developed in murderously cold environments.

Whites have no natural protection. They took over environments where they didn’t need them. Whites are the result of wave after wave of people into those environments. The fight in each case was brutal.

So whites are white because of millennia of fights for the places people would WANT to live. Then waves of them came down and took over the riches and slaves in other areas.

I wrote this earlier in a WOL called something like “E.T. Reports on Human Races.”

It was meant to be amusing, because I tried the concept out of Serious Intellectual Races and they could think of nothing but showing me all the details they know about history. Also, since their explanations of race involved reading volumes of complicated works and knowing them, they didn’t want to hear anything simple and, in retrospect, obvious.

I have been doing this all my life. I impressed few with my absolute knowledge of an endless number of obscure facts. I have impressed nobody with my latest exposure of why Bush is a liar or President Coolidge won’t run for another term, whichever was the Big Deal of the moment.

I am doing what I have always done, and it is very, very serious work.

How Do You Know It’s Wrong if You Don’t Say It?

Posted by Bob in How Things Work on 12/10/2004

A lot of people tell you that if you don’t ask questions, you won’t learn anything. But those are often the same people who are terribly offended when I say something that is just flat wrong.

I have gotten a lot of good information by being wrong. The reason I am able to take strong stands in public is because I have been embarrassed many, many times by finding out I was wrong about something. Now when I go out in public I have to worry a lot less about being made a fool of precisely because I have already been made a fool of a lot.

I got the stupid stuff out and got it corrected.

Research is like military drill. No matter how much you drill, it doesn’t make you ready for combat. You have to SAY things and hear how they sound in public. You have to SAY things and see what others have to say about it.

When I was young, my statements came in three categories:
1) right;
2) wrong and
3) opinion, ie, taste

And you know something. All these decades my statements still come in three categories:

1) right;
2) wrong; and
3) opinion, ie, taste

If you are want for infallibility, this is wrong place. I’m in South Carolina. You’re looking for Rome.

Correction

Posted by Bob in How Things Work on 12/10/2004

I made a mistake in one point on the Masons. I said I was “invited” to join. No one is “invited” to join. They say we never invite anyone to join but you would be welcome to apply.

This I translated as an invitation, but then, I believe the choice of words is very important to a Mason.

1 Comment

Grudges

Posted by Bob in Musings about Life on 12/9/2004

Often what I say sounds like a joke, and I hope it amuses you. That’s because it sounds so obvious and simple. But if you think about it, you will get some good advice out of what I say.

Here is one example:

If you keep a list of the people who have insulted you and done you harm, it will become a very thick book. Getting all of them back is just plain too much WORK.

On the other hand if you keep a list of the people who have helped you, it will be a very short book.

The names of people who do you good are few and, like all rare things, they are precious. You will never be able to get back at all the people who hurt you, but you can do something for all of those who helped you.

Not the least of the things you can do for them is to let them know you remember what they did and what good people they are. You would like to get a note like that, long after you think the incident was forgotten. So do they.

I am not against revenge. In the nasty worlds I inhabited, I had to have a reputation as somebody who you could not go up against without getting hurt. You are not hearing this from a preacher, but from a scarred old veteran of many kinds of wars. Maybe it is precisely because of that that I appreciate the good guys so much.

Shooting in Ohio

Posted by Bob in How Things Work on 12/9/2004

Four people were shot by a nutcase on a rampage, including one famous rock musician. He would have killed more, but a cop there shot him before he killed more people.

That is because that cop was the only honest person there who had a gun on him. Gun rampages don’t happen where people are armed.

The one group that really violent people hate most is the police. But have you ever heard of a gunman going into a police convention and shooting people?

There are no special security arrangements at cop meeings. But everybody in the room has a gun on him. And there are no mass shootings.

About twenty years ago, I was talking to a cab driver in New York City. I asked him if he had ever been robbed, and he replied, “Man, I’m a CABBIE.” Cab drivers in New York City were killed about one a week at that time by armed robbers.

Suddenly, the rate of taxi robbery dropped like rock. What happened was that policemen had been given permission — not assigned — to drive cabs to supplement their incomes.

Even off duty, a policeman must be armed at all times.

Robbers started getting shot.

Cab drivers were overjoyed. Liberals were outraged at the number of robbers pulling guns who got gunned down without due process. So the mayor stopped policemen from driving cabs and things went back to normal — for New York City.

The Masons

Posted by Bob in History on 12/8/2004

E. Walker asked about the Masons. I don’t know much about them, but that never stopped me from mouthing off.

Geroge Washington set the cornerstone of the capitol building. Unfortunately no one now knows which stone that is. Of course Washington died before the government moved to DC, so don’t correct me on my dates. They started the capitol before he died in December of 1799.

Naturally, the laying of that cornerstone was a major ceremony. When Washington put in that piece of stone, he wore his Masonic apron. He was a member of the Masonic Order.

The head of George Washington Masonic Lodge, his recognized superior in the Order, was his gardener.

No one really knows when the Masons began, but it was a very long time ago.

Masons have a huge volume of secret rituals. Many of the Founding Fathers were Masons. Masons help each other and have secret signs.

So naturally the time came, in the 1830s, when the idea of a Masonic Conspiracy became a national issue.

Millard Fillmore, who became president in 1851 as vice president, on the Whig ticket, after President Zachary Taylor died, began his political career running on the ticket of the Anti-Masonic Party.

In 1856 Millard Fillmore made a strong run for president on the American Party ticket. He got around twenty percent of the national vote. I think he holds the record for bouncing from party to party.

Masons today tend to be working-class people. I know a lot of them. You can only join if a Mason invites you. I have been invited, and I was honored, though I never joined.

You may have seen the Masonic rings which members wear.

One reason George Washington was outranked by his gardener is because it takes a lot of WORK to gain higher degrees in the Masonic Order. I understand that the Shriners, who do so much good work and whom we just consider kind of a Lion’s Club or something are actually all 33rd(?), Order Masons, the highest level.

Masons got a reputation for being anti-Catholic, but Masons do not bar Catholics from membership. The Catholic Church bans Catholics from joining the Masons because a Catholic is not supposed to join a group whose secrets he cannot reveal in confession.

A number of Catholics join anyway.

But I am sure the absence of Catholics has led to some anti-Catholic cliques inside the Masons.

When you speak of the Masons, you are talking about millions of people and hundreds of years. If you know real history, you know that any institution, including the Catholic Church, is going to to be different in different times.

I have never met a man with a Masonic ring who was not a good guy. What they were doing in 1400 AD even I don’t remember.

Taking it From The Little People

Posted by Bob in Musings about Life on 12/6/2004

Every time I get into a battle with somebody here or on Stormfront, there is one thing I never forget for a moment. The person I am battling with is someone I respect.

Many times I have refused to back down in a discussion on the subject of race and a roomful of people were screaming at me. Blacks and liberals were yelling and most of the respectable conservatives in the room were trying to shout even louder to prove they were even more anti-racist (anti-white) than the liberals and therefore truly Respectable.

The rest of the respectable conservatives were silently showing the cowardice that is the true sign of respectability.

When I am arguing with someone here or on Stormfront, I keep in mind how relieved I woud have been if one of you or one of the Stormfronters were to walk in the door while I was being viciously attacked from all sides.

You would NOT have kept your mouth shut. And when a person is fighting it out all alone, as I have had to do so many times, one person on my side would made all the difference.

So taking criticisms or even attacks from you is no problem at all for that reason.

There is another reason I don’t mind taking it from you.

You’re worth it.

One of the great pains of political life is that you have to sit there and take it from people who are definitely NOT worth it. They are what I call “the little people.”

Consider that roomful of shrieking morons. Here you have the white liberals, repeating what their professors and the other clowns told them. They think they thought of what they’re saying, and every one of them says the same things in the same words.

It reminds me of an old priest who just heard his fifty thousandth confession. I am sure he is thinking to himself, “This is an awful thing to say, but I would give anything if somebody would come up with just ONE NEW SIN.”

And the respectable conservatives I have spent all these years having to work with! How LITTLE can you get? Their every word is predictable. They point to real problems, and then they give the same old answer that will pass liberal inspection.

And the screaming blacks! A black man I correspond with had the same lament I do. When you are watching some black “spokesman” talk, you can see that his frontal lobe has been turned off. It’s like he’s hypnotized. His eyes go blank and his mouth rattles off the same old crap, without pausing for a breath.

For me that guy is just one more of the Little People. But if you ARE black and you have a brain and ideas of your own, it must be torture watching those black-skinned mental midgets rattle on mindlessly.

It’s even worse because those “black spokesmen” get what I call a Monkey Pass. The whites there assume that blacks have nothing to say, and that no matter how stupid what they say is, it is racist to confront them the way you would a white man.

It always used to be said that racists looked upon blacks as monkeys. Nobody treats a “black spokesman” as much like a talking monkey as much as a liberal or a respectable cosnervative moderator does.

And the black man with a brain has to take that and he knows there is no way on earth he can object to it. For me, the Little People are a major irritation. For him, HIS Little People must cause him to wake up at night in a cold sweat.

So I have no problem taking it from you.

Join Me on Stormfront Now 12-5-04

Posted by Bob in General on 12/5/2004

It starts here: Bob Whitaker with David Duke, Live Online Now!

Started LIVE at 2 PM EST with David Duke, and the moderator says we’re about to top 1/4 million views.

David Duke Live with Bob Whitaker NOW, Dec. 5th
Charles A Lindbergh Today 02:12 PM
Posts 3,591, Views 237,088

Re: David Duke Live with Bob Whitaker TODAY, Dec. 5th

——————————————————————————–

I said:

David, I marched with the Klan in Pulaski, TN.

It was one of the major sacrifices of my life.

You see, when the Klan marches, they are silent. I had to march a mile with my mouth shut the whole time.

It was torture.
———————-

“Dits” asks:

“Forgive me but I’m only 14 and from New Hempshire so I’ve never seen the Klan in real life but why did you have to be silent?”

ONLY 14!!

Don’t miss this.

———————-

Originally Posted by ericthered
Mr. Whitaker, I am reading your book for the second time now. Trying to get these brutal, straightforward, facts established in my head. After reading it one thinks, ‘I can’t believe I’ve never realised this before, or was able to put it in words.’

Much of truth is like that, once you learn it, you wonder why you ever believed the way you did before.

I believe your book displays a very effective technique, laugh that crap right down to the ground!

It is brutal, isn’t it? Very few people on our side realize that.

I really get a letdown when someone writes me, “I agree with you, and another book about professor, XXX, says the same thing.”

XXX does not come within a mile of saying the same thing. The book at

READBOB.COM

is a political weapon, not just one more “criticism of academia.”

No, the criticism of academia written by the neoconservative Weisenstein is NOT what I wrote.

You got it right.
———————-

For a condensed version, another member has reposted the interview answers and comments on one page:

David Duke Live with Bob Whitaker
———————-

Originally Posted by Joseph Morgan
Mr Duke or Mr Whitaker, if the Internet had been around in the 1950s, would white men have been able to stop the Jewish revolution that occured in America during the 1960s?

The internet would have helped beyond belief back then. The dumbocracy is finally realizing what Rather and Cronkite and all three networks that owned the news back then were doing. People like Dr. Fields and Willis Carto were limited to trying to get a sliver of truth through with tiny publications.

We were crippled, we were supressed, we were silenced without the slightest bit of effort. The internet would have been glorious.

But that’s an if. That time is GONE.

As we sophisticated Southerners put it, “If a bullfrog had wings, he wouldn’t bump his butt everytime he jumped.” You got wings now, bullfrog.

Use them.

12/4/04 Insider Letter

Posted by Bob in Insider Letter Archive on 12/5/2004

*** Bob’s Insider’s Message ***

(reprinted to Blog from 12/4/04)

Every day it seems that there is a new outrage in Washington, D.C., and on a college campus somewhere. Bush is appointing non-whites to fill every slot he can, and seems to have a plan to make Hispanics the Negroes of the Republican Party. Even the New York Times is pointing out how completely Bush and the Republicans are selling out their Christian constituents. Too bad these blind supporters can’t or won’t see it.

But their kids can. Once they hit a campus, they will be thrown into an anti-Bush leftist feeding frenzy. Most of the anti-Bush rhetoric they hear will be infantile leftism, but it may separate them just enough to get a few of them to start thinking a bit on their own. It is during that critical time that they need to find a voice of encouragement, of reason. That is why I wrote Why Johnny Can’t Think.

Everyone who has ever thought about much of anything has wondered whether he was the only one who thinks that way. Often he will never know. What if he could find someone of like mind, at the critical moment when he is beginning to doubt the official nonsense. How much difference would that make? I can’t be on every campus, but my book can be. It would be better to have a Bob Whitaker available to every campus in America, and my book is a weak substitute. But, as my staff has told me, they are working for the book not because it is the best book ever written, or the ideal book, or the perfect book. They are working for it because it IS.

Bill Clinton can confuse the word IS, but something either IS or it isn’t. Why Johnny Can’t Think IS. It is available. We have made it very affordable, so that people can get it out to those who need to read it. Maybe the perfect book will come along one day. Why Johnny Can’t Think IS HERE NOW!

Before you buy that neice or nephew or grandchild a new video game, or T-shirt, or yet another CD so that they can become further Whiggerized, won’t you consider a gift of my book? How about a gift for a friend’s kid, or that bright kid down the street?

There are enough people on this list who could send a book to a kid or parent to make an enormous difference. Ten lousy bucks might change the course of a life forever. It might save them thousands in tuition. It might be something they thank you for twenty years from now.

We will even make it easy for you to do. We’ll gift wrap it, and put a little note in there from you, and send it directly to whomever you want us to — all for the same cost. (note: we can’t split discounted multiple book orders to different addresses, due to mailing costs).

My staff committed to taking on this extra work not to humor ole Bob, but because the time IS NOW.

http://whitakeronline.org/120404_wol_e-letter.htm or http://ReadBob.com

Merry Christmas.

Bob

The Sick Side of Zoroastrianism

Posted by Bob in General on 12/4/2004

A lot of people, both religious and philosophical, like to refer to Manichaeism.

Naturally very few of them have any idea what it is.

St. Augustine was deeply influenced by Manichaeism. So he hated women and reproduction.

Manicheism was developed by a third-century gentleman named Mani in what is now Iraq. It was a synthesis of the minor, struggling faith of Christianityand the all-powerful religion of Zoroastrianism.

It is hard to overstate how enormous Zoroastrianism, the religion of Persia, was in the third century. At that time Christianity was one of the competing sects in the Roman Empire, while Zoroastrianism had been the official religion of the equally large Persian Empire for over a thousand years.

That is why the Magi are in the Book Of Matthew. Everybody then knew what Magi were.

Everybody knew that Magi were not “wise men from the East.” That came in later transaltions of the Bible when nobody knew any real Biblical history. When the Book of Matthew was written everybody knew that a Magus was clergyman of the most powerful religion on eath, Zoroastrian, the official faith of the Persian Empire.

Have you ever heard of Thermopylae, where the Persians invaded ancient Greece?

Have you ever heard of Xerxes? Have you ever heard of King Cyrus of Persia, who was praised in the Old Testament as a non-Jew who was doing God’s work?

They were Zoroastrians. And in praising Cyrus the Jews were taking a ride on the back of a much greater religion.

So was Mani. Mani wanted to take a ride on the back of Zoroastrianism to promote Christianity.

Zoroastrianism said that there was Ahriman, The God of This World, and Ahura-Mazda, the Good God.

The New Testament says that Satan tempted Christ by offering him all the kingdoms of the earth. Did you ever wonder why everybody back then took it for granted that Satan COULD offer Jesus all the kingdoms of this world?

Of course you didn’t.

Everybody then knew that Satan was the God of This World. He OWNED all the kingdoms if THIS world. He was Ahriman.

So when Mani wrote in the beginning of the beginning of the third century, he was trying to show how St, Paul’s Christianity, which was competing for power in the Roman Empire, was the same as the religion of all-powerful Persia.

Both St. Paul and Zoroastrianism, said Mani, rejected This World, the domain of Satan and Ahriman, for the next word, the World of Ahura-Mazda and the Father Jesus spoke of.

Satan/Ahriman, the God of this World, wanted men to be obsessed with making themselves immortal by procreaing children in THIS world, the world of Satan/Ahriman.

Saint Paul abhorred both women and procreation. St. Paul and Mani wanted men to stop procreating. They wanted chastity. They demanded sterility. Every pleasure of THIS world was also condemned by Mani.

That is Manichaeism.

I have no idea how much of this is truly Zoroastriansim. After over a thousand years, I am sure there were many versions of Zoroastrianism.

But the idea that this world is evil is, to me, as sick as the Jehovism of the Old Testament.

I Honor the Old Testament

Posted by Bob in Religion on 12/2/2004

Oddly enough, I do.

The Old Testament to me is one of the attempts to understand God before Christ.

It is on the same level as the Avesta of the Zoroastrians. It is on the same level as my ancestors’ One-Eyed God, the Father God Odin who sought knowledge and simple truth instead of a childish Oriental Wisdom.

I have read the Old Testament, and I honor it.

One thing that really impresses me about the Old Testament is the fact that those who wrote it are absolutely unidentifiable, as Mark Twain pointed out. There is no ego in it. They speak of Jehovah, they speak of prophets, but they never speak of themselves. Their only interest is the truth as they see it.

The Old Testament is **A** version of the truth before Jesus gave us a little glimpse of the Father.

If you think the Old Testament is **THE** exclusive Word of God, then I am denigrating it.

But if you understand that, to me, there is only one Testament, and that is only a partial one, you can see why I resent those who put the Old Testament down for its imperfections. I am a Bible Belter, and I respect the Bible.

The Old Testament is the book I was raised on. I honor it, I do not like it to be insulted. Nonetheless, the Old Testament is not THE Revelation.

I am 99% atheist. But the mustard seed of my faith is in Jesus.

There is only one simple truth, the facts for which my Father God Odin suffered on the world tree Yggsdradil.

That is myth but it is the myth our lives are now based on. It tells us how the real fathers of our civilization thought.

Also, if there is a Final Revelation, there is only one: The one for which Jesus Christ died on the cross.

But if you believe in the the one Revelation, don’t try to drag the whole Middle East in with it.

11 Comments

Don Has it Dead Right

Posted by Bob in How Things Work on 12/2/2004

Don quoted me as saying that a blond girl and a black guy kissing in public was as disgusting as two guys kissing in public. Don then said he hated to trump me, but to him there was no comparison. The two guys kissing in public was nothing in comparison.

Don said that, to him, race trumps everything.

Amen, brother!

I have to cater to people who worry that homosexuality violates the Book of Jeremiah 4.225 verse fourteen point two because they are sort of on our side. They own God and I am just a human.

Their only conscience is in their version of the Bible.

I humor them because I am fighting the fight that I must fight, the fight for the Golden Rule, the fight for a world in which my race survives. No other world is worth living in. There is no other world that a human being should be born into. Any world in which whites do not exist is a planet where so-called humans are a stagnate group, a higher sort of ant.

But these higher ants have feelings. They suffer, they die, they rot.

I do not like suffering.

Period.

Here I stand.

Thanks, Don.

Is Anybody Else Tired of the TV Stars’ “Poor Baby” Bit?

Posted by Bob in How Things Work on 12/1/2004

I watch the biography channel a lot, and I am now watching Lloyd Bridge’s life.

Bridges went from a standard actor to a rich star as a scuba diver in the hit show “Sea Hunt.” Then comes the “poor baby” bit. He was “typecast.”

The entire cast of “Married With Children” worried themselves to death about being “typecast.” Every one of them left the show as multimillionaires, but they were very upset about the “limited range” of their titanic acting talent they had been able to show on “Married With Children.”

I got sick of hearing about it.

Poor Marilyn Monroe! She was typecast as a sex symbol.

If you just had a hit show and wind up a multimillionaire, I find it hard to feel sorry for you. Above all, I get sick of hearing you bitch about it.

Back in the 1930′s, when Fred Astaire and his sister were the star dancing team, their biggest competition was a man named Buddy Ebsen, another big-time dancer. But I never heard Ebsen crying about how he was stereotyped as a dancer.

Ebsen then had his wildly popular role as Jed Clampett in “The Beverley Hillbillies.” How stereotyped can you GET?

Then Ebsen did “Barnaby Jones.”

In other words, Ebsen didn’t spend his life crying about his “unused talent.” He found out what WE wanted to see and gave it to us.

The word for an actor or anybody else is this:

“If you can’t cut it, get the hell out of it.” You’re not there to show how talented you are. Your job is to entertain US.

Biography Channel, PLEASE cut the “poor baby” bit!