Archive for February, 2005

Fear of Professors

Thinking about my conversations with Sam Francis, I realized a very obvious fact. Sam and I had taken on professors and beaten them routinely.

But when I ask our people to promote my book and claim the universities as their own, there is a resounding silence.

We are dealing with people who depend on some screaming preacher to tell them why the Bible allows them to be against bad things. They have to have an Old Testament quote to justify their natural repugnance at homosexuality.

Those preachers would not dare take on a professor face-to-face. Certainly people who depend on them would not. They talk about how wrong the professors are, but they never face the professors with that.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

1 Comment

God, I’ll Miss Sam!

This is filed under “Bob.” I don’t feel sorry for Sam Francis. I feel sorry for me.

When Sam and I would see each other, we both heaved a sigh of relief. We were usually in the middle of a bunch of right-wingers both of us had been patronizing, and we both had a permanent case of being “tired all over” from patronizing them.

We would begin with a set of insults to each other and proceed downhill from there. Neither of us would crack a smile:

“They let just ANYBODY in here, don’t they?”

“I thought the same thing when I saw you here.”

Translation: That is how one male tells another that he can say any damn thing he wants to to him. When my brother sees me for the first time after a long time apart, he says something like,

“You STILL don’t know how to comb your hair.”

It meant “I love you, man” long before that phrase became popular, and it means a lot more.

Right-wingers will never know how much constant patronizing they require. It is a measure of Sam’s dedication and my dedication that we did it all the time, without a hint about how tiresome it was.

Right-wingers are a mass of inferiority complexes. Sam and I had none of them. He had a PhD. We had both met the “intellectuals” right-wingers feel inferior to and beat the hell out of them. We thought the “intellectuals” you felt inferior to were a laugh riot. He and I had both WRITTEN the dictionary definitions right-wingers argue about as if they were Holy Writ.

Sam and I worked together on Capitol Hill. We had WRITTEN the laws right-wingers talk about.

We knew everybody was just people, and we were both loyal to our own people. Not only did we not feel obligated to explain that, we thought people who tried to get God Almighty or Ayn Rand or some Libertarian Book to explain why one should have common sense was a laugh riot.

Sam and I would go somewhere and get unapologetically drunk.

Sam had a totally dry wit that I will miss terribly. He would sit, look out into nowhere, and tell me, without cracking a smile:

“I just heard the latest declaration from God Almighty.”

I would laugh my ass off.

Sorry, I’m not supposed to say “ass” am I? It might not be patronizing enough for some Deeply Christian right-wingers.

Give me a break here. I miss Sam.

Sam and I thought your inferiority complexes were hilarious. You said, “Left-wingers say they protect the weak. Well, we go nuts about the Rights of the Unborn. See? We’re more for weak and helpless than leftists are.”

But Sam and I laughed our butts off when even THAT was not enough to satisfy your desperation to prove you were more concerned with the helpless than leftists were.

You started going nuts over the rights of a fertilized egg.

THAT would prove you were equal to the leftists! If leftists were worried about the Poor and Downtrodden, by God, you could obsess over a fertilized human egg.

That’d show ’em!

Sam is dead. He doesn’t have to make his living by patronizing you any more. So I am saying exactly what he would want me to.

Sam was from Chattanooga. He was an old Southerner with healthy instincts. He got an education that gave him a bunch of tools to work with. But it never occurred to him that he had to JUSTIFY the fact that he was a white man with healthy loyalties and healthy attitudes.

We both thought it was HILARIOUS to watch you desperately trying to prove that intellectuals were not superior to you because you had a Book, too. You needed to quote the Bible or Ayn Rand or some Libertarian book to justify the most common sense, healthy attitudes.

You had to have some preacher scream at you to justify your Defiance of Authority.

Sam and I had been there. We worked together on Capitol Hill. We WROTE those laws you quote. We took part in approving those judges you quote like the Voice of God. We had not the slightest respect for any of that crap.

Our theme was, “Will these clowns ever stop groveling and stop quoting the Prophet Jeremiah and realize THEY are ‘We the People of the United States of America?’ ”

Good God, we got tired of you!

But we knew you were the only hope decency had. We knew you were the only hope common sense had. So we patronized you and patronized you and patronized you and patronized you, and on and on and on and on.

And we got SO tired of it.

So you see why it was such a relief when Sam and I saw each other.

Wherever he is, Sam is saying “Sic ’em, Whit!” so I’ll go on.

Sam gave up everything, so he had to depend on you to make a living.

As he told me more than once, “Yes, I’m an honest man. You see what happens to an honest man, Bob? He ends up having to associate with people like you.”

Sam got fired on his way up in a major job at The Washington Times because he wouldn’t shut up about race. So he managed to grub a living patronizing the various Voices of God at the Council of Conservative Citizens.

Lord, he would have liked to have talked about common sense and let that awesome intellect of his soar. But he had to satisfy the anti-evolution fad. He couldn’t go on Stormfront because of some Lord-knows-what controversy CCC had with it.

It had something to do with the fact that CCC represented the Voice of God or true anti-evolutionism or something.

Any preacher was allowed to humiliate Sam if he was to hold onto the tiny living you provided him.

And he STILL loved you. He would always end up saying, “They are the best people there are.”

He just wanted you to stop humiliating him. You never did.

Look at that picture of Sam below. That’s Sam. He is looking straight at you with what looks to the average conservative clown like a Serious Expression. But what I see is Sam thinking, “You are such an IDIOT, but you’re the best we’ve got. God help us.”

He’s about to crack a dry humor joke that would send me howling with laughter.

Lord, I miss Sam!

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

5 Comments

In Memoriam Sam Francis / Brimelow

February 16, 2005

In Memoriam Sam Francis (April 29, 1947 — February 15, 2005)
By Peter Brimelow / VDARE.com

[See also: Jared Taylor on Sam Francis; Tom Fleming on Sam Francis]

The sudden death on Tuesday night of Sam Francis, whom we had believed was recovering from aneurysm-related heart surgery, is a sad moment particularly for us.

Sam played a quiet but effective role in putting together the principals of VDARE.COM and the Center For American Unity. Later, we were happy to reciprocate by giving his syndicated column a web home when it was dropped without explanation by TownHall.com – part of the Beltway Right’s steady migration towards politically correct respectability.

Sam came from a long tradition of scholarly southerners that is now often forgotten. His fate cruelly paralleled that of the conservative movement to which he gave his life: long years of obscure labor, bravely borne, followed by dispossession at the moment of victory.

By the time the Republican Party for which he had worked so long had won Congress and the White House, he was effectively in exile, utterly alienated from the peculiar invade-the-world invite-the-world heresy that had suddenly and unexpectedly seized control of it. Sam’s firing from the Washington Times in 1995 was, in retrospect, a harbinger of this coup. As in the Trent Lott lynching, it was to be especially hard on southerners, despite (or perhaps because of) the fact they provided the GOP with the votes for victory.

Sam’s great value to VDARE.COM was that he was his unflinching disregard of contemporary taboos. He was always prepared to say the unsayable.

With the end of the Cold War, he emerged as a type of white nationalist, defending the interests of the community upon which the historic United States was, as a matter of fact, built. This position, of course, is as legitimate as Black nationalism, Hispanic nationalism, or Zionism. It is, indeed, the inevitable result of multiculturalism that is being imported through public policy.

Although VDARE.COM is not a white nationalist site, we regarded him as an important part of the VDARE.COM coalition. And we will miss him very badly.

The Establishment, left and right, wasn’t ready to listen to Sam. The logic of their own policies, however, means that eventually they will be forced to.

Like many older bachelors, Sam Francis became set in his ways. He could be gruff and even irascible. I suspect he was lonely, although no-one could have been surrounded by more loyal and devoted friends in his final days.

I have always been puzzled at the visceral animosity this reclusive and retiring figure provoked from the likes of John J. Miller and David Brock. Both launched campaigns to drive him out of public life. But for the internet, they might have succeeded. Sam was more hurt by these campaigns than he should have been—heartrendingly, you could always see in him the shy and sensitive little boy. I believe, however, that there will be a reckoning for these campaigns—as in the parallel case of Sam’s friend Pat Buchanan—in the future.

Also through the miracle of the internet, word of Sam’s passing has already spread around the world. A reader from Spain writes:

I have just noticed the news of Sam Francis’s death. I have only been a few months reading Vdare.com but I’m going to miss his columns very much.

His heart has stopped and the mine has filled with sorrow. Regards for all, [NAME WITHHELD]

An America reader writes:

I am so shocked and saddened to learn of Sam Francis’s death. His was a mind nonpareil and his absence will be a setback for our movement. I must confess that when calling up VDARE.COM I first would look for the most recent Sam Francis article and then, time permitting, would venture through VDARE.COM’s other offerings.

From his attendance at the American Renaissance conferences, I recall his quiet yet precise and cutting wit, his boyish face and encyclopedic mind. The room would hush when he spoke, none wanting to miss a syllable of his keen wisdom. If I’d only known his time was so limited I would have better used my opportunities to know and learn from him.  This is a sad day for all of us. [NAME WITH HELD]

I don’t know these people, and I don’t think Sam did. But although he always professed to me an unwavering skepticism (Chronicles’ Tom Fleming, linked above, thinks otherwise) it is because of readers like these that he might say, like the Roman, non omnis moriar — I shall not all die.

We hope to expand out Sam Francis page into a permanent repository for his work.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

No Comments

Samuel Francis / Taylor

Sam Francis
By Jared Taylor
(Posted on February 16, 2005)
American Renaissance

In 1986 or 1987 I was sitting in my house in Menlo Park, California, reading an article in a San Francisco newspaper. I had not noticed the author’s name when I began the article, but halfway through, I said to myself: “This is a mainstream article in a mainstream paper, but this man is one of us.” I looked up at the by-line, and made a mental note to remember the author’s name. It was Samuel Francis.

I began to look elsewhere for the Francis by-line, and soon he and I were in correspondence. I flew to Washington, DC, on business—probably in 1988—and Sam agreed to meet me for dinner. It was the first of countless dinners, meetings, phone calls, conversations, and was the beginning of what became a cherished friendship. This first meeting with Sam was before I had started what became American Renaissance, and over the months he strongly urged me to begin publishing. He promised to write for the magazine, and the knowledge that I could rely on at least one top-notch contributor was a source of much encouragement in what could have been an uncertain venture.

It was in those early years of our friendship that I learned that beneath Sam’s gruff manner there was warm-hearted and sensitive man—even a shy man. When I would telephone, he would greet me as if I were a bill collector. “Hey, how are you doing,” or, “Great to hear from you,” were not Sam’s style. But he was glad to hear from me, and he continued to write for AR and offer invaluable advice.

When, after several years of publishing, I decided to hold a conference for AR readers, Sam was the first person I thought of as a speaker. The 1994 conference—once again, an uncertain undertaking—was a great success thanks, in no small measure, to Sam’s willingness to speak. At every AR conference since then, his talk has always been one of the best attended and best received. His droll wit, his striking parallels, his arresting metaphors, his impromptu sallies during the question period—no one could both edify and entertain as Sam could, and he was always at the center of a convivial circle late into the night.

Unfortunately, much as Sam’s association benefited AR, the reverse was not always true. In fact, his participation at the 1994 conference was at least partly responsible for a sudden shift in his career. From the time I had first known him, Sam had been both a syndicated columnist and a staff columnist for The Washington Times. His position at the Times was one of high visibility and considerable influence, and just as many people subscribed to Chronicles mainly to read Sam’s column, a certain number of readers picked up the Times only because he wrote for it.

Sam first got in trouble at the Times for a column ridiculing the Baptist Church for an official, groveling apology over slavery. Though the column did not defend slavery, Sam pointed out that nowhere in the Bible is slavery considered a sin, and that the Baptists had no doctrinal reason to apologize for something in which no living Baptist had had a part.

The Times gave him a warning, but kept him on. Soon after, however, there was some publicity about his remarks at the 1994 conference. Though Sam himself never entirely understood why he was dismissed from the paper, the following words, spoken to the AR audience, appear to have been intolerable to the Times:

The civilization that we as whites created in Europe and America could not have developed apart from the genetic endowments of the creating people, nor is there any reason to believe that the civilization can be successfully transmitted to a different people.

Perhaps today, the Times would have overlooked this not-very-shocking statement, but ten years ago it was the equivalent of nitroglycerine, and Sam began a career as an independent journalist. His output was prodigious. In addition to his twice-weekly columns and monthly essays for Chronicles, he was editor of The Citizens’ Informer and book editor of The Occidental Quarterly. To this he added a regular stream of books and monographs, numerous speaking engagements, and service on several boards of directors, including that of AR’s parent organization, the New Century Foundation.

Of Sam’s brilliance and boldness as a thinker and writer there can be no doubt. The collection of his works on this page alone is ample testimony to that. He was undoubtedly the premier thinker and philosopher of white racial consciousness of our time. He was a man who could have built an impressive career as a public intellectual if, like so many, he had been willing to trim his sails and steer between the buoys. This, of course, was not Sam’s way, and by writing forcefully about what he knew to be true, moral, and vitally important, he sacrificed prominence and acclaim for the greater reward of doing what he saw to be his duty.

But as with so many men of great talent, Sam’s brilliance was just as striking in areas for which he was not well known. He read deeply in literature, both serious and popular. For example, he had an encyclopedic knowledge of the author H.P. Lovecraft, on whom he wrote several essays. It was a pleasure to discuss my own reading with Sam. Whether it was a novel by Joseph Conrad or a poem by Alexander Pope, Sam always had insightful recollections about the author and the work itself. I was partway through Dickens’s Dombey and Son when Sam died, and in a tiny corner of the immense sadness I feel, is the pang of knowing I will never have the pleasure of his commentary on that great novel.

Unlike many people, whose Ph.D. is a labor undertaken for professional purposes and quickly left behind, Sam’s historical learning reflected a real joy in knowing the past. He seemed to retain all he had ever learned, and was an inexhaustible source of insight and information. When, in my desultory way, I might stumble across an obscure but piquant incident from a 19th century British colonial campaign, Sam would know all about the campaign, why the colonial minister of the time had ordered it, and what objections had been raised by the foreign minister. When I first became acquainted with the Greek historian and geographer Strabo, Sam, of course, knew all about him and why he was important.

What a terrible waste that this immense fund of learning and insight should suddenly be struck down! There was no man who accomplished more for our cause, nor was there one with whom a more agreeable and edifying evening could be spent.

And so it is for both professional and personal reasons that I mourn the passing of a great mind and a good friend. Sam died only yesterday, and it has not yet entirely sunken in to me that this brilliant man is no longer with us. Those of us who shared his vision will carry on, as best we can, without him.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

No Comments

Sam Francis will be missed by many / Andrews

Sam Francis Articles Archive – VDARE.com
http://www.vdare.com/francis/

SamFrancis.net WEBSITE Articles Archive
Chronicles Principalities and Powers Archive

-. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -.

Sam Francis Dies at 57
Report; Posted on: 2005-02-16 11:39:18

Pro-White columnist will be missed by many.
by Louis Andrews

I’M SAD TO REPORT that Sam Francis died last night of complications from his recent heart surgery. Funeral arrangements are pending.

The following is a brief biographical sketch on Samuel Francis (pictured).

Samuel Francis was born in Chattanooga, Tennessee, on April 29, 1947. He was educated at The Johns Hopkins University (B.A., 1969) and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, from which he received a Ph.D. in modern history in 1979. From 1977 to 1981, he was a policy analyst at The Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C., specializing in foreign affairs, terrorism, and intelligence and internal security issues. From 1981 to 1986, he was legislative assistant for national security affairs to Senator John P. East (Republican – North Carolina) and worked closely with the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Security and Terrorism, of which Senator East was a member.

Mr. Francis joined the editorial staff of The Washington Times in 1986 as an editorial writer. He served as Deputy Editorial Page Editor of The Washington Times from 1987 to 1991, as Acting Editorial Page Editor from February to May, 1991, and as a staff columnist through September, 1995.

Mr. Francis received the Distinguished Writing Award for Editorial Writing of the American Society of Newspaper Editors (ASNE) in both 1989 and 1990. He was a finalist for the National Journalism Award (Walker Stone Prize) for Editorial Writing of the Scripps Howard Foundation in 1989 and 1990.

His twice-weekly column was nationally syndicated through Creators Syndicate.

Mr. Francis was the author of several articles and studies of international and domestic terrorism, including The Soviet Strategy of Terror (1981; rev. ed., 1985).

A prolific writer on issues of public policy, he published articles or reviews in numerous newspapers and magazines, including The New York Times, U.S.A. Today, National Review, The Occidental Quarterly, A Journal of Western Thought and Opinion, of which he was Associate and Book Editor, and Chronicles: A Magazine of American Culture, of which he was a Contributing Editor and for which he wrote a monthly column “Principalities and Powers.”

He was the author of Power and History: The Political Thought of James Burnham (1984) and Beautiful Losers: Essays on the Failure of American Conservatism (1993) and a number of other books. He was also the editor of the forthcoming Race and the American Future (Washington Summit Publishers, 2005).

I first met Mr. Francis at an Institute for Historical Review event in 1990. He was one of the few writers of real establishment standing who were willing to risk it all on principle, and speak out against the defacement of America and the ongoing attempted genocide of our people. He will be missed. — K.A.S.

More by or about Sam Francis:

The Origins of the Word (2005-01-29 11:00:32)

Anarcho-Tyranny — Where Multiculturalism Leads (2005-01-03 10:05:39)

Morality Not the Only Target on Monday Night Football (2004-11-30 23:36:11)

Bush Opposes All Invasion Controls (2004-10-15 18:57:27)

Will New California be Like Old Mexico? (2004-10-01 10:38:19)

When the State is the Enemy of the Nation (2004-07-21 20:35:03)

South Africa In Our Future? (2004-06-29 16:24:57)

White Zimbabwean Couple Survive Attack (2004-06-15 13:50:25)

Somali Immigrant Charged in Bombing Plot (2004-06-15 01:56:18)

‘Hispanic’ Hype Befuddling GOP (2004-06-09 07:24:34)

White Activist Warns of ‘Totalitarian Manipulation of Expression’ (2004-04-27 12:16:09)

White Activist Dr. Sam Francis Decries Deception about South Africa (2004-04-11 09:32:19)

Dr. Samuel Francis Supports Embattled Harvard Scholar (2004-03-26 09:40:45)

“Anti-Racists” Say Lord of the Rings too “Eurocentric” (2004-03-01 10:28:26)

Book Review: Communism, the Cold War, and the FBI Connection (2003-11-02 22:40:17)

Sam Francis on Non-White Immigration (2003-10-23 10:44:57)

Conservatives Always Lose (2003-10-01 14:58:08)

Israel is a Real Threat to U.S. Interests (2003-09-27 01:24:00)

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

No Comments

Bob Twain – WebRadio – 2 PM Monday and Tuesday

David Duke and Guest Bob Twain

Bob Twain was again the guest on David Duke’s live WebRadio via Stormfront’s Townhall Feb. 14th and 15th.

Listen to Tuesday, Feb. 15th streaming WebCast Radio
http://www.davidduke.com:8000/content/dd/dukeradio15feb05.pls

Download Tuesday, Feb. 15th mp3 WebCast Radio archive
http://www.davidduke.com/mp3/dukeradio15feb05.mp3

To go to START of Feb. 15th Town Hall posting.
Read and/or post questions if you are a forum member.

Listen live during any scheduled airtime – http://67.43.157.31:8000/listen.pls
Keep checking….

Listen to recorded Webcast Interview after it has been archived at:
Listen to streaming audio for Monday, February 14, 2005
Download program – Monday, February 14, 2005

WinAmp Download
Winamp free player

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

No Comments

Hear Us Sunday, 2 PM, Live WebRadio

David Duke and Bob Whitaker LIVE

I will be the guest on David Duke’s live WebRadio via Stormfront’s Sunday Townhall Sunday, Feb. 13th.

David Duke has chosen me to be his special guest tonight on the biggy, his Sunday night show.

I said yesterday that his last guest, Bob Twain who appeared on Friday, was his best special guest ever. That is one hell of an act to follow.

So who could Dave pick to follow an act like that?

Well, at the New Orleans Conference, former British National Party leader John Tyndal made a speech. Now there are a lot of BNP members who have very serious differences with Mr. Tyndal.

But no matter how hot the disagreement gets, there is one thing nobody will deny to John Tyndal: He is one hell of a speaker.

Tyndal had the crowd on its feet again and again.

Then somebody had to follow that up. After Tyndal, there had to be a “next speaker.”

So who did Dave pick to be that “next speaker?”

You guessed it.

So Dave needs someone to be the next Internet Radio special guest to follow up on Bob Twain.

So who did Dave pick to be the “next guest” after Bob Twain?

You guessed it.

Dave knows that I have been in this fight so long that none of this bothers me. I throughly enjoyed hearing John Tyndall get the cheers he so richly deserves for his courage and his years of fighting this lonely fight without flinching.

I am so delighted that we have discovered a talent like Bob Twain that whether I look good in comparison is nothing by comparison.

David knows that is the way I feel. I like to believe that is why he chooses me to follow up where “that is a hell of an act to follow.”

And, David, if I’m wrong about that, don’t disillusion me.

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=141878&goto=newpost
Here is where the newest discussion is taking place, so read and/or post questions if you are a forum member.

Listen live during scheduled airtime – http://67.43.157.31:8000/listen.pls
Keep checking….

Listen to recorded Webcast Interview after it has been archived at:
Listen to streaming audio for Sunday, February 13, 2005
Download program – Sunday, February 13, 2005

WinAmp Download
Winamp free player

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

No Comments

2/12/05 Insider Letter

(Reprinted to Blog from email list of 2/12/05)

*** Bob’s Insider’s Message ***

The point of my book Why Johnny Can’t Think: America’s Professor-Priesthood is that Political Correctness is not LIKE a religion, it IS a religion. Each day seems to bring yet another story to vindicate my assertion. In fact, we are experiencing a “Great Awakening” type explosion of the religion of Political Correctness on campuses across the country.

The latest outrage centers on Dr. Hans Herman Hoppe, a world renowned Austrian economist who teaches at UNLV. He gave his standard lecture on long-term planning, making the mundane observation that the young and old put less emphasis on long-term planning than do married couples with children. What could be more obvious? Only a retard couldn’t get that.

[Saturday, February 05, 2005, Las Vegas Review-Journal “Lecture causes dispute: UNLV accused of limiting free speech,” by Richard Lake. http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2005/Feb-05-Sat-2005/news/25808494.html]

Hoppe got into real trouble by making the point that homosexuals have shorter time horizons than heterosexuals, because homosexuals don’t have children and engage in riskier behavior. A student was offended and filed a complaint with the administration.

The administration has been trying to get Hoppe to agree to forgo his next pay raise as punishment. He is refusing to do that.

In a converse way, Dr. Hoppe has followed my advice. He stated that the administration should have told the student to “grow up.” He is not backing down one bit. He is tenured, so they can’t do anything to him. The case is so ridiculous, so open and shut, that just by standing up to them he will win.

Any student should be able to do the same thing. But students are young and inexperienced, taught to respect those in authority over them, and no tenure. They are bullied by professors who basically pick fights with children.

But the Hoppe precedent gives them another angle. They can file a complaint with the administration over anything they disagree with. By the Hoppe example, logic is no defense. And if they suffer retribution for reporting a professor, they can pile on even more!

I talk a lot about the “all is lost” crowd. They are the ones who are lost.

We are going to win because the tide of stupidity that is sweeping across the country and our campuses is going to sink the Professor-Priesthood. And sooner than you think.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

2 Comments