Archive for February, 2005

I REPEAT: AntiRacism Means GENOCIDE

My answer to Mark’s comment is to do what the left does.

Memorize it, copy it and paste it, until you force them to answer it.

I will REPEAT this here on my blog:

As David Duke pointed out on his radio show recently, what they never do is answer your arguments. They scream Hate and they accuse, but they never answer you.

MAKE them answer you. Just keep repeating the same argument until they HAVE to answer you. There is nothing more effective than the same statement made over and over and over and over, with “I don’t think you heard me” thrown in innocently.

I have repeated the same thing twenty times, and the audience begins to snicker and then to laugh as my opponent tries, again and again, to twist away from what I said.

Like Lord Playfair, I LOVE it when one of our people learns to USE one of my points and repeats it.

For example, I used to always say to a Communist, “Why is it that every Communist country must build walls to keep people IN and we have to build walls to keep people OUT?” I remember once saying, “Let me repeat this, because I don’t think you heard me, for the eighteenth time, let me repeat it, ‘why is it that every Communist country must build walls to keep people IN while we must build walls to keep people OUT?’ ”

The other readers were laughing themselves silly. The poor Commies twisted and turned. But the fact is that their system is just awful, so people escaped.

On race, what everybody has to call antiracism means massive immigration and integration for EVERY white country and ONLY for white countries. “The race problem” will be solved this way. But there is “race problem” to be solved in Africa or Asia.

Antiracism MEANS the white problem. The solution is genocide.

So say so, without variation, over and over and over and over and over and over. Over and over and over and over and over.

No variation, no letup. Make them answer you or say it again, over and over and over and over.

Originally Posted by Lord Playfair:

I’ll be honest with you.

There are times when I do have the answers written down already.

That’s one of the benefits of my website White Nationalist Info

I have a stack of articles I have written there, and sometimes, when the question is being asked to me, for the 8 millionth time that day, I will just go and copy the answer I gave before, from one of my articles.

But there is nothing wrong with that.

That is why my website is there.

Every article I write is open for anyone here to use, if they feel it can help them in a discussion on another forum, or they feel it would be good posted elsewhere.

My articles are stickied all over the internet, and I’m happy with that.

I know that David feels the same way, I know he is happy for excerpts to be taken from his articles, and used to try and educate, awaken, or stimulate people on other messageboards, to spread our message and to bring them into our fold.

To bring people to our sites and to enroll them in our movement.

That is one of the reasons he writes so many.

He is sharing his knowledge with us, so that we can use that knowledge to share with others, and help them in the same way.

I like to try and to use my own mind, whenever possible, instead of just parroting others, but, on the other hand, if a better man has said it first, then why dismiss it?

If someone can sum something up perfectly then why should I attempt a clumsy alternative?

Sometimes there is good mileage in using words already written, the words of some of our foremost thinkers, instead of trying to find a new angle, or a different way of saying it.

Just don’t forget to tell people who said it first, and how they can learn more.

It’s no good leaving them with a quote on a distant website, and then walking off with out giving them the opportunity to travel further down the road to enlightenment.

7 Comments

Do it or forget it

There were some excellent points made in forum discussions (e.g. medieval knights) about what is, and how we look at, the forcefully aggressive claiming, protecting, defending and standing firm for what they claimed was theirs, and they mostly get everything except what is important TO OUR MOVEMENT.

What we keep hearing is, “Why do they do this awful thing?”

They do those things to you because you LET them do that to you.

Here is an example:

There are places out on the net where we could go on the offensive. They are places set up for airing opposing opinions.

There we hear our opposition repeating the line that, if you are associated with Stormfront or another white nationalist group, you are “anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

Instead of nailing them, our people do exactly the wrong thing! They go into enormous explanations of the difference between Nazis and pro-whites.

Try making an argument against liberals that is a page long and just dropping a line in there somewhere that they are actually friends of Stalin.

They won’t LET you get away with it.

One person I know really took me up on this suggestion. Whenever the term Nazi comes up in the argument, he jumps on it and will not, repeat, will not let it go: “You say I want to kill millions of people? How DARE you say that I want to commit mass murder?”

It works for him. It doesn’t work for others who say, “Well, I mentioned that.”

But you can’t say, “Well, I mentioned that.”

Do it or forget it.

Nobody calls a liberal a Communist and just goes on. He will not LET you.

How about “racist?” It doesn’t matter whether you are a racist or not, nobody gets to call you that unless he DEFINES the charge he just made.

It is a GREAT opportunity.

But what does a white person do with it? He ignores it. You let them get away with it.

Someone who puts a label on you has just given you a license to make your entire argument. As soon as someone says “racist” or “Nazi” he has given you the opportunity to say:

There is a professor at Harvard named Noel Ignatiev who says:

The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists.

You then go on to say that everybody who says he is an anti-racist agrees with that. They say they want to “solve the race problem” by pushing immigration and integration onto EVERY white country on earth, and ONLY onto white countries.

They say intermarriage is the solution to the RACE problem. But this so-called RACE problem doesn’t exist in Asia or Africa. As Ignatiev said, they demand a final solution to the WHITE problem in exactly the same way that Hitler demanded a final solution to the Jewish problem.

You say, “You are calling that anti-racism. I call that genocide. Does that make me a racist?”

And, for God’s sake, DON’T LET GO!

Because today, that is exactly what the word racist means. But you NEVER make them admit that.

No liberal will ever let it go if you call him a Communist. But even if they do make this argument, most people can’t use this point because, as they say, they “mentioned it.”

I go ballistic, like any good coach would over a player who makes the same mistake the fiftieth time.

When someone accuses us of ANYTHING, that accusation is all there is.

Or you LOSE.

I have tried over and over and over with our opposition to demand they define their term. The other people let them off the hook and talk about the usual stuff.

We could drive ALL these bastards back into their slimepits if we forced them to hear our basic points BEFORE we listen to any of their standard arguments.

We don’t USE those places out there to do that. We LET them come in and do that to us.

If you keep acting like someone who has called you a name deserves an answer before he stops calling you names, you are the “serf” and he is the “knight.”

If you keep acting like someone who has accused you of being a potential criminal deserves an answer before he stops calling you names, you are the “serf” and he is the “knight.”

Do you want to be a serf? Do you understand yet why I keep repeating this?

2 Comments

Switch to our mobile site