Archive for April 4th, 2005

This Blog: Writing Backwards

In this blog, the later piece is written AFTER the introduction. The latest article is at the top.

I have thought about this odd fact, and have realized it has a great advantage. My aim is write things that are what you have already suspected, but have not had the time to think out.

When you read something here you like, I don’t think you say, “What a novel idea!” I think you say, “So THAT’s it!”

So when I write, I am able to go on with ideas that have already occurred to many of you. For those who want to know the background, it is below. So we can proceed from where a lot of readers have already gotten to.

A good example of this is the slave trap Idea I wrote about below. It is now time to talk about the slave traps, aka, Great Civilizations, of South America.

A lot of people wonder why the Great Civilization of the Incas was thousands of feet up on top of mountains. The reason is because that is where people had to go to escape the dangers of lowland savages. But that mountain top made an excellent slave trap. Thus another Great Civilization was born.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

No Comments

Slave Traps

Historians compare ancient non-Western societies to Western societies.

There is no comparison.

What historians call ancient Great Civilizations were what I call slave traps. Those Great Civilizations built the giant structures historians worship because they had millions of subjects who could go nowhere else.

Egypt’s population could not move out of the narrow strip beside the Nile River.

The Mesopotamian Civilizations were less stable. Mesopotamian means “between the rivers,” the Tigris and the Euphrates, but it was easier to get out of than the Egyptian Strip, the ideal slave trap.

China’s slave traps were the rice paddy cultures. Paddies can only be cultivated beside huge water sources. They were concentrated beside the Hwang Ho and the Yan Tsu Rivers.

For at least a thousand years, Westerners have worried about the Chinese conquering the world. It is a remarkable feat that China has contained almost exactly one fifth of the human race for at least two thousand years.

In the meantime the Chinese never even conquered the parts of CHINA that were outside the rice paddy area. Conquerors came in from outside. China conquered nobody north of them. They conquered more rice paddies in southeast Asia, though.

And lost them.

South America had a lot of brief slave traps, too. But that is a somewhat longer story.

The paddies came from a completely new, invented crop called aquatic rice. China got it from India when India was still ruled by whites around 2000 BC.

The Chinese took aquatic rice back to China and made slave traps out of Hwang Ho and Yang Tsu areas, just as Great Civiliations had developed in the slave traps of the Nile and Mesopotamia.

Thus another Great Civilization emerged.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

1 Comment

“Handed Down” to Whom?

To youm, that’s whom.

James Jackson Kilpatrick pointed out years ago that the United States Supreme Court was described as “handing up” a decision. I have no way of searching this out in a reasonable amount of time.

Today the courts “hand down” decisions. They “hand down” a decision that overruled an overwhelming vote by the California plebescite against giving benefits to illegal aliens. They “handed down” decisions that enforced racial busing against the wishes of eighty to ninety percent of the public, including a majority of blacks.

Before the World War II Generation gave us Obedience Training, “We the People of the United States of America and OUR posterity” were the only purpose of the Constitution. Before the World War II Generation was obedience-trained, “We the People of the United States of America” were the only source of authority the Constitution had.

But now the guys in robes hand DOWN decisions to us. They ARE the Constitution.

We are allowed to debate questions until the guys in the black robes hand a decision DOWN to us. Then they not only make the Final Decision, they can put us in jail for contempt of court if we discuss it.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

1 Comment