Christ, indeed, did change everything. His church conquered an empire that tried to supress it. Eventually the church reasserted itself, although it had endure the stupidity of people like Luther and Calvin before it got a Wesley, all the while fighting the Roman Catholic heirarchy who would have liked nothing better than to burn the entire lot. Of course, Calvinists were tying Anabaptists into sacks and throwing them into lakes and rivers. Ironically, Anabaptists are now the dominant strain of western christianity.

Going back, in actuality you do agree with me. Your point, “The problem with the church is very simple: It doesn’t believe. So it tries to be ‘relevant’ to the ‘real world.’” makes my point quite succinctly. Very nice summation of my position as well. Calvinists lost there way not long after reaching these shores (if they ever were on the right path is debatable). After chasing all the witches and demons out of Plymouth colony they had to find something to do, so they turned away from the gospel and found abolitionism, racism, sexism, et. al. and the liberal “church” to this day is on the same path. I think it’s the path to hell in more ways than one.

Women being the sensitive caring things they are, probably take one look at you and realize that you need rest, relaxation and a relatively stress free environment. While they won’t admit it, women and stress go together and they have a visceral understanding of this. Having been married before you know just how true this is, even if you may have forgotten it. Maybe on one of your trips to Russia you can find a cute thing to bring back home. If what I’ve seen on some of the websites they do have a few real honeys worth placing on a pedestal back here.

I could go to church closer to home. I belong to a parish
about 20 miles from home because the closer ones are more
into social gospel and bad theology. I actually pay attention
to the words in hymns: one of the reasons I left these two
closer parishes is because their music directors just adore
hymns advocating ending poverty by ending _physical_ hunger,
and ennobling the poor at the expense of the middle
class.

I am poor and I’ve been poorer. I was even homeless
briefly. Sure, we all need to eat and to have a safe
place to sleep. The best permanent fixes for physical
poverty are good educations and stable marriages.

Spiritual poverty can co-exist with physical poverty.
Spiritual poverty can hurt, can cripple, and can
kill. It’s also a lot harder to identify than
anything physical.

I hope it’s just for my own good, but I am plagued by doubts.

The problem with the church is very simple:

It doesn’t believe.

So it tries to be “relevant” to the “real world.”

It is very embarrasing to most professed Christians for people to say, “You’re
just about all that salvation stuff.”

That includes the evagelicals. They want to believe that all the answers are
in the Bible, by which they mean all the answers to the “real” stuff, evolution,
moral leadership, all the stuff that “matters.”

I disagree that the country would not be sick if the churches did their job.

If that is your reason to be Christian, I think you are dangerously mistaken.

Read what CS Lewis Lewis’ senior demon Screwtape said about how easily souls
could be damned by twisting the Faith into “Christianity AND…” Get humans
concentrating on Christianity AND saving America, Christianity AND evolution,
Christianity AND Moral Leadership.

Get them OFF of saving souls, including their own.

You can become a Christian Scientist or Amish or any number of groups who claim
the church’s mission is of THIS world.

That’s certainly what the Old Testament says. The Law and Prophets were for
this world. God was out to save Israel. God was about Israel.

I think that Christ changed EVERYTHING.

The pic on the main page looks better than I remember you back in ’99. You been staying away from women and getting some rest? (I couldn’t resist any longer )