Elizabeth replied to my article about how girls and boys are different by agreeing with me, which is always nice. But she added a more important point: that when women get into a fight, there is no quarter, no rules of engagement, no Geneva Convention.
H.S. agreed with her, as Elizabeth ended, “Gentlemen, just stay out of these battles.”
Feminists love to quote things like the old Roman Law. They point out that, according to those laws, women were reduced to cowering, helpless slaves.
But if you read real history, you see the usual proportion of Roman men, those all-powerful paterfamiliae, who were terrified of their wives.
As usual, I look for the simple explanation of this.
Here it is:
Men are physically stronger than women. As a result, women developed a form of defense that men have only gotten a name for in the last century.
It is called psychological warfare.
My brother is the father of three girls. Once when one of them was about three, she came up to him, cuddled up in his lap and said, “Daddy, I love you.”
She then went into the next room.
My brother was charmed.
A minute later he heard her five-year-old sister in the other room whisper to that little girl, “Yes, that’s how you do it.” My brother is a pediatrician, so this did not surprise him in the least.
While men are learning to be men and warriors and writing great sagas about themselves, women are also learning how to be women. I have this paranoid feeling that if anyone wrote a history of THAT, the Sisterhood would kill them.
#1 by Richard L. Hardison on 06/23/2005 - 8:12 pm
Girls are nice! Just don’t get too close as they do bite. sometimes a bit on the hard side, at that.
#2 by H.S. on 06/23/2005 - 11:29 pm
It fits here as well.
However, IMO men who understand this and are able to deal with those under their influence are highly esteemed by most women who then can get the job done effectively, efficiently in peace. I am not one who supports or supported mass entrance into the general workforce by women. We are still paying the price – collectively and personally. This is not about competency, it is about filling up to the brim and overflowing with the results of letting each flourish under their basic design model. Finding someone who “fits” personally is an awesome accomplishment.
But I agree with what you say above with one change – I would suggest that the tendency is not a response to men’s strength that could crush easily, but was by design. His was not to be used against her and hers not to be used against him. But the creature is no longer the same as what the Creator designed. In Christ we can find that balance again. Circumstances would define “ruthlessness.”
Some may recognize that a sign of a nation about to collapse is that it is run by women and children. It is the opposite of their design and it will NEVER work as a way of life.
The pressure against real men and real women is phenomenal. My heart goes out to young people. In any way I can, I make myself available to help them.
#3 by Peter on 06/27/2005 - 10:30 pm
If you think women can be ruthless, have you ever crossed paths with a homo.? It’s the worst of both worlds.
#4 by H.S. on 06/27/2005 - 11:25 pm
“If you think women can be ruthless, have you ever crossed paths with a homo.? It’s the worst of both worlds.” –Peter
I really did forget about that group. You are SO right. They were the only group that was “allowed” to make death threats filling up answering machines, slash tires, stalk children, key slash cars in parking lots, perform obscene acts in public, ad nauseum when our network (via one activist office of really nice, great people) spearheaded the fight against the sodomite lobby ramming through legislation forcing AIDS infection onto the list of official state and federal “handicaps” allowing them all that that covered.
Don’t even start the subject with an ER nurse or doc if they’ve worked a homo region for any length of time. It came up in training hours we all had to have in ER and from the docs out of Seattle’s Harborview.
I remember situations told by men who were stalked at work (DSHS) and women also. But lesbians are twice as wild. The quotas for queers of both sexes in law enforcement on the west coast wreaked havoc with the forces (especially Seattle PD which was led by one and the new young officers were warned about ever allowing him to close his office door). But the women actually shot each other – and the straight women filed many complaints and needed protection from the fury when they rejected them.
Ya reap whatcha sow, but never in the same season and never in the same quantity. Law of the harvest.
It absolutely does take real men to truly protect and enforce – simplistic truth.
#5 by sprinklehopper on 10/02/2006 - 12:08 am
you’ll agree with some of my points perhaps ?
http://stormfrontpride.blogspot.com/2006/09/stormfront-suppresses-debate-linking.html