Archive for July, 2005
Sobsister History
I have been thinking about doing next Saturday’s internet broadcast on what I call Sobsister History.
Sobsister is an old-fashioned word that means a woman who is always crying and whining about how bad everybody is to her.
We were all raised on Sobsister History. Every single minority group, especially Jews, was always kind and practically perfect in every way, but the Evil White Gentiles treated them horribly, and we owe them money for that.
The idea sprang into my mind when I read a quote that someone on Stormfront had looked up from John Wayne.
The one idea all of us were raised on was how evil white people were to take America from the Indians. But one person on Stormfront looked up a quote from the Duke that puts the whole Sobsister story of the poor oppressed Native Americans we owe gambling casinos and lifetime pensions and reparations to in perspective.
John Wayne said:
“I don’t feel we did wrong in taking this great country away from them. There were great numbers of people who needed new land, and the Indians were selfishly trying to keep it for themselves.”
I was always taught that if a white gentile wanted to take a lot of land for himself and keep it, THAT was Greed. If a few thousand Indians want to keep the whole state of Ohio, that is just Preserving their Culture.
Everybody says that all those Asian immigrants to Europe are “just seeking a better life for their family.” But does anybody suggest that Japan or Taiwan should provide them with that opportunity?
No way. Sobsister History says that the Netherlands, which is more crowded than either Japan or Taiwan, should provide that opportunity.
Why?
Because Japan and Taiwan are oppressed non-white countries. The poverty of Southeast Asia is the fault of white gentiles, so white gentiles should provide these wonderful people with “a better life for their families.”
Everybody agrees that all white gentiles have to pay for the crimes of Nazi Germany against Jews. It just shows how evil all white gentiles are.
But does anybody even suggest that all Jews should pay for the far, far larger crimes Communism committed against mankind? The percentage of Jews who supported Communism was always far, far higher than the percentage of white gentiles who supported Hitler.
In fact, it was finally white gentiles who brought Hitler down.
I can personally testify that if it had been left to the politics of the general Jewish community, the Soviet Empire would still be there.
But Sobsister History says Jews in general had no part in any of this.
They just SUFFERED! Oh, how they SUFFERED.
Maybe it’s time that history grew up.
7/9/05 Bob’s Weekly WOL Articles
Posted by Sys Op in WOL Weekly Articles on 7/9/2005
Weekly WhitakerOnline.org Articles
July 9, 2005
The Shrewd Problem
It Is Not The Shrewd People Who Have The Shrewd Problem
Please Listen!
Fun Quote:
Moron, imbecile and idiot are legal terms, not medical ones.
Under the law, an idiot has an IQ of 30 or less, while a moron has an IQ of between 50 and 70.
Under the law, the dumbest moron is twice as smart as the smartest idiot.
So it ridiculous to say there is no difference between a Republican and a Democrat.
.
The Shrewd Problem
Hitler talked about the Jewish Problem. Today’s respectable conservatives and liberals talk about the White Problem, which they call the Race Problem, in exactly the same way. My focus is the Shrewd Problem. I will be talking about it on my Saturday Internet show:
Oliver Hardy of Laurel and Hardy summed up the Shrewd Problem best when he said, “There is nothing dumber than a dumb man who thinks he’s smart.”
Hardy was from Augusta, Georgia, and he would understand what I mean by the Shrewd Problem because that is the way we used the word “shrewd” down here. It is somebody who thinks he’s smart and isn’t, and the consequences are disastrous.
The first person killed in a railway accident was a Shrewd Man in South Carolina. It has pretty well been expunged from history, but the first regular passenger rail line in America ran across South Carolina from Charleston to the Savannah River.
It was called “The Best Friend of Charleston.”
When the railway first started, a guy who had just been hired to work in the engine, handling wood or something, was irritated by the whistling noise the engine was making. He decided to do something about it.
So he looked around and found the source of that irritating noise. It was the boiler which was right beside where he was working up in the engine. He didn’t ask the engineer.
After all, he was a smart man so he knew how you deal with something that makes an irritating noise.
He tied down the steam pressure relief valve.
A couple of minutes later the clamped steam boiler exploded, literally blowing his head off. This is real history.
It is lucky that this Shrewd Man was on an early train. On later trains a real boiler explosion could kill hundreds of people. Since then, Shrewd People have been killing hundreds, thousands, millions of people.
-. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -.
It Is Not The Shrewd People Who Have The Shrewd Problem
If you ask a Jew what the Jewish Problem is, he would probably say it was anti-Semitism. If you asked the average white man what the white problem was, he might say it was sunburn. What Hitler had in mind when he referred to The Jewish Problem was not the problem of anti-Semitism. What respectable conservatives have in mind when they talk about The White Problem, which they call the “race problem,” is not sunburn.
Those who put the “Problem” in caps are saying the very existence of Jews or white people is the problem for everybody else.
Hitler had several solutions in mind for the Jewish Problem, such as relocating all of them somewhere. Respectable conservatives have only a Final Solution to the White problem, and it is genocide.
They call it assimilation.
This “race” problem does not exist in Africa or Asia. The solution to the “race” problem is massive immigration and integration in EVERY white country and ONLY in white countries. All three large segments of the Jewish Community — Reformed, Conservative and Orthodox — have official statements of policy which state exactly that.
So when I talk about The Shrewd Problem, I mean they are a cause of catastrophe for the rest of us.
While things like massive immigration and real race problems are on the verge of destroying America, all the Shrewd people on television talk about a balanced budget or whether George Bush’s feet stink.
Meanwhile the elephants are right there in our living room.
And they are growing restless.
-. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -.
Please Listen!
Please listen to my new installment of The Untrained Eye.
I have been in the belly of the beast. I have seen how these Shrewd People are chosen for top positions. I have seen how they crowd out every person with rational common sense and a conscience and keep them from getting a hearing or exercising power.
When I discuss this situation, as when I discuss Political Correctness and the unending damage professors in their little publicly financed inbred world called academia do, nothing I say is mysterious or even complicated.
It’s not a conspiracy. The people who get ahead in this process are not bright enough to conspire.
You think you are dealing with Giant Manipulations by Geniuses when your real problem is a bunch of clowns.
You are shooting at the wrong target while the enemy is coming up behind you.
You are guarding the outhouse while the enemy is walking through your front door.
7/9/05 Insider Letter
Posted by Sys Op in Insider Letter Archive on 7/9/2005
(Reprinted to Blog from email list of 7/9/05)
*** Bob’s Insider’s Message ***
In 1871 France was crushed and humiliated in the Franco-Prussian War. Germany took the provinces of Alsace and Lorraine, which were German-speaking areas France had conquered centuries earlier.
In Paris there was a government museum with a statue representing each of the provinces of France. The French did not take out the statues representing Alsace and Lorraine in 1871 when they ceded them to Germany. They just covered them over with sheets.
France had not forgotten.
In 1919 when France was part of the coalition that had defeated Germany in World War I, it took back Alsace and Lorraine. Amidst wild celebrations, the sheets were taken off of the statues of Alsace and Lorraine.
No one blamed France for keeping those sheets on and never forgetting it felt that those provinces were part of France. Everybody thought it was great and showed patriotism and determination.
If France had not gotten those provinces back, the statues would still be there today almost a century and a half later.
When America is dealing with the Arabs, we always want them to worry about terrorism and so forth. We want them to forget that we helped take Palestine from Arabs who had lived there for at least two millennia and given Palestine to outsiders who had no connection to that land at all except our version of the Bible.
When Germany took Alsace they did not drive the Alsatians out. We helped drive the Arabs off their own land.
Arab spokesmen are always bringing that up and our reply is, “Forget it. That’s all in the past.”
It is not in the past and it will never be in the past for a patriotic Arab.
Bob
What are Bantams FOR?
Posted by Bob in Bob, Comment Responses on 7/6/2005
When I was coming up in a place a mile further out than nowhere, there were bantam chickens all over the place. I remember one bantam rooster vividly because he jumped on me when I was only a little bigger than he was.
Mark mentioned bantam roosters, and I was a little surprised that anybody today had even heard of them. Certainly none of the chicken factories today raise bantams, though even I could be mistaken.
In the years since that bantam attack on me, I have often wondered what bantam chickens were FOR. I have never heard of anyone eating bantam eggs, I have never seen fried bantam.
A similar situation arises in connection with goats. When I was a boy and snakes still had feet, a goat was a very skinny little gray animal that would eat absolutely anything. People thought they ate tin cans because they would chew on tin cans to eat the labels off of them.
I saw little gray goats like that all over Central and South America. So when a friend of mine said he had a goat farm, I was astonished at what he called a “goat.” His goats are large creatures of different colors. They look a lot more like small cows than they do like the goats I knew about.
In fact, I imagine there were a lot of cattle the size of my buddy’s goats before scientific selective breeding set in.
In the time of the ancient Greeks and Romans, a horse was a tiny creature. Like the bantams, this has been a mystery to me, too. These guys were making charges on tiny horses with lances and no saddles and no stirrups.
I can’t see in my mind how they did that at all. But how they did that in the middle of BATTLE and drive enemy soldiers off is real mystery to me.
And when the Roman legions came in a disciplined, tight formation, why didn’t the people fighting them just let that disciplined square of soldiers walk around wherever it wanted to? Then, when the formation broke up, they could have just killed them one by one or let them build their forts and stay together.
Take it Outside
This is not the place for commenters to debate with each other.
This is BOB’S porch.
If you want to take each other on, take it outside.
What’s in it for me?
Posted by Bob in Musings about Life on 7/2/2005
Christian morality is an oxymoron.
If an animal learns that it will get food if it does one thing and a painful shock doing another, it will do the thing that gives it food. This is not morality.
Christianity offers the Big Payoff for being what it says is good and the ultimate pain for what it considers bad. This involves not the slightest hint of morality. If it is true, there is no morality involved.
“What must I do to be saved?” What must I do to enjoy eternal bliss and avoid eternal agony. This is a Pavlovian choice. To call it a morality is a joke.
Before you think I am siding with the atheists, let me add that most of the self-styled “practical thinkers” are exactly the same way.
I am a moral person. I do things because they are right. The Practical Person asks me what I get out of it.
I have paid a huge price in my life and have gotten nothing out of it personally. But I couldn’t live any other way. Most of the pleasures people pay so dearly for don’t impress me. I love to do good things for people. I love to spread ideas that help.
You might say I love power, real power, the ability to change things for what I consider the better. That is my reward.
I was talking to a multimillionaire on the phone and described what I was doing for the cause while I was moving. He sounded a little puzzled and said, “Well, if you enjoy it, fine.”
Rich people enjoy big cars and boats. To me, having a boat is about the most boring thing in the world.
From any practical point of view I have wasted my talents. There was nothing in it for me.
From the Practical Person’s point of view, there was nothing in it for me. From the Christian point of view, there was nothing in it for me.
But I AM me, and I’m glad I did it.
A moral person acts on his morality. That is very hard for anyone else to understand.
I’m Moved
I am now living in a nice tenth-floor condo.
As Mark Twain said, “All sane white people hate noise.”
So does everybody here.
Before my life was all clutter. All the years of writing, learning computers, keeping remembrances, all that is gone now.
All serious business involves trust and promises. When I talked about promises not kept, one commenter wrote they wished somebody would even make promises to them.
Poor baby!
Well, in order to be in any serious business you have to deal in promises, and in any serious business, you have to do two things:
1) Do things for other people, and
2) Associate only with people who return the favor.
If no one ever even promises to do something for you you, you are either
1) doing nothing for anyone else or
2) running with trash.
This is not, as Kelly Bundy would put it, rocket surgery.
But I am no longer doing any serious business at all.
When I move, people always let me down. I could never use a professional mover because my stuff is so mixed together and some of it they cannot see.
That’s all gone. If anybody wants to use my top secret clearance now, they can forget it.
Back to the point. People let me down, as always. That brings me back to point 2) above. I suddenly realized, sitting out on my nice tenth-story balcony watching fireworks at a distance which makes their noise nicely muted but their colors beautiful, that my clutter is not just documents, it is people.
What do I need them for?
Nobody has anything interesting to say to me.
Writers are interesting, if you pick them carefully.
It would be interesting if they had retired from the same business I have.
But nobody has retired from exactly the same business I was in.
There isn’t even a name for the business I was in.
People are a pain. They don’t listen to each other, so they can talk endlessly. Their talk is like background music. Background music keeps out the silence. Talk keeps out the loneliness.
I was raised in extreme loneliness. But now cable and the Internet and the books I CHOOSE take up all my time. And I am personally very good company for me.
Nobody else understands what I am interested in.
One result of all this is that, when I am left alone, I am always glad to see the people I meet when I go out. New Yorkers and New Englanders were always closely packed together and were hostile to people. I am glad to see them when I have been alone awhile.
So my garbage chute and the big dump outside and the local charities and the recycling place are full of stuff I have dumped.
But now begins the people-dumping.
There will be a LOT of it.
7/2/05 Bob’s Weekly WOL Articles
Posted by Sys Op in WOL Weekly Articles on 7/2/2005
Weekly WhitakerOnline.org Articles
July 2, 2005
The British Thought Police Take Action
Me and John and Nick
Nick Griffin Searches ME Out
The Ultimate Sacrifice
Fun Quote:
Westerners would never pay back their Muslim enemies in kind for 9-11, because no one is about to commit suicide in defense of hedonism.
.
The British Thought Police Take Action
The British Broadcasting Company (BBC) secretly filmed tape for a documentary about the British National Party (BNP) early last year. Since then the British police have been arresting BNP members and party leaders for what they said on that show.
You see, there is law in Britain against saying anything that might incite racial violence.
Please note that word “might.”
There are laws in America against inciting violence. The classic example is shouting “Fire!” in a crowded theatre. But that law has a very important exception. You may shout “Fire!” in a crowded theatre if there IS a fire in a crowded theater.
When it comes to being convicted of inciting to violence, British law has no such exception. A man was sent to prison for inciting to violence when every word he said was true. In the case of The Crown versus Pierce (1986) the court ruled that, under the racial laws, “The truth is no excuse.”
There is one more little difference between law in a free country and the British race laws against free speech. In order to be convicted for inciting violence in a free country you have to actually incite somebody.
The BBC documentary was made a year ago and there is no evidence that what the BNP members said during their private meeting incited anybody.
Oh, and one other little difference. If a TV station puts on a program that incites violence in a free country, the TV Company is as liable as the person who said the words. The question of condemning the BBC has not come up, and will never come up. They are being praised as apparatchniks of the British section of the World Politically Correct Thought Police.
-. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -.
Me and John and Nick
The two main arrestees in this Thought Police Raid were BNP leader Nick
Griffin and former BNP leader John Tyndall. I know them both.
John Tyndall spoke at the 2004 New Orleans Euro Convention. He is the kind of rip-roaring speaker who brings the crowd to its feet again and again. He is a hell of an act to follow.
Well, SOMEBODY had to speak right after John Tyndall.
When John Tyndall stepped down from the podium to be mobbed by his ecstatic admirers, somebody had to go up and follow that act.
They needed a sacrificial lamb, someone who was dumb enough and loyal enough to be the anticlimax right after one of the high points of the Convention.
Guess who they picked?
Oh, well, I have taken embarrassment for the cause for lesser reasons.
A few years ago, there was a leadership change inside the BNP and Nick Griffin took over the chairmanship. Once again, both the new chairman of the BNP and I spoke.
At this year’s Euro Convention, Nick Griffin searched me out. He was already having problems with the British Government and felt I might be able to help.
-. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -.
Nick Griffin Searches ME Out
The BNP gained some votes in the latest British election and, by some strange coincidence, they were denied the right to have a bank account in Britain. Many years ago I did a lot of work moving money from country to country to help fight terrorists. Since many of the places I worked for were former British colonies, all this was better known in Britain than in the US.
Once again, can you imagine a free country in which any party, no matter how radical, was banned by the authorities from having a bank account? That’s one way they handle opposition in Britain.
Tony Blair wants to help Bush make Iraq a Land of Liberty like Britain.
Nick Griffin asked me about his banking problem, and I am going to try to set up a bank account the BNP can use here.
As soon as I got back from New Orleans I called a big-time lawyer friend of mine whom I last saw on Capitol Hill when he was setting up a bank. Our conversation was a little confused at first. Finally he got what I was talking about.
“You mean,” He said, “They won’t let them put their OWN money into their OWN bank account?” He had thought they were trying to set up a BANK. Even he, a right-wing activist for decades, was astonished at this.
My reply was, “They’re living in 1984 over there, man.”
-. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -.
The Ultimate Sacrifice
Right after the Convention, Griffin made the ultimate sacrifice: He actually READ my book, Why Johnny Can’t Think: America’s Professor-Priesthood cover to cover. He LOVED it. It is every bit as descriptive of the leftist professor tyranny of Britain as it is of the one in America.
And much of the humor in it is exactly the kind an Englishman would appreciate. It would cause a LOT of trouble over there. That is just the sort of thing this kind of government persecution is meant to stop.
Nick is ordering a couple of cases of the book for BNP distribution. He has plenty of serious matters to deal with, but finds my book important enough to add that to his plate. No matter whether they will soon be convicted or not, the British tyranny has crippled the BNP for some time.
I am proud to stand with men like Tyndall and Griffin. You will remember that when the head of the Canadian Free Speech Movement was caught with copies of my book at the Canadian border, the books were seized.
I am not in the same league as people like Tyndall and Griffin, but I am very proud to be on their side. My reason for writing the book and working to get it out there, is to try and stop the Inquisition of Political Correctness before it goes as far as it has in Britain.
Maybe we can keep some of our best men from having to face jail time for standing up for us.
7/2/05 Insider Letter
Posted by Sys Op in Insider Letter Archive on 7/2/2005
(Reprinted to Blog from email list of 7/2/05)
*** Bob’s Insider’s Message ***
This week’s WOL is about the arrest of British National Party leaders in Britain. They could not have been arrested in America.
I know the men that were arrested. All this is explained in this week’s WOL.
Right now, every European leader feels it is his duty to attack the United States because we have a death penalty. They refuse to send even people who have committed cold-blooded murder back to the United States for punishment.
But there is one gigantic difference. We may complain about their refusing to extradite criminals, but we never criticize their own abuses of the most basic rights.
One reason the political left has been so successful is because it recognizes no borders. When the local governments moved against Communists in Argentina or in Nicaragua, the entire American left began making movies about it, defending their fellow leftists.
So when Nick Griffin and John Tyndall are arrested for “inciting to violence” under Britain’s draconian anti-hate laws — though no one can name any violence they incited — the American right stays totally silent.
I look at far right-wing sites in America, and all I see is that they are still trying to sell the same old books by dead men they have been trying to sell for fifty years. On the respectable right, they do what respectable conservatives get paid for doing, ignoring the whole thing.
And the rest? They are bitching about Iraq and sending each other e-mails about how Bush is not a nice man.
You can’t push a string. The whole right is limp and lives in the past or is obsessed with the latest news.
Everything important goes on right under their noses and they don’t notice it at all.
I am getting frantic e-mails about how France and the Netherlands rejected the new European Constitution. But it never occurs to any of them that we might harness the power of Europeans who are challenging the powers that be.
If the rejection of the European Constitution is important, why aren’t we in on it?
Because we are busy pushing books by dead men and bitching about Bush.
If Europe is worth telling me about, it is worth thinking about.
If Europe’s rejection of the European Constitution is worth frantic e-mails, then it is worth our getting in on this international rebellion against our common enemies.
But if you want to get in on it, you have to START somewhere. A great way to start would be to show a little interest in the tyranny of the European Thought Police.
Let’s take a little time off from spreading the astonishing word that Bush is not a nice man and trying to sell old books by dead people. Let’s spend a little time encouraging the BNP leaders who are under assault. Let’s take a few minutes out from telling each other how bad Bush is to send some outraged letters to the British Embassy and some letters of support to the BNP.
What I am describing is happening right now. You will have another Media Event to get obsessed with next week.
And the dead guys who wrote all those books can wait.
Bob
What Might Have Made Mark Sit Up in Church
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 7/1/2005
Mark said talking religion made him sleep in church when he was a boy.
I slept too, when the hundred degree temperature and the agony of having to wear wool pants allowed me to.
But my family was in church work for at least four hundred years. I learned from the first that church work involves some of the smartest and most cold-blooded politics on earth. If the preacher had talked about THAT, you and I would have enjoyed it.
The Rabbi Joshua ben-Joseph was right when he said, “A prophet is not without honor save in his own country.”
So Paul went after the Hellenic Jews, some five or six million of them, instead of their maybe a million country cousins down in Palestine. Most Preachers are not aware that Hellenic Jews existed, much less that they BECAME the church. I mentioned one preacher said they were all Gnostics, a great general-purpose term.
So Wordism has made the Jews who accepted the Rabbi Joshua ben-Joseph into the heathens, and the Hebraic Jews into little gods.
This is typical of Wordism. Institutions routinely make the heroes the villains.
Now THAT sort of Revelation would have mde me sit up in church.
Reply to Mark
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 7/1/2005
Mark, yes my ego is very fragile and your personal remark naturally reduces me to tears.
A blog is whatever the writer wants it to be, and most of them ARE largely diaries. A blog is ALWAYS open to the public.
That is the DEFINITION of a blog, Mark.
If comments come in and the blogger wishes to encourage them, the blog has that, too. This is standard procedure.
In fact, my blog has been compromised from its original purpose by reader’s concern with my speaking too freely here. It is supposed to be a wide-open give-and-take, but some readers, not me, can’t take that.
Isn’t it odd how someone with a weak ego would publish ALL your comments?
In fact, the arguments here have gone a long way toward convincing me that my belief that the Rabbi Joshua ben-Joseph was actually the world savior I had seen him as. Commenters have convinced me that he was an extension of the strictly Jewish version of Savior so many faiths looked for.
The New Testament was written in what Old Testament worshippers consider the pagan Greek tongue, not Holy Hebrew. Jesus was “Joshua” in Greek, so Old Testament worshippers call this particular Joshua Jesus to separate his words from the other, though equally infallible, words by all the other Joshuas.
Christ is the Greek word for Messiah. There were many of them in the Hellenic world, including Hercules and Mithras.
But Joshua ben Joseph never heard himself called Jesus or Christ in his life. So, though he is the strictly Jewish version of the common savior myths in the East, it was good politics to use the Greek words just this once.
To my mind this was good politics but bad religion.
So my fragile grip on Christianity has slipped. This was something I could not have discussed in any other forum. The “Christians” will not tolerate disagreement and a less forgiving group of people I never met.
In fact the greatest weapons Christianity had was its Jewish total intolerance of disagreement. No matter how many times other faiths won, a single Christian victory was forever, backed by the stake and the torture chamber.
No faith from outside the Middle East had that vicious weapon at its disposal.
It is good to keep this in mind when one is celebrating the rejection of the European Union by France and Holland. No matter how many times it is defeated, once a country votes once, by any means, to get in, it can never get out.
I put up my religious views so others could help me come to a conclusion about the remaining bit of my professed Christianity. They have done just that.
So the blog is doing what I wanted it to do, which, as repeated by the BoardOp, is its purpose.
-
You are currently browsing the archives for July, 2005
Bob’s Books
Bob's first book - 1976 
A PLAGUE ON BOTH YOUR HOUSES
Bob's second book - 1982 
THE NEW RIGHT PAPERS
Bob's deadliest book - 2004 
Why Johnny Can't Think
America's
Professor-Priesthood
The Comments are Getting Better Than the Blog
Posted by Bob in Bob, Comment Responses on 7/8/2005
Which, of course, is the ideal of all my work.
Peter made a historical statement which was very interesting and dealt with what I had said about stirrups and saddles. It turns out Mark has horses and is very knowledgeable about them and he went into detail about the whole business of where a lance is couched and the use of stirrups.
Right or wrong, Peter will survive it.
I talked about bantams after Mark mentioned them and it turns out that Mike (I hope I got it right this time) raises chickens and uses bantam hens as mothers because they are good ones.
I think that’s the first time I ever even HEARD anyone talk about a bantam hen. It’s always “bantam rooster” like the one that jumped me in the verion of The Birds I went through sixty years ago.
People are really dumping out a lot of hard information. Some of it’s right, some of it’s wrong, but we just put it out on the table. I hope my own willingness to put it all out there and take the corrections or the guffaws has helped this process to occur.
Keep it up, gang!
5 Comments