Archive for November 10th, 2005
Race and Religion
I hope that all the pieces I was inspired to write below do not make me a preacher.
The point is to separate Christianity from Wordism. Every professional theologian wants to make Christianity into Wordism. He wants to tell that he should have money and power because all that matters is his words.
Jesus was deadly serious about his words. But his words offered us nothing but the fact that he offered us salvation.
But everybody who makes a living off religion wants us to PAY for that salvation.
And whom, pray tell, are we going to pay?
You don’t castrate yourself or destroy your race to follow Jesus.
To follow Christ, you do what is good. The white race is good, to say the least.
But the theologians want their words to be everything. They offer universal brotherhood if you follow their words and sacrifice your race and every kind of identity.
That is what every Wordist offers.
Wordists offer us Jesus versus the survival of our race.
Christ offer us salvation for doing what is good.
It so happens that the greatest theologian under heaven is Satan.
For me, what is good is important. Theology is not.
My Answeer to Jesus
Christ forgave his enemies even on the cross.
He never asked people to Praise the Lord, the way pagan gods like Jehovah did. He told them to love God.
Jesus never asked for anything.
Except once.
Once he wondered aloud, “Why don’t people love me?”
Well, Lord, since you asked, I’ll tell you.
People don’t love you because of the theologians.
People don’t love yu because they have been taught to take very word you said as a threat.
When you said people should be better, the theologians told us that you meant that if we weren’t perfect, you would throw us into the Pit of Hell.
I heard a priest say that the Rich Young Man was damned, because he didn’t give all he had to the poor and follow you.
What you said was, “If you would be perfect, sell all you have and give it to the poor and follow me.”
He gave up the chance to be an Apostle. But theologians tell us that anybody who is not perfect is damned.
You told us you hand out salvation. All the churches tell us you hand out damnation.
Who could love a Calvinist Christ?
Who could love a God who allows the pope to damn people because they do not pay him the money he wants for armed forces to protect the papal states?
Fear is easy. Any pope or any Puritan can inspire terror.
But love is an entirely different matter.
The Christ who can be loved is the one who can forgive even those who put him on the cross.
But if someone preaches a salvation that is “free and without price,” how can he make a living being a theologian?
The Bible Belt Attitude
Posted by Bob in How Things Work on 11/10/2005
I put this in Stormfront:
— The Bible Belt Attitude
In the Bible Belt where I was raised, even the atheists were strong in their faith.
In Europe, practically nobody attends church at all. In the suburbs, the church one attends is usually the one he inherited or the one that makes the most business contacts.
You almost never hear Europeans arguing about religion. In China, the whole concept of religion is utterly irrelevant to young people, Communist or not.
But we always had our village atheists, and they took it dead seriously.
One incident I remember at the University of South Carolina would never happen in Europe. A foreigner made a disparaging remark about Jesus Christ. Guess who we had to keep from fist fighting him?
Our militant atheist.
If you weren’t raised in the deep Bible Belt, away from the suburbs, this will seem odd. But if you were, you will not be the least surprised.
More Historical Context
What if you were talking to a Learned Theologian and you mentioned Islam, and his reaction was to give you a dead-fish expression and say, “What is Islam?”
I don’t know about you, but I would be deeply suspicious of what that Learned Theologian actually knew.
It won’t happen, because everybody who has the intelligence to button his shirt, and many who don’t, know what Islam is.
Half of the civilized world in the period when Christianity developed consisted of the Persian Empire. The official religion of Persia was, and had been for over a thousand years, Zoroastrianism.
Let me tell how this gets practical.
Christians always talk about Manichaeism. Manichaeism was developed by Mani, a resident of today’s Iraq. He sought to harmonize the teachings of the two great religions of his time.
The two great religions of Mani’s time were, let me repeat, Christianity and Zoroastrianism.
Saint Peter was a Manichaean in his early life. It is from that background that he derived his fanatically hatred of sex.
How can a person be an expert on religion, someone who knows all about the influence of Manichaeism, but be completely ignorant of half of the basis of Manichaeism, which is Zoroastrianism?
Easily. He just has to be a historical and theological moron.
The great religious teacher Origen actually castrated himself for Christ.
Now let me ask you something. How can you possibly get the idea that castrating yourself is a good deed by reading the Old Testament?
Where does all this monasticism and genetic suicide come from? Did Saint Paul just invent it out of his own head?
Saint Peter was a married man. Jesus said a lot about adultery, but, and this is not exactly a technical point, he never said anything against sex or procreation. Jesus had a brother. His mother had actually had sex and procreated with Joseph.
Neither Jesus nor James the Just, his brother, ever seemed to be horrified by the fact that their mother had had normal sex with a man and produced children.
But Paul tells us that it is better for a woman not to have sex at all, but “It is better to marry than to burn.”
Will anybody ever notice the fact that this makes Mary, Christ’s mother, a second-class citizen?
Of course not.
Where in heaven’s name did this Manichaeism come from?
If you get paid to talk about nothing but the Old Testament, you just avoid the question entirely. You sure can’t find the answer there.
Historical Context
Mohammed was born in 570 or 571 AD. He did not begin his preaching until he was in his forties.
That means that Islam did not exist for the first six centuries in which Christianity developed.
For fourteen centuries Christians have looked at their world as divided into Christian Europe and teh Moslem World, which controls he Holy Land.
But the point I want to make is the usual Bob Point. It so obvious it is ignored:
The world in which Christianity developed did not have a single Moslem in it.
Obviously you cannot have the slightest idea of how Christianity developed unless you know who WAS in that pre-Moslem world.
It was world of two superpowers: Rome and Iran.
When I refer to “Rome” I am referring to a people who did not know they had Fallen.
What wee call the Fall of Rome was when the City of Rome was conquered by the barbarians, meaning us.
When “Rome fell” to us barbarians, the Roman Empire which had been moved to Constantinople long since considered it a great loss.
But our history says that that was “The Fall of Rome.” In our history the day that the City of Rome fell the Roman Empire ceased to exist.
When Mexico lost the Mexican War in 1848 it lost half its territory to the United States. They didn’t like it. They thought it was a disaster. But you would have had a little trouble explaining to the Mexicans that, after 1848, Mexico ceased to exist.
So when the city of Rome fell, the Roman Empire was not aware that it had ceased to exist.
Our history says that the Roman Empire ended when the city of Rome fell. There was still what we call the Byzantine Empire, but Rome was gone.
But the Roman Empire still considered itself the Roamn Empire, just as Mexico still insisted it was Mexico after 1848.
In fact the world in which Christianiy developed paid very little attention to The Fall of Rome.
What they DID pay attention to was the two superpowers of their time, the Roman Empire and Iran.
No Moslems. The struggle for the world was between the Roman Empire and Iran.
In fact, the Roman Empire and Iran agreed that what happened out in the barbarian wilds of Britain or Gaul or Italy was not important.
It uis easy to explain to modern theologians that “Byzantium,” which still insisted it not only existed but was still the Roman Empire, was not that inerested in what happened among the barbarians.
What they CANNOT realize is that the Roman Empire back then described the two superpowers, Iran and their Roman Empire, as “the two eyes of civilization.” They lived in a world of two civilized empires, Rome and Iran.
Iran, remember, was still white.
No historian of Christianity is capable of realizing that Iran was the other superpower of the time.
Iran’s religion was Zoroastrianism, which was a religion entirely restricted to members of the Aryan race. By the time Islam began, Zoroastrianism was eighteen centuries old.
So Cyrus “did the world of God” in the Old Testament, the only non-Jew so described.
So the Magi, who were Iranian Zoroastrians, accepted Christ.
It means little today that Jesus was described as the Savior of both Persia and Rome. It meant a LOT then.
In their desperation to avoid real history, we have made the Magi into nothing but roaming “wise men.”
In the time the Book of Matthew was written the Magi represented half of the civilized world.
How can you even discuss the history of Christianity if you aren’t fully aware of that?
Sex and Suicide
One thing you notice when you look over the Wise Sayings of the old Wodenist religion is how many of them tell you why you shouldn’t commit suicide.
This is a very Aryan, Nordic problem. We always had the problem of asking ourselves that, if life is not worth living, why not kill yourself?
And historically very few people’s lives were worth living. But only the white man had a serious problem with this question. Most people have simply followed the animal programming to go on living. But the Aryan is an inventive being. He questions things that animals and other Great Civilizations never consider.
This has led us to the moon. But it has also led us to suicide.
Christianity had two things to offer to our two biggest concerns, sex and suicide.
It said, No Sex and No Suicide.
At the other end of the Indo-European migration, in India, there was the old religion we could compare to the Jews, Hinduism, and then there was the blue-eyed Savior, Gautama Buddha.
Hinduism also offered a solution to suicide, but not to sex. Hinduism said that when your body dies your consciousness does not die, it just moves on. They did not consider reincarnation to be a religious concept.
In fact, just as you and I consider that when one dies the default condition is then total oblivion, this idea never occurred to ancient Indians. They assumed that consciousness and the body were entirely separeate thing.
But the critical point is not that they BELIEVED this. They ASSUMED this. It was not faith. It was their reality.
So to a Christian, the idea that you should torture yourself and be sterile to be a Holy Man is routine. But you cannot actually KILL yourself, which would be a lot kinder.
It never even occurs to us to question this. The whole pro-life movement is based on that idea, and liberals do not question it.
This idea that sterility and self-torture is not suicide is so ingrained in our society that no liberal could question it.
Gautama Buddha introduced the concept that one should sit under banyan tree and be sterile. In fact, monasticism is a major problem in Buddhist Tibet because so many men choose to live out of hteir begging bowls and be monks that it was the only place in Asia where the problem was a population BUST, not overpopulation.
Guatama Buddha was part of the movement which rid India of its white population. The caste system is called naryu in Sanskit and naryu means “color.”
In fact, the caste system was the reason that Gautama Buddha, whose family had been in India for over a thousand years, had eyes the color of a lotus, dark blue.
But Buddha was a Wordist. He said that all that mattered were his words. He was not the cause of the end of the white race in India, but he was an integral part of the generations that caused it.
Just two thousand years ago the ruling class of India was very white indeed. That is where we got our “Arabic” numerals. That is where China got its aquatic rice.
But the problem is that Aryans do love suicide. In the cases of Christianity and Buddhism, sterility is the ideal.
Most people think that the idea that a white person being anti-white is the height of idealism is something new.
No, there is nothing new about this idea. Christianity and Buddhism simply made suicide a non-violent matter. They teach that one should CHOOSE genetic suicide to achieve glory in the next world.
The Christian-Buddhist solution to The Suicide Problem was to say, “No, THIS life is not worth living, but there is ANOTHER life.”
But the Christian-Buddhist solution also advocates that one concentrate only on that next life and that the body should die without issue in this one.
And that is the thinking that our whole ideal of white racial suicide as the ideal is based on.
It has absolutely nothing to do with Christ.
That whole mind-set can be explained, but so can schizoid paranoia.
The point of explaining it is to cure it.
Heat Hypnosis
I assume that when civil rights leaders get to Hell their first concern is about the seating arrangements.
When they are talking about getting on Southern city bus the way Rosa Parks did in 1955, the first thing they would notice would be that blacks sat in back and whites sat in front.
Actually what you would notice is that you noticed very little in the bus. Inside the bus was hotter than outside the bus, and it was HOT outside. The way we coped with that was by going into various states of hypnosis.
We spent the summer in a daze. The extreme heat weighed on us and made us semiconscious. There was no relief.
When we went inside a house there was an exhaust fan going and we were out of the sun and we were covered with sweat. It felt cool.
But I have tried that when the air conditioner goes off in recent years, and it is NOT cool.
Waiting for the bus you just stood or sat there, wrapped in your hypnosis. But what I also remember is that, when I got on the bus, it felt like suddenly walkinginto a wool blanket. Those tin cans absorbed all the sun’s heat and you were sitting in them.
I always thought I loved to swim. We used to go to a pond to swim every day in the summer. But when I moved into air-conditioned highrises that had swimming pools, I never went there.
Swimming was the only relief there was from the heat, day and night.
One problem other old Southerners will remember was getting in the car after swimming. Back then the seats were covered in plastic, plastic that had been directly in the sunlight during the cople of hours you were in the pond. As we came back to the car we always forgot that, though we were wet and cool, the world was still very hot.
“OUCH!” We almost invariably, every day, sat down on the auto seat without remembering, and we got burned. Our backs were actually red from the half second it took us to lean back against them in our bathing suits with our backs uncovered and jumping up.
Another thing I had reason to remember later had to do with being on the streets in South America. The buses down there used the same unleaded gasoline we used in the 1950s. When you are walking along and a bus goes by the smell is, well, distinctive. In fact, you get a semi-high from the gasoline, the kind that gasonline-smellers get.
That is another addiction a lot of people get hooked on and finally die of, smelling gasoline.
But we didn’t notice it because we were used to hypnosis.
And there is also cold hypnosis.
Our drugged-out generation may spend more time conscious than anyone before.




Reply to Lemon
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 11/10/2005
lemon, I would like to take you people who say you shouldn’t comment on something and tear your ears off and stuff them down your throat.
Who do think these godlike people are who SHOULD comment on things?
Now to your point:
I believe that Jesus was wholly a man.
I even hope he was not perfect man, because a perfect man couldn’t understand me any better than Jehovah could.
Jesus hungered, he thirsted, and, though I might be burned at the stake for saying it, he lusted, too.
Because he hungered and thirsted and he lusted, he knew how to tell us what to do about it, as you say.
The Old Testament begins by saying that God made us in his image.
The New Testament begins by telling us that God’s son was begotten and that he was a man.
Jesus understood us far too well for someone who was not one of us.
2 Comments