Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

More Comment Responses

Posted by Bob on November 22nd, 2005 under Comment Responses


Tim says that our biggest opposition is self hating white men.

He was bused into Ghetto Hell, so the white men assuaged their guitl by hating HIM.

Tim asked specifically for an answer. I liek that better than people who assume they have been, as one person put it, “flipped off” because I forgot or this damned machine screwed up and threw me off.

Tim, white self-hate is the problem. But it is also a table leg.

The weak bastards can be taken down if we make them look as absurd as they are. I have deveoped a technique for this. I sontantly get letters from people who ried my ways, are amazed at how well they work.

Then they tell a book I MUST read on how Bush lied in Iraq.

Tim, real politis, real powr, comes in two flavors: taht which works and that which doesn’t work.

There are no others.

I am an insect surrounded by EveryReady Men. They run into white self-hate and they just keep going and going and going. They become bitter old men when their charge runs out and the table leg has not moved.

Get your periscope over the water. We know hat the problem is. Now we must WORK on the solution. That means telling the Eeveryready Men they are EverReady Men. That means hitting hte right message over and over. That means making the other side feel EXACTLY how they don’t want to feel.

I write about it and write abut it, and one day, suddenly, it will hit you: “oh, this is all obvious when you understand it!”

Until what I am saying gels, I will just have to keep saying and saying and saying…

CL ( I hope I spelled that right) wjuotes some twit as saying that the French Willaim gave the English Harold a good pasting.

Anyone who has a nodding acquaintance with history knows that William and Charlemagne before him were less French than I am, and I’m not French at all.

William was a Norseman on both sides of his family.

Chalrlemagne, as we insist on calling him, spoke nothing but German. The Franks were one hundred percent German. He tried to give the months pure German names instead of Roman names.

Charlemagne would have recognized himself if he had been called Karl der Grosse, his German name. He would not have had the slightest idea who “Charlemagne” was.

It is a little confusing to historians that Frankfurt was where Karl der Grosse, aka Charlemagne had his palace. The Glorious allies took time out from ifrebombing civilians to destroy it in World War II. It was, after all, a German fort.

I worked on a brick plant near Karlsruhe, which means “Karl’s Rest,” where he also had a place to stay when he wasn’t on horse back.

Joe says, “I find the Congress responsible for this state of affairs. Joe Sobran, for whom I have a great deal of respect, says that the federal courts have usurped the legislative functions of the Congress. Naturally, I bow to Joe Sobran’s assertion. I still point the finger at the United States Congress for failing in its duty to be the lawmakers in our land. Surely, they didn’t “fail to notice” that the legislative function was increasingly being carried out through the federal judiciary. It seems to me that they just didn’t want to be held accountable for voting for legislation that the voters didn’t want. So they didn’t want to be held responsible. That seems to be a way of saying that they would rather be held irresponsible. I’ll vote for that.”

Joe is a rough guy so i can be rought with him.

Joe, PLEASE read what I ssaid in the first place and what I wrote to Tim.

I wrote: “BY DEFINITION a multicultural society cannot have common consent.”

Joe, let me snap my fingers in your face. How on earth could a multicultural society elect a congress that stands for anything?

You and Joe (who no longer speaks to me) need to get out of lala land!

More later. I have already had to write everything at least twice because this thing keeps breaking down.

Comment by joe rorke

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by joe rorke on 11/23/2005 - 7:08 pm

    A few years ago I bought a book that I hoped would help me understand the private language of people who are politicians and the associates of politicians. I couldn’t understand what the politicians were talking about. “Bring to the table,” “red herring,” “white elephant,” “circle the wagons,” and a whole lot of other words and phrases that made it so that I didn’t know what they were talking about. A private language. A private language for people who wanted to not tell you the truth about anything. The book I bought was by a man named William Safire. I later concluded that it was a mistake to buy this book because I didn’t think I would get the truth in this book either. Why not use plain language, I thought, and just “tell it like it is” as they used to say. I concluded it was because they didn’t want you to know “how it is.”

  2. #2 by joe rorke on 11/23/2005 - 7:22 pm

    The question is this: Did the Congress have anything at all to do with the creation of the multicultural society that now exists in our land? Did this condition come into existence all by itself, i.e., spontaneously? Did law have anything to do with it? That’s the question. Who is responsible for this? I know it’s not me. Who is the lawmaking authority in our land? In the central government. What was that that happened in 1965?

You must be logged in to post a comment.