Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Leading From the Saddle

Posted by Bob on November 29th, 2005 under History


The old kings used to rule, not from the throne, but from the saddle. They were personally riding out to confront the enemy at the farthest reaches of their realms.

We find “Charlemagne” in Rome, at war with the Saxons, on guard against the Islamic threat of invation from Spain, which his ancestor had turned back when it reached Belgium, having already conquered France.

This is very puzzling to someone who has the stereotypical picture of kingship, a guy sitting on a throne surrounded by courtiers wearing silk pants.

Historians like the latter picture of leadership. They like the idea that someone sitting and writing orders is in control.

In a museum there is the elaborate office in which General Stonewall Jackson wrote his last orders.

It is a tree stump.

General Jackson was killed precisely because his own men did not know where he was all the time. He was shot by mistake by our own men.

Lee always looks in the pictures like a mellow Southern Gentleman. Actually his officers regularly had to hold him back from charging right into the battle. Once the troops were yelling, “General Lee to the rear! General Lee to the rear!” Lee, the man they counted on for their lives, had charged right into the battle, bullets flying around him.

Lee shouted, “I will withdraw, but will you beat these people?” The troops shouted they would, and would General Lee PLEASE get the hell out of there and let THEM take the risks?

Now let us come down, with a loud thump, from Generals Lee and Jackson to Bob Whitaker.

This is important:

When I write, I am not writing from a Seat of Wisdom. I am thinking out loud. I am riding around the field of ideas. If you think I have a Formula for Success, you are not only looking at the wrong person, you are looking at the wrong RACE.

Einstein, a good Jew, wanted a fixed universe based on the fixed speed of light. Heisenberg, an Aryan, was comfortable with the Principle of Uncertainty. Einstein died fighting that: “God does not play dice witht he universe.”

The Aryan and the Jewish- Chinese points of view are not only worlds apart, they are UNIVERSES apart.

MANY universes.

Einstein wanted one universe ruled by One Jehovah and One Book. None of this even OCCURRED to Heissenberg. Being an Aryan, he was interested in what truth WAS, not in imposing his Truth upon the universe.

So my intellectual life is not giving you a final truth which comes from where I am sitting.

This is a practical matter. Once people decide that I have a lot to say, they begin to ask me what we have been taught to ask of Great Philosophers:

“OK, Bob, you have given me PART of the truth, not give me the WHOLE truth.”

I am giving you what I think I have figured out. I am not even wedded to that.

You show me it is not true and I’ll go with YOU. So how can anyone think that I have some kind of rock-solid Final Truth, the one everybody else claims?

I do not try to rule, but I try to LEAD.

And I lead from the saddle.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by Bruce on 11/29/2005 - 6:26 pm

    “Einstein wanted one universe ruled by One Jehovah and One Book.”

    In regards to that statement, Einstein did not believe in the God of the old testament. He believed in Spinoza’s god, an impersonal god who set the universe up but has nothing to do with man. Einstein even went so far as to praise Lenin. You are right, however, that he had the mindset of a rigidly defined universe.

  2. #2 by Peter on 11/29/2005 - 6:41 pm

    No, no, Uncle Bob you misunderstood me again.

    Don’t get distracted by mere words like “plan ahead.” Maybe I used a wrong word for the context.

    Rather than become a depressed alcoholic, I like to think ahead on what we can DO, how things can BE: like Charleston, a restored virginized forest, how the family farm can be a success and a source of independence in a new America, how physics will take new leaps forward, how the Aryan can surpass the speed of light and shoot for the stars.

    We can’t get lost in the past. Take a city of the future: Charleston. This city as you know was shelled to ruin in the war that gave America her present time. However it was REBUILT to perfection and today it is still English North America’s most beautiful.

    Do you know any salesman who went home right after he dumped the ashes on a lady’s carpet? Do you know a gospeller who ended a revival right after he told everyone they were so sinful that they were damned to hellfire and brimstone?

    Clearly planting a seed to bring the fall is the most pressing task. But how beautiful can that carpet get? What about the heavenly glories of salvation? This is what Charleston is just one example of.

    My feeling, and it is strong, is that you CONTINUE what you are doing but while you rehearse the words of freedom: PC IS THE STATE RELIGION, THE THIRD WORLD IS FLOODING ***ALL*** WHITES COUNTRIES AND ***ONLY*** WHITE COUNTRIES, MULTICULTURALISM IS A CODE WORD FOR ***GENOCIDE***…, tell us stories of how great things can be, like on Charleston (as just one example). Examples of Aryan wonders are really limitless.

    This is why the Germans were so successful in Germany. They inspired folks, they did not focus only on what was wrong as the contemporary Communists did.

    The Germans were successful in Germany because they were able to inspire all the folks who knew what to do, the architects: the historical preservationists, the foresters, the sustainable farmers, the physicists…

    Before the Communist wall fell, there were lots of talk about how bad Communism was, but nothing on the future. So it should surprise no one that these states are still a mess. If there was nothing there before, there is nothing there now.

    If the old time evangelists ended their talk at the NEED of salvation, folks would have left the tents and arbors depressed and turned their lives to Bourbon.

    Your next piece on “Leading from the Saddle” is getting close to a VISION. Please tell us more, Uncle Remus

    But bourbon isn’t very inspiring. Have a cigar instead.

  3. #3 by Bruce on 11/29/2005 - 7:01 pm

    Regarding your piece of the truth, I assume you had some interesting things to say in your previous books and this seems as good a place to ask about them as any. What were your earlier books about? A Plague on Both Your Houses and the New Right Papers are both linked from your homepage to the amazon pages without a description.

  4. #4 by Peter on 11/29/2005 - 7:03 pm

    Inspiring! Some high schools friends of mine who now live in Columbia gave me framed and matted pictures of Stonewall and Lee. They hang over my dresser with a really nice Booey knife. My Shenandoah Deitsch ancestors fought under Stonewall, one was the Chief Bugler of a regiment.

You must be logged in to post a comment.