Anonymous says,

“John Ashbrook probably was murdered. So was his brother, right?”

“What I object to is your implication that political murders (literal or figurative) are a liberal specialty. You said “liberals sure do get lucky.” You said it more than once. Well, JFK and RFK et al didn’t exactly slip on a banana peel, either.
In your recent stuff, you’ve been saying that the difference between liberals and conservatives isn’t so important any more. That makes sense. You’ve also said that the biggest problem people like you and David Duke have are the conspiracy theorists. That makes sense, too.”

“Today you’re saying that conservatives are dropping like flies because of liberal conspiracies. I’m confused. Yes, powerful people often kill their enemies. That unfortunate reality predates John Stuart Mill by quite a few millenia. So what’s up with the conspiracy theories and liberal vs conservative wordism today? ”

John’s brother was strangled to death in a field by the mob. I don’t blame the left for THAT.

But In John’s case a good friend of mine died under VERY suspicious circumstances and the media never brought up any question about it. I don’t think you would be happy if that happened to you.

When Buono died under wildly improbable circumstances and the media didn’t question it naturally stuck out in my mind.

Right-wingers can and do kill the same way left-wingers do. But when the Kennedys and MLK were killed, every possible right-wing connection to their deaths was investigated and discussed.

There is a giant difference between a Media Conspiracy and a media that is just glad John Ashbrook is dead and refuses to discuss how it may have happened.

A Conspiracy is a lot cleaner.