Peter has gotten down to the meat of what we are doing. Four days ago he talked about a discussion he had had and whether he had done it right.

In fact, it was such a critical set of points he made that I said I would have to think about it first. That is why this reply is so late.

Peter said,

I was talking to a man at church today. He was from Pennsylvania but had lived for a while in California where he was a legislative aid for an assemblyman. He noticed two things as he made his rounds around his district: that the real Californians with money and ranches that had lived there for more than a hundred years had Southern accents (similar to west Texas), the other was that so many of the old-time Californians were Nordics. We were trying to figure out why, when he suddenly switched gears and said that unless we believe there is only race there will be genocide like the Nazis. I was disappointed that he would back out like that. I said if there were only race, then it would be OK if someone committed genocide against one group (such as by sterilization), since there was only one race anyway. If we are all the same, then there was no such thing as genocide, so a bad guy could do as he wanted.”

“He looked shocked. Then he repeated something which led me to rephrase what I said, but I had the feeling that it would have been a wee bit sweeter if I had stopped when he looked shocked (confused, actually, like “wow”). I ended by letting him do all the talking so he could be the boss.”

“My question is: Is it better to stop without repeating when you get the dawning look in their eye so it can sink in, or is it better to repeat it a couple times to make sure you made the point you intended, and not something else? ”

Comment by Peter

First if all, Peter, in over fifty years of very successful discussion I have never once had one that I did not think of something I should have said later.

Listen to my first programs for Stormfront this year and you will hear uhs and throat-clearing and other things that will drive you up the wall.

So you forgot much of what I am trying to teach you.

You are not there to be loved. You are there to make some points. When the enemy is in retreat, you don’t let him be the boss.

First of all, never forget the INVALUABLE PRONOUN:

“I.”

When someone mentions Hitler, he is saying that because you want to save YOUR race, you are t he kind of person who would commit mass murder.

REACT ACCORDINGLY.

If somebody mentions Hitler, they have just given you a license to kill.

You don’t go to pieces, you just put him on the defensive. COMPLETELY on the defensive. He just accused you of something.

The magic words are “I” and its little friend “MY.” He has just insulted you as much as any person CAN, but you leave it to blacks and Jews and other minorities to be offended.

It’s the perfect time to get in Bob’s Mantra:

“Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours in EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries. ”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries.”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I want the final solution to the BLACK problem.”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to ntoice and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

But if I say that, I’m a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews. Why do you SAY that about **********ME********!!?

Peter is talking about the battle we are fighting, and he senses exactly where he made a mistake.

Way to go, Peter!