I never discourage comments. If you feel like it, say whatever you want to.

But what I have hit you with here, and my plea for help in our seminar, puts a considerable burden on you.

When Peter hit me with his point that started all this, I took several days off from replying to him.

Finding something to add to a seminar is a lot harder than talking about the latest Bush lie or the Korean War .. sorry, I mean the Iraqi War.

So I will happily suffer time facing Comments (0) if you will spend the meantime thinking about our seminar the way I thought about replying to Peter.

We have the message. We need to spread it.

And somebody bcsides Bob has discovered the deep secret of all this, which is hidden in plain sight.

Antonio says,

“Bob, My experience leads me to wonder if there is something congenitally wrong with our people and the only remedy is to tear power from their grasp.”

“A few years ago I lived in a loft with five roomates. There we were, five white kids living in Spanish harlem behind an iron fence and barred windows. One of my roomates was a New England Anglo Saxon who’s ancestor fought in the Revolutionary war. He made a good income and devoted his free time to teaching illeagal hispanic imigrants to read and write. To his amazement most of his students were illiterate in Spanish as well. Some couldn’t read the floor numbers in an elevator. He felt just terrible for them.”

“One day he was out walking in the Barrio with our pretty blond female roomate and some Latino Youths began yelling threats and insults at them. They kept walking. The girl said “Those lousey _____ want to kill us!” The guy replied, “No they want to kill me. You they just want to beat and gang-rape.” And he wasn’t joking. But he kept volunteering his free time to help educate the “newcomers” and give back to the community, not caring that the community hated him for being white. And he wasn’t alone. Another friend of mine teaches swimming and martial arts at the community center in the same neighborhood.”

“What do you do with people who are impervious to argument because they’re locked into a death spiral like some suicide cult member?”

Comment by Antonio Fini — 12/

Antonio, every soldier who has ever held a dying comrade in his arms has knows that, back home, tens of thousands of people were using the war for profit.

There are no exceptions to this.

In every single case that soldier has had two options. 1) He could encourage his fellow fighters to keep up the fight or he cold 2) obsess on the profiteers and tell them they should get out of way and let the enemy have theirmiserable homeland taht was full of traitos and opportunists.

Your mistake is that thinking that the guy you are talking is any different from the war profiteers because he is not making money off of his treason. There is NO difference.

There will always be us and the traitors. We must decide whether we will follow reaction 1) or reaction 2).

As for taking power AWAY from people, I have just engaged in a long explanation of why it is that no one HAS power.

We are steppting into a vacuum that I have very, very carefully explained.

If you think there is something congenitally wrong with us, you may not believe that the Jews in Nazi Gemany and the Russians under Stalin reacted even WORSE than we are reacting.

The South African Boere are truly pathetic.

Please stop hitting on Reaction 2) and get in the battle with me.

This is a critical moment. I need a seminar, not a bitching session.

I have met you, Antonio, and I need you desperately to jump in here right here and right now.

For every ten thousands bitchers there is one person who can actually THINK.

You are the one in ten thousand. Knowing that is the only reward you will get.

But as you approach my age, you will learn that all the praise in the world means very little compared to the approval of what you have done by the one person in the world whose approval means everything to you.

Yourself.

The first part of explaining where this transformation from a lecture to a seminar is for me to explain my attitude towards how we got here.

As I have said, the real money in writing is in ghosting. I have ghost-written everything, from books to articles to off-hand quips to short replies to news releases to endless numbers of speeches.

The most cathartic experience of my life was when I sat down in 1975 and wrote my OWN book. It made me no money, and I wrote put it under my name because no one else could take responsibility for it. The reason for this is in the title:

A Plague on Both Your Houses.

If you look at Plague today you will wonder what all the excitement was about.

Which is precisely why it was, to my mind, such a success. National Review had a review of Plgue called Read This One! by one of its senior editors. Its publisher did the Foreword.

But Plague was such a vicious attack on conservatives that the publisher of NR had to exempt himself in the Foreword from my acidic comments on William Buckely, founder and owner of NR.

Right after NR’s publisher wrote the Foreword and a senior editor demanded that NR readers “Read This One!” National Review had a cover article attacking me and the book called “To the Nashville Station,” an illusion to Lenin’s arrival at the Finland Stattion when he came back to Russia in 1917. The idea was that I was leaing conservatives into a working-class revolution.

And that was just the confusion on the right.

Leftist reviews poured out, saying that while the book claimed it was damning both liberals and Democrats and the Republicans and the establishment right, it was really only aimed at the left.

Noneof them mentioned National Review’s front-page attack on me. None of them mentioned the number of conservative congressmen who would walk up to me at a cocktail party and then ostentatiously turn their backs.

More than one historian has pointed out that Thomas Paine’s pamphlet Common Sense was as necessary to American independence as Washington and Bejamin Franklin were.

Plague was as influential in making the Reagan Revolution as Paine was in making the one two centuries before.

And the reson Plague was so successful was precisely because if you read it today, you would wonder what all the excitement was about.

That is because everybody now takes for granted what I was considered such a heretic for writing.

It drove my loyal wife up the wall to see writers stealing whole blocks of my ideas without any acknowledgement. I was proud of it.

A major part of the reason I was so tolerant was because the book was, as I say, cathartic. What I did was spend two years writing and rewriting a book that simply explained why human beings act the way they do.

As I wrote it, I learned from it. I began the book by thinking of condemning PEOPLE. I ended up condemning the HOUSES conservatievs and liberals had built, and how they had come to build them in usch an awful way.

So it came to me as no surprise that people who made a living writing and commenting would us what I wrote and never mention my awful name. Most of them picked what I had to say third-hand, and had no idea I had come up with it.

By the time I finished, I was mad at hardly anybody. In the end, my reaction was to laugh at people was being so shallow and unquesioning.

That is why the book was so successful that its success wasn’t even noticed.

And that is also why I was the least popular person on Capitol Hill. People can take a diatribe. But when a professional exposes them naked to the world the way I did, they never forgive.

Explaining this to my loyal German wife, who wanted me to have the credit I deserved, was not possible. Even now, long after our divorce, she is still angry about it.

A couple of years ago I received an e-mail from her with another of my filched ideas in it.

But as you become older, you can either become bitter or you can achieve understanding. And if you are becoming a bitter old man, I would highly recommend that you try skydiving without a parachute.

This long enough for one piece. I hope what I write above will explain how it fits into the general picture I am trying to draw.

For the first time in my life, I am no longer lecturing on basics.

Peter went out and started WORKING on getting our points out, and Mark has some in with advice as a professional salesman.

Here are Peter’s latest two contributions:

I saw the man yesterday inside church before we went home. Two nice old ladies came by to listen, because they “like history so much.” I’ll try to give you a summary for you to think about. I am including longer details so you get a clearer picture.

As I was speaking to the man, I recalled that he hadn’t slung the Nazi thing at me, but used it to explain why HE avoided racial loyalty. This is HIS fear. I decided to use your response anyway. He said, no when he thought white loyalty would lead to killing, he didn’t mean that I was the kind of man that would do that. Because I believed him, we were in a church with excellent acoustics, I have the loudest speaking voice known to man, and the two old ladies and others were listening, I decided it would be bad to go on the attack.

I did, however use most of your arguments (multiculturalism, genocide, the PC religion). He REALLY liked your arguments, since they were phrased just like his own thoughts and he caught the good humor in them.

However, the trick may be tailoring effective arguments to the situation, and seeing what is the central questions in the other man’s mind. I ran through a litany of other answers to his objections. I said racial genocide is murder, but love cannot be hate, love does not lead to killing, race is part of God’s creation, man is created in God’s image, etc…

But the central issue was his fear. I have encountered the identical fear in both liberals and conservatives and it all comes down to the PC version of WWII, the Jews’ great blood libel, which covers up their own genocidal crimes against humanity.

Fear does not well respond to reason. The fear had already led to a rationalization: that the only real race is the kingdom of God. I said that this was much like the gnostic heresy (he knows quite a lot about that and the problems it has led to in American religion), that Jesus came down into history to make our lives better now, before we die, but countering what he said does not work because the real issue is his fear.

Actually, though the conversation was very encouraging. Here is a good man and intelligent, who probably represents the overwhelming majority who think just like us but are waiting for a strong man (or anything viable) to come along and show signs of success. And the masses will through their weight in.

He told me, too, that when he was first hired as the legislative aid on the staff of the assemblyman, he was asked at some kind of a board meeting what he thought was the most important issue of the age. His answer: race. When he was met with total silence, he knew he had hit upon the right answer. But his fear kicked in, too.

So, the only thing I could think of to address the issue of fear was to return to the Scotch-Irish. He was interested in a bit how their history began as Anglo-Saxons in the old English kingdom of Northumbria. The two old ladies listening liked that. (One has red hair.) He accepts his heritage with pride but is guarded because of his fear that ethnic pride leads to killing.

At some point when I first talked to him, he had said UNguardedly, that he did believe there was one race that did deserve extinction, but at that point, he looked terribly embarrassed and I did not twist the knife. I can only guess what he meant.

In any case, I can’t say I have had a conversation like this before. He is fascinating to listen to. He had interesting things to say, such as: Westerners living in the dry West developed strong bodies, but weak minds (and Northeasterners have weak minds and weak bodies). I said he hit the nail on the head. He often has long friendly conversations with people after the service, not surprising for a man who used to travel around a district talking to strangers.

Comment by Peter