Derek said,
“Thanks Bob. ”
“I used to read a lot of philosophy. The serious stuff like Nietzsche, Arelius, Evola, Fouccalut etc., etc. but lacked some serious, everyday common sense. I could quote these guys but not apply any of it to real life (outside of the easy maxims of Nietzsche).”
“Real people don’t have time to be psuedo-intellectuals. There is too much to enjoy in living life rather than speculating on it. Real life requires little rhetoric and much action.”
“I just started using the simplification method last night. My roomates and I started talking about women in combat. They were for it. I, being a former Navy man, vehemently disagreed. I was talking from experience and they were talking from speculation. ”
“I stated my case and then didn’t back down. I told them how all this PC crap hinders unit performance and cohesiveness. I saw it daily. Immigrants couldn’t communicate and women could hardly ever handle the stress.”
“I made my point and did it quick. I stuck to my guns and didn’t waste my time with nit-picking or lame speculation. They wasted 45 minutes talking each others ears off while I enjoyed my Manhattan.”
“I think that it worked.”
This put a picture in my mind.
For centuries the Roman Army had formula that worked. The only way to stop them would have been to say to the Romans, “OK, we all know you are experts and standing shield to shield and using the short sword to jab at your enemies.”
“But is that ALL you know how to do? Why don’t you prove you can do other things with cavalry and different formations?”
A Roman who thought he was Really Shrewd would have proved that he knew more than that one tactic.
If they had been Shrewd the Romans would have proved that they didn’t have to stay in a tight unit. They could fight it out inthe open field man-to-man.
While they ruled the know world the Romans never got Shrewd.
They just kept conquering stuff.
Over and over.
The trick was that the enemy had to break up the Roman Army. The Roman Army remained a unit and couldn’t be broken up.
Now let’s see if I can stretch this analogy.
People who argue with our enemies keep thinking that they have to convince THEM. It never occurs to them that the enemy must convince US.
So when they come at us on race, we use Bob’s Mantra:
” Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries.”
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I want the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”
“But if I say that, I’m a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”
“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
But the point is not that is THE position. That is YOUR position. They have to break it up.
You stay in formation.
They can try to talk about why THE white race should survive. You ask them if they would ask the black man above the same question.
They say blacks have a history of persecution. You ask if the black position is therefore inferior to their ideals.
You admit that you are not God. You are loyal to your own people justlike everybody else is.
They say they are loyal to ideals, not to a race. You talk about Wordism. You ask them if they have any loyalty to ANYTHING. Would they sell out America if they thought the other side had the principles?
You stay in formation.
No matter what they say they are answering YOU. YOU are in formation. YOU have your loyalties.
Where the hell ARE they? Can anybody TRUST them?
You are loyal. You have your ground.
Where are THEY?
Never break ranks.
Which means you must have trained yourself on exactly where you stand.
This is simple.
It is NOT easy.
#1 by Derek on 12/30/2005 - 7:58 pm
It isn’t easy when you have a crowd of people telling you that you are a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews that you are not a nazi, but merely someone committed to his race. But it is worth it.
I have been fighting this battle for 5 years now. Once I dropped out of college and entered the real world I could see how Political Correctness and liberalism is a diseased thought process.
Liberal thought processes are not the basis for making good, rational decisions. They are biases that are aimed at self-degeneration and self-hatred. In this they create an outward hatred for others. How many people do you know that hate themselves but love others? Not too many.
When you are dealing with an enemy that has no regard for themselves it is a lot tougher because it seems that they are in large numbers nowadays.