Derek says,

“Bob –

“I had another thought. This is a little unrelated to the post, but wanted to share it anyway.”

“The message we are attempting to spread is ‘wordism’ to someone else i.e. blacks or jews. Just like all politics can be reduced to one amobea trying to be the top one, all races are trying to assert themselves as the head honcho. But it seems that only one race is the subject of EVERYBODYS anguish.”

“Ours.”

“Ours was the one that produced the most. That established the best. That conquered virtually all. So it seems to me that we should be prominent as we have done so much already.

“So then, IN MY OPINION, you have to believe that what you want for your own people is right and the only truth their is. It requires faith. ”

“Faith seems hard to come by in the world of politics. ”

Faith?

In POLITICS?

You ARE young, aren’t you?

Here is the thinking you led me into:

The problem whites really face is exactly the one Jews CLAIM they face. Jews will tell you that the reason everyone hates them is because of their virtues.

They say they are hated because everyody feels inferior to them.

When Kissinger said, “Any people that has been persecuted for two thousand years is doing something WRONG” he violated the fundamental doctrine of self-pity which is all that is left of modern Jewish religion.

Judaism has degenerated into self-pity. Christianity has degenerated into self -hatred.

Jews desperately need self-ctriticism. White gentiles desperately need to stop hating themselves.

This is not brain surgery. A people that has been given a license to pity themselves to the point any rational person would laugh at them is going to go overboard.

That is license Jews got in 1945. From the same source and the same time, white gentiles were given orders to blame everything on themselves. Naturally, just as the Jews did, they turned it into a sickness.

This leads me directly back to your comments:

“So then, IN MY OPINION, you have to believe that what you want for your own people is right and the only truth their is. It requires faith. ”

Yes, you could call it faith. But it might be easier to explain it this way:

The only race that is not absolutely convinced of white supremacy is the white race. If Derek had the same mind-set as any black or Chinese, it would never even occur to him that it should occur to him that whites are superior.

Let me illustrate this with a typical Whitaker point, meaning a point that is so obvious no one even considers it. It is this:

“How often do Orientals or blacks think of each other?”

You can read an entire issue of Black News or a Chinese newspaper and never see a word written by blacks about Orientals or a word written by Orientals.

This is so routine you don’t even NOTICE it.

For non-whites, there is only one race on the Planet Earth: whites.

To go to Mark’s point, we need to make this part of our world picture. We must convince non-whites that we have a right to survival and a lot to offer.

And the fact is that other races take it for granted that we are MORALLY superior to them. Once again, this is so obvious no one notices it.

The very idea that any other race would worry about OUR survival is assumed, by EVERYBODY, to be a joke. The very idea that we would ignore a threat to any other race’s EXISTENCE is unthinkable.

Back to Bob’s Mantra:

” Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries.”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I want the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I say that, I’m a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

NOW, what if I DID say, “There was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries.”

Does ANYONE doubt that the first people to give me hell would not be black, they would be WHITE?

No one, anywhere on this planet, has the slightest doubt that whites would leap to the defense of the right to exist to exist.

Even Bob, who wrote Bob’s Mantra, has the slightest hope that any OTHER race will address itself to genocide against whites.

We all assume that whites are CAPABLE of this. We want whites to repeat it and INSIST on it. But it would never occur to any of us that any NON-WHITE would feel MORALLY obligated to take white survival seriously.

Only whites do that for other races. Once again, this assumption if so total, so obvious, that we do not even SEE it.

Whites do not have to prove anything. we do not need to have faith in anything.

Our real problem is that everyone, including whites, assume our supremacy, both moral and creative, to the point that our very existence is threatened.

No matter how badly I feel about what I said before, I NEVER try to make up for it by giving false praise.

Antonio, unfazed by my attacks, gave us two great additions to our seminar before I even apologized.

Let me quote them and then explain why they are on target:

]
Antonio Fini Bob I’ve been thinking about your comment to my comment and I’ve yet to think of a magic bullet solution what I’m going to start doing is hammering on the racism of liberals.

My observation about conservatives is they spend their lives secretly wondering when blacks and browns are going to undergo a flash of inspiration and realize that America is a great country, Ronald Regan was a great President and the welfare/ affirmitave action state is destructive and wrong. In other words they believe every intelligent black man has a level headed, white, middle class conservative inside of him struggling to get out.

Same thing with jews.

Liberals on the other hand suffer no such delusions. They know negros are hopeless, and homosexuals are incurrably sick. But it makes them feel good to give away other peoples money and rights to help the underclass.

I mean to keep pounding away on my liberal friends that they don’t really believe in equality. They believe in White Man’s Burden and the eternal misery and hopelessness of non-whites. Also the vengeful ruthlessness of jews. The last thing they want is for blacks and browns to become answerable for their own problems, like adult human beings.

What I mean to hammer home to conservatives is that the liberals are exactly right in their racist assesment of non-whites. It’s O-k to have racist feelings because Hillary and Oprah and Rosie O’Donnell have the exact same feelings. They’re just willing to exploit other people’s misery to demonstrate their holiness to the world.

Antonio Fini

To expand on my point Bob, the Austrian liberals are loudly condeming Govenor Schwarteneggar for signing off on the execution of Black mass muderer Tookie Williams. They even want to name an Austrian football stadium after Tookie, to embarass Arnold.

Now the Austrians I know are a pretty lawful, even obedient bunch of people. They won’t cross against a red light on an empty street at 2am.

So what would Austrian liberals do if a white man walked into a store and shotgunned an entire family of Chinamen? Probably revive the death penalty for him. But a Black mass murderer is said to be “Most admirably rehabilitated” when he refrains from knifing any corrections officers. Why?

Because liberals expect Blacks to commit senseless acts of violence and Whites to obey the law. Liberals are racist to the core.

Conservatives on the other hand know that if only Tookie had read Ayn Rand and Ludwig von Mises he could have developed into a brilliant capitalist entrepeneur. It is conservatives, not liberals who believe in the infinite perfectability of man.

We need to expose liberal racial hypocracy to conservatives. They already know about liberal economic hypocracy.

Antonio, the only magic bullet there is is the kind of hard thought you have given here.

Notice how Antonio’s discussion is TARGETED. It outlines a different approach of each of a group of our enemies. It doesn’t mk ake the whole problem the Jews or the Communists or any other single group of evil geniuses.

Respectable conservatives are masters of self-deception. They are MASTERS of Goodthink. That is the only way to stay respectable and never see anything liberals do not want you to see.

But I did not go the next step Antonio has here. Respectable cosnervatives may be the only people on earth, including blacks, who BELIEVE that blacks are innately equal to whites.

As Fini says, “In other words (respectable cosnervatives) believe every intelligent black man has a level headed, white, middle class conservative inside of him struggling to get out.”

Brilliant. What is funny is that I have OBSERVED this for decades as a conservative attitude, but I have never rbought it right out the way Antonio does. I knowe now that the strange feelig I had in dealing with conservatives was that they BELIEVED this crap.

Now this is what a seminar is all about. Somebody else analyses what a grizzled old veteran has seen and seen nd puzzled about but never really understood. Working all alone leaves you in a lot os intellectual blind alleys like that.

Fini finishes is thought in the second comment brilliantly,

“It is conservatives, not liberals who believe in the infinite perfectability of man.”

I very nearly stood up and cheered. If you read National Review, you see that all the time. I have a free lifetime subscription to NR and have seen that over and over.

But, as Sherlock Holmes kept telling Doctor Watson, I have SEEN it, but I have not previously OBSERVED it.

The technical term for this, by the way, is, “Bringing an idea to the level of theoretical awareness.”

It is one of the basic functions of a seminar.

Can you believe that the same Bob who wrote those nasty replies last night was the same one who wowed you a few days ago with the wisdom that “This Blog is supposed to be FUN!?”

The same one who wisely told you the story of the great advice he received a quarter of a century ago that nobody has any use for an Agry OLD Man?

Ladies first. Shari, please accept my apology.

And Mark and Antonio and whowever else I blew up at last night.

My praise of Derek stands. He has gotten the messsage big-time and did what I reallly admire. He put whole wads of what I said into a short summation.

Now let’s see if I can find some way to wriggle out of this mess.

First of all, when I tell you about stupid people, you now know it is nit just theory. You are hearing from one who has practiced stupidity and, if I may brag a little, does a better job of it than almost anybody else when he really gets going.

Admit it. It takes a political pro to come up with a twisted excuse like that.

You could do me a really big favor by really accepting my apology.

This inexcusable blow-up may have done me some good.

What Shari did was to give me some good advice on how things look at the level of reality, the way Peter did.

Antonio would not be who he is if he was disgusted with our people’s behavior. The stomach-turning example he gave us of the guy who kept getting kicked by Hispanics and not only accepted it but JUSTIFIED it is the sort of reaction anyone I would care to associate with is going to have.

In fact, each thing that was said was part of the very dialogue I am trying to have.

I will be dealing rationally with each of hte points made — and I am sure I missed an important one I will haev to reread last night’s material to deal with.

But it is hard right now because I am trying to get over the embarrassment.

It is hard even to write this.

I am very tired, and it seems my dream of a seminar has gone down in ruins, though I’ll feel better tomorrow.

Derek saved the evening for me. He said,

“The mantra is simple. I have read a million little studies about getting people “on the same page”. Much like getting a group of youngsters to sing “row, row, your boat” we need to get people to start singing the race problem is really the white problem. ”

“This is simple and effective.”

Thank you, Derek!

We CAN change everything. But we have to make a beginning. We have to develope the means to get our message down to basics and sell those basics.

Western science started with people like Newton applying simple gravity everywhere. It got going with Occam’s Razor, which said all the scholastic complications were absurd.

We now have while blackboards full of equations that WORK from simple basic laws of thermodynamics.

And every inch of the way we had to fight the byways that lead nowhere.

A classic remark to Galileo was, “You cannot overturn the whole weight of Genesis with a tube that has a piece of glass in each end.”

He DID overturn the authority of Genesis with a tube that had a piece of glass in each end. Even the most literal Bible literalist still insists that the earth is the center of the universe and the stars were just spread around it.

His enemies were reduced to imprisoning people for disagreeing, just as they are today against us.

As Derek says, while everybody else is arguing with established religion point by point, we need to see what strict attention to reality can do.

That is what built white society, and that is how we save it.

IN MY OPINION, Bruce has just completed the list of what we have been doing wrong.

Shari told us it’s hard and she doesn’t see much hope.

Those are two of hte mandtras taht have made the world what it is today.

Antonio followed with the Bitching Syndrome.

Now Mark says,

“Do you just want to restrict your method of stating the obvious about race, or expand it to other, related areas?”

“For instance, I think it’s obvious that the Iraq war is a bad one because Bush didn’t get the constitutionally required declaration of war. It’s not the lies about WMD, nor the question of him getting approval from other countries, nor even the question of who’s interests we are really fighting for, although those are all important in a small picture kind of way. The big picture on our wars is that every single one from Korea till today didn’t go through the constitutionally required channel. Most of todays peaceniks want to stop the Iraq war, I want to create an atmosphere of understanding where the people will no longer allow any Korean/Vietnam/Iraq wars on legal grounds. Whether Bush lied about some detail has nothing to do with the next series of war and therefor contitutes a distraction from the big picture. I want to focus on the big picture.”

It reminds me of an spisode of Blackadder I was just watching. The World War I Blackadder is informed by the general that there is a new strategy.

Blackadder says, “Would this new strategy consist of marching slowly across No Man’s Land against the enemy?”

The general is upset. This plan was Top Secret. How did Blackadder know it?

“Because, general, it isthe same plan we usd the last seventeen times.”

The general replies, “Yes, and that is what is so brilliant about it. The enemy will never expect us to use the same strategy AGAIN!”

I know I am being unfair to everyody here, but Mark I was here when the Korean War was on. Nobody wanted to talk about race,they wanted to talk about The Big Picture.

It is true that NOBODY declares war any more. Britain and Argentina were blasting each other out of the ocean and possibility os declaring war never even came up.

Mark, you are asking us to join in the chorus a million voices have been singing for fifty years. Do we really need ten more opponents to the Iraq War?

You are all I have. When conservatives were theorizing about a Southern Strategy, handful of us went out and got the experience with working-class conservatives that made the big difference. Then conservatives went back to telling each other how brilliant they were and how brilliant the neoconservatives,who had as much to do with the swing vote of working peopple as a pig has to do with a porcupine were.

No, we will not fit into the Big Picture. We will very much have to do our own thing.

We have to stop talking about how bad some incidents are. We have to stop thinking this is a battle that will be won or lost tomorrow. If I hear, “This is our last chance!” one more time, I’m going to puke.

You will not have an easy time. You will not make friends or impress people by how what we say fits into the Big Picture. Only you will know WHAT you have won. We will not reach an earthly paradise.

No. No. No. No. No.

Derek said it best. It is called getting all of us on the same page.

Shari says,

It’s hard. I don’t see a whole lot of chance to be effective. But, here and there. I send to my sister-in-law, my older son is more or less on the same wave. So we’ll see what happens. I came to the conclusion that power in a white country belongs in the hands of whites, some time ago. And more specifically, predominately, white men. I think that kind of power would be influencial on others as well. Not the “power gives me a cruel chuckle” kind. The reason why agression against us is getting worse is because we’re not doing what we ought to, whether others recognize it, ot not. Other peoples have been set adrift, too, I think. Shari

The first two sentences have been killing us from the word go.

After fify years and two nervous breakdowns, I am am aware that it is hard. Changing the course of world history has never been al that easy.

But try not see this as just a bad time. Try to think of it as a stage of history we have reached over decades precisely because no one has done the real work we need to do.

The field is empty. No one is out there directed at doing this, as Derek says. If we can change teh basic dialogue from asssimilation and tolerance to genocide, which is its gtrue nature, everything will be made different.

It is almost impossible to get anybody to understand that.

I never discourage comments. If you feel like it, say whatever you want to.

But what I have hit you with here, and my plea for help in our seminar, puts a considerable burden on you.

When Peter hit me with his point that started all this, I took several days off from replying to him.

Finding something to add to a seminar is a lot harder than talking about the latest Bush lie or the Korean War .. sorry, I mean the Iraqi War.

So I will happily suffer time facing Comments (0) if you will spend the meantime thinking about our seminar the way I thought about replying to Peter.

We have the message. We need to spread it.

And somebody bcsides Bob has discovered the deep secret of all this, which is hidden in plain sight.

Antonio says,

“Bob, My experience leads me to wonder if there is something congenitally wrong with our people and the only remedy is to tear power from their grasp.”

“A few years ago I lived in a loft with five roomates. There we were, five white kids living in Spanish harlem behind an iron fence and barred windows. One of my roomates was a New England Anglo Saxon who’s ancestor fought in the Revolutionary war. He made a good income and devoted his free time to teaching illeagal hispanic imigrants to read and write. To his amazement most of his students were illiterate in Spanish as well. Some couldn’t read the floor numbers in an elevator. He felt just terrible for them.”

“One day he was out walking in the Barrio with our pretty blond female roomate and some Latino Youths began yelling threats and insults at them. They kept walking. The girl said “Those lousey _____ want to kill us!” The guy replied, “No they want to kill me. You they just want to beat and gang-rape.” And he wasn’t joking. But he kept volunteering his free time to help educate the “newcomers” and give back to the community, not caring that the community hated him for being white. And he wasn’t alone. Another friend of mine teaches swimming and martial arts at the community center in the same neighborhood.”

“What do you do with people who are impervious to argument because they’re locked into a death spiral like some suicide cult member?”

Comment by Antonio Fini — 12/

Antonio, every soldier who has ever held a dying comrade in his arms has knows that, back home, tens of thousands of people were using the war for profit.

There are no exceptions to this.

In every single case that soldier has had two options. 1) He could encourage his fellow fighters to keep up the fight or he cold 2) obsess on the profiteers and tell them they should get out of way and let the enemy have theirmiserable homeland taht was full of traitos and opportunists.

Your mistake is that thinking that the guy you are talking is any different from the war profiteers because he is not making money off of his treason. There is NO difference.

There will always be us and the traitors. We must decide whether we will follow reaction 1) or reaction 2).

As for taking power AWAY from people, I have just engaged in a long explanation of why it is that no one HAS power.

We are steppting into a vacuum that I have very, very carefully explained.

If you think there is something congenitally wrong with us, you may not believe that the Jews in Nazi Gemany and the Russians under Stalin reacted even WORSE than we are reacting.

The South African Boere are truly pathetic.

Please stop hitting on Reaction 2) and get in the battle with me.

This is a critical moment. I need a seminar, not a bitching session.

I have met you, Antonio, and I need you desperately to jump in here right here and right now.

For every ten thousands bitchers there is one person who can actually THINK.

You are the one in ten thousand. Knowing that is the only reward you will get.

But as you approach my age, you will learn that all the praise in the world means very little compared to the approval of what you have done by the one person in the world whose approval means everything to you.

Yourself.

The first part of explaining where this transformation from a lecture to a seminar is for me to explain my attitude towards how we got here.

As I have said, the real money in writing is in ghosting. I have ghost-written everything, from books to articles to off-hand quips to short replies to news releases to endless numbers of speeches.

The most cathartic experience of my life was when I sat down in 1975 and wrote my OWN book. It made me no money, and I wrote put it under my name because no one else could take responsibility for it. The reason for this is in the title:

A Plague on Both Your Houses.

If you look at Plague today you will wonder what all the excitement was about.

Which is precisely why it was, to my mind, such a success. National Review had a review of Plgue called Read This One! by one of its senior editors. Its publisher did the Foreword.

But Plague was such a vicious attack on conservatives that the publisher of NR had to exempt himself in the Foreword from my acidic comments on William Buckely, founder and owner of NR.

Right after NR’s publisher wrote the Foreword and a senior editor demanded that NR readers “Read This One!” National Review had a cover article attacking me and the book called “To the Nashville Station,” an illusion to Lenin’s arrival at the Finland Stattion when he came back to Russia in 1917. The idea was that I was leaing conservatives into a working-class revolution.

And that was just the confusion on the right.

Leftist reviews poured out, saying that while the book claimed it was damning both liberals and Democrats and the Republicans and the establishment right, it was really only aimed at the left.

Noneof them mentioned National Review’s front-page attack on me. None of them mentioned the number of conservative congressmen who would walk up to me at a cocktail party and then ostentatiously turn their backs.

More than one historian has pointed out that Thomas Paine’s pamphlet Common Sense was as necessary to American independence as Washington and Bejamin Franklin were.

Plague was as influential in making the Reagan Revolution as Paine was in making the one two centuries before.

And the reson Plague was so successful was precisely because if you read it today, you would wonder what all the excitement was about.

That is because everybody now takes for granted what I was considered such a heretic for writing.

It drove my loyal wife up the wall to see writers stealing whole blocks of my ideas without any acknowledgement. I was proud of it.

A major part of the reason I was so tolerant was because the book was, as I say, cathartic. What I did was spend two years writing and rewriting a book that simply explained why human beings act the way they do.

As I wrote it, I learned from it. I began the book by thinking of condemning PEOPLE. I ended up condemning the HOUSES conservatievs and liberals had built, and how they had come to build them in usch an awful way.

So it came to me as no surprise that people who made a living writing and commenting would us what I wrote and never mention my awful name. Most of them picked what I had to say third-hand, and had no idea I had come up with it.

By the time I finished, I was mad at hardly anybody. In the end, my reaction was to laugh at people was being so shallow and unquesioning.

That is why the book was so successful that its success wasn’t even noticed.

And that is also why I was the least popular person on Capitol Hill. People can take a diatribe. But when a professional exposes them naked to the world the way I did, they never forgive.

Explaining this to my loyal German wife, who wanted me to have the credit I deserved, was not possible. Even now, long after our divorce, she is still angry about it.

A couple of years ago I received an e-mail from her with another of my filched ideas in it.

But as you become older, you can either become bitter or you can achieve understanding. And if you are becoming a bitter old man, I would highly recommend that you try skydiving without a parachute.

This long enough for one piece. I hope what I write above will explain how it fits into the general picture I am trying to draw.

For the first time in my life, I am no longer lecturing on basics.

Peter went out and started WORKING on getting our points out, and Mark has some in with advice as a professional salesman.

Here are Peter’s latest two contributions:

I saw the man yesterday inside church before we went home. Two nice old ladies came by to listen, because they “like history so much.” I’ll try to give you a summary for you to think about. I am including longer details so you get a clearer picture.

As I was speaking to the man, I recalled that he hadn’t slung the Nazi thing at me, but used it to explain why HE avoided racial loyalty. This is HIS fear. I decided to use your response anyway. He said, no when he thought white loyalty would lead to killing, he didn’t mean that I was the kind of man that would do that. Because I believed him, we were in a church with excellent acoustics, I have the loudest speaking voice known to man, and the two old ladies and others were listening, I decided it would be bad to go on the attack.

I did, however use most of your arguments (multiculturalism, genocide, the PC religion). He REALLY liked your arguments, since they were phrased just like his own thoughts and he caught the good humor in them.

However, the trick may be tailoring effective arguments to the situation, and seeing what is the central questions in the other man’s mind. I ran through a litany of other answers to his objections. I said racial genocide is murder, but love cannot be hate, love does not lead to killing, race is part of God’s creation, man is created in God’s image, etc…

But the central issue was his fear. I have encountered the identical fear in both liberals and conservatives and it all comes down to the PC version of WWII, the Jews’ great blood libel, which covers up their own genocidal crimes against humanity.

Fear does not well respond to reason. The fear had already led to a rationalization: that the only real race is the kingdom of God. I said that this was much like the gnostic heresy (he knows quite a lot about that and the problems it has led to in American religion), that Jesus came down into history to make our lives better now, before we die, but countering what he said does not work because the real issue is his fear.

Actually, though the conversation was very encouraging. Here is a good man and intelligent, who probably represents the overwhelming majority who think just like us but are waiting for a strong man (or anything viable) to come along and show signs of success. And the masses will through their weight in.

He told me, too, that when he was first hired as the legislative aid on the staff of the assemblyman, he was asked at some kind of a board meeting what he thought was the most important issue of the age. His answer: race. When he was met with total silence, he knew he had hit upon the right answer. But his fear kicked in, too.

So, the only thing I could think of to address the issue of fear was to return to the Scotch-Irish. He was interested in a bit how their history began as Anglo-Saxons in the old English kingdom of Northumbria. The two old ladies listening liked that. (One has red hair.) He accepts his heritage with pride but is guarded because of his fear that ethnic pride leads to killing.

At some point when I first talked to him, he had said UNguardedly, that he did believe there was one race that did deserve extinction, but at that point, he looked terribly embarrassed and I did not twist the knife. I can only guess what he meant.

In any case, I can’t say I have had a conversation like this before. He is fascinating to listen to. He had interesting things to say, such as: Westerners living in the dry West developed strong bodies, but weak minds (and Northeasterners have weak minds and weak bodies). I said he hit the nail on the head. He often has long friendly conversations with people after the service, not surprising for a man who used to travel around a district talking to strangers.

Comment by Peter

I asked, not to say begged, for more INPUT on the subject of the technique of how we can spread our message.

Mark broke the ice, starting with a quote from me:

“’This is not sales, this is revolutionary politics.’”

“Bob, in sales we have an interesting belief that EVERYTHING is sales, meaning, if we are arguing a point — even though we are not getting paid for it in monetary terms — we are still selling our ideas. The payment comes, in our case as white nationalists, in the conversion of another lost soul to our side.”

“BTW, I didnt’ mean to sound like I was criticizing your way of debating. I was just putting in my two cents worth at how I change people’s perspective in a ‘conversational sales’ approach. I like for people to say what I want them to say because it comes from their mouths. As they say in sales, ‘If I say it they can deny it — if they say it, they have to accept it.’”

Mark, you couldn’t be righter, everything IS sales.

People love to say that sales or propaganda is persuasion, but the alternative to mere persuasion is force. In this world-view, sales and persuation are merely effeminate approaches, but warfare is the Real Man’s alternative. the Real Thing.

In fact, one of the basic rules in military strategy is that THAT is a form of sales. Even when an army twice the size of your forces is beaten, it remains much bigger than your forces even when it is full retreat.

The enemy is not defeated because it is weaker than your forces. It is defeated becuase it is CONVINCED that it is beaten.

Even war is a form of sales.

Which leads us to your second paragraph. We are in a battle. You are, to some extent, suggesting an alternate strategy. The question is not whether you agree with me, but which strategy WORKS.

Or, more likely, which combinaton of strategies works.

Believe me, I would infinitely rather see the enemy in retreat because we decided you were right than I would to be sitting around in defeat with you admitting you were wrong.

I have been in both positions, and I know the feelings involved.

We are comrades. The ONLY question is how we will win.

Right now our problem is to get Peter back into our discussion.

I just got this little note:

“This is a very interesting line of topic, how to communicate effectively. As a Film Industry professional in Hollywood for over 8 years who has worked on many major feature films I can tell you about how the Jews of Hollywood devise, craft and market their Anti-White products.”

“Hollywood really is an entire Dialogue. A sentence is begun in one film and ended in the another. So you have two major questions, each being indirectly answered. It’s takes incredible security to make sure this can be pulled off, you have to own the methods of production, the cameras, the sets and even the actors so you don’t loose your investment in these Broken Dialogue Propagandas I call them.”

“I’ll contribute more if I see this helps ouf WhitakerOnline.org.”

“Thank you for your time.”

“From inside the corrupt Jew film industry called Hollywood.”

“A White Nationalist in the system. ”

Comment by Film Industry professional

You say, “A sentence is begun in one film and ended in the another. So you have two major questions, each being indirectly answered. It’s takes incredible security to make sure this can be pulled off, you have to own the methods of production, the cameras, the sets and even the actors so you don’t lose your investment in these Broken Dialogue Propagandas I call them.”

I can’t figure out what you mean by that.

Please explain it as unto a child.

And this doesn’t get anybody else off the hook in providing me input.

Film Industry professional wouldn’t be saying this if he hadn’t already read what I said about letting professional credentials scare you off.

INPUT, dammit!

In response to my “Belated Reply to Peter,” Mark says,

“Bob, being in sales for 20+ years I have found that posing a statement in the form of a question makes a point go over easier than just blurting out a fact or opinion. If you make a statement YOU are making the statement, whereas if you ask a question, the answer is being made by the OTHER PERSON and that makes it HIS statment, not yours.”

“For example, I could make the statment, “Black inner city neighborhoods are unsafe for white people to be in,” and the person I’m talking to says to himself, “Now that was a racist statement”. Off he goes without even thinking about what I’ve just said. ”

“Whereas if I pose it as a question, “Have you ever wondered why, when you and your wife and kids are driving thru a black neighborhood and you see black guys selling drugs or walking around drinking beer and acting half out of their mind, you instinctively fear for you and your family’s safety? But when you drive thru a white neighborhood — even a POOR white neighborhood, you don’t fear for your family’s safety? I wonder why do you think that is?”

“The person can still say, “Now that was a racist statement — but in his mind, since you’ve posed a question rather than a statment and have painted a series of word pictures, he has to answer it on some level, verbally or not. ”

Well, Mark, nobody ever declared me infallible, least of all me.

We need a team effort here.

This is not sales, this is revolutionary politics. Your socratic advice would be good even in regular politics, but this is not regular politics. Nonetheless, yours is advice that WORKS.

That has to be useful be useful to us or we are runningalong on some kind of Wordist Bobism.

The big difference is that in sales or regular politics you have to aim at making your prospect like you.

IN MY OPINION we must aim a lot more at shock value. We should let someone know KNOW that accusing you of mass murder is not something you will tamely put up with the way The Greatest Generation so bravely did.

You cannot put MY race is the form of a question. Then you’re back to the rabbit-like theoretical discussion of THE white race while every non-white would be considered nuts if he took this genocide the way we do.

The man Peter talked to sent him a nice note. Did Peter make his point?

Maybe not completely, but he has another chance. Maybe I wouldn’t.

Would my attack have alienated the man so much that Peter would never have a chance a chance to make the same points more gently?

These are questions Peter will have to answer for himself.

We have here a professional salesman, a political pro, and Peter, who is out there DOING what we theorizing about.

“One experiment is worth a hundred Expert Opinions.”

What we probably need is try more of your approach in some cases, but we must ALWAYS realize that our goal is to get across the few simple truths that I have spent decades hammering out.

Peter, we need you to get in here again.