Archive for February, 2006
It is there right now but it is “under construction.”
If you set up a website I will discuss it here. PROVIDED you are dealing with things I care about.
Joe has indicated that he feels a bit handicapped filtering everything through my blog.
And the time MUST come when Ole Bob is not the only one carrying the messsage.
Setting up a blog is not expensive. You don’t have to fill it all the time.
The big problem is getting somebody to read it. You have a start right here that most bloggers lack.
But most important, I would like to see blogs that don’t consist of endless quotes from dead people. But here again the nice thin about blogs is that there is room for some that consist of quotes and others that consist of live writers at work.
You can quote me all you like. But I would like to see YOUR comments in YOUR blog, even a sentence or two, on why it is relevant or what you want to say about it.
To get back to Derek, you can write drunk one day and angry the next and on top of the world the next.
Believe me, when you are really ticked off telling a bunch of people about it is a wonderful outlet.
Comment by Derek
You know it took me a while to get this (a little hungover and studying econ right now).
I think that is what makes American politics, and the subsequent arguments from us little proletariat trolls, so interesting.
Everyone wants to blame the puppets, not the puppeteer. You are right…the concept of abortion didn’t begin in ‘73 and wasn’t invented by Roe.
I am the father of an aborted child. I didn’t want the child to be aborted but his mother did. What could I do? But if you ask me about abortion I don’t have a solid answer. I can’t make up everyone else’s mind.
If it comes down to aborting unwanted children or being forced to watch my race be bred out of extinction…I think I will chose the former.
Hungover and studying econ! That brings back memories!
Derek, to quote the Jews and the “Greatest Generation,” you don’t know what SUFFERING is!
Basic economics is not a thrill to those who HAVE to take it. TEACHING it to thirty students is even less fun at the best of times.
But I had to teach basic economics once at a private college to a roomful of students at eight o’clock on Monday morning when everybody, including Herr professor, had a hangover.
That is SUFFERING!
Jews talk about five thousand years of suffering, but that class lasted more than five thousand years every time.
Tim is USING my stuff.
I repeat, this is not Whitakerist Wordism or a cookbook.
Tim is using it his own way.
I am very happy about that.
But it makes you understand once again how frustrated I am with people who don’t use what WORKS.
An acquaintence of mine who is an idiot anti-racist liberal. Just came in and stated that now his changing his ways. Apparently, I have hit him in the ribs one time to many with “BW’s”. He said:”I got under his skin one time to many”. He started doing research online and started reading Vdare etc.(thank GAWD the internet) He never told until now. I immediately had to one-up him. I told him that White Nationalism was out dated —-I am a white RACIST now! I’ll be damn if some ex-liberal is going to go to the right of me! He just smiled and said:”Tim you are just saying that–the only thing to the right of that is a NAZIWHOWANTSTOKILLSIXMILLIONJEWS”. He has a point.
I have conditioned people with that —I love that —and was flattered that he said NAZIWHOWANTSTOKILLSIXMILLIONJEWS! I never just say Nazi —I always say NAZIWHOWANTSTOKILLSIXMILLIONJEWS and I enjoy it! That may be the best BW invention yet. Blacks love it! It completely takes the terror out of the word Nazi.
But my friend did make a good point. What would happen if millions of white men pulled a Prince Harry and put on “the uniform”? Would they put millions in jail? In Europe they would try —but gawd that would be funny. Satan cannot handle humour. And Prince Harry had better stay clear of Austria.
Comment by Tim
I said, “PeterGene, where the hell are you?”
He hadn’t replied to my at my yahoo address.
So naturally when he DID reply to me, I neglected to answer HIM. He sent me three notes on yahoo and one here.
Being both obsessive and havig attention deficit puts me inthis position all the time.
As an obsessive, I want my responses NOW. But when I get self-righteous about it, I end up being the one who has either already gotten it and missed it or neglecting to do something myself.
And I do it in public.
In a way, I have turned htis into an advanatge. I am so used to being embarrassed that I am not afraid to do so again and again and again.
Most people are terribly afraid of embarrassment. But most of the special learning I have done has been by plowing right in and making a fool of myself.
As I have said before, if you are respectful with an expert on a subject, all you will get out of him is what is already in his writings. But if you say exactly what you think, heresy and all, he will crush you with a mass of information he would never give a normal person.
And he starts with the basics.
So while somebody else woud sit there crushed, I am listening carefully to a flow of information he wants to make damned sure I understand.
Everything I pass on to you falls into the same category. I tried all the different approaches, right out there in public, and I know very, very well which ones they cannot deal with.
I got a lesson from all those athletes in the 50s and 60s who had fought their way back from polio. By the time they had been totally crippled and then slowly gotten back on their feet, going on to championship athletics was a lot easier for them than for others.
Many of the things I have to offer come directly from the crippling problems I have neurologically.
And once you go through all that, and realize what you have done, you really resent having to listen to “The Greatest Generation” having spoiled your young days by telling you how wonderful and brave THEY were while yielding on every important point to the powers that be.
I quote PeterGene’s comment here:
I have tried to contact you Bob.
Sorry for this one being off topic [but on topic i am against abortion of MY Godlet or Godling [i don’t think more needs be said! ]]
This is a repeat of my email sent to the address you gave on this forum.
>>I have changed to plain text.
I will add this to your latest BLOG as well because i can’t be sure i can even communicate with you Bob!
Perhaps that was the problem because you Murlutok are not image orientated but rather word orientated.
I am image orientated and i use words with a strong mind, like you have suffer respectable conservatives.
My Nick at SF used to be “Sibelius”.
I deliberately deleted all my personal details and my avatar at SF before i fell on my sword.
The monitors obviously saw that.
Why i hate white racists is something you need to understand because it is part of the battle for MY people! After you defeat the Jews you will have to pass by me! And Don Black with all his experience would have to be brain dead not to know what i am on about.
But i understand the problems with the forum.
It has to do with scale and politics and how to handle loose cannons like me.
They don’t know me, nor trust me.
Well the action they took was good!
That is how i may defend my Keep and MY PEOPLE!
After all, it is THEIR [SF] forum and a piece of shit like me should be put down when he appears as a naughty lil boy.
It ain’t fair! LOL.
But i understand it perfectly.
But they don’t understand!
I am prolly the most transparent member they EVER got. I got absolutely no secet you or them can’t research with GOOGLE about me on all forums i have been to. And i have have been to some pretty sordid forums and got banned there just as i have been on SF.
They are ALL sooooo serious about their fantasies!
Because i would do the same?
My only sadness is, i can’t communicate with anyone.
It is the price we pay for integrity in the environment we must now negotiate.
Yes bigger [in regard to SF numbers] is better for the Jews but as you and i know it is also LESS for us Aryans who need intimate communities were we can relate to each other!
Don’t worry Bob about me, i am nobody and i do not wish to be anything other than i am worthy, I KNOW YOU WILL understand the problems with SF perfectly…
You will be great helping this forum! And please keep me banned until my time is up.
I trust you, based ENTIRELY, on all you have said, on the last 30 or so of your talks.
I have actually listened to them!!!!!
That is ALL i got to go by!
PS. I am sad you have not been able to read any of my emails and not see any of the images.
I don’t know why this is so, but perhaps this one will get through.
Comment by Peter Gene
Two things about abortion: 1. Roe was an egregious lawless thing. 2. Millions of live and kicking, way past the fertilized egg, have been slaughtered for the most insane of reasons, not rape or crisis. I’m sorry that our so called “lawmakers” are not interested.
Shari, PLEASE don’t take this personally, buit I am SO tired of repeating this:
It refers to your point 1:
” Roe was an egregious lawless thing.”
Shari, the world did not begin in 1973.
In 1967 the Supreme Court invented the right to miscegenate out of whole cloth. The Catholic Church heirarchy almost had a simultaneous hernia celebrating this decision.
Every state that ratified the Constitution had an anti-miscegenation law. Almost every state that ratified the fourteenth amendment had an anti-miscegenation. Massachusetts only repealed its law against blacks and whites marrying in 1863, at the height of the Civil War, when it wiped all racial laws off its books.
I am talking about states that had and enforced laws against miscegeneation.
In alll my readings, I have never come across a single authority in ANY state before 1940 who said that a state did not have the RIGHT to pass antimiscegenation laws.
God, I’m tired of repeating this!
By the time of Roe versus Wade, no one was allowed to criticize the Supreme Court’s invention ofhte right to miscegenate.
But for most people, the world suddenly began in January, 1973, when the Supreme Court invented the right to abortion.
For those who were silent about the 1967 right to miscegenation, their case is a LOT weaker. No states had abortion laws when the Constitution was ratified.
Everybody who marched for life had already agreed that the Supreme Court had a perfect right to invent a right to miscegenation.
When the same institution invented the right to abortion they went ape.
“Where did the Supreme get this power?
They got it from the Catholic Church and others who wanted the right to miscegenate to be enforced all over America, and who didn’t give a damn about constitutionality.
There was absolutely nothing “lawless” about Roe vs. Wade if you accept the 1967 antimiscegenation decision.
And I have yet to meet one single pro-lifer who EVER criticized it.
Their world BEGAN in 1973.
If you give the Court the power to do it to us evil Southern bigots, you give them the right to do it to YOU.
God, I’m tired of repeating this!
I have attention deficit, big-time, so it ishard for me to keep names straight.
I know PeterGene got cut off of Stormfront. I think somebody ELSE said they got cut off of Stormfront for criticizing the use of swastikes.
PeterGene, where the HELL are you? You were supposed to send me your SF screen name at
I NEED this, because I can ask questions i n defense of my Bloggers and they cease to be just theoretical.
So should the other person who got kicked off.
I need these names, as I said, so I can find out exactly what the policy is from Kelso and
Black when I meet with them, and I will be meeting with them a lot, this weekend.
Just last week, Nick Griffin, the head of the British National Party, quoted my post which was quoted by National Vanguard on the swastika (my stuff DOES get around!):
“The same point is made very effectively by Prof Robert Whitaker, writing in the latest issue of National Vanguard. This is the theoretical magazine of the National Alliance, perhaps one of the most hard line pro-white organisations in America, and one with which we also have very significant ideological and tactical differences, but the extremism of the Alliance only underscores the value of Professor Whitaker’s message. He explains how he regards it as self-evident that race mixing is wrong, then goes on to say that:”
“Liberals and ‘respectable’ conservatives agree that this makes me a ‘Nazi’! It also made
Harry Truman and Douglas MacArthur ‘nazis’ according to today’s respectable conservatives.
“It is time to take on this ‘nazi’ tactic without compromise.
“For many decades I have been yelled at by respectable conservatives and liberals screaming:
‘If you are a heretic on race, you are a NAZI!’ For anyone with any male hormones there is a hurting wish to scream: ‘OK, damn you, I’m a nazi.’ Many of us have yielded to that natural tendency. But the simple fact remains that I am not a ‘nazi’. Truman was not a ‘nazi’.
‘MacArthur was not a ‘nazi’.
“When you let them make you react that way, you are yielding to their Orwellian tactic.
— BNP – A Natural Home for Youngsters
“Professor Whitaker urges genuine nationalists and patriots to work to win those confused youngsters back from “the swastika and the klan.” He concludes: “As long as ‘respectable’ means ‘coward’, a lot of good people will fall for the lefts’ Orwellian ‘nazi’ tactic. Iwant the good people who have fallen for this enemy tactic to come back. I want them to join those of us who fight for freedom and who care about our race.”
In his on target comment, Tim includes the following:
“Interesting to note, folks that grew up around areas like I did (heavily minority areas) are converted already. ”
Tim, this is the story on race. When I was young, Hubert Humphrey of Minnesota was the leader on “civil rights.” At that time Minnesota had next to no blacks. Swedes and other Europeans were frothing at the mouth about civil rights. They were all-white.
It was, in fact, a well-known rule of thumb that the less blacks an area had, the more integrationist it was.
My first multicultural experience was when I was sent to an all-white segregated school. I was raised almost entirely among blacks.
You may notice my enthusiasm for integration was never very great. I’ve hinted that here several times.
When my fiancee came back from South Africa to take her degree at the University of Vienna, no one would listen to her onthe subject of race. They said that, having lived and worked in Sout Africa for several years, she was prejudiced.
This puzzled her a little, but I assured her that I was used to it. Prejudice means to PRE-judge. So if you have actual experience with non-whies, you are PREjudging them. If you never met one until you were in your teens, you are not prejudiced.
Of course, those who have been there are POST-judging, and those who spin theories around the absense of minorities are PRE-judging.
As whites are being chased down in every corner of the world, us POSTjudgers are becoming ever more numerous.
The title is my reply to Tim’s comment on abortion:
I always get asked about abortion. I always say: “It depends on who is getting aborted”. This draws anger and awe. The usual reaction is shock. The oddest thing is that EVERYONE knows what I mean! This has come as a surprise to me. You would think someone would ask for a further explanation. It has almost never been the case. I think Katrina has solidified a few things for us Mr Whitaker. I have seen more folks interested in my remarks. I have also seen and heard WAY more folks who are much more receptive to the title RACIST. I see folks more and more that do not bat an eyelash at this stuff. Now we just have to get more parots like me. Interesting to note, folks that grew up around areas like I did (heavily minority areas) are converted already. The Suburban folks are in general stupid and naive. I see why the politicos have no respect for the masses (I hate to put it like that because it may make me seem unconcerned toward the common man–which is obviously not true –or I would not be here on this blog). The suburban soccer moms are feeling the fire and getting more protective—mother ducks are becoming LESS STUPID and Naive. Thank Gawd. I was wondering how many Haitians living next door to a person in the burbs it would take to get through to them. Lenin had White people pegged when he stated:”Worse is Better”. These stupid immigration policies may be seen as the saving grace for our race.
Many a young girl has confided to me that what she wants in life is EXACTLY what feminism condemns.
She wants to devote her life to having children and she wants a man to support her.
That is the feminist DEFINITION of the enslavement of women. So when a girl tells me that, she does so in whispers.
In a totalitarian society, all natural preferences are conferred in whispers. All real feelings are banned.
Believe me, I know.
I cannot tell you how many people in politics have told me, in whispers, that they don’t give a damn about abortion.
There is no justification for this that anyone in today’s politcs can express.
Listen to the pro-life argument:
“Oh, God, this little tiny baby, no, someone more helpless than a baby, will be KILLED….”
And so forth.
You are absolutely required to take a position on this.
If you are in politics, you are required to be vitally concerend with EVERY issue, especially “Here is a helpless human being being MURDERED.”
Don’t quibble. Murder is defined as willfully taking a human life.
If, as the Pope says, a fertilized egg is as human as any adult, taking its life IS murder.
But back on Planet Earth, many if not most fertilized eggs are rejected by the body.
The Pope is just plain wrong. Everybody knows he is wrong.
So pro-life politicians WHISPER to me that this is SILLY.
The same Pope who declared that life begins at conception also declared that an unbaptized baby was DAMNED.
Do you have the slightest idea what DAMNED means?
So pro-life congressmen deal with pro-lifers, but they tell me in whispers that this is nonsense.
The psychopaths who have taken over the Religious Right quote the Pope, though they have no idea that that is what they are doing. The shriek and they scream, so nobody is allowed to disagree with them.
I am SICK of the simple truth being WHISPERED.
The idea that a fertilized egg is a child is ridiculous.
But our society cannot face any question of genetics or of who should be born. So instead of discussing these questions, we have to emote to suit them.
PETA is right. If anything that breathes is as important as a human being, then every member of the Animal Kingdom is equal. If a fertilized egg is as important as you are, then so is every squirrel.
PETA and the Pope are right: If you start differenitating between feriltized eggs and squirrels, how can you avoid RACIST conclusions?
The kind of thing that really makes me laugh is what happened to my brother many years ago.
He was up in Tennessee moving into a house that had its own furnace. His family moved in in the spring so the furnace would not be used for a long time, but he was showing them the place, so naturaly he showed his children the furnace.
He was e4xplaining the furnace to his daughters, aged two, four and six. He told the girls that the way he heated the furnace was by burning the coal that was sitting there.
The girls looked at what was obviously a pile of black rocks and grinned at him.
“Daddy is being FUNNY again.”
Children knew that you don’t burn rock.
I thought it was hilarious, and so did he. How do you PROVE to the most practical people on earth, little girls, that black rock DOES burn if you are in warm weather and can’t burn it?
Once my doctor brother was interviewing for a job at a home for the retarded. He had enormoua intellectual credentials, and he got the job.
My brother got his MD, then did his internship and full residency in pediatrics and then a full residency in neurology. As a result, he was awarded the one-year residency at Harvard in the field of pediatric neurology.
He was a member of the Harvard faculty.
The ONLY member of the Harvard faculty who wore a “(George) Wallace for President” button to work.
Back to the story, he had not the slightest problem getting that job at the retarded home.
The only problem he faced was when he was at the retarded home for the first time waiting for the interview.
He wanted a drink of water and he couldn’t find a button or a pedal on water fountain.
One of the retarded children walked to him and said, rather pityingly and trying hard not to make my brother feel dumb, “You push THIS right HERE.”
Once again, both my brother and I have had endless fun over this incident.
“Suffer the little children to come unto me, for of such is the Kingdom of Heaven.”
You don’t have to argue with children or retardeds. Children will learn. Retardeds, by definition, CANNOT learn.
You should just admire their sense of reality.
But what if you are dealing with people who are physically and clinically adult, but who can never grow up? They have been told, and they BELIEVE, that Mommy Professor and Experts have given them the Final Truth.
They are disgusting freaks. They are warped creatures who were meant to be adults someday. But they are forever crowded into the womb.
Growenups inthe womb!
How repuslive can you GET?
They deserve my pity. But, God help me, all I feel is disgust.
Chidren’s sayings are funny.
Retarded children are charming.
But the products of Mommy Professor are not quite so humorous.
I am now getting the feedback I want: people USING my approach.
“This,” as I said below, “is the garden I want to make grow.”
They say that manure is the natural fertilizer.
I say a lot of good stuff, but not one reader here can deny that Bob’s Blog has provided enough h*****s**t to reawake the Sahara.
Someone asked me to repeat my e-mail address and I forgot to do so.
PeterGene can contaft me there.
I just accepted the “Monitor” title on Stormfront, and Kelso was flatteringly grateful. He said my joining will get other “big names” to go in as monitors.
The idea that ***I*** give somebody some kind of respectability is a new experience for me.
But one of my active Bloggers has been banned from Stormfront.
I will be at the American Renaissance Conference later this week and I will talk to Kelso and Don Black about this. Is PeterGene your name on Stormfront?
No, don’t take your marbles and go home.
I don’t take my marbles and go home, but that is because I lost them a long time ago.
I am serious about you who take part in my seminar, so I would do this anyway and try to make peace. But in this case, it gives me an opportunity to find out exactly WHO does the banning on Stormfront and how they run it.
I know that the membership of SF took a huge jump after they got rid of one monitor who did too much banning. I like him, but when you run an organization, you have to impose impose discipline, often unfairly.
Kelso and Black get a lot of enemies that way, as did I. But if you concentrate on the abuse of power, you are NOT concentrating on the cause.
Every moment you spend concentrating on yourself is a moment you are NOT concentrating on our war.
So, PeterGene, send me your SF name at my address,
and let me try to take it from there.
I know you are too ticked off right now to want reinstatement on SF, but I will try to make it your option.
But don’t just think about how ticked off you are. ***I*** need this opportunity to find out how SF works with a specific example. Kelso and Black know how seriously I take my Bloggers, so you can give me a real chance to ask what I need to ask.
Beautiful stuff Bob.
I like that sort of line and mentallity.
To change subject….
Well i really irritated the Jewish Masters of StromFront!
I have been Banned!
“Your account has been disabled for the following reason: 6 month ban – Egregiously violating every guideline & attacking Stormfront as well
Date your account will be reenabled: 08-20-2006, 12:30 AM”
Now Bob i AM proud of that! Can you understand that? I mean not the ban, but that i am proud of that.
What greater respect could they have paid me?
I love them for it!
I have been taken very seriously by THEM!
But the joke is i never took myself seriously at all!
Do you see?
Well, my victory is the correctnes of my prediction!
Few will know this!
I stood up againsts of load of Nazgool bastards. I have done so many times before.
I know it was not the politically correct thing to do Bob, but that exactly WAS MY intention.
You my despise me and hate me but you will never get a politically correct statement out of me!
You know what happens when you poke a stick into the ant’s nest?
Are you always politically correct Bob?
But 99% of the population at SF write infinitely more vile stuff than i ever wrote. Naive childish Stuff! I know because i have read it! They have written awefully stupid hateful and racist stuff such as i NEVER wrote.
For that reason i love my ban because it invalidates The Entire Stormfront Movement.
It is bereft of validity! But i would lie to you if i did not state that i knew this from the very beginning.
Were there is rot it must be exposed even it it harms oneself! That is not to say there are no good people there on StormFront who may be supported. Nor does it necessarily mean that the exposer of the rot is any good! It only means that when we find a terminal disease we have to cut deep – and yes it hurts. It hurts me too!
But i have proved the point that ALL forums are controlled by THE Jews. I have yet to find as forum that isn’t. Its scarey!
Stormfront would be shut down in an instant if it did not do servitude to the Jews!
The Jews allow it to opperate because it provides them with a counterfoil to justify their victim status. That means that certain mantras must be repeated there. Anything unusual is a danger to the Jews and also more functionally such unusualness horrifies the Dog Minded Racists who dwell at SF.
Don’t worry you won’t have to ban me from your forum.
I shall evaporite as a cloud on a Blue Spring Morn.
The feedback from my response to Derek on the length of Bob’s Mantra has been the garden I wish I knew how to nourish.
Derek, below, went on to state his method of dealing with this situation in actual arguments.
Tim has a terrific insight on real arguments.
There is at least one other I want to quote.
But right now, I need to make a point I have tried to make over and over and over: But I am tired and I won’t be here forever
I have spent a lot of time lately in the antis section of Stormfront. I demonstrate, again and again and again, that my points leave the antis gibbering.
That is the ONLY point of dealing with the opposition.
We have a war to fight. We have a point to make. Lately, by concentrating on the anti thread, I have begun to get my comrades into backing me up. But if I disappear, they will be back to arguing details.
Here Derek’s comment sparked a discussion of how YOU can use my points, how YOU can “stay on message.” I got some feedback from some of you who actually can give me pointers from ACTUAL USE of my points.
Derek explains here that he has to get in all in in segments. But the point is that he is finding a way to get it in.
THAT is what I am here for.
Derek, I can usually say something like, “Are we going to have a discussion or are you just going to go to pieces on me?” If the other person is not a hopeless nut, I can buy enough time to state Bob’s Mantra, completely. The, as Tim says, I simply will not get off it.
But always remember, I am not offering you a Wordism. I am not giving you a cookbook.
You have to do what Tim and Derek are doing, develope the approach that gives YOU the most yield.
And for God’s sake, PLEASE share your experiences with the rest of us here.
Once you get m y approach down, you are going to feel sorry for Ole Bob. YOU are going to spread this approach, and YOU are going to sigh with exasperation as YOUR pupils constantly veer back to the old stuff:
“The dog returns to its vomit, the pig returns to its mire, and the burnt fool’s bandaged finger goes wabbling back to the fire.”
Once you start backing them down and convincing people, you will the horrible frustration at others who simply cannot seem to understand the basics. All good teachers suffer that all the time.
But I am, slowly, making progress.
This is a seminar, not a lecture. You have outgrown your college education, even if you never had one.
I expect a lot of you.
I expect you to save my race.
Comment by TIM
The reason it is so effective is BECAUSE it is NOT short. If it were short no one would think about it. It forces folks to think about uncomfortable things. And dispossesion is very uncomfortable. If you start using the “BW lines”. You will find that people TRY to get off the subject. And that is the ultimate compliment! When a liberal tries to get off the subject —you have won. At first, I did not know what to do when someone immediately tries to get off the subject. Now it is like blood in the water for a shark. I just dig in and keep at them until I see fear and tears. I have seen it change people. You have to remember though. To go from reverse to drive —you first have to go throgh neutral. People always try to convince others. I have learned at a young age–that is a waste of my time. I am just a parot. We are pre revolution and Bob’s mantra is my revolutionary slogan. I just keep repeating it. In pre-revolution people look to those who are bold and show courage. Bob’s lines incorporates both these traits.
Comment by Derek
When talking with others about this issue so many get upset and angry that they won’t let you get in a word edgewise. I usually have to break it up and address it in different sections when someone brings up a point.
For instance: person A says to me “there is a race problem in America.”
I say “and in Europe and all white countries. Notice how there are no race problems in Asian countries. The race problem is the ‘white problem’ and it won’t be solved until we are bred out of existance.”
A:”But this means you are a racist. I am anti-racist.”
Me: “Anti-racist is a code for anti-white.”, etc, etc.
I guess my basic point is that if you can’t get it all out at once try and get as much out as you can, even in fragments. The more the better, but some is better than none. At least that is my opinion.
Someone sent me some quotes that appeal to my bitterly ironic sense of humor.
On the other hand, in the midst of all this bitterness is the one I live by:
“Be kind, everyone you meet is fighting a tough battle too.”
If you always remember that, you can have the bitterness all intelligent people learn, but you won’t HURT anybody with it.
Here they are:
Don’t kick a man when he’s down unless you’re certain he won’t get up.
Indecision is the key to flexibility.
You can’t tell which way the train went by looking at the track.
Be kind, everyone you meet is fighting a tough battle too.
There is no substitute for genuine lack of preparation.
This is as bad as it can get…but don’t bet on it.
By the time you can make ends meet, they move the ends.
Nostalgia isn’t what it used to be.
Sometimes too much drink is not enough.
The facts, although interesting, are generally irrelevant.
The world gets a little better every day, and worse in the evening.
Someone who thinks logically is a nice contrast to the real world.
The other line always moves faster…until you get in it.
Anything worth fighting for is worth fighting dirty for.
Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.
Friends may come and go but enemies accumulate.
It’s hard to be nostalgic when you can’t remember anything good.
I have seen the truth and it makes no sense.
If you think that there is good in everybody, you haven’t met everybody.
If you can smile when things go wrong, you have someone in mind to blame.
One seventh of your life is spent on Monday.
The more you run over a dead cat, the flatter it gets.
Happiness is good health and a bad memory.
Do unto others.
Artificial Intelligence is no match for Natural Stupidity.
Plagiarism saves time.
means never having to take all the blame yourself.
Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups.
We waste time, so you don’t have to.
Go the extra mile. It makes your boss look like an incompetent slacker.
The Romans did not create a great empire by having meetings; they did it by killing all those people who opposed them.
If you can stay calm while all around you is chaos… then you probably haven’t completely understood
the seriousness of the situation.
Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exist elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.
As you journey through life take a minute every now and then to give a thought for the other fellow. He could be plotting something.
If you find something you like, buy a lifetime supply, because they will stop making it.
Always remember you’re unique, just like everyone else.
Discussig Bob’s Mantra * Mark says,
Bob, while your mantra is dead on target it is a tad cumbersome to get out. What would happen if you ccondensed your mantra and made it easier to recite in a shorter time frame — w/o losing any of it’s message? Perhaps more of the Stormfronters would begin using it then? Back in the 60’s the negroes were fond of repeating their mantra, “black is beautiful” and it instantly conveyed all the points they wanted conveyed.
“Black is beautiful” was not what liberals wanted to hear. Their aim was to get rid of Whitey. The idea that blacks had some sort of pride in being black was wht got a black president elected for the NAACP when all of its presidents had been black for sixty years after its founding in 1905.
I personally endorsed statements like “black is beautiful.” I see absolutely nothing wrong with blacks having some kind of pride instead of looking at themselves as a set of throwawy genes to make the white race brown, and I said so at the time. That’s why I found it so easy to get along with black militants like Stokely Carmichael.
But your basic point is about the length of Bob’s Mantra.
I do not think you can find a single short statement of the kind you are talking about that gives anybody a new view of a group they don’t already endorse.
I have found — and have tested this AGAIN on the antis on Stormfront — that those few paragraphs put the opposition, which has been carefully coached for YEARS in how “racists” are just evil people — totally on the defensive.
In his Essays, Montesquie pointed out that “If I had had more time I would have written less.”
When you really work at writing, when you rewrite, you find that you can make your ideas shorter and more obvious. I do that here all the time. I write a short piece that would fill tgwenty pages for anybody else. That’s because I did the work HERE, and I don’t large numbers of readers to go through twenty pages and then do the intellectual work themselves of trying to get what the point is.
Bob’s Mantra is, if anything, too short. That is its problem. People want to talk about huge tomes they have waded through. They simply cannot absorb the fact that people who have gotten paid lifetime salaries as Intellectuals and written acres of pages are just plain simply WRONG.
In Russia, Russians who reject Communism still think Lenin was a genius.
They hold their arms apart and say, “He wrote THIS many books!”
The average person wants a BOOK that says whatever it is.
If you nac boil Bob’s Mantra* down to an explanation three words long, I would welcome it.
I also cannot expand it to a book. A book gives the other side too many holes to crawl through. They can get off on any point in the book and avoid the fundamental, devastating, obvious point.
Bob’s Mantra has been tried.
Galen’s Humor Theory of medicine killed tens of milllions. But it was in Latin, it was a part of the rediscovery of Classical Learning in the Renaissance. I have yet to find one single good hting that came out of the Renaissance.
Galen’s Theory never WORKED, but the entire academic medical community swore by it for centuries.
Taking pints of blood out of a sick person is insane, but it was standard treatment.
Genocide against whites is genocide.
Almost everybody says that Political Correctness has gone too far. Here is a statement that gies an example of that. It also gives every person who advocates “assimilation,” the required buzzword they all use today, on the defensive. It also shows that whites concerned about survival are not only not Nazis, they are the only decent people around.
The problem is that people got PAID for Galen’s Theory. They had to learn Latin for it and they were looked upon as Intellectuals. NOBODY got anything GOOD from opposing Galen.
Does this sound familiar?
USE Bob’s Mantra or MAKE something better.
But I am using Bob’s Mantra all by myself. It is a LOT of work and has been for years.
So I really don’t have time for theoretical discussions about it too.
I have spent a lot of time being told that “everybody” is the wrong word long before Joe brought it up here. Everybody has a different version, but they spend no time at all on USING it, they just want to discuss the theory of it.
They have every right to do that.
But Bob has serious work to do.
” Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”
“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”