Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

The “DUHH! ” Tactic

Posted by Bob on February 17th, 2006 under Coaching Session


This is what I put inthe various threads on Stormfront today as antis tried desperately to fid some way around Bob’s Mantra:

— The DUHH! Tactic

I have not bothered to answer the lame “replies” to Bob’s Mantra because every single one of
them boils down to the old “DUHH!” tactic.

“I never heard of ‘the race problem.'”

“This is all very vague. I don’t understand what you’re talking about.”

Nobody ever said ‘assimilation’ — intermarriage, was the solution to this race problem.”

And so on.

What would a senator do if he were debating hte budget and suddenly the opposition came up
with a brilliant remark: “Define the word budget.”

Well, it’s an unanswerable question, no doubt about it.

But smart?

Not bloody likely.

Do you think an adult, much less a senator, would try to explain to another adult what the subject is that they are debating?

This is sophomoric. Sophomore means “wise fool.”

I have heard the same person onthe same day talk about intermarriage as the solution to the race problem and then deny he had ever HEARD anybody say that intermarriage was the slution to the race problem.

I have heard people who were just talking about the race problem deny theyhave ever heard of something called the race problem.

I have heard a former president of the United States seriously try to discuss what the meaning of “is” is.

He got laughed at.

When someone uses this “DUHH!” tactic, NEVER get intot he drooling pit with them.

I have never heard a single person actually take “That depends on what you mean by the word ‘is'” seriously. People just laughed and went on.

And that is the only way to deal with the “DUHH!” tactic.

Everybody went through the stage when they were young when they thought that instant amnesiawas smart.

We are not here to piddle with crap like that. We are here to make our point and go on.

Nobody takes the “DUHH!” tactic seriously, least of all the person who uses it.

You can never actually answer “DUHH!” But everybody listening to the argument knows it’s silly.

So what do you do when your opponent gets downright silly?

You feel good about it and leave them gibbering to themselves.

Nobody listening takes them seriously.

Just say it again, maybe with “If you don’t understand this, I can’t help you.”

You can either USE Bob’s Mantra and repeat it and repeat it and repeat every time they go “DUHH!” or you can get down in the drooling pit with them, which takes attention away from

the overwhelmingly obvious and needed point you are making.

When they go “DUHH!” it is anohter opportunity for you to say:

” Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved

when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or

Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote

assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY

white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if

hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black

countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking

about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black

man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the

white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a

naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by Derek on 02/17/2006 - 7:04 pm

    During the Clinton deposition he continuously asked the attorneys to define words. He squirmed his way out of it. But it is really not his fault. Anyone who had a brain knew what that guy was about. .

    But most didn’t stop to think that they were making a bigger deal about something so lame that they should have concentrated on policy. His biggest friend was the respectable conservative because they were the ones doing all the gabbing. They acted morally pious and he played the brain card.

    Look who won. No one. We all lost, in my opinion. It was a waste of time and money when we should have been analyzing policy and looking for ways to stop immigration.

You must be logged in to post a comment.