Discussig Bob’s Mantra * Mark says,

Bob, while your mantra is dead on target it is a tad cumbersome to get out. What would happen if you ccondensed your mantra and made it easier to recite in a shorter time frame — w/o losing any of it’s message? Perhaps more of the Stormfronters would begin using it then? Back in the 60’s the negroes were fond of repeating their mantra, “black is beautiful” and it instantly conveyed all the points they wanted conveyed.

MY REPLY:

“Black is beautiful” was not what liberals wanted to hear. Their aim was to get rid of Whitey. The idea that blacks had some sort of pride in being black was wht got a black president elected for the NAACP when all of its presidents had been black for sixty years after its founding in 1905.

I personally endorsed statements like “black is beautiful.” I see absolutely nothing wrong with blacks having some kind of pride instead of looking at themselves as a set of throwawy genes to make the white race brown, and I said so at the time. That’s why I found it so easy to get along with black militants like Stokely Carmichael.

But your basic point is about the length of Bob’s Mantra.

I do not think you can find a single short statement of the kind you are talking about that gives anybody a new view of a group they don’t already endorse.

I have found — and have tested this AGAIN on the antis on Stormfront — that those few paragraphs put the opposition, which has been carefully coached for YEARS in how “racists” are just evil people — totally on the defensive.

In his Essays, Montesquie pointed out that “If I had had more time I would have written less.”

When you really work at writing, when you rewrite, you find that you can make your ideas shorter and more obvious. I do that here all the time. I write a short piece that would fill tgwenty pages for anybody else. That’s because I did the work HERE, and I don’t large numbers of readers to go through twenty pages and then do the intellectual work themselves of trying to get what the point is.

Bob’s Mantra is, if anything, too short. That is its problem. People want to talk about huge tomes they have waded through. They simply cannot absorb the fact that people who have gotten paid lifetime salaries as Intellectuals and written acres of pages are just plain simply WRONG.

In Russia, Russians who reject Communism still think Lenin was a genius.

Why?

They hold their arms apart and say, “He wrote THIS many books!”

The average person wants a BOOK that says whatever it is.

If you nac boil Bob’s Mantra* down to an explanation three words long, I would welcome it.

I also cannot expand it to a book. A book gives the other side too many holes to crawl through. They can get off on any point in the book and avoid the fundamental, devastating, obvious point.

Bob’s Mantra has been tried.

It WORKS.

Galen’s Humor Theory of medicine killed tens of milllions. But it was in Latin, it was a part of the rediscovery of Classical Learning in the Renaissance. I have yet to find one single good hting that came out of the Renaissance.

Galen’s Theory never WORKED, but the entire academic medical community swore by it for centuries.

Taking pints of blood out of a sick person is insane, but it was standard treatment.

Genocide against whites is genocide.

Almost everybody says that Political Correctness has gone too far. Here is a statement that gies an example of that. It also gives every person who advocates “assimilation,” the required buzzword they all use today, on the defensive. It also shows that whites concerned about survival are not only not Nazis, they are the only decent people around.

The problem is that people got PAID for Galen’s Theory. They had to learn Latin for it and they were looked upon as Intellectuals. NOBODY got anything GOOD from opposing Galen.

Does this sound familiar?

USE Bob’s Mantra or MAKE something better.

But I am using Bob’s Mantra all by myself. It is a LOT of work and has been for years.

So I really don’t have time for theoretical discussions about it too.

I have spent a lot of time being told that “everybody” is the wrong word long before Joe brought it up here. Everybody has a different version, but they spend no time at all on USING it, they just want to discuss the theory of it.

They have every right to do that.

But Bob has serious work to do.

” Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”