Archive for April 19th, 2006
Kanefrost — Listen Antonio!
In response to “Is This Denial?” kanefromsf said:
My position: I couldn’t give a darn, lol. Actually my position is that people shouldn’t talk about it. It’s just like negative plugging a site you don’t like. People will go to it.
When Dershowitz mentioned nukeisrael, people probably went to it. So why even mention it? I see more “pro-white” people mention it than Jews mention it.
Comment by kanefromsf
MY REPLY:
Don’t get too wrapped up in your OWN ego.
This whole Holocaust business is hideously embarrassing for Europeans.
I was watching a documentary about German authorites who were talking about “pornography and Nazi stuff.”
They were trying to minimize it.
Which means we should maximize it.
Requiring a form of historical correctness is hideously embarrassing.
But what we need to concentrate on is not the facts onthe other side, but what embarrasses out enemies:
REQUIRING agreement unbder penalty of imprisonment.
We should talk about “French intellectuals” crying on the stand because they said something in an academic paper that they could go to prison for.
This is EMBARRASSING!
So there are two sides:
1) One group wants to get out the FACTS about the Holocaust;
2) The other side wants to put anybody who discusses the Holocaust in prison.
Then there’s me.
I want to know why 2) is doing something so insane.
THAT is what makes 2) nervous.
It is not SANE to put people in prison for disagreeing with history, right or wrong.
1) argues they are right. That is the argument that does NOT embarrass the Modern Inquisitors.
Is there any way to get SANE? Is there any way to argue on precisely the point on which our enemies are weakest?
Antonio, my Great Secret is that I find out what they are embarrassed about and hit on THAT.
They can defend on facts. They cannot defend their Inquisition itself.
I have seriously thought about going out by going to Germany with a picket sign that says:
“Is this Denial?
“As a Freeborn American I say that anything the government requires you to believe is an out-and-out lie.”
It would put them in a bad position.
I hate bullies.
Is This Denial?
Posted by Bob in Bob, How Things Work on 04/19/2006
My position on the Holocaust is that of a free-born American:
Anything that a government requires you to believe is an out-and-out lie.
My Ego is not the Point
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 04/19/2006
As usual when I want to reply to a comment I can’t find it.
Anyway, Peter included a statement about how I would probably claim that I saw the computer revolution coming in my teens, and added, correctly, that a dictionary definition of “humility” would not refer a person to Bob’s Blog.
I don’t see why not. I have plenty to be humiliated ABOUT.
But there is an important distinction to be made here.
Unfortunately what Peter says about hte computer revolution is not true. If I had anticipated the computer revolution in my teens, I would be writing from a giant mansion and you would all be paying ME instead of Bill Gates for your computers.
There is a reason I keep emphasizing what an intelligent guy I was when I was young .
And, no, Peter, you smartass, I DON’T know what happened to me since to make me the way I am now.
I am getting on towards the final act and I want you to learn my way of thinking.
Why?
Because it WORKS.
Nobody can face me in a debate on immigration or race. Normally, people would ask, “Bob, what’s your secret?”
Nobody does. For decades they have watched me routinely take the opposition to pieces in public, but they seem to think it’s some kind of special, interesting phenomenon. Then they go on to use their own Latest Revelation.
SO I keep telling you it WORKS. What I get from that is the observation that I don’t seem to mind tooting my own horn.
That is true, but if that is all you notice my message is lost.
In 1982, when John Ashbrook died, the amendment preventing the IRS from imposing racial quotas on every private school in America came up for renewal.
John and I had gotten that amendment on a vote of over four to one with 431 of the 435 voting congressmen sitting there.
When it came up for renewal, John’s wifge had been elected to fill out his term. She and Bob Dornan were left to defend it.
They barely made it. They were cut to pieces in the debate.
Did it occur to them to call me in?
No way. I had to sit there watching them babble and miss. I finally managed to get a couple of points to them, or it would have gone down. But I had to do it through other staff.
I could not believe they had not simply read up on what we said in the first place to pass the thing. Their staff work was typical Republicans conservative staff work, beneath contempt.
So what was I supposed to do? Call up Mrs Ashbrook and Bob Dornan and tell the truth, “You can’t do this without me.”
All they would have noticed was the ego.
And we damned near had racial quotas imposed by IRS mandate on every private school in America precisely because all they woud have noticed was the ego.
I’m getting old, gang. You can either notice the ego or save the race.
“Undocumented”
Posted by Bob in How Things Work on 04/19/2006
In my Charlotte interview, which is supposed to aired in May, the cameraman was a very dark Hispanic. After the female interviewer finished, he asked me some questions.
Q: “You don’t want Hispanics here, but you wouldn’t mind Russians anad Eastern Europeans coming over.”
REPLY: “Within limits, no. They are not part of the genocide.”
Q: “But hwat about Hispanicsw who want a better life for their families?”
REPLY: “You are justifying genocide. There is no justification for genocide.”
I think I pointed something else out in the interview:
“When you use the term ‘undocumented worker’ you are saying that the only difference between me and anybody in the world who wants to live in the United States is that some bureaucrat gives me documents.”
Nobody but me is CAPABLE of thinking that way. I am standing on my OWN American ground. Everybody else starts and stays onthe defensive.
Whent the Hispanic talked about Hispanics, I simply pointed out aht he was worried about his own people and I was worried about MY people. Why shyould it be more naturtal for him to worry about his people and me to worry about mine.
When the girl asked me about Hispanics and Anglos getting along in this country, I simply replied, “They HAVE a country.”
That ended that discussion.
In fact everything I said put an end to a line of inquiry that leaves every other American helpless.
Immigration Thinking
Posted by Bob in How Things Work on 04/19/2006
In the last piece I was talking about the regular Southerner-turned-hippie took it for granted that the Coca-Cola man should feel guilty that his Coca-Cola bottling plant was a thing of beauty — and a beacon of hope — in the misery of 1950s India.
If you ever wonder how our thinking ever got so screwed up relative to immigration, you can stop wondering.
As always, what passes for thinking among suburban Southerners is what all the other suburbanites were thinking a generation ago. Southern “liberaism” is always a fossil enclosed in amber.
The apprently harmless crap that the hippies were pushing in the 1960s is the basis of natioanl policy today. Everybody from the Marxists to the libertarians agrees that whatever we have was STOLEN from the third world.
Libertarians don’t SAY that, any more than liberals outside the South say it today.
What libertarrians say is that the border should be open because any third worlder walking across the border magically gets paid ten times as much on this side of the border.
Therefore, says the libertarian, since the market will pay him ten times as much on this side of the border, you are ROBBING him if you don’t let him in.
In other words, the libertarian and the Southern liberal are saying exactly the same thing: the only reason workers get paid better on this side of the border is becauswe they happen to be on this side of that magical border. The libertarian says we have no right to it.
Who ARE the Old Folks?
About 1959 I watched a Twilight Zone episode which had a World War I pilot breaking through the time barrier an landing at an American air base. He was in a completeley alien world. To us in the late 1950s World War I was a completely unrelated age.
His tick-tick-tick little plane looked like a toy amid the huge jets bombers. His ID showed him with his hair uncombed and looked like a cheap bit of cardboard, totally unlike the laminated IDs of that “modern” age.
World War I was a LONG time ago.
Today, we still have hippies pushing the “revolutionary” ideas they were marching around about four decades ago. The media NEVER refer to them as “old timers.”
Listening to the dying voices of network TV, you woulf think those were still the Voices of Tomorrow. Nobody notices it or thinks it’s funny.
And that, boys and girls, is the POINT.
It’s not just incorrect, it’s FUNNY.
Until you realize that the hippies are in an age as farther back than World War I was in 1959, you have not the slightest persepctive on Modern Opinion.
Every campus in America is firmly stuck in the 1960s. They are trying to enforce 1960s hippie opinion.
If someone has to be pretty stupid to hold that nonsense high decades after its heyday, what about the people who PAY for it? What about hte people who disagree with it but take it seriously?
I am trying to get the truth out among a bunch of retards. aka, respectable conservatives. Southerners are particularly pathetic. When a Southerner goes liberal, he instantly becomes a 1960s hippie. Worse, he honestly believes he has discovered Modern Opinion, a whole NEW set of ideas.
I was reading a history of hte Coca-Cola company by a guy from an old Atlanta family, published in 1993.
He was talking about a Coca-Cola executive who went to India and got a good look at the misery there around 1952:
“Harold had an overwhelming desire to lock himself in the Taj Mahal Hotel to ‘shut out all the misery.’ Ther next day, WITH NO APPRENT SENSE OF IRONY (my emphases), Harrold described the p’perfectly gorgeous’ Coca Cola bottling plant…”
Why should he feel a sense of irony? He was bringing somehting to India to help alleviate all that misery, but the author didn’t see it that way. He is a Southerner who has adopted Modern, i.e., hippie, thought.
The hippie idea was that all of us should be ashamed that we lived better than the third world.
The ippies BELIEVED something that is hard for us to imagine today. They genuinely believed, and said repeatedly onthe endless string of Tonight Shows they were on, that all the money white countries had was STOLEN from the third world. So the Coke building was the cause of India’s misery.
How do you deal with that? How on earth would we be able to steal money the third world never had?
Nobody EVER asked that.
Certainly this author, a Southerner-turned-Modern Thinker, had no sense of irony whatsoever about what he said. He took it for granted that all Modern Thinkers would understand why an American should feel a sense of “irony” because his plant was rich and India was poor.
Most people wouldn’t even notice this little sentence in a thick book, but, as a friend of mine said, “Things jump out at you that other people don’t even notice.”
Well, if we are going to reverse today’s trends, we had damned well better start NOTICING.
-
You are currently browsing the archives for Wednesday, April 19th, 2006
Bob’s Books
Bob's first book - 1976
A Plague On Both Your HousesBob's second book - 1982
THE NEW RIGHT PAPERSBob's deadliest book - 2004
Why Johnny Can't Think:
America's Professor-PriesthoodWhy Johnny Can't Think ebook zip
pwrd: Phu=9Ad5
Good to See Antonio
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 04/19/2006
Antonio Fini says,
“Ok Bob, what’s the secret? ”
“I know the secret to losing weight is to burn more calories than you eat. While I’ve never actually done this, at least I know The Secret in case I ever want to try.”
“So what’s the secret to defeating the enemy and making the audience say ‘Yes! That’s what I’ve always thought myself !'”
“Whatever it is I’ll bet it’s as plain as the nose on my face. So just point us in the right direction: ‘Whitaker’s maxims for winning in debate’ or the like. ”
Comment by Antonio Fini
RULE ONE:
This is personal.
This is MY country.
This is MY race.
You HAVE a country. What right have you to mine?
This is genocide. How DARE you be a part of genocide against MY race?
If you have a Hispanic name, you are defending Hispanics. I accept that.
Anyone like me who does not defend MY race is a traitor.
If you wanted to get rid of all Hispanics to please me, I would despise you.
I feel the same way about people who don’t defend MY race.
Nothing you say should EVER reflect any other attitude.
No Comments