Archive for April 27th, 2006
Aristocaqrcy — naciocracy
Professional — A title which entitles one to get paid without producing anything
Consultant — See “Professional”
American — Somebody who is part of a nation of immigrant, i.e., everybody and therefore
Constitution — The Supreme Court of the United States
Modern — Becoming dated
Knowledge — See “Law”
Wisdom — Drivel which is taken seriously
Equality: Bad arithmetic.
Moderation: the idea that truth is the average between two absurdities.
Hate: Righteous Indignation on the other side.
Law — Opinion with teeth
Brotherhood — See “Cain”
Fascism — “One man, one vote” where the man is specified
Do you think that testable IQ has been skewed by the feminization of education? I remember being one of those “smart” little girls who learned to read quickly, was good at memorizing,etc. But after I grew up, I found out that I actually wasn’t very good at figuring things out. I’m impressed with Peter’s psychology professer doing what she did.
Comment by Shari
I warned you that what you will get for your comments is not necessarily a reply to what you said.
You will get what you made me think of.
I also said that that is what I want from you.
What Shari made me think of was request from my sister, the one who actually reads this blog from time to time.
She wanted me to record here the regular piece I wrote for The Southern Patrisan for so long, “The Partisan Dictionary.” It was an Ambrose Bierce type of definition, which uses definitions to make a point.
Bierce, from Texas, called ie “The Devil’s Dictionary.”
For example, he defined the word “mulatto:”
“Mulatto — n — A child of two races, ashamed of both.”
So when Shari used the word “feminization, it reminded me of a definition I used in the Partisan Dictionary:
“Feminism — n — a movement dedicated to the diea that being feminine is a sign of inferiority.”
Shari makes it clear that she is a female. She makes it very clear that a more male approach is necessary in leading a white society to the stars.
But aren’t all women just like men?
That is what feminism is all about: women can do everything men can.
I have read astonisahed articles written by the few feminists who actuallly had children. They tell us, breathlessly, that by the age of eighteen months the girl child is DIFFERENT from the boy child.
They discover that, after a few hundred million years of evolution, the girls’ function and the boys’ function is actually DIFFERENT.
Girls are not people who, given the proper upbringing, would be boys.
Once again I am in the peculiar position of explaining to you something you will not believe about the ruling attitude I remember just a short time ago. Like all those outdated attitudes, it is required on campuses today.
But on planet earth, the idea that boys and girls are the same is laughed.
You brats simply cannot believe that this idea was required belief for most of my lifetime.
Women PICK the leaders. In every part of nature, it is the females who decide whom they will mate with. Male peacocks do all the strutting. Female peacocks are the POINT of all the strutting.
Feminism says that what is important is the strutting. Femals don’t get the big colored fantails male peacocks get.
This causes the female peacocks irreversible ego damage.
You think I am joking, of course. You didn;t live through decades of this orthodoxy.
So Shari uses the term “feminization” as derogatory.
How one earth could a WOMAN use “feminization” in a derogatory sense?
She uses it because that particular feminization is in the wrong PLACE.
There are places where being feminine is absolutely essential.
That’s not rocket science.
There are places where being maculine is absolutely essential or evolution would have produced no males at all.
In fact, since females do all the judging and raise all the offspring, it is a bit of a relief for us males to realize that we DO have a place.
None of which answers the point Shari made.
But I think she will find it a relief that somebody else understands where she is coming from.
Living in a world where nobody seems to understand the basics is no easier on Shari thanit is on me.
Her basic point is right.
I wish I had been able to address it at length, Shari. But because we live in a world where the difference between men and women is a mystery, it is hard to get down to other essentials.
Peter points out:
Do you really think that even the “testable IQs” that are marketed today are valid measures by race?
Do you really think that a psychologist who discovered that Orientals or Jews had much lower IQs than whites would be given much press?
In college, I had a Psych professor who did tell the truth — quietly. She found real, valid test results and displayed them on an overhead in class. She put the results up as just one display in a series of overheads. It was part of a group of overheads that she said we didn’t need to take notes on if we didn’t want to, that they wouldn’t be on the test, and that they were just for our own information. She had done this previously with more innocuous overheads, so we were familiar with the routine. She left up the overhead of the test results showing lower IQs for Orientals and Jews only briefly. But she did scan the class to see who had noticed. I did.
I stayed after class and told her thanks for the overheads, smiled and left. She got great evals from the class. I got a good grade.
Comment by Peter
That lady is part of our underground army, each member of whom works alone.
You were a blessing to her.
In any totalitarian environment, there are those of us who keep telling the truth, defying the Truth.
I cannot give you enough credit for understanding. I cannot give you enough credit for what you did for that lonely shieldmaiden whom I wod love to thank.
I get SO tried of people praising somebody who makes a publc statement which is something like the truth.
The heroes and the herioines are the underground warriors like her.
We fight for what is true simply because we cannot stand untruth.
That is heroism.
When you understand that, everybody else seems superficial and silly to you.
Joe Rorke, whom I discussed in the last article, has not only come back despite my twisting his words, but, as a fellow old-timer, he just gave me an invaluable compliment:
“Bob, I swear I think you are getting better by the minute. Here I thought you were devolving and it turns out you are evolving. Not bad for an old timer. ”
Comment by joe rorke
Modesty woud be the decent response, but it’s not in me.
The killing thing about age is that it leaves you spending decades repeating yourself, chasing your tail, like Chinese civilization. Joe knows that.
And he tells me I am not doing that.
You young folks may not understand what that means to me.
But the rest of you young ‘uns are all a bunch of brats, so who cares?
Joe says I’m a pain in the ass, but I’m worth the pain.
And I was joking about the rest of you being brats.
They’ll believe that won’t they, Joe?
Joe Rorke said that he had finally given up on me after he had been isinterepreted 27 times in these pages.
I just got embarrassed on Stormfront because I read only one entry by somebody and then gave them advice as young man.
It turned out that Christian Identity was not only a young woman, but she was pretty young woman who had put her picture inthe Pic Thread I was writing in.
I explained to her that the old man got confused:
“At my age, young lady, the brain is the second thing to go.”
She’s a sweet girl, so she did my humiliate me by making me specify what the FIRST things is.
But the POINT of this piece is that I cannot and will not improve, however hard I try.
When you are young, you slowly get to understand that people, even the people who pretend to be perfect, make mistakes.
As you get really mature you learn that people make the SAME mistakes over and over and over and over.
So I am going to misinterpret you, over and over and over.
1) I am not going to read what you said carefully enough.
2) I am going to be reminded of a lifetime of mistakes people have made, and use your writing as an example of that mistake. This is BAD.
There re two ways to deal with this.
One is to refuse to put up with it any more.
The other is to recognize that, despite my honst and truly desperate efforts to avoid it — and please note that I said that — this comes with the territory called Bob.
When I read what you say, my mind starts working. It often starts weorkingo n things you did NOT say.
Taken in context, this is NOT an insult.
It is inconsiderate, but it is NOT an insult.
And I can’t help it.
My mind moves very, very fast, and often precisely what you said gets lost in what you made me think of.
So the result of what I say will often be unfair to you. It may be completely off of what you said.
A toughold turkey like Joe Rorke decided he wouldn’t put up with it. Then he decided, “Oh, to hell with it, I will.”
Shari must find this really hard to put up with.
Help me out, gang. I get you wrong, but EVERYBODY gets you wrong.
I can spend all my thought on getting you exactly right or I can just blather away and make points you will not find elsewhere.
You have the comments section to straighten me out. But if I had somebody like me to read, I wouldn’t give a flying rip if he happened to get me wrong a lot.
I know it’s asking a lot, but let the old buffallo roam, even if he does leave his chips in inconvenient places.
Bob is a screwup.
But he is very unique screwup. An irreplacable screwup.
And he asks your tolerance and your help.
I could have called this “LibAnonII,” but I thought the title above was catchier.
I was reading another comment said Anonowitz, and I noticed he said more or less what I just said in anwer to his comment below.
He began, as all good people should, by quoting me:
‘What LibAnon is talking about goes much deeper.”
The credit is all yours, Bob. I simply took your Whitakerism, which was a classic, and proceeded to ask the Whitaker question: “Yeah, but did it WORK?”
Based on the evidence, my provisional answer is “yes”. Centuries of priestly celibacy in Europe undoubtedly did lower the average IQ among whites — how could it not have? On the other hand, the Odinism inherent in the white gene pool would not, in my opinion, have culminated in science, technology, and world conquest had white Europe remained a group of pagan tribes. The culture of the “West” as we know it today, a compound of Germanic and Greco-Roman institutions, was largely the creation of the (Carolingian and Ottonian) Holy Roman Empire, presided over by the Church. In other words, the Germanic genetic heritage was necessary, but not sufficient, to create the civilization we’re trying to defend today.
LibAnon in his comment below is sinking back into all the non-Whitaker arguments and missing the exact points I am trying to make.
But if this is what he got, it means I am doing something wrong.
I am thinking as I write, so don’t stop with my first comments.
“Bob, you’re arguing today like a member of an official Oppressed Minority Group. White people, you say, can’t be that dumb because we invented horseshoes, those tests don’t measure REAL intelligence anyway, and besides, our people were genetically sabotaged by a thousand years of ‘Middle Eastern crap.’”
*****LibAnon, my first rule, as you should know by now, is that I NEVER go on the defensive.
***** First of all, what I discovered during this discussion of “middle east crap” was something that was entirely different from what I started with a few months ago. This self-destruction program of whites did NOT staryt with “middle eastern crap.”
***** The opposite is the case. The Ideal of Sterility has nothing to do with the Old Testaments or Semites. It came from a religion what was officially limited to Aryans an degenerated.
**** That was a great discovery for me, and it bothers me that you misssed it completely.
*** A lot of people have asked me what is so self-destructive in our race. I came up with at least a start at a beginning of an exampleto work with.
**** You will NEVER see me say “those tests don’t measure real intelligence anyway.” I have been working onthese tests, blood groupings, EEGs and a lot else for over forty years at a professional level, we were asked to present one paper at Walter Reed Hospital, and my attitude wouuld take a LOT of explaining.
***** A third point you missed here is that I am NOT talking about some ability to “creat a civilization.” That is, once again, a standard point that is PRECISELY what I am NOT saying. See below.
What’s the difference between that and African Americans who argue “we can’t be DAT dumb because brothers invented peanut butter and traffic lights AND dem tests don’t measure REAL intelligence anyhow AND besides the white man been keepin’ us DOWN, five hundred years of oppression, yo”?
****** You have a good point here. We must not get into this defensive crap.
****** But remember my BIG point, the one no one else makes:
**** Creating **A** civilization is like ants creating an ant hill.
**** Creating one more civilization is of no importance whatever. What whites have created is a pathway to the stars.
My point is, who cares? When it comes to the qualities necessary to build a civilization that GOES SOMEWHERE, IQ is pretty far down the list. No society has EVER been run, except into the ground, by intellectuals. Intellectuals are servants and can’t succeed as anything else.
**** Now we’re cooking!
**** Every “other Great Civilization” got to the point where it found geometry or something and then the priesthood took over and it stagnated until it turned brown and died away.
**** In hte case of the Great Native American Civilizations, they were colored alrady, built things, stagnated and went away, leaving us to gawk at the greatnes of that particular glorified ant hill.
**** Reading what you said, it occurs to me tha the minute smart people stop impressing people with what they DO and start calling themselves intellectuals or Great Goobies or priests of Ammon, the stagnation phase is under way.
The true strength of our race is not our collective intellectual ability, measurable or not, but our faith, our passion, our sense of beauty, our sense of loyalty, honor and fair play, and our grateful curiosity about the world outside our own heads. In other words, our religious sense. That’s what makes us unique and gives our race its unique power.
***** As so often happens, I glory in your sentiments but I disagree with your logic.
***** By now you know my favorite NC saying, “You’re ugly, your feet stink, and you don’t love Jesus.”
**** On our level, it refers to the idea that accomplishment comes from virtue.
**** The Aryan group does have “our faith, our passion, our sense of beauty, our sense of loyalty, honor and fair play, and our grateful curiosity about the world outside our own heads. In other words, our religious sense. That’s what makes us unique and gives our race its unique power.”
**** I think that is largely CONCOMMITANT, not causal.
I read in this morning’s newspaper that it has been recently discovered that even songbirds can do arithmetic and parse grammatical structures. So much for Noam Chomsky, who thinks that such abilities are what defines humanity. Let’s leave such extravagant overestimation of the ability to perform such tricks, which we share with animals, to the Noams of the world. It’s something we’re picking up from the “Judaized cultural imperium” (to use Kevin Macdonald’s phrase) in which we live, and we need to get over it.
***** Noam Chomsky will naturally believe that what Jews excel in is what “humanity” is all about.
***** But what you saying precisely in line with my observation.
***** I was talking about other people’s — not Bob’s — obsession with MEASURABLE INTELLIGENCE. I already put it in all-caps several times, and I don’t know how to make it more clear.
**** I made a typically Whitaker observation that no one else thought about: This measurable IQ could have been made higher by Jews who concentrated on that sort of ability, in order to encourage it.
**** In the decades I have been on this IQ business, EVERYBODY has mentioned the probability that Jews have bred for the things that made for a higher IQ, and Jews have a higher MEAURABLE INTELLIGENCE now.
**** Nathaniel Weyl was discussing that in the 1950s, and it wasn’t new THEN.
**** But no one has mentioned even the possibility that a thousand years of the church doing exactly the opposite may have had the opposite effect on us.
**** Except Weyl, who is a Jew. He indicated that white gentiles had pushed their IQ down, and stopped there.
**** If you are an IQ nut, the implications would be, and I know people who fell for it, that Jews are specially bred to rule.
***** According tot hat theory, we are permanently crippled.
**** So our proving that black IQ was lower than white was used to prove Jewish Supremacy.
**** So many of the comments on what I said are correctly replying that IQ is not the only thing here. But in doing so they seem to be saying that I indicated something about IQ I did NOT say.
***** My point is that we are the only NON-ANTS around.
***** What do Jews and Orientals, inthe absense of white gentiles, DO with all that puzzle-solving and reading IQ they have?
***** They study their Ancient Scripts and they stagnate until somebody comes along and burns their Ancient Wisdom.
****** As a matter of simple arithmetic, the church may have lowered our average IQ.
***** That’s an interesting point. But regardless of that, we are still the only humans in town.
***** As LibAnon points out, BIRDS can do what Jews and orientals can do. Ants can do it better.
**** It reminds of what Carleton Putnam said fifty years ago in response to the people who kept saying blacks had much better sense of rythme and were greater athletes than whites:
“Canaries sing beautifully. And every year a HORSE wins the Kentucky Derby.”
Comment by LibAnon
In comments responding to “The Church’s War Against Genetic Intelligence” people are still finding it impossible to see that I am talking about TESTABLE intelligence, the stuff Orientals and Jews are so good at.
Going through this for the unpteenth time on Stormfront, in the middle of a reply, a very important point hit me.
Here is the exchange. The IMPORTANT point is in the last part of my reply below:
Very true, but not my point.
Please realize that I am very aware of hte difference between creativity, constructive ability and TESTABLE intelligence.
All we are talking about when someone praises Orientals and Jews is TESTABLE intelligence. TESTABLE intelligence, literacy and so forth, was exactly what the church looked for when it made a eunuch out of any boy who showed special reading ability.
A child who was good at reading was “for the church,” and therefore had chastity pushed on him.
All I say is a matter of simple logic. This breeding program pushed down the TESTABLE intelligence that makes IQ nuts say Orientalsd nad Jews are master races.
In, fact, you have hit on exactly the point that kept this from being a total disaster. The church may have tried to make the kids who showed testable talents into eunuchs, but it did NOT get all the ones who didn’t SHOW their creativity and productivity by a special talent for reading, etc.
IN FACT, YOU JUST MADE ME THINK OF SOMETHING:
The genes that survived the thousand years of church-sponsored dysgenics wold be precisely those of creative, brilliant people who did NOT show an obvious special talent in TESTABLE areas or in reading and writing.
That would mean that a large of our treasuryof good genes are in the classes of our people who are brilliant but don’t show it in an obvious way.
Which may be why I have aleays been puzzled at how people worshipped professors and I thought so much of blue-collar people.
We have all noticed that the brains and common sense are not in the professors.
There may be a whole story in that.
\[QUOTE=Ibere]Just because a person can’t read or write doesn’t mean that he is not intelligent. There are a lot of great men in history that couldn’t do either. There are a lot of people with B.S. and P.H.D.’s who don’t have enough sense to come in from the rain. Just my opinion.[/QUOTE]