Never try to teach an anti that he should be loyal.

I remember a sitcom where he parents were appalled to find that their son was psychopath. They suddenly discovered that he couldn’t CARE if he hurt somebody.

What I loved was his common sense reply:

“You are saying I should feel bad when I hurt somebody? Why should I WANT that?”

This was statement of pure economic rationality, the position Ayn Rand took.

He was perfectly correct.

If one is born without loyalt in a society where loyalty is a mortal sin, why on earth should one want to be otherwise?

The anti has no feeling for his own race whatsoever.

He certainly has nothing to GAIN by having any such loyalty.

You can never persaude anybody that a feeling for the survival of your kind is something they should WANT.

A conscience is a burden.

If they don’t have this burden, why should they WANT it?

I talk about the heredity industry below.

There is another one developing which will provide us with an invaluable source of support.

Right now, sex-based education is gaining a great deal of ground. Sex-basd education calls for the segregation of male and female children in school.

One of the articles essential for salvation in the faith of Political Correctness since the 1970s has been that what we call “girls” are just children who were forced to play with dolls as children and what we call “boys” were the children who were forced to play with toy guns.

I wish this were an overstatement, but it isn’t.

They BELIEVED that crap!

But sex-based education isn’t just a theory, it’s a BUSINESS. Like education and welfare, it is becoming an INDUSTRY. Those in this industry, whether it is professors writing articles advocating it or teacherws specializing in it, constitute a major and increasing force for heresy inside Political Correctness.

Premise Checker, who knows all this, introduced me to a new potential industry: RACE-based education.

The reason “There is no such as race” is statement required of all professors is because the old idea that everybody is the same under the skin is just plain GONE.

Lately reviewers have noticed that Jensen and Rushton are published in major journals and not a peep of protest is made. The fundamental innate differences between races has ceased to be a matter of debate.

So the innate differences are now at least tacitly admitted, so all that is left is to say that it isn’t really RACIAL because race doesn’t exist.

By the way, since they lost the battle over the importance of heredity versus the important of environment, Politically Correct people today also insist that there is no scuh thing as heredity or environment.

When they had a case, they debated the relative importance of heredity and environment. Now that they’ve lost the debate, they say that the idea of heredity and enviroment is “simplistic.”

Normally when the Poliically Correct establishment admits it has lost a debate by saying that the debate never existed, everyody just lets that sleeping dog lie.

But race is now understood to be real. This would not matter so much if there were not articles to be written on it. This would not matter if there was not MONEY to be spent on it.

Buit blacks learn differently from whites, and there is now room for specialists to address that reality.

For one thing, as anybody who has heard Rap “Music” knows, blacks learn by ear, whereas whites tend to learn more by eye.

This has been pointed out repeatedly by Evil Racists, but now educators who want a job and a speciality are beginning to notice its importance.

Race-based education is not really segregation by a different name. The fact is that we segregated blacks because we assumed that “black education” was an oxymoron and any money spent on educating blacks was a waste of the miniscule amount of money the South had to educated whites.

To give them credit, those who want race-based education are really interested in black education.

But in my world this is not important. Now that we are richer, I don’t mind if blacks get education money as long as “black education” is not used the way the NAACP used it, as an excuse to destroy the white race.

If I were black and I thought that blacks were actually equal, I would think that anyone who was using them merely as a weapon against white gentiles would be about the nastiest insult anybody could come up with.

But it never surprised me in the slightest that blacks never thought of this, because it never occurred to me that blacks were CAPABLE of thinking that way.

Their leaders obviously agree with me. And blacks worship their leaders.

If you think black education is important, race-based education makes sense.

And here we have a whole industry dedicated to the proposition that race is important. Here we have an whole industry dedicated to the proposition that blacks are not just a weapon to use against the white race, but a group with its own characteristics.

In fact, race-based education says that blakcs are not only NOT just little white people whose job is to Harry Belafonte the white race out of existence, but a group with its own contribution to make.

Which makes race-based the enemy of the enemies of our existence.

Which makes them, though they wouldn’t want me to say so, makes them my friends.

My first book in my own name was, “A Plague on Both Your Houses.”

One of the basic themes of “Plague” was that liberalism was based on the biggest industry in America, what I called “the education-welfare establishment.” So social science professors who teach about heredity and environment belong to an industry, education, sociology, psychology, etc., whose only product is environment VERSUS heredity.

When the education-welfare establishment first got started it was the pet puppy of the capitalist ruling class. Camuses were conservative because that is where their money came from. When William Jennings Bryan ran on an anti-capitalist platform in 1896 the students at Hearvard tioted when he tried to speak on campus, just as Mommy Professor’s pet “revolutionaries” riot to keep Jensen or anyone else who talks about heredity off of their campuses today.

Today there is another industry devloping, the HEREDITY industry. Right genetic study on campus is the pet puppy of the social scientists. Just as professors at the turn of the century swore their loyalty to big business, the geneticist who wants to be allowed on campus swears that there is no such thing as race, that the programs of social science make perfect sense.

But it will not be long before people begin to CHOOSE the genes of the children they have. Power and money will flow to the new HEREDITY Industry.

Just as the social scientists did to businessmen, the pet puppy in their lap will bite social scientists in the crotch and become their enemies.