I put this inthe antis thread on Stormfront:
“The hottest part of Hell,” said Dante, “Is reserved for those who, in a time of moral crisis, preserve their neutrality.”
But of course the HOTTEST part of Dante;s Inferno was not the WORST part of Hell.
The Tenth Circle, the WORST part of Hell, was for TRAITORS.
So since our society is dedicated to the eradication of the “race problem,” meaning the white problem, the white person who says, “I never think about race” is either being neutral or taking the side of the traitors.
Is he refusing to take a stand, and therefore belongs to the hottest part of Hell, or is he an outright traitor?
Does he deserve the hottest or the coldest?
#1 by Dave on 05/05/2006 - 10:12 pm
He deserves the hottest part of hell. He’s ordinary. He doesn’t know hatred, nor does he know loyalty. He just wants to get along.
The coldest part of hell is reserved for someone who runs for war leader to reciprocate a solemn purpose to a fictitious nation while committing treason to the real one. Worse yet, this scoundrel when presented with obligations to bravely “go among and muster” discharges it through fake media events in favor of his own personal safety and careerist retirement. Worse yet, this scoundrel excuses it all as “discharge of duty to God”. We all know whom I am taking about.