Archive for May 27th, 2006
Don’t forget, this is an industry which needs us to survive! Without us nasty racists, they are out of buisiness. No wonder they seem so keen to make any white person who speaks for his race a racist, and anyone else who doesn’t really support multi-racialism a ‘latent’ or ‘closet’ racist.
They need us to survive, just as the Jews need racists, so they can be Jews. They need their enemies.
And in a sense, I think some of us need them.
Comment by Dennis
That reminds me of Gandalf in LOTR.
What if I get my little army and topple the Dark Lord the way I want to?
We can do it.
While all the obvious forces are in full array marching against the Enemy, we can destroy the evil ones
Why? Because they will be looking at the chest-beaters. None of them could imagine anyone would be willing to forego all the glory and hit them in hte one place that would be their ruin.
The Dark Lord was destroyed in the very place and with the very Ring it never occurred to him anyone would be willing to have the moral courage to destroy.
H was confident that everyone would see that the Ring was beautiful and precious.
No one would destroy it simply because it was Evil.
Let eerybody else array themselvea against the Powers That B
We will destroy them because they are laughable.
Gandalf said that his mission ended when the Dark Lord was destroyed, when the Third Age ended.
Could I live with that?
Put it another way:
With that, I could LIVE.
How would Morris Dees be able to increase his multimillion-dollar bankroll if we didn’t exist?
How would he gutsy Norman Finkelstein’s “Holocaust Industry” survive if they actually made good on their statement “There is no place for racism in America.”
A more basic question:
Do you think that anybody in the anti-racism industry today really CARES about white racism?
I am amused by all the people who shout how practical they are because “It’s all about money!” but at the same time they insist the other side is motivated by pure Idealism.
News item gang: The people who really hated us are mostly DEAD.
We are dealing with an INDUSTRY a lot of people who are making a living INHERITED.
Think about that and then get back to me on it.
Clint Eastwood made a movie called “The Unforgiven.”
He had made all those spaghetti westerns and Dirty Harry movies, so Eastwood decided to make a movie that all the critics would think was GREAT.
You have to give Eastwood credit for knowing what he is doing. He wanted all the critics to say all those other movies were just entertainment, but “The Unforgiven” was The Real Thing.
Keep in mind that the last person who could possibly know what The Real Thing was in the real west would be a New York movie critic.
Have you ever seen a Woodie Allen movie?
Absolutely every single whie person in “The Unforgiven,” including the one Clint Eastwood played, was a Woodie Allen clone.
All of them were absolute cowards. Clint’s character was a coward until he got drunk.
The only real hero in the movie was Eastwood’s Faithful Negro Companion. He never showed an ounce of fear. He was the martyr the evil sheriff totured to death and for whom Eastwood got drunk and killed the white gentiles for.
To say this movie was a critical success is a gross understatement. Whoever and Ebert pronounced it a truly realistic picture of the Old West, with which they were apparently intimately familiar.
Reality, realistic, true to life, all of New York praised the movie.
Eastwood made the movie precisely to get this bunch of retards to say that.
The slow season for news has traditionally been August. That’s probably still
true on a national basis.
There are a lot of small towns and small cities where most of the local clubs
don’t meet in June, July and at least the first half of August, but we’re in
an off-year election year and some states have very hot state and local races.
A press release isn’t _hard_ to write. However, there are some requirements,
such as prominently listing a point of contact and his or her _current_
contact information. Sending any picture files less than 300 dpi is a waste
as they won’t print well.
Comment by Elizabeth
I was talking with a lady in her seventies, and we share a certain wonder.
She said that I was breaking up on her cell phone, so she had to use her land line.
This will not strike you younger folks as anything strange, but it gave me a revelation.
When I called her on her land line, I pointed out that she and I knew what a “land line” IS.
I then said, “You know, when you and I were kids, it would never occurred to us that we would do more learning after age sixty than we did when we were six years old.”
Land line, attachment, DVD as opposed to VCR, Favorites, Page Up, download, upload, you don’t have the room on a floppy disk (which NEVER flops) so you have to use the E drive, remember that you need a CD-R disk for that, you hit “Quote” when any fool know you should have hit “New Thread.”
And on and on and on.
Every word of this would have been Greek to us a decade ago.
So we LOVE to complain about it.
What you young people may find hard to believe is that we enjoy the HELL out of all this.
We exercise the human prerogative of bitching, but we wouldn’t have it any other way.
When we were young, learning consisted of repetition.
You can recite the ABCs today. But you cannot remember what an agony it was to repeat them and repeat them and repeat them.
If you want to torture a child, you can put them on the rack or you can make them mindlessly repeat the same thing over and over and over.
Which one is crueler?
It’s a toss-up.
Remember the boredom you experienced when learning the multiplication tables?
Of course you don’t.
Memory blocks out agony like that.
Remember the pain of each baby tooth coming out?
Us old folks bitch and complain about how Kindergarten kids find computers natural, while we have to grunt and groan to learn them.
Us old folks love to groan about how much energy kids have and how slow we are.
But would we would have it any other way?
Try taking away a child’s natural energy and who would attack you violently?
Young people learn this modern stuff easily. It’s WORK for us.
We love to bitch about it.
But if you tried to even things out by making it harder on the kids, we’d kill you.
A Florida TV station has begun regular attacks on Stormfront.
Paul Weyrich wrote a piece in my “New Right Papers” in 1982 that every person who wants to know REAL politics should read. It is Bob’s favorite kind of stuff, common sense from a pro who has DONE what he is talking about.
Paul wrote about how he got through to the media.
First of all he talked about how, when he first got to Washington, conservatives were all of the “All Is Lost!” school. The media was all leftist and they had given up on trying to get their message out.
Paul certainly knew the media was against him, but he also noticed that “All Is Lost!” conservatives were doing an AWFUL job of dealing with them.
So Paul analyzed what the media might publicize.
You see, the media are in a rough, competitive business. So what you do is give them something to compete with.
For example, you get to know when the slow season for news is. You time your announcements for slow periods when they NEED anything they can get that won’t put readers or watchers to sleep.
That never occurred to regular conservatives. They were too busy convincing each other that “All Is Lost.”
He gave them press kits.
Normally a conservative would do a press conference and then try to fend off questions like, “Where is your money coming from?”
Paul would say, “That’s in your press kit, fellows. Why don’t you read it?”
A press kit also does their writing for them.
I keep pointing out that the one time my picture was on the front page of the New York Times was when I really didn’t FIT there. The story was about YOUNG Reagan appointees and I was 41. But htey used my picture anyway and didn’t mention my age.
Because the writer desperately NEEDED the lines I had given him. My stuff made his article INTERESTING.
The New York Times was not one of those publications that were desperate to put Bob Whitaker on the front page. But I had learned from Weyrich that if you say things that keep readers AWAKE, the most astonishing people will feature you.
I listen good. Paul’s advice got me in a lot of places, but a picture onthe front page of the New York Times is my prize trophy from Paul.
The media have a hell of a problem with white survivalism.
On the one hand, it is FASCINATING to readers, and in fact minorities are likely to be more fascinated by it than white readers.
Furious, but interested. And “interested” sells papers.
You know all those movies about Evil Nazis?
The usual explanation for this is that “ALL Is Lost!” (AIL). The AIL crowd has a point. They say that the reason the media concentrates on Nazis is because they don’t want to denounced leftists like Stalin and Pol Pot and Mao Tse Tung.
But, using the Weyrich formula, I realized something ELSE about Evil Nazis.
Down here on earth, folks don’t like to look at UGLY people.
You never see an Evil Nazi who not absolutely beautiful.
The women are all wildly beautiful unapologetic, wonderfully built blond Nordics dressed to the nines. The men are all six feet something, blond, blue-eyed and their uniforms are starched and their hair is perfectly combed.
Where else can you show people like that except in a show about how evil Nazis? Nobody ever asked for racial balance in a show about Nazis.
Nobody wants to look at ugly Communists.
So the media are faced with the fact that everybody knows race and immigration are the elephants in the living room. If they talk about THAT, they can keep their audiences not only AWAKE, but fascinated.
We need to think about how they can do what they need to do.
Why is that Florida station hammering on SF? Obviously it INTERESTS people.
The AIL group will moan about, “This is all anti stuff.”
But you give an old pro like me a way to get publicity, and I’ll go after it like a wolf after raw meat.
They want what we have to offer so desperately it is hard to conceive of. We are NEWS.
Which is why I get so desperately frustrated when one of us spends his time joining the millions bitching ahout George Bush and Iraq.
Let me introduce you to something basic: at all times and in all societies, the establishment media does not LIKE real revolutionaries.
Can we all learn to live with that fact?
All the publicity we get will be “anti stuff.”
No revolution ever succeeded by depending on the good will of those in power.
We need publicity.
If we do it right, we have more potential publicity than we can imagine.
All of it negative.
Those who hate us will still hate us, but they will see we are a growing power.
But a lot of people will LIKE us. They hate the media, too.
As a pro, I see a wide-open road.
Is there any way on earth I can persuade SOMEBODY to help me go down it?
Ok, back to why George Bush is a meanie.