Washington towers above the other Founding Fathers, but you almost never hear a quote from him.

If you do hear a quote from him, it was probably written for him by Hamilton or somebody. If you read biographies of GW you simply cannot conclude that his IQ would have tested above average.

I have studied and worked with testing a LOT. I worked with my doctor brother and we came up with testing methods he was especially invited to Walter Reed to talk about.

PLEASE don’t get bogged down into what IQ tests test. Analogy tests are better, becasue IQ tests were developed to tell the difference between the LEGAL, not medical, categories of idiot, imbecile, moron, subnormal and normal.

Mensa be damned, IQ tests are admissible in court, but they are NOT admissible to talk about how BRIGHT someone is. The analogy test is better for that.

The point is that even the best “intelligence” test, the PERFECT intelligence test, would have classified GW as about average.

But Washington was a genius.

There is a CORRELATION between intelligence and genius. There is a CORRELATION between I and height.

But Napolean was still highly intelligent.

Genius is CORRELATED to tested intelligence. But GW was a genius.

You see, intelligence is largely a matter of how fast your mind works, among other things. So while a highly intelligent person will LEARN to read fast, a genius like GW will never read fast.

Charlemagne tried hard, but he never learned to read at all.

So while a high-IQ person could leap from mountaintop to mountaintop in an hour, old George could ponder and ponder and ponder and finally come up with something said high-IQ type would NEVER come to.

That is what GENIUS is: Thinking of something no one else would EVER think of.

When the fighting in Boston got under way, a lot of people tried to jockey their way into being the Commander in Chief of the inevitable new American Army. They spoke, they made conncetions, they did the whole thing.

There is no record that Washington ever said a thing as a member of hte House of Burgesses. He figured he couldn’t compete that way.

So he just showed up at each session with his uniform on, six feet two inches of Silent Dignity. That was genius.

No big speeches, those were for politicians. No jockeying. That just made the other jockeys hostile.

He just showed up in his uniform saying, “When you stop babbling and want to get serious, I’m here.”

Actually GW wasn’t much of a general.

I will now do a separate piece on how he won the Revolution.

I am about to write a piece explaining that one cannot understand the true genius of George Washington unless you first realize, I mean really take into account, the fact that he was not very bright.

This reminds me once again that most of the really important realizations in my life have sounded like jokes.

One of my best insights was taken entirely as a joke by every commenter.

Everybody talks about how their heart bleeds for poor Mexico. I wrote an article pointing out that fact that I wish WE had a Great Northern Neighbor the way Mexico does.

What would our Great Northern Neighbor look like? It would be made up of beautiful Nordics who made us look colored.

What would our Great Northern Neighbor be like?

It would have ten times our per capita income. When one of hteir companies sent a branch office to our area they would Exploit us by paying us at least five times as much as we get right now.

A minimum wage job from up there would start at fifty grand a year.

I could live with that.

You know how the average Mexican lives? Our Great Northern Neighbor would see our presnt standard living the same way.

Do you know thw malnutrition and bad teeth and diseases the average Mexican takes for granted. Can you IMAGINE the kind of health the aveage Mexican would take for granted if the United States didn’t EXIST?

They would look at the diseases and old age we take for granted EXACTLY the same way. Medical breakthroughs would be pouring through like a flood.

But it sounded like a joke.

It wasn’t.

I would LOVE to have a Great Northern Neighbor I could sneak into and earn two hundred dollars an hour.

And they would think they were EXPLOITING me.

But I understand why you considered this a joke.

But if you looked at the world this way, what a difference it would make?

Instead of whipping outselves about how POOR Mexico is by our standards, we would look at a world where Mexico existed and we did not.

That is a wholey different, a wholey realistic, worldview.

So why does it sound funny?

Because humor consits of insights. Humor consists of looking at things in a shocking way.

You know the old joke about the man who walked into the doctor’s office with a bird on his head?

The doctor asks, “What can I do for you?”

The bird replies, “I want you to get this guy off my ass.”

The humor is the surprise of looking at the world from an entirely different point of view, the BIRD’S point of view.

To a man who thinks like I do, the way so-called smart people look at the world is a series of jokes.

In 1945, Jews became the spoiled children of the world.

Jews were the symbol of everything anti-Nazism fought for. The emerging third world looked upon the Jews as fellow sufferers, looked down upon by the white gentiles.

Leftists looked to Jews as leaders of the Communist movement. Jew bragged about the complete preponderanceof Jewish names in Commuist leadership all over the world.

When the first Knesset met, they tried to distribute themselves on the standard left-to-right continuum, but not one single jew would sit on the right.

Then the pictures poured inof Jews inthe Death Camps. Eisenhower granted leave to members of the Greatest Generation to visit the Death Camps. All of htem came back with testimoney about The Death Camps in Germany.

It came out a couple of decades later that none of the Death Camps were in Germany. They were all safely behind the IronCurtain where nobody could examine them.

None of which ever kept a single member of The Greatest Generation, icluding Andy Rooney, from declaring he had SEEN the Death Camps in Germany.

But there is a fatal problem here.

In all the world, there is no group that is less able to HANDLE the status of Official Spoiled Children than the Jews.

The problem is that today’s Christianity has degenerated into pure self-hatred, while Judaism is now 99% self-pity.

Judaism was always based on Five Thousand Years of Suffering. As Henry Kissinger pointed out, “Any group that has been persecuted for five thousand years is doing something WRONG.”

But Judaism has always been based on the psychotic assumption that everybody is crazy but Jews. Every nation on earth has persecuted Jews, and every nation on earth, except the Jews, has always been wromg.

If I walk up to you and say, “Everybody’s crazy but me,” you would try to put as much distance between yourself and this nut as you could.

“Everybody’s crazy but me” is the CLASSIC line of a psychotic.

But “Everybody’s crazy but me” is the BASIS of Judaism.

So Jews were the world’s love children in 1945.

Now who loves the Jews?

Easstern Europe hates Jews in the old way. The French amabssador in the US referred to Israel as “that sh—y little country.” And the anti-Semitic Arabs have just BEGUN to arrive in France.

Those Arabs, who like Jews just a little less than Adolf did, are courtesy of the Jews. After World War II, Jews decieded they would GET white gentiles, once and for all. So they called anybody who opposed third world immigration into Europe Nazis.

So in came the Moslems. Tens of millions of Moslems.

Jews had long since decided to get their revenge on white gentiles through Bolshevism. So they backed the Communists who took over Eastern Europe.

Who loves Jews more, Eastern Europeans or Moslems?

It’s a close contest.

If Jews are so smart, why are they digging their own grave?

There is a lot of disagreement about how much efffect heredity has versus environment.

The post-World War II period, when the Greatest Generation went to college to get indoctrinated on the GI Bill, was the halycon period of pure environment versus heredity.

I was there. Any mention of heredity was instantly branded Nazism. But that period wore itself out as more and more discoveries about genetics surfaced.

In the period 1945-1955, though, one could say without fear of contradiction on campus that there was no such thing as genetics when it came to human intelligence.

Nobody SAYS that today, but it is the unspoken assumption in every classroom, and no student ever challenges it.

The argument today is whether heredity makes 50 or 90% of the difference in determining who will commit crime or one’s choice of toothpaste. Identical twins reunited separated at birth almost always use the same one and usually commit the same crimes at the same ages.

But you will sit in social science and science classes for a thousand hours and never hear one single word about hte effect of hereidty on human action.

But if the disagreement is about how much of human action is causd by heredity and how much by nurture, surly htose questioning young minds that are supposed to be so revolutionary would ask why this is never mentioned in ANY class.

In the 1960s, when Mommy Professor’s Young Revolutionaries were out there demanding that the whole economy be made Marxist and everything be turned over to “the intellectuals,” meaning Mommy Professor, those so-called “radicals” were the most obedient people imaginable.

No “young radical” EVER asked why heredity was never discussed. They attacked anybody physically who asked about it.

Those were the Questioning Young Minds Walter Cronkite and Dan Rather always praised to the skies.

But the iron lock on all discussion of what REALLY determines the human future is as solidly in place today as it was in 1955.

And no young “mind” questions it.

You’ve heard anti-whites introcude themselves this way:

“First of, let me introduce myself. I am English, white, have blue eyes, …”

Readers need to understand this particular psychosis. It reminds me of the Communists who used to begin by bragging that they were born and raised in Middle America.

Why is it a virtue to declare that one is not merely anti-American or anti-white, but that one is also a genuine, dyed-in-the-wool, total traitor?

The reason is that, for Mommy Professor, the ultimate virtue for an American or a white gentile is to hate his own people. For white gentiles who belong to the cult of Political Correctness self-hatred IS virtue. Self-destruction is the ultimate Good.

But, unlike Christian monks, the religion of Political Correctness does not demand PERSONAL self-torture and locking oneSELF away in sterility and self-mortification.

Political Correctness sees salvation as the destruction of one’s own country and one’s own race.

So monks begin by explaining they are not homosexuals. They are lustful and are committing genetic suicide nad are therefore to be admired.

And Political Correctness has one start by saying he is blond and blue-eyed and he would be pro-white except for his Virtue.

To me anyone who thinks self-destruction is a virtue is simply a sicko.

But you may need this explanation of why they brag about it.