Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!
«
»

Red

Posted by Bob on September 7th, 2006 under Comment Responses


Not Spam

Not Spam

Being new to this, I haven’t understood the divisions among the groups and leaders. Wouldn’t it be in our best interest to put those that exist aside or are they too deep to do so?

Comment by Red

ME:

It’s not just the leaders. If you try to tell movement websites something constructive they can use, you can be ignored. But if you have some dirt on somebody else in the movement, they will come thronging in, chattering and excited.

So leaders have to fight each other, to keep the throng excited. It’s like any other kind of politics.

Everybody in the movement bitches about how little is being done and go into glories when dirt is being dished out, in the exactly the same way that Americans love nothing but scandals in politics and can’t understand why the system never listens to THEM.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

This entry was posted on 09/07/2006, 12:59 pm and is filed under Comment Responses. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

  1. #1 by Red on 09/07/2006 - 9:14 pm

    NOT SPAM

    NOT SPAM

    Thank you Bob.

    You made me think of a couple more questions. Since the general membership resembles America in their actions, do we have a respectable class hanging onto us?

    It was brought up before in this blog about every movement having a right and a left wing. I cant seem to find one. Are we too decentralized, or am I over looking something?

    Quote

You must be logged in to post a comment.