Archive for September 10th, 2006
Mark
Not Spam
NOT SPAM
Bob, sorry for being off subject here, but a question:
I just read where a man named BOB WHITAKER photographed albumn
covers for the Beatles during the mid 1960’s. I don’t guess
youre the same BW, are you?
Okay, back to the regularly scheduled programming…
Comment by Mark
ME:
Boy, Mark, you really stepped in it!
You gave an old man a chance to talk about HIMSELF!
Thanks for looking me up, and I will no longer pan anyone for doing exactly hwat a seminar is all about. So you done good.
Bob Whitaker who wrote about the Beatles is not me. There is also a Robert W. Whitaker who wrote a book about psychiatry lately.
In fact, back when I wrote my first book, I was on Capitol Hill and the Library of Congress still had a card catalog. When I looked up my name, the drawer I pulled out consisted almost entirely of Robert W. Whitaker. Whitakers filled drawer after drawer.
In the 1960s a buddy of mine from Brazil pointed out that there was a Whitaker on the Brazilian Supreme Court.
When our family historian traced out whole family tree back to Jamestown, she had to find the names of ONE THOUSAND direct ancestors. She is obsessive, like hte rest of our clan, so she is very worried that she can’t find ONE of that thousand.
But she added an important one to make up for that. Alexander Whitaker, who converted and baptised Pocahontas and wrote the first book in English America and DIED before the Pilgrims got to Massachusetts, was the brother of my direct ancestor Jabez Whitaker.
She now has a fairly complete family tree back to about 1450, with a Thomas Whitaker.
But there is a problem with us Whitakers. In all that thousand and the ones before, there is not one single FAMOUS one. There is not one who ever had a title.
My cousin, Bob Whitaker, ran Emory University for many years. Like me, he was a staffer.
My cousin Bob Whitaker was the perpetual Assistant to the President of Emory University. The President of Emory changed regularly. It was a job that was given to big money retired exceutives of the Coca-Cola company, which supplied giant infusions of money to Emory. They enjoyed hte title, but the last thing a retired executive wants to do is run the politics of a university. So they went out and made speeches and raised money for Emory.
Bob Whitaker ran the University.
One of the more ironic incidents that happened in the early 1960s, when I was a graduate instructor at the University of South Carolina, and firmly on the FBI list, was when the head of our department, who already had a very high position in academic terms, received an even better job at Emory University.
He came to me one day while he was waiting for the academic year to end and his going from department head to his better job at Emory and said,
“Bob, there is a Bob Whitaker who actually runs Emory University. Are you kin to him?”
I replied, “He’s my cousin.”
This seemed to surprise him somewhat. A self-proclaimed segregationist redneck from Pontiac, SC does not fit the image of families that run universities. He didn’t know my father was the unchallenged top world expert on brick making and had been sent to Russia to represent the American Ceramic Society.
There are other members of my family who wrote books and ran things as second-in-command. It seems to be a family trait. Why would he bother to find THAT out?
I keep going back to Senator Sam Ervin of North Carolina. He KEPT saying, “I’m just a country lawyer from North Carolina.” When Senator Baker of Tennessee said to hin, “Dammit, Sam, you are a MAGNA Cum Laude graduate of the Harvard Law School, Ole Sam smiled and said, “Yes, Howard, but nobody will ever know it.”
In Massachusetts they say, “The Lodges speak only to the Cabots, and the Cabots speak only to God.”
The Lodges and the Cabots get a real kick out of that stuff.
They can have it. We just want to rule the world.
Racial Loyalty is for Minorities Only
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 09/10/2006
When a Jew says something, we all take it for granted that he is taking Jewish interests into account.
When an educated black or Oriental says something, we take into account that he is speaking both as an objective commentator but also as a black or Oriental.
But a white man must speak in entirely objective terms, and not give a damn about whites as such. The very definition of Heretic! in our society is a white man who keeps the survival of his own race in mind. This is HATE!
We all take that for granted.
Maybe it is time that SOMEBODY questioned that. Maybe it is time some MINORITIES questioned that.
Until a minority member questions that, we assume, correctly, that they are inferior. This whole idea that only whites can speak objectively is based on a twisted form of white supremacy. We do not expect minorities, no matter how educated they may be, to speak objectively.
The fact that we take this for granted so easily is because whites ae in a different category. Whites are supposed to “rise above” any consideration of their own kind. Whites are expected to be purely objective, and non-whites are NEVER expected to getup to that level.
This is stupid of whites, but such an attitude would be impossible to accept so easily if everybody, white and non-white, took it for granted that whites, and whites alone, are MORALLY superior.
Remember that for fifteen centuries, Western Christian Civilization took it for granted that a morally superiuor person was one who committed genetic suicide in a monastery or in the priesthood. Virginity amounting to sterility was the highest ideal.
For one who sees the world as it is, the whole structure of Political Correctness is based on an unshakeable, unquestioned faith in white supremacy.
The Issue is RACE
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 09/10/2006
I got many responses to my last articles, for which I am grateful. But they dealt with immigration and the third-worlding of America.
Please never forget that the issue is the end of the white race. If we followed the neoconservative program and cut immigration and dediated ourselves to assimilating with the nonwhites we have here now, there would be no white race in America. We already have PLENTY of nowhites here to become the colored conservatives liberals, respectable conservatives and neoconservativves dream of.
It is no accident that the present immigration law was passed in 1965, right after the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It is part and parcel of the same package. The same conservatives who say the 1965 act was a disaster praise the 1964 Civil Rights Act to the skies.
That is WHY they call themselves NEOconservaties. They say that everything liberals did on race in the 1960s was perfect in the 1960s. Those of us who said the whole program was aimed at an end to the white race, according to National Review and the neos, was right. The will lead the lyunch mob against anyone who criticizes any of that program.
Decolonization, they insist, was wonderful. They insist that all those little poverty-stricken dictatorships in the third world were a wonderful product of Holy Progress.
BUT… now that those wonderful colored sovereign states are beginning to get hold of atomic weapons, they say the whole thing is just getting out of hand. They want white countries to have colonial authority over third world weapons, but how they treat their own people is THEIR business.
That is the ONLY difference between an openly colonial attitude and a neoconservative attitude.
Neoconservative means that everything they did to get us into this condition was GOOD, but the CONSEQUENCES we predicted back then are a pure accident of history.
The point is that respectable conservatives and neoconservatives protect libeals from admitting that their whole world view after WWII was Evil, it was WRONG from the word Go.
As long as all we bitch about is hte LATEST MANIFESTATIONS of that attitude, we are AGREEING with them.
It is easy to join in the hue and cry against the latest outrages. It is hard work to tie those latest manifestations to the fundamental WRONGNESS our society has accepted.
THAT is our job. We must turn our people AROUND. We must guide the thought to basics, to RACIAL issues.
Their position had been that the Declaration and not the Constitution is the basis of America, all the way back to Lincoln.
We must fight the fight on the BASICS. Not a single comment traced our problem back to the BASICS:
Bob’s Mantra
” Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”
“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
http://whitakeronline.org




Kelly
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 09/10/2006
NOT SPAM NOT SPAM Bob if you see me making a mistake, Getting tough on me would be a good thing…ANTIS should get the hell out…This is a Seminar…Or ANTI number two-The ANTIS that are making laws that are forcing the genocide of the white race in what ever form should also face JUDGEMENT for trying to control the will of GOD!..Anyone who back’s the knowingly genocide of a race of people have tainted minds that are just as responsible as a knowingly violent criminal on the streets commiting murder against some one who is an innocent person…So these society murderers (ANTIS) can sit back on their little keyboards playing and pretending not to understand what is going on but the judgement shall be the same…for when the LORD knocked no one answered…WHAT these ANTIS should do, is clear their minds and get on the RIGHT side of this FIGHT!
Comment by Kelly
ME:
You will notice that antis are a very short-lived species here on Bob’s Blog.
You will also notice that every time I deal with one, it is the usual process:
1) He makes a Mommy Professor statement which Mommy Professor told him was sure to destroy evil racists
2) I use it to make a basic point, which is the purpose of Bob’s Blog.
The fact that he is made to look the fool he is is incidental.
Then the anti goes away.
It is Mommy Professor who must ban all opposition.
I just knock the crap out of it.
No Comments