Archive for September 13th, 2006
Stormfront Piece on Wallace
Boy! Kelso’s illustration from the 1972 primary takes me back!
Note the “Ashbrook 9%” there. Congressman John Ashbrook was my boss on Captiol Hill. He ran in the Republican primary as a protest against Nixon’s leftward movement.
While I was working for John, National Review had a cover article attacking me. It noted that I was trying to get the “Wallace Vote” allied with the Republican conservative base to elect Reagan as president.
Eight years later, the “Wallace Democrats” did join with conservative Republicans to elect Reagan president. At that point they suddenly became “Reagan Democrats” and National review declared it had been for that strategy the whole time.
But what was interesting on a personal note was that I was working as Ashbrook’s senior staffer and I showed the article to him. The first quote National Review used in the article, “From the Nashville Station,” was from John Ashbrook! He had said in 1972 that Wallace was not a true conservative, which he wasn’t.
Can you imagine the coincidence? John hadn’t seen the article yet and his own senior staffer, the subject of the article, showed it to him!
I talked with George Wallace in Montgomery when he was on his feet and later when he was in his wheelchair in 1976. A couple of coincidences there, too.
I drafted a letter praising my book, and Wallace was kind enough to sign it. It gave Wallace credit for being the populist leader he was.
It happened that when I was visiting him was exactly when Jimmy Carter, the Democratic nominee for president, was arriving in Alabama for Wallace’s endorsement against President Gerald Ford. But Wallace, in his wheel chair and relegated to a minor role, was MUCH more interestedin what I had to say about his glory days than he was in Jimmy Carter.
So Governor Wallace’s wife kept interrupting our talk with calls, “Carter is HERE! Where ARE you!?” We kept on talking.
Finally the phone rang and Wallace didn’t even bother to find out who it was. He said, “I’M COMIN”!!”
Wallace had read my book and he said, “If I had had you when I was on my feet we’d be in the White House now!”
I didn’t have the heart to remind him that I HAD been in his office when he was on his feet. There was a struggle about which group would run the Wallace campaign in South Carolina in 1968. Maurice Bessinger and I went to Montgomery to ask Governor Wallacethat we, who had the actual workers on our side, should run it.
Tom Turnipseed, who said he represented, “All the finest people in South Carolina” and who had the country clubs on his side, managed to persuade Wallace to give the campaign to his group.
South Carolina was the only Deep South state Wallace did not carry in 1968.
Turnipseed is a solid leftist now.
A Moot Question for You
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 09/13/2006
Lester Maddox was a staunch segregationist who was elected governor of Georgia in the 1960s. Black riots were occurring all over the country. When a black riot took place in Augusta, Georgiaq, Lester Maddox stated that if any policeman did not SHOOT looters on sight, he personally would take away that officer’s badge.
The riot ended suddenly. Only one looter was shot. He was in a liquor store he had broken into, lying on the floor. That pitcure appeared in outraged publications all over America, especially Time Magazine. But though Time tried to make the case that the poor man was only getting liquor to take home to his starving family, it wasn’t very successful.
While I was on Capitol Hill ther was a hurricane in Florida followed by massive looting. My boss, John Ashbrook, shared his senior staffer’s gift for subtlety, so he made a speech on the House Floor called, “Shoot Looters!” The main newspaper in his district attacked him violently, saying this was an irrational statement to make. After a flood of letters backing Ashrbook came in, they decided it must be some kind of organized protest by Ashbrook supporters, so they did a scientific poll of the district.
They pointed out, with some embarrassment, that Eighty-One Percent (81%) of district residents backed Asbrook: “Shoot Looters!” More than one letter to the paper said that this was the first time the writer had EVER agreed with Ashbrook on ANYTHING.
I first broached the idea of aq Platform Party to Jamie Kelso as we were riding back from the DC convention. He LOVED the concept,but we had one strong disagreement. As you will see in an article below, I believe in SHOOTING anyone who comes across our border illegally. Jamie said Americans would not STAND for such a thing.
I would give a months warning in every publication in Mexico, Canada, and elsewhere. I would put up huge signs in Englsih, Spanish, French and various Indian labguages to make it clear that the US border is a DEADLINE, complete with skull and crossbones for the illiterate.
My point is this: Any other form of enforcement would be subject to debate.
We must make it absolutely clear that the US border is not a game of hide-and-seek.
We can say that America is the world’s last superpower, but it is the only superpower in history which wants nothing but to protect its OWN borders and its own people’s interests.
But the Preamble Party says that, on THAT point, there is no room for compromise.
Kelso says that is too violent. I say that any other approach makes the border a game of hide-and-seek.
Shoot looters. Shoot border violators. Our border is no longer a game.
There is a major side benefit to this. The United States will no longer speak in George Bush whine. We will speak little and MEAN it:
“Speak softly and carry a big stick.”
A country that shoots anyone who violates its borders can tell OPEC to cut the crap and OPEC will cut the crap.
What do you think?
The Preamble Party and Alaska
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 09/13/2006
You are letting me down. I have not had a single comment on the Preamble Party Platform yet and I need them.
Alaska is a prime candidate for a Preamble Party to make a strong showing.
Alaska has problem that have led to an actual secession movement there. It has to do with the appropraition of Alaska’s resources by the rest of the country. As a political gesture, we need to side with Alaska on that.
There is another issue that has not been brought up. Alaska has the highest percentage of member of the National Rifle Association of all the states. But they can only drive to the “lower forty-eight” through Canada. At the Canadian border all weapons are confiscated.
All literature considered Hate by the Canadian Government is also confiscated and the carrier can be charged with a crime for it.
I know. Paul Fromm was carrying MY book and it was taken from him when he went home to Canada. My book was taken, questioned, and beaten, but after two months it was pronounced legal by the Canadian Thought Police.
But what bothers Canadians is the fact that they cannot take their guns with them across Canada to their own country.
There are a number of countries like Lsotho and Swaziland which lie completely within the borders of another country. To prevent their being isolated, international law recognizes that such countries have special rights to crossing the surrounding country’s borders. The surrounding country would otherwise have the right to a blockade or partial blockade against them, and a blockade is an act of war.
“The Platform Party completely supports the right of Alaskans to all the benefits of resources in the State of Alaska. No resouces may be taken from that State without due compensation, and compensation in fell.”
“Further, Canada has imposed a blockade on the State of Alaska. Citizens of Alaska are entirely separated by land from the rest of the United States, but Alaskans traveling to the rest of their country and citizens of the rest of the United States travelling to Alaska are subject to siezure of property which is legal in other states but not in Canada.”
“A blockade, even a partial blockade, in such a case is an act of war under international law.”
“The platform party will subject ALL Canadians to rigorous search and siezure until Canada ceases this practice against Alaskans en route to the rest of their country.”
The Preamble Party and the White Race
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 09/13/2006
I cannot FIND my RECENT Blogs, though someone once found out for me where they were.
So I cannot give credit tot he commenter who gave me the site for The White People’s Party.
But there is a section of their platform I wnt to steal outright for the Preamble Party:
“ENDANGERED SPECIES”
“The White Race qualifies under existing law to be placed on the endangered species list Per Sec 4 of the 1973 Endangered species act (Determining Endangered Species) paragraph D which states (D) “the inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms;” to protect the habitat, is cause for a species to be added to the list. Clearly, all relevant laws are working against the continued existence of Whites.”
ALSO:
I would also add Bob’s Mantra. Since so many of “We the People of the United States and our posterity” are white, and that Preamble was written to refer ONLY to whites and “Indians … taxed,” we have a special obligation to prevent genocide against my race.
The Preamble Party and The Last Superpower
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 09/13/2006
The only Preamble that is binding onthe United States Government, “We the People of the United States of America and OUR Posterity,” was written when this country had no standing army at all.
The Preamble Party says that the size and weapons capacity of our armed forces has no effect whatsoever on the Constitution. Whether we are the last superpower or we have nothing but a Coast Guard and National Guards, the ONLY obligation we have is “to secure the blessing of liberty to OURSELVES and OUR Posterity.”
We have no right or obligation to kill foreigners to secure liberty for THEM or anybody else. We have killed hundreds of thousands of people with that excuse, and it is inexcusable and unconstitutional.
We have not only the right, but the obligation, to shoot a far smaller number of people crossing our borders illegally. We cannot secure liberty for our people without taking our own borders as seriously as we do the borders of Iraq.
The shooting has already started, long since. So we will listen to no outcries about how innocent civilians might get killed. We had no such scruples firebombing Japan or bombing Arabs.
The United States Government has no RIGHT to extend protection to those who are not part of We the People of the United States of America.
Due warning must be given, and after that we will meet all incursions into this country with every means at our disposal.
Innocent people will be killed. Thousands of innocent AMERICANS are being killed regularly by illegal aliens.
The Preamble Party says that our Constitution allows our government no right to extend protection to non-Americans crossing our border illegally. The Preamble Party says that it is UNCONSTITUTIONAL for us to ALLOW illegal aliens to cross our borders if we can stop them by any means in the government’s power.
How We Got Jeremy
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 09/13/2006
The Preamble Party and OIL
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 09/13/2006
PLEASE READ THE APPENDED WARNING FROM THE “The Platform Party” PIECE BELOW!!! ***
Oil is an issue the Platform Party wold need to address.
Does anybody remember when Bush was accused of fighting “a war for cheap oil” in Iraq?
Have you seen any cheap oil? Have you heard anybody who REMEMBERS that charge?
In his last infuriated Senate speech, Senator Hollings let the cat out of the bag: We are
in Iraq for Israel, wholly for Israel, and ONLY for Israel.
This is not exactly a secret. If you were one of the thousands of staffers on Capitol Hill
and you didn’t know that, you would either be fired or put on disability. Everyone inside
the Beltway knows that, but they also know you don’t MENTION it.
The media have not mentioned Fritz Hollings, once their liberal darling, since.
The Preamble Party would say that the Middle East is a dangerous, unstable place. For the
good of our people, which is the only reason our government exists, we must end our
dependence on MIDDLE EASTERN OIL.
Since the fall of Communism, some serious economic work has gone on in Russia. Since the
fall of Communism, serious exploration has discovered that the country with the largest oil
reserves on earth is NOT Saudi Arabia, but RUSSIA. And more is being discovered every day.
Russia is very anxious to conclude agreements with the United States, whatever you may hear
elsewhere.
The country which has the largest COAL reserves on earth, by far, is the United States.
“Cracking” coal to make oil was where South Africa got ALL of its oil. “Cracking” coal
isnow economical,but nobody wants to do it.
Why?
Because if we went into serious coal cracking to make oil all the amphasis on the Middle
East would suddenly disappear. The only OTHER excuse we have for being there would
disappear overnight.
Coal cracking is now cheaper than buying oil. If we got into it, it would be much, much
cheaper. We would be the world’s OPEC again.
We were once the world’s OPEC. That is how we got Japan to attack us at Pearl Harbor, by
cutting off their oil supply.
There is another problem with cracking coal. We have huge expenditures for “alternative
energy,” but this is an appeal to the environmental lobby. Like the Hispanic vote, Bush
keeps trying for the solidly Democratic environmentalist vote. So “alternative energy
sources” does not mean making more oil.
For the Preamble Party, Americans need oil, so we will get oil.
Cars can be run on processed natural gas. Once again we probably have the world’s largest
supply of that, too.
Diesel engines can be run on vegetable oil as well as gasoline.
But none of this is being looked into, for the reasons listed above.
*** I will also be hitting on issues outside our usual area for another reason, and you are in on the plot.
If you look at history today, you get the impression that the German National Socialist Party never talked about anything but Jews. But it was a POLITICAL party, and Germany was inthe midst of a giant depression and had lost a war and a major portion of its territory.
I have repeatedly emphasized Bob’s Mantra, so PLEASE don’t think this is an invitation to wander off the subject only the few of us here are needed to emphasize.
PLEASE!
But YOU can also use some information I have accumulated on other issues.
I can try them out here on you, BUT PLEASE DON’T LET IT GET YOU OFF SUBJECT OUTSIDE THE FAMILY!
Other issues can be USED if you keep popping Bob’s Mantra in. No matter what the subject is, you can become adept at getting the Mantra and HERESY! in.
The true Preamble, “We the people of the United States and OUR posterity,” can be the basis of dealing with ANY issue:
“What’s in it for US?”
The Preamble says our government has no right to do anything for any other people. Building a free nation in Iraq violates the United States Constitution. Doing ANYTHING for ANY United Nations agency violates the United States Constitution. Americans as individuals are free to help the third world, but the government is expressly forbidden to do by the Preamble.
No alien has any rights under the United States Constitution. It applies only to ourselves. Legally resident aliens have only those right expressly granted them. They are NOT covered under the Bill of Rights. Before they have ANY rights, Congress must pass an act stating them specifically. Illegal aliens have no right to due process.
How’s THAT for starters?




Simmons versus Antidisestablishmentarianism
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 09/13/2006
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
I think we are also at that point that as a political movement we could promise
liberation, liberation from PC and the goofs that lord it over us.
Comment by Simmons
ME:
The platform plank Simmons is advocating will begin:
“The established religion of the United States of America, Political Correctness, is hereby disestablished.”
Those who oppose this plank will be antidisestablishmentarians. I bet you never expected to see that word used in a sentence!
Ann Coulter’s new book, “The Church of Liberalism” is a straight steal from my “Political Correctness is not LIKE a religion, it IS a religion.” So this concept is no longer a far out idea.
All outstanding student loans will be paid out of the giant reserves universities have. Harvard University alone has several billion dollarrs. The rest will be charged to professors and deans and contributors who have contributed tax-exempt funds to the Political Correctness seminaries we call colleges and universities.
We just got several million votes right there.
Other platform sentences:
“Under American laws, all monopolies are illegal. Two men in the same business are subject to criminal prosecution if they DISCUSS prices in their common filed of business.”
“By the same token, anyone who discusses graduation from a Political Correctness seminary as a qualification for hiring is subject to prosecution under the Clayton Anti-Trust Act.”
A few million more votes from people who waulify for Mensa but never finished college.
A million votes here, a million votes there, and it adds up to serious political clout.
2 Comments