Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Interrogation

Posted by Bob on September 30th, 2006 under How Things Work


“For the Party’s sake you can and MUST at 24 hours’ notice change all your convictions and force yourself to believe that white is black.”

A Catholic cardinal was asked how he would reply if hte Poper told him to believe taht two plus two is five. The cardinal replied, “I would ask him, ‘Your Holiness, would you prefer that it be SIX?”

Aleksander Solzhenitsyn had plenty of personal experience with KGB “interrogations.” They lasted for hours every day for days on end. Solzhenitsyn knew hundreds of others who had been through what the KGB called interrogations.

It takes a cold-blooded bastard like me to think of an obvious question:

Why did the KGB BOTHER with “interrogations?” Why didn’t it just make up whatever it wanted the person to have said and put it down in the records? The reason was that what the KGB was doing had nothing to do with interrogation. They were not seeking information.

KGB actuallly did these things precisely so that Solzhenitsyn and his fellow Gulag residents and all potential stoolies would hear about them…They would literally step on a man’s testicles and crush them.

John McCain openly admits he was a stoolie in the Vietnam “interrogations” he got a solver start for resisting.

But stoolies weren’t there to give real information. They were there to give out information that could be used against other prisoners in order to get what the “interrogation” WANTED to get.

In America, the police get rough only when they are no longer looking for information. In the real world, a copy does not get paid to find out the truth. In the real world, a cop gets paid for closing cases.

Over and over and over big-time lawyers shock law students by laughing and telling them that being a lawyer has absolutely nothing to do with justice. You win cases. Period.

Lawyers and cops get rough when they need their victim to say what they need said. These are NOT interrogations.

I have a major problem with the fact that the points I most desperately want you to absord sound like jokes. So let me tell you why there are so few interrogators like me. I will start by reminding you how to get into “intelligence” work. In order to get into intelligence work you needed an Ivy League degree. You also needed to get along iwth the other Ivy Leaguers.

These were people who saw no difference between Communism and the West except that the Communists were more idealistic.

So how did I get into any of this crap? Once again, the truth sounds like an old joke:

A con man taught his son all about how to lie, cheat and steal. One day the kid asked him, “Papa, is there ever a time when you just tellthe TRUTH?” HIs old man was shocked, but he gave it some thought. Finally he replied, “Well, son, in a real pinch ANY gimmick will do.”

So how did I get into ANY of this stuff? Very rarely and ONLY in a pinch. Not only did I not make it into the big time, my intelligence work COST me money.

When was Ic alled in as an interrogator? ONLY on the rare occasions when someone needed a real interrogation. Sometimes things get desperate and someone higher up is in a position where they cannot afford to turn things over to the intelligence bureaucracy.

There ARE cases when you need a real interrogation. At some point, admittedly in rare cases, you need to go beyond the general questioning and get deadly serious. You need INFORMATION, not confessions.

Let me give ONE quick example. When police are looking for a confession, they try to keep the suspects seprate so they cannot concoct a story to get around what

the police are looking for and what the suspects know the police are looking for. After all, this is a game. Remember, nobody is looking for INFORMATION. The so-called interrogation is to make suspects say what you need them to say to close the case.

If you are not looking to do anything to the people you are questioning, when you need INFORMATION, you normallly give them plenty of time togather. This is precisely because people are used to the idea that an interrogration is NOT an interrogration. So they wil discuss what it is that you are trying to get them to say, what it is they are “in” for, and it will never occur to them that you have no interest inthat whatsoever.

If you’re good at this, it is hilarious to listen to them try desperately to avoid certain subjects. You know EXACTLY what they have decided the whole thing is about. You watch them dodge subjects so obviously that it is funny while they try desperately to be Shrewd.

On Capitol Hil, I alwasy thanked God for the fact that everyone thought anybody witha Southern accent was a dolt. In a serious interrogation, where peoples’ lives depended on getting it RIGHT, I thanked God for the general impression of what an “interrogration” is. The person you are questioning is almost tearfully relieved when he gets to talk about something besides whatver he think he needs to be Shrewd about. You can play him like a violin: you make his trings taut by hovering around whatever it is he thinks he’s there about.

So when it seems like you are just talking about htings in general, he is so relieved he talks freely.

It never occurs to these people that you have not hte slightest interest in THEM at all. What you are looking for is those bursts of relieved frankness where he tells you everything he can think of. He is trying desperately to keep this terrible Interrogrator off of The Subject, which he assumes is him.

I have never bullied ANYBODY since before I reached age thirteen. I have never even froced someone to say what he does not want to say.

I am not Shrewd. The only way I can SOUND honest is by BEING honest. People can see through me when I make a pathetic attempt to be tricky, and I have known that since grade school. But I am AWFULLY good at LISTENING. The only way I know to find out the TRUTH is to listen carefully.

This is what real interrogration, the pursuit of genuine INFORMATION, is all about. Only in very rare cases is it necessary.

Maybe I am wrong to call myself a PROFESSIONAL interrogator. You can’t make a living off this alone. But you can make yourself irreplacable in several areas, and the living follows.

But when there is a desperate need for INFORMATION, someone like me is absolutely essential.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by kane on 09/30/2006 - 6:28 pm

    NOT SPAM
    See, I know Stalin faked trials, and he did it for the propaganda effect. It makes him look like the good guy, who is executing a guilty criminal. Totalitarian dictators understand how important it is to control every single pyschological variable of the people they rule over.

  2. #2 by Dave on 09/30/2006 - 8:17 pm

    NOT SPAM
    NOT SPAM

    It is what we do not perceive and are not thinking about that does us in.

    That is why Aldous Huxley was fond of saying: “Want to solve your problems? Learn a new way of seeing.”

    Better is Johann Goethe’s statement: “In life, nothing less than everything will do”.

    Rest assured both Aldous Huxley and Johann Geothe were top tier intellectuals.

    BW is a top tier intellectual. I wouldn’t take too many BW’s and our intelligence agencies would have all the information they need while saving countless billions to boot.

    But unfortunately, the world has a shortage of BWs.

    BW has a marvelous mind for “textured observation”. If your observation is “textured” it means you cannot and will not be satisfied with anything less than throwing light on what has heretofore not been thought about, or has not been visible.

    That is why BW is an opponent of ideology. An ideologue is satisfied with conclusions and accepts them as “the light”.

    No matter he is not required to do any real work to receive “the light”. The benefit of receiving “the light” without having to work for it is the main allure of ideology.

    That is why our colored “cousins” love ideology.

  3. #3 by Alan B. on 09/30/2006 - 10:20 pm

    NOT SPAM

    Excellent post on the subject of interrogation, Bob you always have me saying to myself, wow, so thats how that works, it makes sence. This tecnique is practised today, special interest groups are selling Americas a false product, when in fact the real objective is more extreme. For example, femminism is disquised as equal rights for woman, while its true objective is to marginalise marriage and family. Bob have you read the book “The marketing of Evil”, I plan to.

  4. #4 by Dave on 10/01/2006 - 12:26 pm

    NOT SPAM
    NOT SPAM

    “For the Party’s sake you can and MUST at 24 hours’ notice change all your convictions and force yourself to believe that white is black.”

    Let me add the in the real world the “party faithful” have no convictions other than somebody has told them they are “leaders” and they belong to some sort of exclusive club.

    How many times have you read in your local paper: “Congressman so and so met with local leaders and said the current party line”?

    It is as if they all get together and agree to memorize lines of words they are required to recite exactly.

    Dare violate the party etiquette of just who or what you are allowed to criticize and YOU ARE GOING TO BE PUNISHED.

    It is a scheme for the misdirection of attention in a game of betting on whom ultimately wins and loses.

    The fools that play this game lack street smarts.

    If you are a target of any kind ploy by someone who is attempting to hustle you, you have the option to remain silent and passive and admit to yourself that you do not know his or her objects. As BW keeps pointing out, there is great value in failing to be shrewd.

    You can also pretend that you are a retard. That ploy has saved many of poor soldier’s life and is especially effective if you happen to look like a retard.

  5. #5 by joe rorke on 10/01/2006 - 7:48 pm

    not spam
    not spam

    Well, it’s at least satisfying to note that no one here has come eyeball to eyeball with what real interrogation is all about. Remember Bobby Garwood. All this talk about McCain is well and good but at least he had a daddy who was an Admiral in the USN. That’s better than nothing. That’s more than Garwood had. No, no one here has come close to real interrogation by real interrogators. I guess you never know who’s going to float into a blog. Sure would have been nice to hear from someone who knew something about the subject. It’s interesting to see how people can float around a subject that has been brought up and never touch on the subject matter at all.

  6. #6 by joe rorke on 10/01/2006 - 7:54 pm

    Even the people that are reading this have no idea what they are reading. That shines through. Hopefully, someday they’ll find out. Personally. That’s the only way to know.

  7. #7 by Alan B. on 10/02/2006 - 12:46 am

    NOT SPAM

    We usually think torture is the application of physical discomfort, applied to varing degrees of intensity to extract imformation, torture may be physical and again it may be something totally opposite. The feds for instance, may threaten to link you to a crime solely on the grounds of guilt by association, they could threaten to inprison you for years, seize your assets etc, this could be defined as a methiod of torture, it could definitly keep you awake at nights thinking about the alterntives, you may accuse others of wrong doing to escape this nightmare. Torture could be defined as the physical or mental assault apon another, in a controlled setting, minipulation or contol of the victim is the desired outcome. I am willing to bet that mental torture in the absense of phyiscal abuse would be the most reliable method.

  8. #8 by Dave on 10/02/2006 - 3:26 pm

    NOT SPAM
    NOT SPAM

    “Even the people that are reading this [comments on interrogation] have no idea what they are reading. That shines through. Hopefully, someday they’ll find out. Personally. That’s the only way to know.”

    Comment by Joe Rorke

    The subject of interrogation is well worth discussing because of legal traditions that can be used to foster freedom and defeat the emergence of a culture of totalitarianism.

    For example, when people demand the justice system produce “justice” they are unintentionally fostering an attitude that leads to totalitarianism.

    In contrast, we white people demand an “adversarial” system because we admit that justice is beyond the grasp of any court.

    That is why that even though I may not be tough enough to refrain from blubbering confessions to my interrogators, I’m sure as hell not going to furnish any confessions in advance of having my balls crushed.

    Crushed balls are good evidence.

    Also, I share something in common with my tormentors: We both trust that there is some possibility that results might be furnished through the use of a 50-caliber persuader.

    And when the prosecutor says: “Just take that lie detector test in order to prove you’re not afraid to take it”, he will receive our white hysterical reply that he is attempting to manufacture evidence.

    In contrast, our colored brothers are fond of such notions as, “All men are created equal.”

    That’s because they possesses no “shining city on the hill” to prove it.

    They also believe that the courts “are supposed” to furnish justice.

  9. #9 by Alan B. on 10/03/2006 - 2:38 am

    NOT SPAM

    Great comment Dave, this is what I want you guys to do, don’t worry about hurting my feelings, I am here to learn. I guess Bob tring to tell us once again to look at the words being used and what they really mean. Ok, Bob pointed out that ivy leaguers got into the intelligence field, they were well educated but left leaning, so classified information was kept away from them and usless imformation was all they were provided with, and as expected they gave it to our soviet enemy, I understand now. They were usefull after all, amazing! So from now I will examine things differently.

  10. #10 by Alan B. on 10/03/2006 - 2:39 am

    NOT SPAM

    Great comment Dave, this is what I want you guys to do, don’t worry about hurting my feelings, I am here to learn. I guess Bob tring to tell us once again to look at the words being used and what they really mean. Ok, Bob pointed out that ivy leaguers got into the intelligence field, they were well educated but left leaning, so classified information was kept away from them and usless imformation was all they were provided with, and as expected they gave it to our soviet enemy, I understand now. They were usefull after all, amazing! So from now I will examine things differently.

You must be logged in to post a comment.