Archive for September, 2006

Shari — and My Apology to Commenters

Not Spam
Not Spam

Well I got some help and can now copy and paste. I sent to 4 disappointed students at Catholic Universities. The mantra is on my desk top so if someone has too many sites, they could assign a few to me.

Comment by Shari

ME:

I almost congratulted Shari on finding help on her own. Then it occured to me that Shari might not take this as a compliment. After all, she is a competent adult and she might not appreciate my praise for her simply acting like a competent adult.

But all of you who have been in this movement for a while realize how the IQ of a person seems to collapse when they get in here. On Stormfront you hear constant sfreaming about things no adult would bother with. You cannot get anybody to concentrate on the real, serious battle we face every day. They want to shout about the latest news and talk about how useless doing anything now is, but when The Time Comes, they’ll be out there with their machine guns in the right.

They sound like ten-year-olds playing cowboys.

Even before I met these folks, I had been exposed to the World War II cowboys.

Or apemen.

Maybe only Joe and I remember, but Tarzan movies were always advertised with the King of the Apes, Tarzan, swinging from vine to vine and giving his call. “AAAOOAAOOAHOOAHOOHAH!” It was as famous in my youth as the Lone Ranger Theme, aka, The Willaim Tell Overture.

And every time I met a World War II vet I could hear him beating his chest and screaming, “AAAOOAAOOAHOOAHOOHAH!” One could not speak to them rationally, it was always “I learned in the military that you can’t buck the Government.”

“That shows I’m a Tough, Practical Real Man.”

I found it tough to tell the difference between a shrieking Tough, Practical Real Man and a slave.

You have all been exposed to this sudden collapse of intelligence in people who go cowboy on you. It costs you a LOT of pain to get used to it, to get resigned to it. Now, abruptly, I am surrounded by adults. But from time to time I will slip into my old habits, and you know first-hand exactly where those habits came from.

I am delighted to have this problem. It was such an astonishing delight to read Dave’s step-by-step, no words wasted guide to our kind of political warfare. It is great to see Shari going out and finding help and volunteering, I WANT YOU TO TAKE HER UP ON IT, to place some Bob’s Mantras for those who have a list to put them on.

But I am still going to slip from time to time and fail to respect you the way you deserve to be respected.

My habits of mind run pretty deep. Shari mentioned some disappointed Catholic university students she had contacted. This got my mind back in my old professor mode. Then Shari mentioned she had Bob’s Mantra on her desktop. I am NOT joking here. I thought for several minutes that she had a page with Bob’s Mantra stuck on her COLLEGE-type, desktop!

I finally shook it off and realized what she meant, but it was honestly in my mind for a minute or two that she had it pasted on her desk, the wooden classroom one!

I still get a smile from people who volunteer to give me their cell number. I used to work in a place where one’s cell number was an essential piece of information, but it had nothing to do with the telephone.

And when I go into a store and see directions relating to a credit card, telling you how to “swipe” something, it has a meaning for me that one would not expect from the management.

An old guy’s institution memory is useful. But it comes with some liabilities.

1 Comment

Wordism: Dave’s Rewrite of the Concept

Wordism: Aldous Huxley
In our thinking we make use of a great variety of symbol-systems – linguistic, mathematical, pictorial, musical, ritualistic. Without such symbol-systems we should have no art, no science, no law, no philosophy, not so much as the rudiments of civilization: in other words, we should be animals. Symbols, then, are indispensable.

But symbols – as the history of our own and every other age makes so abundantly clear – can also be fatal. Consider, for example, the domain of science on the one hand, the domain of politics and religion on the other. Thinking in terms of, and acting in response to, one set of symbols, we have come, in some small measure, to understand and control the elementary forces of nature. Thinking in terms of and acting in response to, another set of symbols, we use these forces as instruments of collective suicide.

In the first case the explanatory symbols were well chosen, carefully analyzed and progressively adapted to the emergent facts of physical existence.

In the second case symbols originally ill chosen were never subjected to thoroughgoing analysis and never re-formulated so as to harmonize with the emergent facts of human existence.

Worse still, these misleading symbols were everywhere treated with a wholly unwarranted respect, as though, in some mysterious way, they were more real than the realities to which they referred.

In the contexts of religion and politics, words are not regarded as standing, rather inadequately, for things and events; on the contrary, things and events are regarded as particular illustrations of words.

Symbols have been used realistically only in those fields which we do not feel to be supremely important.

In every situation involving our deeper impulses we have insisted on using symbols, not merely unrealistically, but idolatrously, even insanely.

Even the best cookery book is no substitute for even the worst dinner. The fact seems sufficiently obvious.

And yet, throughout the ages, the most profound philosophers, the most learned and acute theologians have constantly fallen into the error of identifying their purely verbal constructions with facts, or into the yet more enormous error of imagining that symbols are somehow more real than what they stand for.

“Only the spirit,” said St. Paul, “gives life; the letter kills.” “And why,” asks Eckhart, “why do you prate of God? Whatever you say of God is untrue.”

Such utterances were felt to be profoundly subversive, and respectable people ignored them.

A lie can be extended, propounded and repeated, but not truth; and when you repeat truth, it ceases to be truth, and therefore sacred books are unimportant. It is through self-knowledge, not through belief in somebody else’s symbols, that a man comes to the eternal reality, in which his being is grounded.

An education that teaches us not how but what to think is an education that calls for a governing class of pastors and masters.

But the very idea of leading somebody is antisocial and anti-spiritual. To the man who exercises it, leadership brings gratification of the craving for power; to those who are led, it brings the gratification of the desire for certainty and security. But, surely, it is not the voice of reality; for the voice of reality must come to you; it cannot be appealed to, you cannot pray to it.

You cannot entice it into your little cage by placating it, by suppressing yourself or emulating others. That which you ask for you get; but it is not the truth. If you want, and if you petition, you will receive, but you will pay for it in the end.

ME:

Lord, you cannot imagine how great it feels to have someone ELSE, someone who adheres to the basics, stating my basics and expanding on them. I spent half a century coming up with these “simple” things, and finding someone who is able to expound on and restate them accurately gives me a giddy feeling.

4 Comments

Three-Dimensional Thought

The difficulty and uniqueness of Dave’s work is that it is three-dimenational. Revolutionary hobbyists and peopple in general have a strictly two-dimensional way of thinking: You say something, they say something, then back again.

That is how respectable conservatives make liberals look like sane leaders while nothing they propose ever WORKS. What happens is that liberals say something and a trained respectable cosnervative knows exactly what answer to give. Professional conservatives get paid professional athlete’s salaries for their endless game of sit-down ping-pong.

Dave is dealing with my concepts in THREE dimensions. It is not simply filling half an hour with verbal ping-pong, it is leads on to NEW concepts. It doesn’t just go back and forth, it goes UP.

But Dave is also dealing with another problem. Our concepts also go DOWN. They go DEEP, as basics do. We have here a WAY OF THINKING, a way of thinking which we cannot predict will lead where we WANT it to go. Repectable conservatives never question the basics. They never question the assumptions upon which our society is built. Their “debates” with liberals are always a “just-so” story, which ends up with their agreeing that everything that was done up to 1970 was good and true. All respectable conservatives are neoconservatives.

One problem Dave’s active mind has is that everything he is dealing with interconnects. As you ponder the basics, as you look at EVERYTHING fresh, you begin to discover principles that apply to more and more areas of life. But what is terribly frustrating,what makes this HARD work, is that writing is a two-dimensional medium. You must go in one direction, from beginning to middle to end on a particular point, while your mind wants to go off into all the fascinating implications.

I am sure that exactly the same problem occupied Newton’s mind when he started analyzing gravity. Adam Smith started on simple supply and demand and had to quit after he had written several hundred thousand words about it in The Wealth of Nations.

When you get to basics, you find that they all interconnect. And when you go to basics you find that everybody else has been unimaginably superficial, childish, silly, pretentious and just plain wrong.

This makes for hard work, working in three dimensions in a two-dimensional world and keeping your temper while doing it.

2 Comments

I Advertise Dave’s Site on Stormfront

http://www.nationalsalvation.net/siegecraft.html

One of my bloggers has produced a SHORT blog which lays out my basic ideas and strategy better than I could have done it.

http://www.nationalsalvation.net/siegecraft.html

This is DISIPLINED, hard intellectual WORK, and it has given me real hope that some people are getting my simpler message about how to fight it out in the real world.

http://www.nationalsalvation.net/siegecraft.html

COMMENTERS:

Go thou and do liewise.

No Comments

Dave

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

I have assembled scores of BWs articles and grammar and spelling corrected blog postings at www.nationalsalvation.net to make them more accessible to myself.

I go back to them again and again because I am always learning more, realizing more.

Going over the postings keeps impressing me as to how extraordinarily intelligent the participants of this seminar are.

If it is true that heredity is destiny, perhaps the answers for our race are already known. They may not be known consciously, but perhaps they are known down deep in our racial unconscious.

Our recent history is fairly straightforward: Adolph Hitler happened, PC racial indoctrination happened, and the white race lost its bearing toward the nonwhite world.

Now there are signs of change.

But what is the FIRST THING the white race will do to firmly regain its bearing?

I want to believe our race unconsciously knows the answer – the real answer. Not an ideological answer. Not a political answer. But a real answer – perhaps an answer residing in our racial unconscious.

I want to believe that is part of what BW means when he states “heredity is all important”.

I want to know the answer. An answer that causes white people to step back into the saddle of being astride the world – to where we psychologically regain our centeredness in all of our dealings with nonwhites, from the most trivial to the most weighty.

We are responsible. No nonwhites are responsible for our tribulations. We are responsible.

Perhaps someone in the seminar has the answer to the FIRST THING we will do, the very first thing that our race does to actually and concretely regain its bearing.

Perhaps not, but life is not a dress rehearsal for something else.

Consequently, I have hope that one of the participants of this seminar knows the real answer, the real answer to the very first thing our race does that puts us “back into the saddle”.

Comment by Dave

ME:

Thanks for giving us the URL.

This is GENIUS! The reason it is genius is because it doesn’t wander. Dave has put everything in a rigid order, which is excatly what needs to be done. It is exactly the opposite of respectable conservatives.

I cannot praise this work too highly. Dave is writing our textbook.

And the title is “siegecraft,” which I never thought of but which is exactly accurate. A siege is rigidly conducted along specific lines. A siege does not vary from its objective, which is CONQUEST. A siege is the opposite of our sixty years of charging off blindly in all directions.

Dave, I’m sorry I did not get to this earlier. I hope I did not help discourage you, because your work makes my life worth while. All the scattered “I agree with yous” in the world are of no importance compared to your hard and disciplined work here.

1 Comment

That Which is Politically True is Never SCIENTIFICALLY True

This can go into your set of basic ammunition along with Bob’s Mantra and HERESY!

There may, at some unique time in history, have been a single scientific truth which the
ruling regime had to impose, but I don’t know of it. When the Medicogenetical Institute
of Moscow did a massive identical twin study and found that heredity was all-important
compared to environment, Stalin wiped them out. Communism says that all of man’s defects
are to be cured by a Communist environment.

Stalin then put Lysenko in charge of Soviet genetics. Lysenko help to destroy Soviet agriculture, which didn’t need much help in being destroyed, by saying that genes were unimportant. He tried the old Lamarckist method of turning summer wheat into winter wheat by FREEZING it.

The same thing is true of Political Correctness.

It took us a full generation to get over the idea, backed by “reputable scientific opinion,” that gay sex practices really had nothing to do with AIDS.

A forensic pathologist must be able to do two things:

1) Find our the race of a corpse from a few dessicated remains; and

2) Testify under oath that race does not exist.

This is not unusual in our society. This is not unusual in any toitalitarian environment.

George Orwell called it Doublethink.

When a scientist says something that the authorities WANT to be true, it is NEVER true.

5 Comments

Elizabeth

When I talked about the desperation in academia to prove INdians didn’t kill hte mammoths and giant sloths, Elizabeth added a comment about the “balds” in Appalachia. These are mountain tops that Indians regularly burned off, destroying the trees. She also pointed out that large areas of the East where the “nature-;oving” Indians lived were reduced to prairie.

Here isa comment from Marshall de Bruhl’s 1993 life of Sam Houston. It is a grovelingly politically correct book in general, but he did let this slip. He was discussing hte fact that white settlers of the Shanandoah Valley found it already cleared. He explained htis by the fact that, in order to get herding animals to hunt there, the Indians burned it off every year:

“The standard portrait of the native Amerians as benign ecologists is somewhat marred by this practice. One forester obserrved that had this seasonal burning xontinued, in a few centuries Vorginia would have beomce eitehr a PRAIRIE or a desert.”

You know those temples that are found inthe middle of the Central American jungles? It turned out that the Indians built up civilizations there and destroyed the trees and brought on doughts and flooding that brought down each civilization. The jungle, with its thin, Amazon-like soil, then grew over it.

3 Comments

Dave and Mark

Dave did not include his Internet Address here, which makes it unreachable for new readers of this Blog.

ALWAYS give your Internet address.

Mark had to remind me to do that in Bob’s Mantra.

Then he had to remind me he had reminded me.

I have taken scores of BW’s articles and blog postings (with full attribution), done spelling and grammer cleanup, and posted them at nationalsalvation.net in an INITIAL attempt to make BW’s WN’s observations more accessible (to me). I will radically change this site and probably its domain name (I own scores of domain names) as I proceed.

The godsend of BW is that he has developed a comprehensive ideological countermeasure to PC race indoctrination that is badly needed and that is not tainted by the kind of WNs crap that has proven to be counterproductive in the past.

I threw it up as a “project step” to enable me to ruminate on how to fold it into a “siegecraft manual” for white people that will include an orientation to various laws and strategic coaching for whites on how to deal with a society where we have 15 Mexicans lined up for the chance to receive the minimum wage for the privilege of getting to scrub a white man’s toilet.

Soon we will have 100 Mexicans (per each white man’s toilet) in the same line.

Also, “planned community” consultancies (real estate developers) need better grounding for handling the “race pitch”. I want to develop something unique that will embolden them to become more “in your face” regarding gated communities.

Gated communities are something I deal with in my work as an accountant and I understand the industry and know some of the players.

That is why I have done much raging against the police on this blog. I know from direct experience how useless (and dumb) the police are.

In every third-world country the police are useless accept to rob law abiding people (through the “taxes and fines” finance mechanism) and to aid and abet drug gangs in their business activities.

Third-world America is no different; hence the growing industry in “private security” and gated communities.

Comment by Dave

2 Comments

Pairing

While we are at this beginning phase, we might want to think a bit about pairing.

For new people, it might be easier to go in with someone more experienced, especially at the beginning.

Would this help someone getting started?

6 Comments

History’s Most Important Game of Chess

In a chess game between Masters, the match suddenly ends before most of the fans understand
why. That is because both Masters are thinking six moves ahead, and one of them realizes
he has lost long before it is obvious to the merely excellent players who think four moves
ahead.

I keep warning you never to get off Bob’s Mantra and HERESY! because the enemy only has two
arguments, and these moves destroy them. So in the real world, you have to keep dealing
with their attempts to wiggle out of the fact that they are proposing genocide and they are
suppressing al counter arguments as HERESY! aka anaziwhwantstokillsixmillionjews, Racism.

This is simple. It is NOT easy.

You will let your prey slip through many times. But you will soon realize instantly, like
a chess master, that you just let it go.

Every time you play a game of poker, you will sonder how in the HELL you could have done
something that STUPID. You’ll get over it.

Chess has been described for centuries as a war strategy played on a small field. Our war
strategy is as fascinating as chess, but unlike chess, it MATTERS.

The main thing I have to offer you is what I learned from fifty years of screwups.

I am NOT asking you to do something easy. Exposing yourself to ridicule or defeat,
even under a pseudonym, is HARD.

Add to that how hard it is to learn the Internet techniques people like Pain consider easy.

Shari had the courage to say she didn’t know how to copy and paste. For each Shari, there
are a dozen people who don’t have the guts to appear ignorant.

Let Ole Genius Bob tell you up front that HE can’t just follow Pain’s instructions at first
shot. But I’ll find out. I’m USED to asking over and over and over again. The battle is too important for me to worry about whether I look smart or not.

I need my TRAINIG, and I’m going to GET it.

If anybody is embarrassed about asking publically over and over, I can get you together directly if BOTH
parties CLEARLY agree to it. But having the courage to ask publically is important.

For each person who is willing to ask over and over and look amateurish, there are a dozen others who don’t want to admit they just don’t GET it. So it would be better if you forced the experts to instruct you over and over and over.

Did I say “over?”

The payoff is high.

A lot of people are addicted to chess or bridge. But we are playing a game of World Domination for REAL. The startup cost in effort to you is high, but the payoff is enormous. This is the Big Game.

Also, if you screw up, tell us so. The main thing I have to offer you is what I learned from fifty years of screwups. No matter how ridiculous you may consider your mistake in hindsight, a lot of people are going to repeat it if you don’t tell us about it.

Now for some Words of Wisdom that, Lord be praised, I didn’t come up with.

I love it when my students come up with stuff I can’t match, like Pain’s:

“Keep moving fast. The more you post, the higher your morale.”

And I wind this up on Lord Nelson’s unimprovable:

“Whats going to happen IS happening.”
“LET’S TAKE OUT THESE SICKOS!”

4 Comments

Our Pack of Wolves

What does a Leader do when his followers get ahead of him? He panics.

What does a teacher do when his pupils get ahead of him? He GLOWS.

Pain is on the offensive, big time. He didn’t just talk about “what we should do,” he DID it. Only here, on Bob’s Blog, do we have soldiers like that. I have spent fifty years listening to people tell me what we shoud do, but a man who plans it and DOES it is almost UNIQUE.

Lord Nelson came up with an argument for a point he had to deal with. It WORKED. I hope I am still able to think that fast. And Lord Nelson learned a lesson you can only get with you have been taking on the enemy nose-to-nose: Forget dazzling them with statistics, hit the BASICS.

Antonio laid bare the fact that you don’t lead with statistics on the Holocaust, you hit them with the fact that we are being JAILED. Nelson and Antonio, fresh from the front, make the points fresh that I am been trying to make theoretically for so long.

Then Pain came up with something I had not considered. He said that the TITLE of the piece should be aimed at each particular audience. I was so obsessed with a consistent message that that point didn’t occur to me. But I was hitting you with theory. Pain was out there thinking about his AUDIENCE.

Another commenter reminded me that the Blog address should be part of Bob’s Blog.

Kelso noted we were down and HE called our server to get us back up.

We are forming a TEAM. Or, as the enemy might call us, a PACK. You HAVE my basics. The Blog is a complete book of them already.

We have basic textbook, but it is time for you to begin to write the new chapters.

Old Bob is aglow.

1 Comment

Pain Expands the Attack, and Calls for Volunters!!

This is from from Peter Pain.

And I think the enemy will agree with the name Pain from now on!

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

MANTRA REPORT

I always keep my word.

I have spent the last weeks getting DSL with a good ISP for access the the Newsgroups. I was successful. Today I “subscribed” to every Newsgroup my server has with the word “politics” in it. I posted the Mantra in ALL of them. Some have few current posts (ca 500), so it is sure to get notice. Others have a huge base (more than 300,000), so many are sure to see it, but it will take watching to keep the Mantra visible. The total Newsgroups of “politics” was 58.

There is room for creativity in Subject lines. For example, in a Democrats site, I write: “Unemployed? It’s the alien invasion.” IN the Republican sites I write: “Democrats plot alien invasion of US.” In a UK site: “Muslims seek genocide of Britain.” This takes no time at all.

To do it:

* Highlight the Mantra here in the blog, click control-c; open a simple text reader click inside a new file and click control-v. There it is.
* Make sure it looks right, with no hanging lines, or unnecessary quotation marks. Save the file to the Desktop where it will be handy. You may call it “Mantra.”
* Download a good Newsgroup reader, such as Netscape or Thunderbird from Mozilla.com. If you don’t know how to set it up, call your service provider on the phone and ask them.
* When everything is working and you are ready to subscribe to a Newsgroup, search the Newsgroup list for something that might work, like “politics,” which is what I did. Not all servers have the same list, so you may see some Newsgroups I don’t. Put a check mark next to the name of a Newsgroup that sounds good.
* “Compose” or “Write” a new message. Put a good Subject in. Copy (control-c) and paste (control-v) the Mantra into the message body. Click “Send” or “Post.”
* That’s one. It only takes about a minute if you have a fast connection.
* Keep moving fast. The more you post, the higher your morale.
* Come back here and brag.

Here is what I posted:

Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

http://whitakeronline.ORG

Comment by Pain — 9/21/2006 @ 9:36 pm | Edit This

NO SPAM
NO SPAM

MANTRA REPORT

Just went back and checked. My posts are “propagting” (meaning other people on other servers can read them). I know this because I caught the first reply. Here it is:

“Which countries have a strong focus on the future and are getting it done?

Japan, China, Singapore, Taiwan.

Which countries don’t take in 3rd world migrants?

Japan, China, Singapore Taiwan.

What criticism do they get for their no immigration policy? None.

What criticism do western democracies which want to limited the 3rd world
invasion get?

Heaps – and all from the “useful fools” of the left.”

Ta da!

Comment by Pain

No Comments

Lord Nelson and Antonio Make a BREAKTHROUGH!

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

I just want to say some things about my earlier comments.
If anyone thinks the points I made were too base, and simplistic, then PLEASE, look at this (PROFESSIONAL) antis question again:

“How do YOU, know Britain Has always been a White country since the beginning of time, were YOU, in Britain at the beginning of time????”

Now ask yourself; what kind of IDIOT! would have stood there reeling off endless facts and statistics, just to counter such a baseless, and stupid argument?

And yet, I hate to say this, but if you posted that same question on OV at Stormfront, you would see many good people (NOT ALL) doing exactly that.
We have all been subjected to BILLIONS, of dollars of propaganda from the media, academia, mainstream politicians etc.
And we may not like to admit it, but we are all carrying symptoms of this.

Its NOT complicated.

There is no logical reason why ANY race of people would ever want to become a minority, in their own countries.
And every non White we will ever, meet in our entire lives already knows this.

Like the coach says, this is about “GENOCIDE”.

So lets Throw the facts, and stats, AWAY

Comment by Lord Nelson

The heresy angle is also the BEST way to aproach holocaust revisionism, a subject which

seems to obsess our side.

I never waste time quoting numbers and studies to prove wether the big cookoff happened,

didn’t happen or sort of happened. To a right thinking Aryan all that matters is that

they’re putting people in jail for trying to amend the death figures by even one victim.

THEY ARE PUTTING PEOPLE IN JAIL.

Kidnapping them when necessary, and holding them in solitary confinement like mass

murderers. I direct anyone who will listen to Google up Ernst Zundel, David Irving and

Gemmar Rudolph then draw their own conclusions. What happened to these men is a more potent

argument for our cause than piles of moldy Nazi documents and archaeological excavations at

the alleged camps.

If the story of David Irving doesn’t outrage you, then go back to your football game. We’ll

let you know when the revolution is over.

Comment by Antonio Fini

ME:

AT LAST! After years of effort, I have two commenters talking to each other about strategy on my level.

Every other civilization before ours was based on Authority. Ours is based on experiment:

“One experiments is worth a hundred Expert Opinions.”

Lord Nelson and Fini know something that simly cannot be found out without some experience in

the field:

It doesn’t matter how man books you’ve rad on a subject when you have five minutes to change

an ATTITUDE.

I keep speaking as one who has had to defend our position with every kind of population and who was never given any time to get started. I had to get going from sentence one.

This is a world apart from people who are debating with each other about which form of racism is the Word ofthe Lord or True Science.

I have to use my first two minutes to BUY another fifteen minues without letting someone
label me out of the discussion. So I have to wait until YOU are in the position where you
need something that WORKS.

Lord Nelson has a FRESH way to say what I have been trying to say: We don’t have TIME to dig into stats in that crucial first period.

And Antonio has the same no-nonsense advice: We can attack the Hlocaust right off hte bat, or we can condemn those who are JAILING people.

And only experience can teach you how to come back with the argument Lord Nelson did on “native” Britons. That requires staying on target and still dealing with the debate you are faced with.

The point is not to WIN an argument. The point is to be able to MAKE the argument without being labelled out. And the next point is not to WIN the argument, but to CONVERT the listeners, which is what Lord Nelson did. The interviewer pretended to never ge his point, but the listenders DID.

Let’s keep this up. I couldn’t be happier.

3 Comments

Staying in Formation

The piece below, addressed to Alan and Al Parker, is repeated below *** because it is so critical.

We are faced with the same thing over and over and over and over:

1) The other side gives us all sorts of arguments about “tolerance” and “the mixing of THE RACES.”

2) We state Bob’s Mantra and they accuse us being racists, naziwhowanttokillsixmillionjews. The we hit them with the HERESY argument. What is incredible here is that we have been facing the same two arguments for sixty years, but we never DEAL with them.

The Romans faced the same problem with both Northern Europeans and Oriental hordes. The hordes would come screaming down on them, each time. EVERY time the attackers did exactly the same thing.

Rome found a single solution to this, and Rome conquered the world with it.

That s0lution was called DISCIPLINE. Romans found that if they stayed in formation and fought as a unit, they NEVER lost. They ONLY lost whenthey tried to get inventive. The hordes would scream and taunt them. But the Romans STAYED in formation.

Staying in formation is SIMPLE. It is NOT easy. There is nothing easy, even for the most battle-hardened veteran, about keeping your mind on what you are doing when thousands of shrieking blood-thirsty attackers are running at you. So the Romans spent endless hours on Mars Field practising STAYING IN FORMATION.

You have a Mars Field right here on the Internet. You can copy and paste and find our every ruse the enemy will use without using your name and without embarrassment. To get out there and take them on live the way Lord Nelson did is advanced work.

Never BREAK FORMATION.

Like the shrieking hordes, our enemies have only ONE strategy. For sixty years we have tried to meet it with novel information, thick books, and arguments that make us feel knowledgeable. And that doesn’t make a dent in their lines.

They are out to destroy YOUR race and they are out to take waway YOUR freedom of speech. It is long, long PAST time that we hung onto those two points like bulldogs, that we stayed in formation like Romans, and took that crap OUT.

Let the hobbyists of revolution quote all their exciting new information on Conspiracies and news realeases and Inside Stuff.

WE have a WAR to fight, and bubbleheads are NOT the people who will stand shoulder-to-shoulder with you. Let them prance around and enjoy themselves.

Leave the women and children at HOME.

****NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

I am new at this but i’ll give it a try. I think I understand how to attack the PC retards

as described by BOB. Never fall victm to their wordism charge that takes you off message as

one example. Bob did not fall for this tactic, he applied their retard logic and reversed it

on them, excellent. PC retards are the perverts on normal society, expose it for whet it is

and we crush their silly litte make believe world.

Comment by Alan

NOT SPAM

It’s interesting how quickly they resort to calling you a nazi when you talk about the Jews

or the “white” thing. They will insult you or try to discredit you any way they can and

evade arguing your points. Bob and Tim know that well. In a formal debate, those tactics

would be considered fallacious arguments.

Comment by Al Parker

ME:

Welcome aboard, Alan!

Alan and Al give me a chance to repleat my one-two punch. I wish Lord Nelson were doing this, since he is fresh from the field of action.

Alan, our first message, which you KEEP hitting them with is:

Bob’s Mantra

” Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE problem. Everybody says

this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and

ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or

Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote

assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY

white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if

hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black

countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am

talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black

man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the

white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a

naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

http://whitakeronline.org

Al Parker,

You know the above, but we have developed this into a one-two punch.

Punch two deals with the only recourse they have:

HERESY!

Every society has its own word for HERESY! ( then spell it out with the caps and the exclamation point.)

In Communist countries all heresy is denounced as Fascism.

In Fascist Italy all heresy was denounced as Communism.

In our Politically Society you denounce all heresy as Racism.

This is supposed to allow you to refuse to answer me. This is supposed to give you the right to suppress my opinions. But in a free society you can’t hide behind labels.

Ther point is that our enemies only have TWO arguments. But we never DEAL with their ONLY two arguments.

I am urging you to take out their two arguments,and to talk about NOTHING else until they address genocide and suppressing our point of view.

6 Comments

Alan and Al

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

I am new at this but i’ll give it a try. I think I understand how to attack the PC retards

as described by BOB. Never fall victm to their wordism charge that takes you off message as

one example. Bob did not fall for this tactic, he applied their retard logic and reversed it

on them, excellent. PC retards are the perverts on normal society, expose it for whet it is

and we crush their silly litte make believe world.

Comment by Alan

NOT SPAM

It’s interesting how quickly they resort to calling you a nazi when you talk about the Jews

or the “white” thing. They will insult you or try to discredit you any way they can and

evade arguing your points. Bob and Tim know that well. In a formal debate, those tactics

would be considered fallacious arguments.

Comment by Al Parker

ME:

Welcome aboard, Alan!

Alan and Al give me a chance to repleat my one-two punch. I wish Lord Nelson were doing this, since he is fresh from the field of action.

Alan, our first message, which you KEEP htiing them with is:

Bob’s Mantra

” Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE problem. Everybody says

this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and

ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or

Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote

assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY

white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if

hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black

countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am

talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black

man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the

white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a

naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

http://whitakeronline.org

Al Parker,

You know the above, but we have developed this into a one-two punch.

Punch two deals with the only recourse they have:

HERESY!

Every society has its own word for HERESY! ( then spell it out with the caps and the exclamation point.)

In Communist countries all heresy is denounced as Fascism.

In Fascist Italy all heresy was denounced as Communism.

In our Politically Society you denounce all heresy as Racism.

This is supposed to allow you to refuse to answer me. This is supposed to give you the right to suppress my opinions. But in a free society you can’t hide behind labels.

Ther point is that our enemies only have TWO arguments. But we never DEAL with their ONLY two arguments.

I am urging you to take out their two arguments,and to talk about NOTHING else until they address genocide and suppressing our point of view.

No Comments

Lord Nelson Leads Our Fleet to Victory

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

Thought you might like to know that last week I called a talk radio phone in show from the UK. they had a social construct, Ooops! I mean anti (sorry Bob) as a guest on the show he was being presented as an impartial member of the public who had some inside information about how evil the BNP are.
The compare let talk to him and I quickly had him cornered in our debate, at this point he threw in one of those mind numbing anti arguments, which if you used as your defence in a court of law you would be sent to a mental institution.
I calmly did what I always do, I took what the anti said, turned it around onto the non white race, then threw his own argument back in his face.
This left the anti speechless, as usual, so the compare cut in and started demanding that I make my point, I kept repeating (I HAVE MADE MY POINT) over and over, until I was cut off.
Well I continued listening to the show and to my surprise several other people phoned in praising what I had said earlier.
About 90% of the callers were pro BNP and by the end of the show both the compare and his little anti sounded quite shook up.

Whats going to happen IS happening.
LETS TAKE THESE SICKOS

Comment by Lord Nelson

ME:

Wonderful work!

But you clearly were able to hold them to YOUR subject. We need more instruction in how you did THAT.

Tell us how it FEELS not to let the bastards get out from under your devastating point.

THAT is the key to victory!

10 Comments

Al Parker, Shari, and OUR Conspiracy

If anything happens to me, you can call Jamie Kelso and he will tell you how to keep this blog, our seminar, our conspiracy, going.

One watershed was reached here that only I would fully appreciate:

Shari said she didn’t know how to do the copying and pasting, AND SOMEONE ANSWERED HER.

Once you learn to do something on the Internet you forget how mysterious it was before. Shari had the courage to state flatly that she didn’t know how to do it. For one person who simply doesn’t know how to do, there are at least ten more who don’t want to admit their “ignorance.”

When a comrade asks for help please give it. Please don’t leave it to me.

I see more and more commenters advising each other on which blogs to hit with Bob’s Mantra:

NOT SPAM

Let’s not overlook the blogosphere. It may be a more suited area to target. Blog readers are less composed of nerds and wannabe intellectuals. Let’s look for blogs worth posting to on Blogspot.com, then enter the comments section and insert Bob’s mantra. Often the commenting can be done quickly, anonymously, and is not even moderated. We can start with the Islamo-obsessivist Gates of Vienna ( http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/ ), who thinks the question of Muslims in Europe is only religious in nature.

Comment by Al Parker

ME:

This is exactly what I am looking for!

You are steadily taking over.

This is not a lecture, this is a seminar. I am not your Fearless Leader. I am trying to get you grad students ready to take my place.

And this is why I do not want you to consider me “political leader.” In fact, the whole point of my efforts here depend on your clearly seeing the distinction I make here:

A Leader is one who cannot be replaced. His followers follow in the path he has set out.

And here is the BIG difference. I am not a Great Leader in whose steps you are supposed to tread. I am a SEMINAR leader. I am a TEACHER.

The whole point of being a great historical leader is to be one who can never be completely replaced. The whole point of being a TEACHER is to train your replacements in what you have to offer, and for THEM to go on from there.

I want to leave a group of people who have learned a way of thinking, some basics. But I want you to become capable of calling Kelso and going right ahead with this or proceeding in other way, or both.

I want to see Shari asking questions and getting less apologetic about HER point of view. I want to see YOU answering questions. I want to see YOU reminidng people to go back to basics.

You cannot imagine how delighted I am when I don’t have to repeat the point because YOU do.

One commenter made me happy when he told another wrier, “You are getting off Bob’s point.”

YOU have to steadily learn the points I can offer you.

But you must progress so that Ian not be the only one who keeps prodding people back to the BASICS. YOU are supposed to get better and better at doing that yourself.

YOU are supposed to go out and try what I have to offer and come back (please note this, Joe) with the lessons you learn, many of them lessons I don’t KNOW.

If you don’t progress this way, I have failed. If you DO, then everything I am doing is worth the effort.

I want to teach you what I know. But what I know should be only how to handle a glider.

I teach you how to glide so you will learn to fly.

1 Comment

Joe

Joe said at the outset that Carto was his kind of guy. He repeated that after my latest praise of Carto.

I LISTEN, Joe.

After my bitch about readers who don’t copy and paste, which Joe made me think of, Joe apparently got offended:

The difference between Paul Craig Roberts and that pack of paid whores is that Paul Craig Roberts is honest. For whatever reason he decided to go a different route than you did. I really should ask him about that. Maybe I will. I sure would want him in my camp if I were you. Do you suppose it could be that he disagrees with your entire set of premises?

Comment by joe rorke

I am not kidding: it is kind of fun to be accused of dishonesty after a lifetime of being criticized for exactly the opposite.

It is also ironic, a type of humor we like. The last time I saw Paul was at the Voice of America in 1985. We were in school together twenty years before. We exchanged opinions and he smiled and the last thing he said to me was:

“You know, Bob, it’s kind of nice to know that some things never change.”

3 Comments

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

“We are NOT “mankind.” We are brawling, aggressive people no one can unite. Or Conquer.”

Bob, what about the welfare trolls I see every weekend while shopping for groceries?
They are white, usually obese, dirty, not old, addicted to taxayer’s money to the point
of thinking it’s owed to them, have hords of white-trash kids (from multiple fathers) trailing along
behind the “Free” food cart. These people HAVE been conquered and they are WHITE! If it can happen to them, what makes you think it can’t happen to the rest of the white race?

I fear this, I really do.

Comment by Mark

ME:

First, allow me to feel a bit of triumph at your saying:

“I fear this, I really do.”

You are not a member of The Greatest Generation. You said to Ole Bob that this scares you.

You don’t know what a triumph that is. I am so desperately tired of being told that the essence of True Manhood is that one knows no fear.

Now take a psychological jump with me. We all take it for granted that ten thousand wildebeeste live their lives in fear of the pride of lions which sits there and picks off the slow and weak among them. There are TEN THOUSAND of them! Why don’t they just stomp those twenty or thirty lions to death?

They never have. They never WILL.

WHY?

A troop of baboons obeys the alpha. The rest of the baboons are denied the most basic of instincts, the ability to BREED, by that alpha.

WHY?

If the other males got together, they could rip the alpha to pieces.

That is the way the world WORKS.

Why should all the unstoppable invasions in history stop at Vienna?

I don’t start with the illogic of it. I start with the fact that they DID.

Why aren’t YOU one of the welfare trolls? If they are white and you are white, why aren’t you one of them?

To an old South Carolinian like me, there is no mystery to this, and there is no novelty to this.

We called them “trash.”

And we forgot about them.

The white race is not superior because we are ALL superior. All those invasions did not end at Vienna because everybody north and west of Vienna was an Ubermensch, an Aryan Superman.

Let’s ask another question that is more relevant. Why did all those invasions roll across the whole world UNTIL they reached Vienna?

Because Ghenghis Kahn and Mohammed were the ONLY alphas in THEIR world. They had no competition until they reached Vienna.

Do any of us wonder why Papa Doc Duvalier ruled Haiti? Do any of us wonder why a Ho Chi Min or a Mao Tse Tung or a Pol Pot has absolute power in Asia?

It never even occurs to us to be puzzled about why the third world is routinely despotic.

But we would be ASTOUNDED if a Stalin did not run into a Hitler and a Hitler did not run into a Churchill in OUR world.

Asia and Africa are SUPPOSED to be ruled by Strong Men. That is the way of the world.

But in the West, our whole history is a struggle between popes and emperors and kings. We have never sorted out the alpha.

WHY?

There is no Alamo outside of the White world. There was no Thermopylae outside of OUR world.

Look at the number of historians trying desperately to discredit the “Alamo Myth.” The Alamo stands in the path of Politically Correct History in exactly the same way that Vienna stood in the path of one World Conqueror after another.

The answer is because our world contains people like US.

Our white world contains many betas and deltas and gammas. But our white world also has a wildly disproportionate number of ALPHAS, people like you and me.

They can screm, “There is no God but God, and Mohammed is his Prophet.” Their whole world will collapse before an alpha statement like that.

But we will say, “Balderdash!” “Crap!” “Nonsense!”

When they say the white race has to go because all mankind is one in the Name of Allah or Jehovah, we will reply, “What pile of crap!”

In all the world, the buck stops HERE.

For all our pretences at respecting All Mankind, the fact is that Asia and Africa are EXPECTED to roll over at crap like that.

But HERE, an Alamo or a Bob’s Mantra or a Thermopylae is natural.

Despotism is the routine lot of Asia and Africa and all the nonwhite peoples. YOU take that so much for granted you haven’t even THOUGHT about it.

But it ends HERE. There are Bobs with Bob’s Mantra here. You have no trouble with the idea that Afro-Asians can be slaves, but it SCARES you that WHITES can get that way, and you SEE whites getting that way.

Your question, Mark, is your answer.

5 Comments

Vienna

For over a thousand years, the West has feared the Yellow Peril.

Consistently, throughout recorded history, China has contained one fifth of the entire human race. And everybody realized

that if a white country was united and contained a fifth of hte human race, it would take over the planet.

China was united for centuries at a time. Surely the Yellow Peril would take over the world.

There were breaks in this certainty that the Chinese would take over the world.

During those breaks, there were other people who were certain to take over the world. In aingle century Islam went from a

single Prophet to fielding an army all the way up into Tours in today’s Belgium.

According to historians, only a historical accident kept Islam from crushing hte West as it had crushed all others.

Again and again, at the height of its power, Islam slammed into Vienna, and fell back. And every time Islam moved up towards

Vienna, it was agredd in the West that a white country that united that many people could not be stopped.

The red-haired, green-eyed Ghenghis Khan rolled over China in an unstoppable wave. They reached Vienna.

Then a historical accident, the death of Ghenghis Khan or something else, kept them from going any farther.

Then, once again, the Yellow Peril was the Inevitable Future.

Over and over and over and over,t he West has been doomed.

Over and over and over, the West has been divided in the face of a united enemy.

I watched while a united Revolutionary Communism used the top officials of our own government. No country that became

Communist during the Cold War ever went back to the Free World.

It was obviously inevitable.

They got to Vienna. They lost Vienna and a generation later they disappeared.

Why is it that WE are always divided against ourselves but the united Inevitable Conquerors end up as a lost incident of

history?

Is it a string of coincidences, the chances of which are about one in a million?

Or is it because we are unconquerable for the precise reason that we are always divided?

Ghengis Khan, China, Islam, Communism, each has tolled over and united everybody who fell under the general definition

“mankind.” Then they slammed into the West.

We are NOT “mankind.” We are brawling, aggressive people no one can unite.

Or conquer.

6 Comments

Al Parker

NOT SPAM

I want to share with you the MOST painfully accurate description thus far of the EURO/AFP conferences, from Harold A. Covington, the guy promoting the northwest migration.

“[These conferences are] quasi-intellectual bullshit bloviated in rented motel banquet rooms while [attendees are] being served rubber chicken by Mexican waiters, where 90% of the visible heads in the audience are gray or snow white-haired and the average waist size is 42.”

Ouch! That takes the cake.

Comment by Al Parker

ME:

I appreciate you and Joe backing me up, but it should not be at the expense of fighters on other fronts.

Willis has been courting the old people with money for four decades. That is the way he has started and financed so many endeavors. Everybody else who has gotten hold of a LITTLE money on our side has gotten into a fight over it or stolen it.

Those old people with the 42 waists have quietly financed us against the giants for decades, and no one will ever give them credit for it.

Willis has had tens of millions go through his hands without any of it sticking to them. He lives very simply and always has.

Willis has never wavered even the slightest bit from his dedication to our cause. He damned near destroyed me once, but I admired him the whole time, and said so.

Willis has exploded many times, he exploded at me. But a man who can handle big money and never show the slightest concern for it compared to his dedication to the cause is my hero, no matter what. Carto towers above our movement through the decades.

Carto got slapped down and came back fighting again and again and again and again. He NEVER wavered, no matter how bad things got. Willis can blow up in my face any time he wants to. If I can say that, with all my time and agony invested in the movement, you should have the same attitude.

Willis often comes out swinging at the wrong person at the wrong time inthe wrong place, but he always comes out swinging. There simply is no one in the same league with Willis Carto.

I have been in this fight for half a century. I have personally known and worked with almost all the greats. But Willis stands in a categoryof his own.

When we were few and discouraged, Willis was combative.

Lord, how I admire that man!

3 Comments

Tim

I spend time each day on spreading your (OUR) message. These days this has replaced
Stormfront and listening to David Duke etc(I already know what he is going to say anyhow).

The only things I do outside of reading this blog is keep up with the news and work. I am
busy planting seeds in a variety of different ways…EVERY DAY. Of course, I will be totally
honest. I am more excited and optimistic than ever. It is not by accident, that your blog
has coincided with your message getting spread far and wide. Nor is it a coincidence that
this is happening when people like me are doing things EVERY DAY to spread OUR message. We
are seeing first hand how the Jews plant their message among the Jewish troops. We are kinda
doing something similar. It is networking and spreading a message. Nothing magical to it.

Unfortunately, we do NOT yet control the Synogogues. But we are coming along and quickly. We
are making converts and an impact. And the “WE” includes anyone that spreads BW’s message.

I am no respectable conservative. I know what to do these days. And you should be excited.

You are having the impact you want. Pat Buchanan can spread a message. But he cannot spread
a RADICAL message. Young men like me can AND WILL. Be optimistic. These fools are against
TIME. They think they are triangulating. No. They are moving the debate in our direction. It
is just now getting interesting. They are triangulating us into potential leadership positions. Maybe not as fast as anyone of us want. But a whole lot faster than anyone could imagine.

Most of these old time Nazi/Stormfronters/WhiteNationists are looking for a BIG BANG. I am
paying attention to a trend. And the trend is NOW self reinforcing. So while everyone is
bitching about the Blacks, Mexicans, Muslims etc. I will keep doing my part. I will keep
making my point. All day. All week. All weekend and anywhere and everywhere I can. I will
stay on message. Since I realised our race is OUR religion, this has been the equivalent of
going to mass for me. I have always heard a handful of people can make a huge impact if they
are persistant and unwaving. We are seeing this first hand. Every week. I see pieces all
over the world that highlight our message in subtle WAYS. I was going to start posting them
on here for people to read. I have not had time. One recent European blog (someone connected
to one of Fjordmans—I think it was baron bordissey) on Feminism blew me away. It was as IF
you wrote it. Again, what more can you ask for.

Comment by Tim —

ME:

Tim, you are the pick of the pick of the lot.

Once again, I cannot improve on the comment here. And you cannot imagine how important that is to me.

I have to do my work entirely on FAITH. It is a faith based on experience. What I do WORKS. But I get TIRED, and it is very hard to keep yourself going all alone.

The fact that you and Dave wrote what only I could have written a couple of years ago, eben moreso the fact that you have given our BASIC message a priority in your life, keeps me at this keyboard.

What you said about Dr. Duke reminded me of another point that needs making again.

I told you to weigh the information you receive. People do it all the time, but they don’t do
it enough.

You face a flood od advertisements every day, but you don’t BELIEVE that nine out of ten
people prefer Every kind of chewing gum. You are perfectly aware that that ad is giving
you information for a purpose so the information is not reliable.

You need to do this balancing act with ALL information. A geneticist says race does not
exist because he knows and you know what will happen to him if he says anything else.

On Stormfront, I would give a long, careful lesson on how to obtain power, how to change the

world. Then I would go to the radio thread to see if there were any comments on what I had
said. There almost never were.

In fact, during and after my talk the same comments wouldbe made that would have been made
if I had never been born: the latest gossip about Bush, another Great Revelation about
Israel or Iraq, another horror story about a crime by an illegal alien.

Exciting stuff.

It is not true that ALL advertisements are false. But you watch them closely and you know
what the game is.

By the same token it is not true that ALL exciting information is wrong or off track. The news that the
Japanese had bombed Pearl Harbor was both exciting and true. But information that is
spread BECAUSE it is exciting, like advertisments, tends to be untrue and, when true, it
tends to be something that doesn’t really matter. Something else exciting will come up the
next day and you’ll forget all about it.

One person on SF told the exact truth, “I respect Mr. Whitaker a great deal, but his talks are so
BORING.”

David Duke, who was a professional announcer and is an expert public speaker, knows how to
be breathless all the time. His talks are full of vast, powerful groups of villains and
Davids facing Goliaths.

But David makes his living this way. He is serving his purpose. I am looking for people
who are good soil for the ideas I am planting. Hobbyist revolutionaries, the ones who go
for excitement, are still worth telling these things, but they are not the soil I am looking
for.

YOU are.

And after a while, if you have the kind of mind I’m looking for, you get BORED with breathless expositions. You begin to find the basics food for your OWN thoughts. A good mind craves EXERCISE. Being spoonfed with breathless stuff becomes boring:

“So what?”

If you have good mental teeth, you want something to chew on. One more illegal alien outrage is pablum.

One commenter a while back said he was ADDICTED to Bob’s Blog. I think I now understand what he meant.

His baby teeth are gone. And this is the only place where he can find real food.

5 Comments

Dave

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

When do big things happen? When the conditions are right for them to happen.

Something ruinous has transpired, a great “upping of the ante”.

Our fathers received a “narcissistic payoff” for selling me and mine (and you and yours) out

and they got paid everything there was to be paid.

They got to be “compassionate” without ever having to shoulder another’s disability.

They got to be “tolerant” without ever having to suffer the intolerable.

They got to be “charitable” without ever having to release anything dear.

They got be “heroes” without ever knowing misery.

They got to be “affluent” without ever knowing struggle.

But I wouldn’t trade my place with them for anything. Even for all the Gold in Fort Knox

(assuming there actually any gold there):

Why? Because:

I get my hatred.

I get my resentment.

I get my hard-barked will.

I get to endure the occupation of my lands and waters by races of monkeys.

I get to watch “public safety officers” assist Niggers and Spics in the theft of my

property, my inheritances, and my God given rights – right down to the last one.

I get to endure having my citizenship stripped for the crime of being born with a country.

I get to be an alien and foreigner in a land my people have lived in for 350 years.

I get to watch my grandfathers lands and rivers laid claim to by Mexicans who insult me in

my own home.

I get the pleasure of a club slammed upside my head for daring to protest being raped,

robbed, humiliated, beaten, and left homeless without a name or a country.

I am very grateful to my fathers indeed, for they have furnished me a life worth living.

Their lives certainly weren’t. The proof is in the fabulous inheritance they left.

Don’t even talk to me about Carter, about Bush, about Ford. If those worthless rats and

cowards multiplied themselves by all stars in creation end to end they would not reach to

KISS MY ASS.

I will act when it is time to act.

But I would tell you this, when I act to bring justice to criminals who insult my very

existence with their presence in the world, they will never know from whence that justice

came. Never.

I too have been around the “halls of power”.

I am well aware of how ordinary those “halls’ are.

Comment by Dave —

ME:

This is perfect. It is what every young person must realize.

1 Comment

Stayin’ Alive

Well, glad to see you finally fess up about Paul Craig Roberts being the “Craig Roberts” you were referring to along with Pat Buchanan in that piece of some time ago that you wrote, Bob. I didn’t want to have to badger you about it but I did want to be sure of the person you were referring to in that piece. I like what Paul Craig Roberts is doing. I don’t see William Rusher or George Will or Cal Thomas or a whole pack of what you call “respectable conservatives” doing what Mr. Roberts is doing. It takes guts and brains to do what he is doing. If we don’t hold this unflushed toilet bowl of a country together I don’t see how in the world we can do anything else worth doing.

Comment by joe rorke

ME:

Rusher and Will and Thomas are making a very good living at what they do.

When I ask commenters to cut and paste Bob’s Mantra, I get the response that they “have lives,” they have to make a living, they have to raise their kids, and they can’t spare time for this last priority.

Yet all those same commenters are very upset that Rusher and Will and Cal Thomas and the rest of them are not risking THEIR livelihoods by getting out there and taking dangerous stands.

Pat Buchanan was the top-paid columnist in America before he got out there. Craig Roberts edited the Wall Street Journal editorial page. But they forsook on the priorities I keep getting lectured on here.

Will and the rest are doing exactly what commenters are so proud of doing: they had their living to make first. They have LIVES, you see.

3 Comments

Overdrive

I doubt anybody really noticed that I said I spent over twenty years developing the Wallace strategy and then the Reagan strategy. Now it all looks like a natural developement.

It used to take years for my ideas to reach the publication stage, when other people took them on.

You may not have noticed that I am crowing over the fact that Ann Coulter an others are ALREADY claiming ideas I came out with just two years ago.

“Respectable,” which I was using in 1998, was bad word in conservative circles within three years.

I do wish somebody ELSE could appreciate what I am watching. It took eight years from when I deveoped the idea of Societal property and presentd it at a Public Choice Conventionw ith a Nobel Prize winner was there, before I produced the whole New Right Papers to present it to the public.

FINALLY SPR became a part of mainline thought.

It took twelve years from Wallace’s ten million votes to when the Republicans got it.

And back then, I was big stuff.

In fact, since I gave up my place as Very Important Person, I thought I had given up spreading ideas this way. Now that I am anathema, someone Buckley or Sobran or Buchanan will not even answer, I find my ideas are going out much faster.

But in 1982 I was such a big dog that when I decided to do the big book on The New Right, which elected Reagan, St. Martin’s Press JUMPED at it.

This is because of the Internet.

Look up John Huss on wikipedia (I haven’t). He led a giant religious rebellion a centur before Luther, but he lost. Luther succeeded entirely because of the printing press.

Let me repeat something else critical: I cannot take you back into history with me. But in 1982 you NEEDED credentials to be listened to. But today one out of every hundred men, women and children in America has a law degree, a Doctor of Jurisprudence. PhDs are everywhere.

The Internet came in just as everybody was ready to laugh at credentials.

Nobody BELIEVES any more. As in the USSR just before Glasnost, everybody repeats what they must repeat, but nobody believes it.

Christian believers had the inside track ten years ago, but they’ve thrown it away on Israel. The massive conversions they were making is now history. I am one of the few people who even REMEMBERS them.

In my memory, politics used to be the Democrats and liberals proposing things, and the conservatives and Republicans OPPOSING them. People voted for Republicans simply because they were NOT Democrats.

Now Democrats propose NOTHING. Today you vote Democratic because they are NOT Republicans.

Here is the part you will have difficulty understanding. Bush Republicans are STILL trying to position themselves between “extremes” that disappeared decades ago. They are desperately trying to be in the middle of a road that was bypassed long ago.

Everybody laughs at all of them. The Neoconservatives are laughed at. National Review worships them, because they say libealism was OK until 1970. So. they say, respectable conservative are NOT just plain silly. Taking liberals seriously is the intellectual way to go.

But the simple truth is that nobody takes any of this seriously except those who are making their livelihood off of it. People hate and blame Bush, but when they see the black chairmen of the new House committees if the Democrats win in 2006, they will be appalled by them, too.

Do you know anybody outside the Religious Right who identifies with either side in a POSITIVE way?

The whole system is at a dead end.

Now let’s get back to how bad Jews are and other fascinating stuff.

2 Comments

Switch to our mobile site