Archive for October, 2006
I put the piece below about the champion of free speech in Europe on Stormfont. PLEASE don’t tell me this means that Europe is brave but America is weak and hopeless. I am SICK of being MOANED at.
Political Correctness is giving ALL the Love and Brotherhood crap a bad name. The time is not far off when a person who eve mentions racial equality will have to make a quick apology for it and say he is going THERE — to genocide against whites. That is what we are working on right now with the Mantra.
Right now a person who defends the rights of criminals in conversation has to quickly separate himself from the “revolving door” policy that has killed so many innocent people. I REMEMBER the ’60’s when fasionable people said all criminals were innocent victims of society. Today liberals are the first to say that the bastard who kills people should be punished.
Even the media is now reporting that us racists are saying there is a PLOT against the white race. They didn’t say it that way before.
Today there is a spark that may grow into a revolution. Europeans will be thoroughly ashamed that they ever had such laws. The time is not far off, thanks to US and our Mantra, when people who have anything to say against bigotry will make it clear that they are not going THERE.
Meanwhile, moan, moan, moan.
More than one of our commenters has said something monumental: Other people have already HEARD of the Mantra. This tiny little group has ALREADY started having that effect. We are having that effect because it is TIME for it. Even liberals are getting SICK of Political Correctness.
When the Minister of Justice of Switzerland goes on an outright campaign to end Europe’s legal enforcement of Political Correctness it is GOOD NEWS. It is TIME for it. It is going with the tide of history, and he knows it.
I have seen this same thing happen in other areas time after time.
A member of the British Naional Party said that Bob Whitaker os the most quoted person in the BNP. Not the most quoted Britisher. The most quoted PERSON.
The Labor Party of Britain has as part of its platform the imposition of a required term of imprisonment for anybody who questioned the Holocaust, just like the one in Germanyand France. It has been abandoned completely. I have been discussed on the floor of the Australian parliament in Canberra.
Do you think that the Minster of Justice of Switzerland is on this campaign beause HE thought it was time?
So I reported a victory that is very important to me. I reported a beakthrough I am trying to teach YOU to help make. So what do I get when I report it?
Moan, moan, moan. Europeans are strong, Americans are weak.
Pleae STOP it!
We see here a major reason why the people who SPARK the revolution are never a PART of the revolution when it happens. While others see things HAPPENING, they are still moaning about how bad things are.
We are making a difference. We are riding the tide of history. Sixty years of moaning is coming to an end.
The tide of history is coming. Let’s get off our pity pots and jump on our surfboards.
Our constitution refers many times to God, we have our God given rights, laws and so forth. The great men who wrote the constitution were well aware of the depravity of pagan law, rights afforded to a society by the grace of god could never be taken away or usurped by a tyrant. This worked fine for a period of time. Human secularist and marxist believe in rule and rights drived by man, 60 million human beings lost their lives in the 20th century because of this fraud. So where does this all fit in today. PC, multiculturalism and racism are three parts of that new religion that is destroying our white race. This religion is based apon rule and law derived by man, they warp all our concepts of life, liberity and the pursuit of happyness. If brown skin immigration is not worshiped we are called racist, we are denying their right to liberty. If we do not tolerate their allien customs, we are denying their right to liberity. If we refuse to accept them with open arms and fail to provide them with benifits beyond what we possess, we are dening their right to a life on easy street. When god was replace by man, we ended up with this sick and twisted logic, few question how prejudist this is against our people. Our rights and our liberities were god given, from there it was up to each individual to make the best of it, thats what freedom is all about. The church in America today has sold out each and everyone of us, they only preach what is in style. The church has lost faith in god and turned to man for guidence, how else can we explain their refusal to fight the PC crowd, god never takes sides, if only these religious idiots would open their eyes and see how used abd abused they have become.
Comment by Alan B.
I cirrected Alan and told him that the Constitution does not MENTION God a single time.
That is a common misconception, and the rest of what Alan said was, as usual, thoughtful and worth reading.
What he is talking about is generally IMO accurate, but we must always remember that the name of God is just as good an excuse for evil as secularism is.
Better, actually, because at least the secularists are not commiting BLASPHEMY.
I was outraged when Bob Jones IV suddenly swiched sides onteh Confederate flag in South Carolina. It had been flying over the state capitol over thirty years and he had never objected. Then the businessmen objected to it, the money men, fearing an NAACP boycott.
So the Citadel and Bob Jones suddenly decided the flag was bad.
What is funny is that there is STILL an active NAACP boycott against SC, but nobody notices. They panicked over nothing, as thsoe wo follow in the steps of The Greatest Generation so often do.
But what enraged me was Bob Jones”s REASON for switching sides. Like Governor Beasley, he picked a very convenient time to do it and said GOD told him to. He quoted some scripture that had been there two thousand years before the flag went up. He said it offended blacks. If it did that, why hadn’t he said so thirty years earlier?
I have not abandoned my Bible Belt rearing. A person who switches sides for money is bad, but a person who says GOD told him to do it is EVIL. He is claiming to speak for God to people who TRUST him for the well-being of their souls.
If you speak for God, then you are to that extent claiming to BE God. Unlike Jesus, you don’t take responsibilty for what you are saying. Right or wrong, Jesus Christ is a HERO to me. He told the Jews,
“***I*** am the way the truth and the light. NO ONE goes to the Father BUT BY ME.” You can’t get less subtle than THAT. But preachers keep telling us he didn’t mean the Jews. So who the hell was he talking to in Roman Palestine, Buddhists?
I taught Constitutional Law, but I resented that TITLE. There is nothing constitutional about Constitutional Law.
Judges say they just speak for the Constitution. But if you say, “All the state that ratified the Constitution had and ENFORCED laws against miscegenation, but I don’t like them, so the Constitutin says they’re unconstitutional” you are not interpreting anything, you are not speaking for anything but yourself. What they call “Constitutional Law” is Judge Law.
When preachers and priests and rabbis get together and declare that all of them agree that their purpose is to help the poor, that is not charming to me. That is not just a statement of good intentions. They say they are speaking for GOD.
Jesus said “the poor we have always with us” and it said it for a REASON. He said very, very specifically after that that the poor we have with us always but he was here only once, and for the salvation of souls.
When Jesus told the rich young man to give all he had to the poor, the important point was, AND FOLLOW ME. Jesus always spoke, not of the harm to the poor, but of the damage to the souls of the rich and greedy that, in his opinion, sent them to a place far worse than all the suffering all the poor on earth combined could ever suffer in THIS world.
So the churches get together and say Jesus was worried about social justice for the poor. I am NOT charmed by this. The simple fact is that, like Bob Jones IV and Beasley, they no longer BELIEVE in that heaven-and-hell stuff and they want to be “socially relevant.”
I RESENT that. If they ant to help the poor, stop spending church money left to the church by believing Christians in their wills for social causes and get into SECULAR welfare work. They would be decent people if they WERE open secularists. But they want their nice, safe jobs. Bob Jones wants his family business to keep bankrolling him.
It is not HONORABLE to claim to speak for God or the Constitution if you are not doing it. I believe in Jesus maybe 1% but I believe in HONOR 100%.
I believe in the Constitution but I would spit in a judge’s face. Jeus is a hero to me, but I would throw most preachers and priests, and especially bishops and Bob Jones IVs, into the sewer where they belong.
Alan has it right. What he has to learn from Bob is the other tricks of the evil trade he is talking about.
One of my most rewarding moments was when I told my grandnephew that when I was young I was scared of something, I forget what it was, that he knew made no sense. A three-year-old doesn’t know how to extend a conversation. So he kept saying, over and over and over,
“You were SCARED, Uncle Bob?”
He couldn’t get over it.
At that age, adults know EVERYTHING. It was the first time in his life that an adult had t0ld this child that he was afraid of something when he was a kid that other people would laugh at.
This gave me special satisfaction because I was the fifth of five children, almost five years younger than the last one. They all told me they were afraid of NOTHING, and I BELIEVED them.
Mr. Rogers sang a little song for his toddler audience, “You won’t go down the drain.” That hole in the bathtub that everything goes down looks little to us, but a small child has no such sense of proportion. He saw everything else go down the drain, so why shoudn’t HE?
I will never cease admiring Mr. Rogers for knowing that, for EMPATHIZING with that.
When I was tiny we had an outhouse. That hole was HUGE to me. And what was UNDER me was horrible and horseflies were down there and also up around me. My family all thought that it was funny how sitting there terrorized me.
Now I live in a whole society that was raised by The Greatest Generation, who had no fear. I am surrounded by every variety of Christian who tells me he knows EXACTLY what the True Faith is. He tells me with a pretence of absolute certainty that he is Saved while others are headed for the Pit. But those “Christians” are far, far more afraid of death than I am.
All my life The Fearless Greatest Generation has warned me not to defy authority because I should be afraid of it.
They tell me they faced death without fear and only they can say what fear really is. But they have lived their lives in terror.
That was OK when the older CHILDREN in my family told me the same thing.
It is NOT OK when adults tell me the same crap today.
I have written 20,000 words on the first draft of my new book in a week. I am TIRED.
I cannot give commenters the attention you deserve right now. If I had the energy I would have most of them up here. They are on target. You are fulfilling my dream of using my thoughts to go on with.
I need you now to write the Blog.
More and more the comments ARE the Blog.
Write them. READ them.
Take the torch. Or, as one dying Confederate flag carrier said as he handed the flag to another in the midst of battle, “Keep them stars and bars a-flapppin’!”
Bob said “The verbiage is deifferent, if that’s all you mean.”
I am also Norwegian. And I have never heard someone use the exact phrase “race-problem”. It is extremely seldom I hear people using the word “race” either. We just put it in another way.
If we are going to translate the mantra into norwegian we must find a substitute for the word “race problem”.
As Bob said “The verbiage differs but the goal is always the same.”
SOS-racism is a marxist group (with some respectable conservatives) that want mass-immigration into Europe and hide behind that they are “only” anti-racist.
Anti-racists will always argue in favour of more immigration.
Comment by Adelheim
You said, “If we are going to translate the mantra into norwegian we must find a substitute for the word ‘race problem’.”
This is a GRADUATE seminar. For tenestre’s amusement, let me point out that this is a gradudate course for those who have outgrown their college education, whether they had one or not.
I am not training you to be Bob’s Followers. I am training you to take the torch and go with it. If we are going to translate the mantra into Norwegian, and presumably for other Europeans, you and tenestre must do it. Budarick should get in on it.
Think it out and put it here for so others dealing with your audience can have it. We can work it out here. That’s what a real seminar IS. But when it comes to talking to your fellow nationals, the ball is in YOUR court.
The torch is passing.
Unfortunately I don’t understand the first part of your comment. What do you mean with “By replying with standard tactic number 1: DUHH!”? Also, is “anti” the same as “anti-racist”?
Well, I don’t want third world immigration to Norway. Neither do I consider myself an “anti-racist”. How can I be “against” something which is a part of nature?
I’m just saying that in Norwegian public debate, of which this Harvard professor is not a part, I’ve never heard third world immigration to Norway justified with solving a “race problem”. We have been given other reasons, initially that we needed more workers and then that the immigrants are refugees who need protection.
So it seems that this notion of a “race problem” comes from America?
Comment by timestre
Tom hit the nail on the head. Your original statement sounded like the old “DUHH!” stuff. It is a relief I have ONE commenter who will go to bat at that.
About every time I was in Europe there was an “Anti-Racist” group marching or an “anti-racist” speaking in Hyde Park. Opposition to “anti-racism” is not permitted in Hyde Park now, as you know. I remember one of our Bloggers put Bob;s Mantra in British newsgrops and was immediately physically threatened by a bit “anti-Racist” outfit there.
Groups don’t often use the term AntiRacist in their titles here because it is so obviously Marxist The verbiage is different, if that’s all you mean.
Your original comment, as Tom and I said, sounded a lot like the “DUHH!” crap we are used to.
The same people who agree that intermarriage is the solution to the race problem go “DUHH! I never said that” when we challenge them on that.
They tell every white country that its population is aging so the third world has to pour in. Japan’s population is actually going DOWN as it ages, but no one DEMANDS that THEY bring in the third world.
All those poor little “refugees” could make a good living in third world countries and offer special skills to them. But no one EVER demands that any third world country bring them in. Indians are the only hope for many African countries getting food at all by trade.
But as soon as Eastern Europe threw off the Reds, the cry began, “Are you ready for immigration yet?” It was fully understood that if a country is white, third world immigration is the next step. It never even occurred to anyone to ask WHY “Are you ready for immigration yet?” would be the first question asked of desperately poor WHITE countries.
The verbiage differs but the goal is always the same. It is the GOAL that matters if one opposes genocide.
Alright gang, I’m back with more.
All my postings have been ignored, but Ive spent the past few hours looking for massive blog rolls and these three links seem to fit that description.
I haven’t scoured them thoroughly but I don’t think that they repeat.
Comment by Tom
All revolutionaries are ignored. Do your expect them to put a statement they can’t deal with front and center?
Repetitive? I just said that’s a virtue.
If anybody is reading this, we just had a comment from somebody who said he has never heard that there is a “race problem.” He has never heard of anybody who said that whites marrying other races is the “solution” to this “race problem.”
If you don’t eat him slive, your tired old alpha wolf will do it for you.
And the tired old pack leader will be VERY disappointed.
Bob has taught us that there are the proper conservative, those who play the game with the liberals, that would describe George Will and Buckley, the are the beltways boys, the game players. Buchanan is a lame rebel so to speak, he never really gets as tough as he should, but then again he was a conformist like Sorban before he went some what farther to the right. Bob was always true and real from start to finish, he never compromised on his beliefs and values. Now We THE PEOPLE, tend to look towrn the nanny state for authority, mose want somebody in a costume as Bob would say to tell us what to do. Authority thrives on the myth that they and not the people are the real authority. People prefer to worship words and costumes, they are setting theirselves up for the all encompassing nanny state. This authority lies, missleads and olny reacts in ways that bennifit their authority, so we must shy away from the myth. PC is a myth its all words that only destroy, period. Like Bob says it all ties together.
Comment by Alan B.