Moan, Moan, the Stupid Zone

Posted by Bob on October 31, 2006 at 9:09 pm  
Filed Under Coaching Session | 8 Comments »

I put the piece below about the champion of free speech in Europe on Stormfont. PLEASE don’t tell me this means that Europe is brave but America is weak and hopeless. I am SICK of being MOANED at.

Political Correctness is giving ALL the Love and Brotherhood crap a bad name. The time is not far off when a person who eve mentions racial equality will have to make a quick apology for it and say he is going THERE — to genocide against whites. That is what we are working on right now with the Mantra.

Right now a person who defends the rights of criminals in conversation has to quickly separate himself from the “revolving door” policy that has killed so many innocent people. I REMEMBER the ’60’s when fasionable people said all criminals were innocent victims of society. Today liberals are the first to say that the bastard who kills people should be punished.

Even the media is now reporting that us racists are saying there is a PLOT against the white race. They didn’t say it that way before.

Today there is a spark that may grow into a revolution. Europeans will be thoroughly ashamed that they ever had such laws. The time is not far off, thanks to US and our Mantra, when people who have anything to say against bigotry will make it clear that they are not going THERE.

Meanwhile, moan, moan, moan.

More than one of our commenters has said something monumental: Other people have already HEARD of the Mantra. This tiny little group has ALREADY started having that effect. We are having that effect because it is TIME for it. Even liberals are getting SICK of Political Correctness.

When the Minister of Justice of Switzerland goes on an outright campaign to end Europe’s legal enforcement of Political Correctness it is GOOD NEWS. It is TIME for it. It is going with the tide of history, and he knows it.

I have seen this same thing happen in other areas time after time.

A member of the British Naional Party said that Bob Whitaker os the most quoted person in the BNP. Not the most quoted Britisher. The most quoted PERSON.

On EARTH.

In BRITAIN.

The Labor Party of Britain has as part of its platform the imposition of a required term of imprisonment for anybody who questioned the Holocaust, just like the one in Germanyand France. It has been abandoned completely. I have been discussed on the floor of the Australian parliament in Canberra.

Do you think that the Minster of Justice of Switzerland is on this campaign beause HE thought it was time?

So I reported a victory that is very important to me. I reported a beakthrough I am trying to teach YOU to help make. So what do I get when I report it?

Moan, moan, moan. Europeans are strong, Americans are weak.

Pleae STOP it!

We see here a major reason why the people who SPARK the revolution are never a PART of the revolution when it happens. While others see things HAPPENING, they are still moaning about how bad things are.

We are making a difference. We are riding the tide of history. Sixty years of moaning is coming to an end.

The tide of history is coming. Let’s get off our pity pots and jump on our surfboards.

Alan B.

Posted by Bob on October 31, 2006 at 11:30 am  
Filed Under Coaching Session, Comment Responses | 4 Comments »

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

Our constitution refers many times to God, we have our God given rights, laws and so forth. The great men who wrote the constitution were well aware of the depravity of pagan law, rights afforded to a society by the grace of god could never be taken away or usurped by a tyrant. This worked fine for a period of time. Human secularist and marxist believe in rule and rights drived by man, 60 million human beings lost their lives in the 20th century because of this fraud. So where does this all fit in today. PC, multiculturalism and racism are three parts of that new religion that is destroying our white race. This religion is based apon rule and law derived by man, they warp all our concepts of life, liberity and the pursuit of happyness. If brown skin immigration is not worshiped we are called racist, we are denying their right to liberty. If we do not tolerate their allien customs, we are denying their right to liberity. If we refuse to accept them with open arms and fail to provide them with benifits beyond what we possess, we are dening their right to a life on easy street. When god was replace by man, we ended up with this sick and twisted logic, few question how prejudist this is against our people. Our rights and our liberities were god given, from there it was up to each individual to make the best of it, thats what freedom is all about. The church in America today has sold out each and everyone of us, they only preach what is in style. The church has lost faith in god and turned to man for guidence, how else can we explain their refusal to fight the PC crowd, god never takes sides, if only these religious idiots would open their eyes and see how used abd abused they have become.

Comment by Alan B.

ME:

I cirrected Alan and told him that the Constitution does not MENTION God a single time.

That is a common misconception, and the rest of what Alan said was, as usual, thoughtful and worth reading.

What he is talking about is generally IMO accurate, but we must always remember that the name of God is just as good an excuse for evil as secularism is.

Better, actually, because at least the secularists are not commiting BLASPHEMY.

I was outraged when Bob Jones IV suddenly swiched sides onteh Confederate flag in South Carolina. It had been flying over the state capitol over thirty years and he had never objected. Then the businessmen objected to it, the money men, fearing an NAACP boycott.

So the Citadel and Bob Jones suddenly decided the flag was bad.

What is funny is that there is STILL an active NAACP boycott against SC, but nobody notices. They panicked over nothing, as thsoe wo follow in the steps of The Greatest Generation so often do.

But what enraged me was Bob Jones”s REASON for switching sides. Like Governor Beasley, he picked a very convenient time to do it and said GOD told him to. He quoted some scripture that had been there two thousand years before the flag went up. He said it offended blacks. If it did that, why hadn’t he said so thirty years earlier?

I have not abandoned my Bible Belt rearing. A person who switches sides for money is bad, but a person who says GOD told him to do it is EVIL. He is claiming to speak for God to people who TRUST him for the well-being of their souls.

If you speak for God, then you are to that extent claiming to BE God. Unlike Jesus, you don’t take responsibilty for what you are saying. Right or wrong, Jesus Christ is a HERO to me. He told the Jews,

“***I*** am the way the truth and the light. NO ONE goes to the Father BUT BY ME.” You can’t get less subtle than THAT. But preachers keep telling us he didn’t mean the Jews. So who the hell was he talking to in Roman Palestine, Buddhists?

I taught Constitutional Law, but I resented that TITLE. There is nothing constitutional about Constitutional Law.

Judges say they just speak for the Constitution. But if you say, “All the state that ratified the Constitution had and ENFORCED laws against miscegenation, but I don’t like them, so the Constitutin says they’re unconstitutional” you are not interpreting anything, you are not speaking for anything but yourself. What they call “Constitutional Law” is Judge Law.

When preachers and priests and rabbis get together and declare that all of them agree that their purpose is to help the poor, that is not charming to me. That is not just a statement of good intentions. They say they are speaking for GOD.

Jesus said “the poor we have always with us” and it said it for a REASON. He said very, very specifically after that that the poor we have with us always but he was here only once, and for the salvation of souls.

When Jesus told the rich young man to give all he had to the poor, the important point was, AND FOLLOW ME. Jesus always spoke, not of the harm to the poor, but of the damage to the souls of the rich and greedy that, in his opinion, sent them to a place far worse than all the suffering all the poor on earth combined could ever suffer in THIS world.

So the churches get together and say Jesus was worried about social justice for the poor. I am NOT charmed by this. The simple fact is that, like Bob Jones IV and Beasley, they no longer BELIEVE in that heaven-and-hell stuff and they want to be “socially relevant.”

I RESENT that. If they ant to help the poor, stop spending church money left to the church by believing Christians in their wills for social causes and get into SECULAR welfare work. They would be decent people if they WERE open secularists. But they want their nice, safe jobs. Bob Jones wants his family business to keep bankrolling him.

It is not HONORABLE to claim to speak for God or the Constitution if you are not doing it. I believe in Jesus maybe 1% but I believe in HONOR 100%.

I believe in the Constitution but I would spit in a judge’s face. Jeus is a hero to me, but I would throw most preachers and priests, and especially bishops and Bob Jones IVs, into the sewer where they belong.

Alan has it right. What he has to learn from Bob is the other tricks of the evil trade he is talking about.

Fear Again

Posted by Bob on October 30, 2006 at 2:16 pm  
Filed Under Bob | 5 Comments »

One of my most rewarding moments was when I told my grandnephew that when I was young I was scared of something, I forget what it was, that he knew made no sense. A three-year-old doesn’t know how to extend a conversation. So he kept saying, over and over and over,

“You were SCARED, Uncle Bob?”

He couldn’t get over it.

At that age, adults know EVERYTHING. It was the first time in his life that an adult had t0ld this child that he was afraid of something when he was a kid that other people would laugh at.

This gave me special satisfaction because I was the fifth of five children, almost five years younger than the last one. They all told me they were afraid of NOTHING, and I BELIEVED them.

Mr. Rogers sang a little song for his toddler audience, “You won’t go down the drain.” That hole in the bathtub that everything goes down looks little to us, but a small child has no such sense of proportion. He saw everything else go down the drain, so why shoudn’t HE?

I will never cease admiring Mr. Rogers for knowing that, for EMPATHIZING with that.

When I was tiny we had an outhouse. That hole was HUGE to me. And what was UNDER me was horrible and horseflies were down there and also up around me. My family all thought that it was funny how sitting there terrorized me.

Now I live in a whole society that was raised by The Greatest Generation, who had no fear. I am surrounded by every variety of Christian who tells me he knows EXACTLY what the True Faith is. He tells me with a pretence of absolute certainty that he is Saved while others are headed for the Pit. But those “Christians” are far, far more afraid of death than I am.

All my life The Fearless Greatest Generation has warned me not to defy authority because I should be afraid of it.

They tell me they faced death without fear and only they can say what fear really is. But they have lived their lives in terror.

That was OK when the older CHILDREN in my family told me the same thing.

It is NOT OK when adults tell me the same crap today.

More Important Than Ever, READ THE COMMENTS!

Posted by Bob on October 30, 2006 at 12:39 pm  
Filed Under Coaching Session | 1 Comment »

I have written 20,000 words on the first draft of my new book in a week. I am TIRED.

I cannot give commenters the attention you deserve right now. If I had the energy I would have most of them up here. They are on target. You are fulfilling my dream of using my thoughts to go on with.

I need you now to write the Blog.

More and more the comments ARE the Blog.

Write them. READ them.

Take the torch. Or, as one dying Confederate flag carrier said as he handed the flag to another in the midst of battle, “Keep them stars and bars a-flapppin’!”

Adelheim, the Torch is Passing to YOU!

Posted by Bob on October 30, 2006 at 12:31 pm  
Filed Under Coaching Session, Comment Responses | 1 Comment »

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

Hello timestre!

Bob said “The verbiage is deifferent, if that’s all you mean.”

I am also Norwegian. And I have never heard someone use the exact phrase “race-problem”. It is extremely seldom I hear people using the word “race” either. We just put it in another way.

If we are going to translate the mantra into norwegian we must find a substitute for the word “race problem”.

As Bob said “The verbiage differs but the goal is always the same.”

SOS-racism is a marxist group (with some respectable conservatives) that want mass-immigration into Europe and hide behind that they are “only” anti-racist.

Anti-racists will always argue in favour of more immigration.

Comment by Adelheim

ME:

You said, “If we are going to translate the mantra into norwegian we must find a substitute for the word ‘race problem’.”

This is a GRADUATE seminar. For tenestre’s amusement, let me point out that this is a gradudate course for those who have outgrown their college education, whether they had one or not.

I am not training you to be Bob’s Followers. I am training you to take the torch and go with it. If we are going to translate the mantra into Norwegian, and presumably for other Europeans, you and tenestre must do it. Budarick should get in on it.

PROPOSE something.

Think it out and put it here for so others dealing with your audience can have it. We can work it out here. That’s what a real seminar IS. But when it comes to talking to your fellow nationals, the ball is in YOUR court.

The torch is passing.

timestre

Posted by Bob on October 30, 2006 at 8:30 am  
Filed Under Comment Responses | 8 Comments »

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

Hello Brian

Unfortunately I don’t understand the first part of your comment. What do you mean with “By replying with standard tactic number 1: DUHH!”? Also, is “anti” the same as “anti-racist”?

Well Brian, I don’t want third world immigration to Norway. Neither do I consider myself an “anti-racist”. How can I be “against” something which is a part of nature?

I’m just saying that in Norwegian public debate, of which this Harvard professor is not a part, I’ve never heard third world immigration to Norway justified with solving a “race problem”. We have been given other reasons, initially that we needed more workers and then that the immigrants are refugees who need protection.

So it seems that this notion of a “race problem” comes from America?

Comment by timestre

— ME

Brian hit the nail onthe head. Your original statement sounded like the old “DUHH!” stuff. It is a releif I have ONE commenter who will go to bat at that.

About every time I was in Europr there was an “Anti-Racist” group marching or an “anti-racist” speaking in Hyde Park. Opposition to “anti-racism” is not permitted in Hyde Park now, as you know. I remember one of our Bloggers put Bob;s Mantra in British newsgrops and was immediately physically threatened by a bit “anti-Racist” outfit there.

Groups don’t often use the term AntiRacist in their titles here because it is so obviously Marxist The verbiage is deifferent, if that’s all you mean.

Your original comment, as Brain and I said, sounded a lot like the “DUHH!” crap we are used to.

The same people who agree that intermarriage is the solution to the race problem go “DUHH! I never said that” when we challenge them on that.

They tell every white country that its population is aging so the third world has to pour in. Japan’s populationis actually going DOWN as it ages, but no one DEMANDS that THEY bring in the third world.

All those poor little “refugees” could make a good living in third world countries and offer special skills to them. But no one EVER demands that any third world country bring them in. Indians are the only hope for many African countries getting food at all by trade.

But as soon as Easstern Europe threw off the Reds, the cry began, “Are you ready for immigration yet?” It was fully understood that if a country is white, third world immigration is the next step. It never evenoccurred to anyone to ask WHY “Are you ready for immigration yet?” would be the first question asked of desperately poor WHITE countries.

The verbiage differs but the goal is always the same. It is the GOAL that matters if one opposes genocide.

Brian

Posted by Bob on October 29, 2006 at 8:02 pm  
Filed Under Coaching Session, Comment Responses | 1 Comment »

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

Alright gang, I’m back with more.

All my postings have been ignored, but Ive spent the past few hours looking for massive blog rolls and these three links seem to fit that description.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/links.html

http://neo-neocon.blogspot.com

http://www.vodkapundit.com

I haven’t scoured them thoroughly but I don’t think that they repeat.

-Brian

Comment by Brian —

ME:

All revolutionaries are ignored. Do your expect them to put a statement they can’t deal with front and center?

Repetitive? I just said that’s a virtue.

If anybody is reading this, we just had a comment from somebody who said he has never heard that there is a “race problem.” He has never heard of anybody who said that whites marrying other races is the “solution” to this “race problem.”

If you don’t eat him slive, your tired old alpha wolf will do it for you.

And the tired old pack leader will be VERY disappointed.

Alan B.

Posted by Bob on October 29, 2006 at 4:26 pm  
Filed Under Coaching Session | No Comments »

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

Bob has taught us that there are the proper conservative, those who play the game with the liberals, that would describe George Will and Buckley, the are the beltways boys, the game players. Buchanan is a lame rebel so to speak, he never really gets as tough as he should, but then again he was a conformist like Sorban before he went some what farther to the right. Bob was always true and real from start to finish, he never compromised on his beliefs and values. Now We THE PEOPLE, tend to look towrn the nanny state for authority, mose want somebody in a costume as Bob would say to tell us what to do. Authority thrives on the myth that they and not the people are the real authority. People prefer to worship words and costumes, they are setting theirselves up for the all encompassing nanny state. This authority lies, missleads and olny reacts in ways that bennifit their authority, so we must shy away from the myth. PC is a myth its all words that only destroy, period. Like Bob says it all ties together.

Comment by Alan B.

The Mantra Campaign and the “Old Thing” Tactic

Posted by Bob on October 29, 2006 at 3:53 pm  
Filed Under Coaching Session | 6 Comments »

I just got another e-mail on Stormfront from someone who is also hitting the net with the Mantra.

He said the only thing they have to hide behind after The Mantra followed by “HERSY!” is that this may be genocide, but it involves no KILLING.

I told him to read the general UN Resolutions on Genocide and the Genocide Treaty. They declare any method of doing away with a group to be genocide, and only one among the many methods they mention involves actual killing.

He also said taht the world will be a better place when The Mantra is something “everybody know.”

It will be a better place then, and then will come the next standard Politically Correct tactic. They will start saying, “Oh, that’s the old Mantra thing.” Many of us will then stop using it because it will make us look out of fashion and boring. This will allow people to FORGET it.

Liberals always say, “oh, that’s the old ‘If Guns are Outlawed, Only Outlaws Will Have Guns’ thing.” So conservatives have stopped saying that. But it is TRUE, and no liberal can answer it, so they use the “old thing” tactic to shut it up.

Have you ever heard a Politically Correct person shut up about ANYTHING that works for his side, no matter how often we have heard it?

The idea is that every time a subject comes up that “old thing”, like “Nazis killed six million Jews” or “race doesn’t exist” or a hundred otehr things we have heard endlessly is THE FIRST THING COMES TO MIND when a subject comes up. That requires hammering it in SHAMELESSLY, ENDLESSLY.

NEVER stop repeating something that WORKS because they’ve heard it. MAKE THEM hear it again until “everybody knows” they’re WRONG.

Antonio and Mark

Posted by Bob on October 29, 2006 at 3:24 pm  
Filed Under General | 3 Comments »

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

Thanks for reminding me Mark. Here is something I’ve been meaning post, but I just had a wedding and funeral back to back.

Respecable Conservative newsblogs are an excellent theatre of operations for us. They are frequented by people who think Rush Limbaugh is the man, because Rush tells it like it is.

These blogs have names like “My Vast Right Wing Conspiracy” and explain why it’s really Ok for us to torture captured Iraqis.

While these folks are skewed, they are far from hopeless. If you paste the mantra in the comments section of an appropriate blog entry you will get a reaction. Sometimes the mantra and the whole blog entry will be erased by next morning. Other times people will line up to call you “racist pig.” This is better than being ignored. Rage is often the outgrowth of fear and fear preceeds change.

You can access about 50 such blogs at this site: http://www.blogsforbush.com/

ME:

Mike’s guidance below and Antonio’s reply and further advice are EXACTLY what I need to be free to write the book.

Right now I have finally found my troops, and I don’t want to break the charge we have going after all this effort by spending time onthe book.

If you want the book done, this is the way to help me.

Mark, Antonio, Dave, Pain, other seminar members, PLEASE keep this up!

Reports from the battlefield that I can repeat here, learning and advice you are picking up, that is what we need desperately, book or no book

It is time for this attack to become YOUR battle, with me just in there helping.

YOU lead the pack, YOU keep up the drumbeat, YOU let us know the action is ongoing.

It time for YOU to take the lead.

Thank you, Mark and Antonio, this could not have come at a better time.

Dr. Duke Reports That Europe Now Has a Champion of FREE SPEECH!

Posted by Bob on October 29, 2006 at 3:15 pm  
Filed Under Coaching Session, General | 1 Comment »

“Switzerland’s justice minister has called on the Swiss government to reverse a law which makes historical revisionism illegal.

Minister Christoph Blocher is on a campaign to change the law, according to the Neue Zuercher Zeitung (NZZ) newspaper – even if it will impinge upon the sensitivities of minority groups, including the country’s Jewish communities.

Blocher claims that freedom of _expression is more important than protecting the sensibilities of minority groups, NZZ wrote.

Blocher just returned from a trip to Turkey where a public discussion of the Armenian genocide is de facto punishable by a court of law. Upon his return home, Blocher said that he believes that Swiss laws needs to be a beacon for other nations.

As far as the minister is concerned, a ban on free speech in Turkey has made an effective public discussion of the Armenian genocide and Kurdish issues there impossible. In effect, he claims that widening the possibilities for freedom of speech in Switzerland might entice other countries to do the same.

Mark

Posted by Bob on October 28, 2006 at 11:36 pm  
Filed Under Coaching Session, Comment Responses | 3 Comments »

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

Bob, an update that might help some of our comrades out.

As I’ve said before, I look for different places to post the Mantra. Actually ANY place is a good place as far as I’m concerned because people will read it and have to think. I like online news articles because there are usually places to discuss the article at the bottom of the article. Any article is good but a race-related article is a breeding ground for OUR kind of people, and I’m finding there are MANY MANY people who think along our lines out there posting commments. It’s those people I try to target as my audience.

If you choose to post the Mantra in the discussion areas of news articles, I reccomend you have 3 or 4 email accounts. Most of the news articles require you to log in, using your email, and since I try to hit 5 – 10 news articles in a sitting, and 3 -4 Mantras per article, the news board watches for repeat postings. You can get around this by adding a period or two or by taking the quotation marks out or putting a long dash between the end of the Mantra and WOL”s address line, but eventually the news board will catch on and you will be shut out. This happens to me every day. Thus the need for 3 or 4 email addresses. You have to trick the boards into thinking youre not a spammer or a corporate poster.

Also, it helps if you post the Mantra in response to an eye catching comment. Many posts are repeatedly replied to (RE: Name of Comment) and it’s these that I prefer to post the Mantra on, since your chance of getting people to read it are better. I don’t waste time arguing with anyone, in fact I don’t even look for a response. I’m just shotgunning the Mantra at as many people as I can. If one person takes the time to read, think, and check out WOL, my task is complete.

Hope this helps!

The Book So Far

Posted by Bob on October 28, 2006 at 11:34 pm  
Filed Under Bob | 1 Comment »

I’ve got about fifteen thousand words down, but as always the book is building itself., and this makes it very complicated, as all my books have been for me. Then I have to go back and rewrite it over and over to make it smoothly explain to the reader.

In short, once again, what I have to say is simple but not EASY.

I began a piece below, “What Real Politics Looks Like” by talking about explaining that the guy out there alone at 7 am was what real politics looked like. That was easy enough. But one day we were watching a baseball game and she asked me to explain it to her.

You and I have been around baseball all our lives. It’s simple, to US. So I started to explain. Then I realized what a huge task I had before me. Baseball and football, unlike soccer, are hideously complicated games.

I have written books for others and for myself. Every single I am convinced that this one will be duck soup.

But look at all the reading YOU have had to do to get my “simple” approach! And I don’t have the give-and-take with book readers that I have with you. When you miss my point, I can correct you and you can correct me. But with book readers I must anticipate the way they will misunderstand my point. That means covering a LOT of ground.

Every word I use they have heard before many times, but what I mean and what they are used to is very specifically different, and it is that SPECIFIC difference in nuance that is the heart of what I have to say. So something I thought I could explain quickly, as if I were speaking to you, becomes a long explanation to make sure they are following right along the path I am leading them on. The sidetracks are ENDLESS.

That is why I present parts here. It would be awfully nice to have some people who know where I am going to read along and help me out.

The tentative title of the book was going to be “Northern Wordism, Southern Racism. But I am fifteen thousand words in and have not yet been able to get down to my exact theme. Every concept I have to present is new, but the words have to be explained. Hell, the whole basis of history must be explained.

I don’t know if you can actually help me with this.

Anyway, I am reminded why I had determined never to write another book. Keeping your train of thought for tens of thousands of words, building point on point, is heavy labor.

But this is what I have chosen to do. So don’t weep for me, Alabama!

But the question nags at me, am I wasting time on the book that I should be spending here, when I have FINALLY found the people I need?

Shari

Posted by Bob on October 28, 2006 at 12:22 am  
Filed Under Comment Responses | 3 Comments »

Not Spam
Both Mr. Sobran and Mr. Buchanan were white before they were Catholics and they were made Catholic or Christian by other whites. There is something wrong with the notion that mankind is to be saved by the destruction of whites. That is the poison that must be recognized and removed. I could say a whole bunch of things about fighting this and that for the last thirty yrs. {I’m tired too} but this blog is right in that standing up for who you are, your people are, has to come first. I even believe that Jesus thinks so too.
Comment by Shari

ME:
Shari, your comment is a great relief to me. I have been worried about you.

I always get a bit of a tired feeling when someone says up front that they are “Christians.” I know they will desert me.

Why? Because the time will come, as it did with Sobran and Buchanan, when I violate something they have from Sacred Writ.

On the other end of the spectrum, a lot of people who have been through this are offended that I like to consider myself a Christian, without the quotes. I know exactly what they mean.

I am not a Christian if something in Sacred Writ says I have to make a human sacrifice of my race. Worse than that, if something in Sacred Writ says what I know to be true is not Truth, I say screw the Truth.

But I am not a philosophical Christian, one who says Jesus was a Great Philosopher. Mine is a very unique position. I say, with C.S. Lewis, that Jesus was God or he was a madman. But C.S. Lewis, like everybody else, went on to say that Jesus was somehow an opponent of settling other worlds and other tripe.

My only claim to Christianity is this: If Jesus is what he said he is, he will stand for me at the Judgment, not as a prophet or a philosopher, but as the Son of God. What I must do is stand for the truth against the Truth.

If one realizes that Jesus was in a society where you could be stoned to death on the spot for saying the wrong thing, every word he said becomes simple truth in defiance of everything the modern “Christian” declares to be Sacred Writ.

Do unto others as you would have them do unto you is the ONLY Commandment Jesus declared. Nothing could violate that more than making a brown world. Nothing could violate that more than preventing the birth of healthy white children to desperate white parents for the sake of some fertilized eggs that feel nothing.

Shari, that is all the Christianity you will ever get out of Ole Bob. But I am becoming more and more sure that you, among all the people who call themselves “Christians,” will consider that enough.

“Wherever two or more of you gather in my name, there I will be also.”

Shari, I believe that you and I have a silent Bob’s Blogger here who, in the unlikely event that Judgment Day ever does come, will be very welcome to the other commenters.

Dave

Posted by Bob on October 27, 2006 at 10:14 pm  
Filed Under Coaching Session, Comment Responses | 2 Comments »

I just wrote a piece in “Mark” about how I am NOT charmed by people who think praise of them should be ignored and put down.

Dave has made a great point here. It includes a lot of genuine praise of ME, but that is part of the point he is making.

I accept the praise gratefully. But if I didn’t think I was doing something special this Blog wouldn’t BE here. Dave explains what I am doing that is special, and why you need to know about it:

DAVE:

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

It’s always amusing to watch people play the “Who (or what) is the real authority?” game.

It begins with, “Well so and so is the real authority”. Then that is challenged and demolished and on it goes until a whole big line of dominoes fall.

Finally, it gets spiritual and religious and the game ends.

But the truth is always the same, regardless of the subject matter: Those that are the RECOGNIZED AUTHORITIES (and believe themselves to be the RECOGNIZED AUTHORITIES) are never the real authorities.

Instead there is some “heretic” out there who is not the recognized authority that is actually the real authority. This is true in every field, almost without exception.

It is just the way human life works and always worked.

For example, we all know that Steve Wazniak had to quit his job at HP to get the time to design a PC that was actually useful. The executives at HP wouldn’t let him do it, even though he begged them for the chance. They actually did not know that there was no one in the world at that time that had more expertise about computers than Steve Wazniak.

This is exactly the situation with BW.

BW is the authority on how and why American law ran off the track with respect to national sovereignty and the rights of America’s indigenous European populations.

Nobody else out there is really addressing the issue in exactly the same way that in the 1970s no one but Steve Wazniak was really addressing the issue of how to make a PC genuinely useful.

Lots of people were working on the issue, but no one else even came near Steve Wazniak’s expertise. Steve Wazniak alone had the background and brains to figure the central problems to getting the devices to be genuinely useful tools.

Again, this is exactly the situation with BW. You have to be BW himself, have his background, and brains, to get the whole thing resolved as to how America law ran off the tracks and tanked our national sovereignty.

Lots of people have opinions on this issue, are working on it, but none of them even come close to BW because he is the world authority on the matter in the same way Steve Wazniak was the world authority on PCs.

We have to respect this and take it seriously.

Comment by Dave

Kelso Strikes Again!

Posted by Bob on October 27, 2006 at 10:06 pm  
Filed Under Coaching Session | No Comments »

If you look to the right of this text you will see a change that is hard to notice, but critical.

You have to go all the way down to “Search” and look below it, and you see “Archives.”

I have been complaining that I couldn’t find earlier Blogs and earlier comments. Now you will see that, after I called Kelso about this, he extended our Blog Archives all the way back. So now you and I can see my pieces and your comments all the way back to the beginning.

I can now go back and quote what I said. I can also go back and see what YOU said.

This may not be a big deal to you, but I needed it badly.

Jamie Kelso delivers.

Mark

Posted by Bob on October 27, 2006 at 11:07 am  
Filed Under Bob, Coaching Session, Comment Responses | 4 Comments »

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

“Joe Sobran said you couldn’t even really call it a book…because there are no talking heads in it.”

I’ve said it before: Joe Sobran has a necro-romance with the very, very late hack author, Bill Shakespeare — a topic only Harvard or Yale “intellectuals” give a damn about, not because it relates to their life in any usable, common-sense way, but because it’s “in vogue” to do so in the so-called intellectual crowds. I’m sure smoking marijuana is in vogue with those Reds too.

Meanwhile, Bob is writing books to save the White race. I’ll buy Bob’s book. I would be inclined to start a fire in my fireplace with Sobran’s books just so I could have enough light to read Bob’s books by it. Perhaps Sobran should come down off his Buckley-like throne and join us in the trenches. He could recite Shakespeare to keep his knees from knocking once the revolution gets messy.

Comment by Mark

ME:

Joe is a fully trained Shakespeare scholar. During my DC days we would sit on the porch and he would quote wads from the Bard’s plays. He wasn’t showing off. We just enjoyed them, especially after a moderate intake of alcohol.

I was walking with Joe a couple of years back when he finished his book, “Who Was Shakespeare?” He told me he was getting very tired telling the truth and being kicked downstairs for it. He wanted to concentrate on Shakespeare again.

On the one hand I sympathized. The man had lost his job and friendship and the sponsorship of William Buckley for raising hell about the Jews.

On the other hand, it was a little like me hearing a hundred times a year for fifty years, “But, Bob, I’ve got a LIFE!” The clear implication being that Bob has no life, so HE can dedicate himself to the battle for our survival, a minor matter compared to getting Little Suzy to Kindergarten on time.

I had gotten tired long before Joe got into this fight. He and Buchanan were pro-immigration freaks in 1980 and they were people I had to fight. I was exhausted THEN, which is why I am on disability now

Which brings up the big difference between us and the usual wolf pack Mark (I hope to God I got the person right, I’m too TIRED to search back right now) talks about.

In a wolf pack the aging leader will die before he gives up his lead position. In our group, Ole Bob lives for the day he can see some other tail up front. I am endlessly encouraged to look out of the corner of my eye and spy, in alphabetical order because my old tail can’t take another nip, Alan B, IF he DOES what he proposes, Dave and Mark and Peter coming up beside me. If I missed anybody, speak up, but we are in pretty rarified company here.

I long for the day when the leaders are up front and Ole Bob can lope along behind and whine to Joe Ororke about how those smartass young pups up front don’t realize what WE went through. Our Joe will tell me to shut up, but I won’t.

Joe SOBRAN was a good buddy until I was able to tell the world to go to hell and put myself beyond the pail. I think that the reason Joe and Pat don’t return my calls is because they are Catholics first and whites third or so.

Whenever somebody raises hell about embryonic stem cell research, I remember risking my job by refusing to have anything to do with any “pro-life” effort to outlaw in vitro fertilization. There are over thirty thousand people alive today, almost all of them intelligent whites, as a result of in vitro. “Pro-lifers” didn’t want them born because you had to kill some fertilized eggs in the process.

And to make their case, they never hesitated to lie like rugs.

So when stem cell research came up, they used the old generic “conservative” argument I discuss in the the Intro to my book below:

“I’ve always been wrong before, but this time I’m right.”

AND, in addition to that:

“I lied before, but this time you can believe me.”

Two statements, two identical answers:

“No way.”

Joe edits a very conservative Catholic publication, so my position on things like embryonic stem cells turned him off me big time. I think preventing abortions means more to him and Pat than anything about our race.

Back when Pat Buchanan was stating on national television that the Americans at Normandy died to open Europe to third-world immigration, I was reading the Mexican Constitution and putting quotes in the Congressional record about THEY treat illegal immigrants.

I’m a little tired, too, Joe.

But we are back to the point I just made with free agent. One Joe Sobran or Pat Buchanan is more of a man than a hundred George Wills or William Buckleys, so I give them credit for what they do.

Buchanan did bring the whole issue of Jews getting us into the Middle East up. Pat wrote a book that brought the end of the white race into mainstream thinking. Pat was the highest paid editorial writer, liberal or conservative, when he switched his position on immigration. He isn’t any more, by a long shot.

They don’t speak to me, but I will never cease to be grateful to and admiring of both Pat and Joe Sobran
But the future is in the hands of those who will take over the pack leadership from Ole Bob.

The day of the conservative who happens to talk about race is over. Their job is done, but I hope they stay at it, just as I told free agent that I deeply hope that Stormfront will keep on, though its days of real basic contributions are over unless it starts some hard rethinking.

Pat and Joe made my ideas mainstream. Stormfront proved we CAN speak up if we do it right.

I thank them. I admire them.

And it is time to move on.

Free Agent

Posted by Bob on October 27, 2006 at 10:01 am  
Filed Under Coaching Session, Comment Responses | No Comments »

We would do well to study the recent May Day ‘boycott’ / mass demonstrations that infested our major cities earlier this year. Someone ORGANIZED all those people. It had to have been fairly efficient and it was certainly effective from a p.r. standpoint. (Except for the initial marches with all the Mexican flags, but notice how quickly they learned the lesson and managed to distribute US flags the next time around.) I have read very little analysis of these marches in the media, although there was one study done which suggested that Spanish talk radio had a lot to do with the organizing, especially in L.A. We could learn from the enemy.
Comment by freeagent

ME:

Freeagent, Bob’s Blog is a pretty tough group, and we wouldn’t have it any other way.

Trager, a rough old warrior for the cause, came in here with a la-de-dah attitude and I hit him so hard he completely dropped out. This is what separates us from Stormfront. They are looking for numbers. We are training fighters.

So I am going to hit you pretty hard here. If you can take it, you might become a fighter. If not, you’ve always got Stormfront.

As I told Trager, you’ve got to READ the Blog before you comment on it. Mark and I just had one of those nose-to-nose exchanges we have here, and a major point Mark on which shocked me back to reality was that we are fighting a totally different battle from herding a bunch of illiterate Mexicans or blacks onto the streets.

I JUST wrote a piece entitled “What REAL Political Warfare Looks Like,” and that piece made it perfectly clear that REAL warfare for us does NOT mean a street full of Mexicans.

Stormfront loves to talk about who is behind the big news stories. But, as Don Black says, Stormfront has hit a membership peak. And membership is their big thing. This blog is far, far smaller but Stormfront has done a wonderful job and, if they don’t do some strategic rethinking, that job is over.

I hope you stay with us, freeagent. Each person on Stormfront hurts our rulers more than a hundred conservatives ever could.

Bu one person who stays and joins in and LEARNS in Bob’s Blog is more than ten thousand of the cattle we are conspiring to herd.

Mark

Posted by Bob on October 27, 2006 at 9:27 am  
Filed Under Bob, Coaching Session, Comment Responses | 2 Comments »

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

Peter, I’m a big, mean wolf and while I’m glad as hell you use the Mantra, and while I respect you immensely, I’m beginning to feel a low guttural growl slowly wriggling upward thru my throat and my canines are showing a bit — about not getting any mention on these boards from Bob. I’m feeling a tad irrelevant and as you know, an alpha wolf doesn’t like to be ignored when he’s fought a battle for the pack. I post daily, perhaps not in as large a quantity as you do in one sitting, but mine is a slow and steady approach, like walking across the dessert all day rather than running for a few hours. I cover the same distance only slower and in my wake I leave carrion for the vultures. My fur is bristling and I’m beginning to circle the pack with my eyes wide open, my tail held out straight, and a howl lodged in my throat…

Comment by Mark

ME:

Mark, our pack cannot afford your eating any of other members.

You may, with my blessings, gorge yourself on dog meat.

I got a bit giddy from Peter’s mention in specific cases of battle. Please understand I have fought all my life ALONE and this is like a shot of co cocaine to have a little army out there fighting with me just the way I have fought alone all my life.

By the way, I sniffed cocaine a couple of times, but I didn’t INHALE.

Contrary to popular opinion, junkies make mistakes in their psychedelic states.

In my exhilaration I made the same mistake I was complaining about. Mark is fighting the battle on a broad front. He does not have the same battle stories Peter does because, like my best efforts, he doesn’t HEAR BACK from his hits.

But those are exactly the kind of hits that have made me a power nobody knows about. I planted ideas and only after years did I come to realize that the fact that my ideas showed up at a regular filter-down level in general conversation and the public media. Peter is giving your aging pack leader regular encouragement; Mark is fighting the long fight, the very fight I keep asking for.

So I ignored Mark.

Smart, Bob, SMART!

But I would not have realized this if that particular wolf had not snarled at me. Which brings me to a wholly different topic.

Mark said, dammit Bob, I want some attention to MY ideas, MY fight! He said it out loud.

The dogs don’t DO that. If anybody compliments our modern human doggies, said puppy is supposed to say, “Oh, I’m really nothing. I am not worthy of notice.”

I didn’t realize how SICK I am of that until I read Mark’s comment. I have a feeling that, if they think about it, a lot of commenters will feel this same rage we hardly ever think about because, it has become so much a part of our society.

When I give a person a compliment, I sort of expect them to APPRECIATE it, not to say, “Oh, you’re wrong. I’m embarrassed. Look at the pink blush on my face.”

Nobody has any trouble resenting it when I give them hell. But the fact that I give you hell SHOULD also make you understand that you don’t get an accolade from crusty Ole Bob unless I MEAN it. The last thing I want when I have the rare joy of telling someone that they did it RIGHT is for them to shrug it off.

It is RUDE to shrug off a compliment. But all the little doggies today seem to thing it’s the thing to do, it makes them look good. It never occurs to them to look at it from the OTHER person’s point of view, the point of view of the person GIVING the praise.

When did it become the height of party manners to respond to a compliment by kicking the person complimenting you in the teeth?

This is a very ORIENTAL habit. I remember a ritual exchange among Chinese businessmen in the old days in which one would compliment the other and the other one would denigrate what he had and then compliment the other, to which the other would reply by putting his own down.

One of part of the exchange had to do with asking about the other man’s wife:

“How is the flower of your Household?”

Ritual reply:

“That pig is fine.”

I must be missing a subtlety, but that does strike me as courtesy incarnate.

In ancient times, when one described a hero, one of the required compliments, right up there with courage in battle, was, “He hungered for glory.” The Chinese were referring to their wives as pigs back when a Western man could not be a hero unless he was hungry for glory.

Mark has to give up his hunger for glory as part of the battle we have to wage here. But he’s no Chinaman.

Give him some credit or he’ll bite your ass off.

Death and Humor

Posted by Bob on October 26, 2006 at 12:55 pm  
Filed Under Bob | 2 Comments »

At least a hundred times people have said to me, “Even after all you’ve been through, you STILL have a great sense of humor.” I appreciate the compliment, but they’ve got the sequence backwards.

There was a guy who was more of a hero than any of the Greatest Generation types who go into crying fits over their own sacrifice and heroism. He was blind and in a wheelchair, and he had a job he was good at. He never asked for any help he didn’t HAVE to have and he made damned sure he paid you back for it. In his job, he made sure he was WORTH the accommodations they made for him because he did the job and was so ready for overtime that no one could replace him.

One person I knew worshipped this guy to the extent he deserved. They suffered with him, but never told him anything about their sympathy with the miserable side of his life. This person would gets tears in their eyes when talking about him.

Then one day that admiring person was told that this man, paraplegic and in a wheelchair, had lost his job. That person’s reaction was to burst out in hysterical laughter. I understood that perfectly. This was so bad you could only laugh or cry.

And in this case you couldn’t cry enough.

Man is the animal who laughs. Man is the animal that knows he is going to die.

Eric Hoffer was talking about what people consider the hallmark of True Wisdom. The Wise Man is seen as grim and hard-faced. Hoffer concluded, “If you want to see what the picture of a Truly Wise Man looks like, watch a cow solemnly chewing its cud.”

Snakes have no sense of humor. Monkeys do. Snakes have no pity, no empathy. Monkeys do.

The same rule holds in our human race. Our snakes never laugh.

Dave

Posted by Bob on October 26, 2006 at 12:32 pm  
Filed Under Coaching Session, Comment Responses | 4 Comments »

I did a little editing, including putting Dave himself in the “wolves” category:

Dave says:

Keep this mind: There are two types of humans in this world, domesticated humans (”dogs”) and undomesticated humans (”wolves”). BWs writings are not going to appeal to “dogs”. “Dogs” are going to be threatened by the raw political reality they expose. “Dogs” respond only to what comforts them. Any politician worth his salt knows this. That is why the general public, being “dogs”, are clueless as to how they are manipulated by persons far more cunning than themselves.

The primary strength of BW’s work is that his writings appeal to “wolves”.

BW needs to write his samzidat on the development of political correctness from the ante-bellum point of view. We “wolves” need it.

I have no doubt that BWs writings are going to succeed in catalyzing the first truly effective white nationalist revolutionary cadre.

I think perhaps this makes me different alone among the other participants in this seminar. I know for a fact that the success of these writings is a forgone conclusion. Call me arrogant, but believe me, I am very good at these kinds of prognostications. It was a talent I was born with.

Comment by Dave —

Alan B and What Political Warfare Looks Like

Posted by Bob on October 26, 2006 at 12:17 pm  
Filed Under Coaching Session, Comment Responses | 2 Comments »

I was thinking of Alan B all alone out there handing out the Mantra and being told by the university officials that “This is OUR university. Have you gotten permission (from us) to do this? Have you paid us tuition to be a student so you can do this?”

When I wrote Why Johnny Can’t Think I wanted people to go into universities and put our stuff on the bulletin boards and face down the officials who told them they had to pay for the place but they had no right to express THEIR opinions there.

It didn’t happen. It takes a lot of years to build up the kind of confidence I have on a campus. The bottom line was FEAR. For all their chest-beating about the universities, nobody was ABOUT to go in there and fight it out. I offered to go in there with them.

No takers.

Alan B is proposing more than he realizes, and he will probably come back the first time with his tail between his legs. I got slapped down more times than I can relate in the last fifty years.

But it is the tries, the defeats, that are especially worth reporting back.

When I brought my Austrian wife, whom I met in South Africa, back to the States with me we were watching the first reports on an American election, at the very beginning of the primaries. It showed a lone man out at about 7 am in a deserted shopping mall with his campaign literature in hand.

“Now THAT,” I told her, “Is what REAL politics looks like. Look at that guy. I have been where he is many, many times.”

We keep reading stuff from Stormfront about people who dream of being in the march of tens of thousands of Storm Troopers who have just taken over the government. When we see campaigns talked about on television, we see the candidate marching in with thousands of ecstatic supporters cheering for him.

That is what politics looks like to almost everybody who hasn’t been in a campaign from the get-go.

Actually, when a campaign reaches the point where the candidate has gotten the nomination and it is a serious fight, the planning for that news event where the camera shows the candidate marching in greeted by the enthusiastic crowd, the planning for that news event began weeks before. The campaign the local drudge, like me, and says “We’ll be there on September 8.”

Said drudge then begins calling, arranging. It’s scary because you are never SURE people will show up. And all that matters in a news event is that they SHOW UP.

“But I’ve got a LIFE. I have to do to a movie that night.”

But I’ve got a LIFE.

But I’ve got a LIFE.

The assumption is that Ole Bob has no life at all except to knock himself out, free of charge, to do this work.

So flash back to the candidate I was watching at the beginning of the primary with my new wife. That man was out there alone in what no chest-beater would call “real” politics, the mass marches and the mass demonstrations. REAL politics is mass demonstration. REAL politics is fighting off the worshipping mob of supporters with a grin on your face.

Until that happens, people will tell you, “But I’ve got a LIFE.”

Compared to what people call READ politics, this is nothing to interrupt your LIFE with.

A final note. My wife called me at work one evening in November, when I was tired and busy.

She said, “You remember the guy we saw on television when you said ‘That’s what REAL politics looks like?”

I thought and then remembered the incident through my fog of election-day exhaustion and said, “Yes.”

My wife said, “He just got elected.”

Alab B, Pain, and DISCIPLINED Initiative

Posted by Bob on October 26, 2006 at 11:44 am  
Filed Under Coaching Session, Comment Responses | 5 Comments »

Pain has developed what he calls “Mantra parties.” He reported back here to headquarters in a comment that he had handed out the Mantra, but taken off the title BOB’S off the Mantra. Pain knows very well that that is no problem, but he reported it back because we are using a style of warfare that made the West so devastating from ancient times.

The reason our approach is so devastating is precisely the same reason the Roman legions conquered the old world. And for centuries no one could explain it to Easterners. To a Middle Easterner, the difference between what Roman and what they had was simple too subtle to explain.

Roman legions wheeled in formation. They were a solid block. We use the same one-two punch, Mantra and HERESY! over and over. To an ancient Middle Easterner or a modern Political Correctness freak, that is just blind obedience.

But blind, slavish obedience was the specialty of the East that faced the Romans and it is the foundation of the Politically Correct establishment today. So why were a hundred thousand of their troops cut to ribbons by a thousand Romans then and a single Blog practitioner today?

Well, I added the word “initiative” to it. But the hordes of Eastern potentates then and PC freaks today show plenty of what THEY call initiative. In fact, the reason Romans ripped them apart was because each of the members of their howling horde was fighting his OWN fight. They came roaring down in hordes, or being wildly offended in the case of today’s OC freaks, and the Romans wheeled in formation.

Our enemies had initiative and they the discipline of slavery, i.e., blind obedience.

We form a block, but that is not BLIND obedience. It WORKS.

Alan B reports back to HQ that he GOING to distribute a hundred copies of the Mantra at his old university. That is a GREAT idea. I am anxious to see how it comes out, so the word GOING is in caps as a challenge.

But, one could ask, what is the difference between Alan B handing out stuff and the billions of pieces or paper PC freaks have handed out? Nobody is better at going into a mental coma and repeating the same things over and over than they are.

You and I know the difference, but this Blog is all basics, so let’s spell it out.

No Eastern potentate ever said, “OK, you men go out there and find a way to use our disciplined formations. The Roman model was developed when the Roman army was made up of citizen-farmers. Their WEAPON was their formation, their discipline. But in each battle they had to wheel and move together in the bewildering confusion of real battle.

All the Tough Guys will tell you that the whole plan of a battle falls apart in the first minute of real shooting. If that had happened to the Romans they would have been dead half an hour later. The magic of the while thing was that the Romans stayed information and, at the same time, adapted that weapon of discipline into the wild confusion of an actual battle.

Now let me give you an example of how OUR formation can so easily break down. A year or so ago, when I was trying desperately to get some people like you, one person decided my discussion was a parlor game and not a means of warfare.

He didn’t want to sound like he was just being a follower, so he said, “You say Political Correctness is a religion, and I agree it is a lot like one. But (what us true intellectuals know is that) it is not a religion. It is rigid system of beliefs.”

This is the break in discipline that gets you slaughtered. It made me tired all over. No, I explained for the hundredth time, PC is not a “rigid system of beliefs.” The Bill of Rights does not say the United States Government cannot establish a rigid system of beliefs. The whole public school system cannot be defunded for teaching for teaching a “rigid system of beliefs.” A professor cannot be fired for teaching “a rigid system of beliefs.”

The whole point is that this is a religious, something, ILLEGAL for one to use public funds to promote. The point is, this guy thought he was showing intellectual discipline when what he was doing was fatally breaking up our ranks, our line of battle.

Like the Roman legion, the Mantra and HERESY! were the products of YEARS of costly trial and error.

Both the legion and the Mantra look like common sense. But any professional writer, especially in politics, will tell you that when something looks like it is obvious and just fell out of the typewriter, there’s BLOOD on the typewriter keys. You SLAVE to write 1) something that just flows; 2) contains ALL the point AND 3) quits, dead stops, when it has done and makes it SHORTER.

Once I have hammered my points down, once I have figured out exactly what the truth of what I am trying to say is, each rewrite is SHORTER, not longer.

I have given you some weapons which are the best fifty years of using a powerful mind can produce. I demand that you not PLAY with our rigid formation. But at the same time the LAST thing I want is a bunch of Oriental hordes or PC Zombies who keep repeating The Master’s Words.

So Pain is having a little fun. He is finding ways to hit people with the message and then reporting back to us about the wasps’ nest he stirs up. But he NEVER breaks formation. He is NEVER lured into running out and chasing down one particular slave of the enemy he has got cornered.

Pain STAYS ON MESSAGE.

That is why one of us can destroy the solid front a whole university has spent millions of dollars building.

Sic ‘em, Alan B.

And report back.

Just FIGHT!

Posted by Bob on October 25, 2006 at 10:27 pm  
Filed Under Coaching Session, Comment Responses | 4 Comments »

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

Fear of “big schemes” = All is Lost

Comment by Pain — 10/25/2006 @ 5:24 pm | Edit This

Not Spam
Not SPam

Way to go, Peter!

I wish we had a few hundred more comrades like you posting on a regular basis. What’s interesting is that once you get started you find yourself looking for more places to post and pretty soon it just becomes a habit. Keep up the good work!

Comment by Mark — 10/25/2006 @ 9:24 pm | Edit This

Not Spam

No, fear of “big schemes” does not mean all is lost. As far I as I can tell, there is no Big scheme, just a small one, until something happens. Right now, I would not trust a Big scheme.

Comment by Shari —

ME:

Forget the big scheme little scheme stuff.

Pain’s Mantra Parties are what is critical. I am enormously encouraged by that initiative.

Mark, let me join with you in hailing Pain’s efforts. He is doing EXACTLY what must be done.

Fight the fight in front of you. When the time is right, your efforts will grow on their own. The Mantra is a sledgehammer which is showing the kind of results to you that I have gotten all my life, all alone. The one-twopunch of the Mantra and then “HERESY” has been grabbed and run with.

It doesn’t take many to make it happen. Don’t worry about the hundreds. Today you can do a hundred entries that would have taken hundreds of people great effort to accomplish when I was coming up.

Fight the FIGHT.

Fight the FIGHT.

Fight the FIGHT.

Book Intro: FIRST DRAFT

Posted by Bob on October 25, 2006 at 10:54 am  
Filed Under Bob | 14 Comments »

This Blog is a seminar. When a professor is getting started on a book, he talks about it with his grad students. He gets THEM to do research on it.

BUT I DO NOT WANT YOU TAKING TIME OFF FROM SPREADING OUR MESSAGE TO DO THIS.

BUT I DO NOT WANT YOU TAKING TIME OFF FROM SPREADING OUR MESSAGE TO DO THIS.

I sm hoping this might interest you and give you more incentive. You are being trained to replace me. You are here to learn to do what I do.

But better.

So let’s try submitting my intro to the class. I will take it off soon to save band width.

 Introduction

These two pieces from my blog at

www.whitakeronline/blog

make a good beginning in introducing what I write about:

Talking Heads
In his very laudatory Foreword to Why Johnny Can’t Think Joe Sobran said you couldn’t even really call it a book. He was right in the usual sense of that term. It is not a book because there are no talking heads in it.
I am about to write to book about American history from the Southern point of view. Those who love Southern history know that there are few places outside of Elizabethan England from which greater oratory came. That thundering speech is what most of us love to quote.
Those who look to my book for it will be deeply, sorely, heartbrokenly disappointed.
And furious.
I write logic, not oratory. I am pretty good at real oratory myself. I had the paychecks to prove it.
What Sobran wanted was more quotes and especially more quotes from Great Men about how bad things are in America. My book was based on the proposition that everybody could see what I was talking about by a proper reading of the magazines in a doctor’s waiting room.
After one hundred-hour-a-week job after another, steam-cooker pressure job in Washington, I had had enough. So I took a nice, forty-hour-week career job as a writer for the Voice of America.
Needless to say, that “easy” job was the one that did me in. It wasn’t any scary assignments abroad. I could handle an assault weapon.
What did me in was the tape recorder.
All the editors at VOA came from the cookie cutter that produces all media writers today. You have to have a “talking head” in every discussion. So every time you have a TV reporter say, “Many government officials feel that lemons are sour” they have to cut to a clip that shows a man with the words, “James L. Kliphammer, D-New York” below his picture saying, “In my opinion, lemons are sour.”
This is what is called “a talking head” that says what everybody knows. Every cookie-cutter reporter has to do that.
So I was paid the highest salary of any writer in my area because I was an expert on American government. My fatal assignment was to explain the workings of the American government for foreign broadcasts.
Every broadcast had to have two “talking heads.”
To get a “talking head” that week, you had to arrange an interview with an official at the part of the government you were talking about, do a taped interview with him, and then write so that some piece of the tape you had made could be cut and quoted.
I had to cut the tape myself. Anyone who has ever done this will tell you it is, to say the least, tedious. So is setting up an interview in that week. Two of them are twice the fun.
The cookie-cutters were all trained in news departments. What I was doing was not news. I was trying to explain the workings of the many segments of the United States Government to foreigners. It is not easy to explain the workings of the United States Government to Americans. But trying to treat the Federal Communications Commission as if it were a news item and sticking in talking heads made the task impossible. The FCC was not invented this week and the place of a regulatory agency inside the administrative machinery of Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Branches is not helped by the current opinion of some appointee.
My books were NOT cookie-cutter books. They are explanations of what you already know or should know from a different point of view. I had to rewrite “Why Johnny Can’t Think” fifteen times, and I don’t think there’s a quote in the whole thing.
I don’t WRITE talking heads. I AM the talking head here.
I WROTE the quotes they used from congressmen and senators and cabinet members and the president. At age forty I couldn’t adjust to trying to fit some inane remarks into the complicated explanation they hired me for.
And after I left they couldn’t find a product of the cookie-cutter who COULD.
So my last book was not a REAL book.
My next one won’t be either.
Comments (0)
10/23/2006
Ex Garbage Dump Lux
Filed under:
• History
— Bob @ 1:13 pm Edit This
In the Great Catastrophe of 2050 A.D. almost all ancient records were destroyed. As civilization began to come back, historians began to try to find out about the past. But they despaired.
The reason they despaired was because they had found enough ancient records to know that historians of the pre-2050 era had only been able to find real history because of an incredibly fortunate coincidence. It happened that everything before them had been invented in the Middle East. Due to a miracle, the Middle East was the very place where all real history had been preserved.
While Europe and all other places had had rain and city after city had been built on the same spot, the Middle East was a place where ruins were found out on the desert. In the Middle East many civilizations fell and STAYED fallen. In Europe one invasion had followed another invasion.
The new historians knew the saying “Ex Oriente Lux,” “Light comes from the East,” on which history before them had been constructed. Everything old had been found in the Middle East, so everything had originated in the Middle East.
Post-2050 historians were delighted beyond measure when they found they had a similar miracle.
Out on the islands of what was once New York, there was a huge, buried area which the pre-2050 ancients had called “Garbage Dump.” Right there was where the earliest example of every kind of writing and artifact of the old civilization was found!
Everything had originated right there, in “Garbage Dump!”
The new history could be written. Everything could be traced to its origins in Garbage Dump.
Ex Garbage Dump Lux.
Be it the Middle East or the Garbage Dump, the professional historian’s motto is, “The Truth is IN there!”
*****************************************************************8

Since I am asking you to read a huge hunk of my writing here, it is important for me to explain how my way of thinking, the thinking I am asking you to consider here, actually works.
My example and hero among writers was Eric Hoffer. Hoffer was a writer of aphorism, short thought-pieces that were supposed to touch on whatever was in his mind. Hoffer was one of the few real successors to

To illustrate his kind of thought, Hoffer gave an example. He said that his way of doing research for his writing was different from that of others. Instead of looking in the card catalogue to find things relating to the subject he was mentally munching on he would simply look at the first thing that hit his eye, from a magazine or a newspaper to a book being touted at the time. He would spend half an hour looking around.

If the stuff he looked at didn’t give him an insight into the idea he had come into the library munching on he would for that particular idea and go on to something else. Hoffer insisted that any concept worth thinking about related to anything worth writing about.

Hoffer, who had never entered a schoolroom in his life, was given a professorship at UCLA. He resigned before the first semester was over. He said, “These students can’t THINK!” They could not deal in concepts. They were training to be good professional regurgitators like the ones I described above as cookie-cutter products of today’s journalism.

I try to copy my idol’s idea that one’s thinking must interrelate or it is useless.

So this book was originally supposed to be two books. One would explain “Wordism.” The other was requested by publisher, a book on history specifically from an ante-bellum white point of view. It soon occurred to me that the subjects are interrelated. In fact they go better together than separated.

First of all, as stated above, today’s historian does not see history as a description of earlier people’s present. He sees everyone he writes as part of a parade leading to what we consider the perfection of human thought we have achieved today. We call it Political Correctness.

Political Correctness is not LIKE a religion, it IS a religion. It is the established religion of the United States and the rest of the West today. It views history the way all religions view history, as the evolution of mankind into an acceptance of the True Faith of our day and place. To a Christian, the Old Testament is the evolution of thought to towards the New Testament. To a Moslem or a Mormon, the Old and New Testaments show the road to the Koran.

No theologian can keep his job if he looks at earlier writings in any other light. No historian can keep his job if he looks at history as anything but a progression towards the faith he is paid to teach, the established religion of Political Correctness.

No historian is going to write a history of America from a Southern ante-bellum point of view any more than a Moslem is going to write a history of religion from Saint Augustine’s point of view, and for exactly the same reason. In each case, the writer has the True Faith, and he is not about to go back to heresy.

And heresy it is.

Each age and each society has its own term for “HERESY!” In Communist countries all heresy was denounced as Fascism. In Fascist Italy heresy was denounced as Communism. In Politically Correct America “HERESY!” is spelled “HATE.”

And as we all know Hate=Racism and Racism = any white view of the world.

A good example of HERESY!=HATE= any white point of view is what I call Bob’s Mantra:

Bob’s Mantra

“Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem?” I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

http://whitakeronline.org

There is no way to deny Bob’s Mantra on a factual basis. It has been placed in hundreds of places and the only reply has been to shout “HERESY!”

As a general statement, the ante-bellum Southern position saw the Federal Union as a Union of white people. This point of view was summed up as part of the Dred Scot Decision of the Supreme Court in 1857. There are many good, solid PRACTICAL objections to that decision, but it was solid constitutional thinking as the Constitution stood in 1857. I have never read single critique of that decision that challenged the fact that was an accurate, defensible interpretation of the United States Constitution and constitutional history as that history stood at that time.

The Supreme Court decided that the Union was based on race. Political Correctness says that is heresy today. Both points of view are correct.

During the Lincoln-Douglas debates in 1858, Lincoln said that if the Supreme Court gave states the right to make black people citizens, he would not favor doing it in Illinois. Very, very few people are aware that the Supreme Court had actually banned states from making black people citizens. At least to Lincoln’s mind the Supreme Court had gone that far in the Dred Scot Decision, and he didn’t even disapprove of it. That was the world of 1858.

Historians are so wrapped up in the Political Incorrectness of the Dred Scot decision in today’s terms that they simply cannot put themselves in the position of the present as it existed in 1858. But if you cannot do that, you are not discussing history, you are talking about today’s established religion as applied to those living back then.

All of today’s paid historians, liberal or token conservative, must discuss ante-bellum history in terms of some version of the Northern point of view. Sympathetic though he may be, even the most revisionist must see the North as right and the South as wrong.

As a heretic, I am going to present a complete, thoroughly heretical dissent from this.

Which is the reason this an e-book and not, like my first two books, the product of a mainline publishing concern.

Under the Soviet Empire, this kind of writing was called samizdat, “self-publication.” It was illegal. Now that I am comfortably retired, the threat of arrest and imprisonment or a psychiatric ward would bother me. But the only punishment I face for this American samizdat is disapproval.

After many decades as a political writer in America in America, disapproval is something I have learned to live with.

Next Page →

Switch to our mobile site