Archive for November, 2006
Comments Needed
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 11/30/2006
One of the mistakes I made in the last month or so was to emphasize the Mantra so much that it made observations and comments seem unwelcome. I think it’s time I got back on track. This is a place of discussion and comraderie.
I sidetracked myself the same way. Writing is work for you, too, so I appreciate it.
Let’s try to get back on track.
The Mantra project should have given us more to talk about. Experience in the field is useful and could be interesting. Bt one thing we must always do is see which sideof a thing works and which doesn’t. We need to keep up our discussion while those who wish can go on with the Mantra and I hope the “buddy” approach works out independently.
But writing is in itself critical. It is an art we will have to develop, and this is a special opportunity to develop it. I get a lot of your ideas and they lead me to think in areas I would not have gone without the stimulation.
Budarick Hits the Exact Nub!
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 11/29/2006
Budarick said:
“Yea Bob, you will never be the Hitler we NEED.”
“But Bob, you taught me not to worship Hitler, but rather to find the strength inside myself.”
“There is no greater fear we have than to stand alone and trust our own authority.”
ME:
There is so much packed into those three short sentences!
You know, it is fashionable for someone who is picked to be a leader, whether it is Pope or president of the local garden club, to say they are not the one who should be taking the lead. It is so routine that we do not see the importance of the people who MEAN it.
One of the funniest examples was when Mousilini made a speech saying he wanted to march on Rome and take over and straighten the whole mess out. It was like the campaign of 1992 when Ross Perot mentioned on America’s least-watched cable interview, The Larry King Show that, yes, if people wanted him for president he would take the job. A couple of months later he had more votes in the polls than either of the main party candidates and he backed out.
So when Mousilini said, yes, if they march on Rome and make me dictator, I’ll take the job, they got out there, marched, and he almost missed the whole thing.
I NEVER felt I should have had leadership forced on me. I am a creature of loyalty. From boyhood I hungered for a leadership I could follow, the old natural American leaders. I remember feeling a sort of panic: WHERE ARE THEY?
I should not have been taking leadership jobs when I was in my teens when I was surrounded by combat veterans of World War II who, in any other age, would have been the ones to lead. That is something I resented then and I resent it now. In any other generation of Americans, I could have been a young follower of my rebellious elders, as I had a right to be.
A young man should be allowed to be YOUNG first, not leap into leadership vacuums. That was a luxury I never enjoyed.
Budarcik says,
“There is no greater fear than to stand alone and trust your own authority.”
Having ready rebellious elders was SUPPOSED to be the one trait that made a free-born America. Yet all I got from my elders was that I shouldn’t do that, they were too wise to put themselves in that kind of trouble.
How in the HELL is a people supposed to be free if their biggest priority is “not getting involved?”
I wish each person here would think about Budarick’s words, “Bob, you will never be the Hitler we NEED.”
If you want to see what shape Germany was in when it needed Hitler, read up on it. Even Churchill wrote a letter to the London Times in the 1930s in which he said that, if Britain ever got in the shape Germany was in, there would be someone like Hitler to step forward and pull the country out of it.
But PLEASE don’t let these mentions of historical incidents distract you from the CRITICAL points Budarick is making here.
Budarick is hitting on the critical nub here. I am not trying to take over at the head of some romantic torchlight parade. I am trying to show YOU how to TAKE ACTION. This is the way I have had to fight for fifty years, and I’m GOOD at it. You have to fill the vacuum the Weakest Generation left. You have to take action with each other on this gift of God to us we call the Internet and the other technology that already brought down the USSR.
They SHOULD.
They DON’T.
So we MUST.
Budarick and Alan B.
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 11/27/2006
I can’t FIND it, but Budarick proposed to Mark that they go in as a team, so Mark won’t be the only one posting Bob’s Mantra so often. Some time ago, I can’t find that either, I propossed a “buddy system.” It seemed so odd to commenters that I didn’t follow up on it. But two people going in together helps a lot of the time.
Thanks, Budarick. This blog cannot continue to be the only point of contact if we are to go forward.
Gang, I am really out of energy right now. I’m sorry if I mishandled things with Alan B., but the two things here are interrelated.
I make a lousy dictator. YOU need to make things move. All I give you is some strategy. If Alan B. doesn’t have time for this, that’s up to him to decide. Alan B. can at least take it as a compliment that I was so deeply disappointed that he didn’t come through.
Alan B. is a good man. I am astonished at how good the people are we have here. But I am not a Leader in the classic sense. I need you to keep me going, too. I need you to follow up as if I weren’t here.
When Budarick makes a proposal for a partnership to Mark, I expect MARK to follow up on it. I just want you folks to act like the top-notch people you are.
mderpelding
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 11/26/2006
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Pattern recognition is important to intellect.
And…guess what.
There are other White People who agree.
But not now.
Comment by mderpelding
ME:
“Pattern recognition is important to intellect.”
“And…guess what.”
There are other White People who agree.
“But not now.”
Read that over and over.
THINK about it.
I end this evening with the conviction that someone understands.
Thank you.
I Did Not Write This!
Talking about Sgt. Mark reminded me of something odd about my mentality.
Yes, children, my mentality is sometimes a bit odd. Please do not let this statement destroy your faith in me as the Only True Wisdom. Just put it down to the fact that I am tired and upset at this moment.
This particular oddity has to do with my attitude towards General Sherman, who, among other things, burned my home town, Columbia, SC, to the ground. He said, “War is hell,” and he made it hell.
I saw what was left of a man I had known in Africa after the Soldiers of Liberation and the People’s Peace-Loving Democratic Republics, backed by the World Council of Churches, had gotten through with him. He had had his skin slowly cut away from him until he died, and then he was left for us to find.
My reaction to this was not the objectivity you would expect of me.
Sherman treated the South with what was considered at the time total brutality. He burned us out. He violated every rule of war. But few Southern women were raped. In fact, compared to the kind of war we take for granted today, the whole thing was within limits we would consider pure restraint.
Within the restraints of THAT TIME, Sherman was inexcusable. He set precedents for war AMONG WHITE MEN that were new and destructive.
But war is PREJUDICE. You are killing people, not for the color of the skin they were born with, but for the color of the outfits they happen to be wearing at the moment.
So when I saw what had happened to my friend, my reaction was not rational. He was ONE OF MINE, which is what war is all about. My men wanted to go after them. They wanted to do to them what Africans do to Africans.
Well, I couldn’t stop them, could I? I even helped them a little.
On the Confederate side, I am incensed about what Sherman did. But we had been killing HIS men.
On the one hand, I know what a monster he was. On the other hand, I understand how he took our killing HIS men as something special.
A commander who is objective abut his own men bothers me.
Sarge Replies
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 11/26/2006
I screwed up.
When Sergeant Mark said “armchair blowhard” he was talking to Alan B., not me.
And he is right. Alan B. IS long on promises and short on performance.
Which leaves me out here in a bare-assed, familiar position.
I wish the mistakes I make would be more subtle. I tend to make flat statements, and when I’m wrong, I’m just flat, frigging WRONG.
It gets worse. I accurately described Mark as a SERGEANT. When you declare someone a sergeant you are not assigning him the task of being diplomatic. So he said I was making an ass of myself. The whole thing about being a sergeant is that you kick people in the ass.
HARD.
If ***I*** had not made Mark a sergeant, he might have said, “SIR! You misread the text. SIR!”
Sergeants are where the rubber meets the road. Someone once accurately described noncoms as the last ten years before you actually meet the enemy.
Mark may have made it a little easier on the old man.
If he had, I’d have ripped off his stripes.
I made Mark a sergeant so that he would remove every race of sympathy and “Why can’t we all be friends?” from the makeup of what had once been a human being. He is assigned not only war, but the last ten yards of war.
Mark, you exposed me as a complete nincompoop.
That’s a good start.
But you haven’t earned your stripes yet.
“Armchair Blowhard?”
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 11/26/2006
BTW, how often do you post the Mantra — when you’re not being an armchair blowhard, that is.
Comment by Mark
ME:
I am trying to get to Iran. You don’t do that in an armchair. I have posted the Mantra THOUSANDS of times.
I post in on OV in SF all the time.
I could be on campuses taking on the people you folks are afraid to face if you had the guts to go there and demand it.
Can you cite any incident where I have ever done anything but spoil for a fight? And anywhere I could find a fight on, like OV on SF, I have been there.
Along with anywhere else I can find.
Where the HELL does this armchair crap come from?
I think I deserve an explanation of that remark.
A Thousand Bits of “Getting It”
Since you have effort and dedication invested in me, I want to point out to you that I was the only person on Stormfront who has received an invitation to attend that invitation, including those who thought they were going and told me about it. This is inexcusable of those sponsoring the convention, but it also authenticates a lot of the things I have been telling you about my background.
Most of my life is deep cover, so it is nice to have my background verified from a source that is so hard for us all even to contact. When you run into names like David Duke and Paul Fromm and Joe Sobran and Pat Buchanan there is no doubt who they are. My whole modus operandi for a lifetime makes it necessary for me to toot my own horn all the time, and I can’t even toot too loudly or too specifically.
This was all right when I operated alone. Not fun, but all right. But now I am trying to get people to take me seriously in the company of people with names INSIDE the movement. What makes it worse is that the last thing I want to do is COMPETE with any of them. But David and Paul and the others have me in the shade because their names and their heroic, I said heroic, history, are KNOWN.
I seem to have done nothing but sat safely inside the establishment. So this recognition from people inside the Iranian establishment, a place government agents can’t influence, gives me a major leg up. If I haven’t been one hell of heretic, a heretic well known among those who have access to files, this coincidence would not have taken place.
I solve big problems very quietly. The problem is that I cannot be absolutely sure that the pressure I put in the right place was the determining factor. But some of you are beginning to notice things like Buchanan using the term “code word.” That was a liberal term conservatives NEVER used, never used for FORTY YEARS.
Liberals were always saying that “crime” was a code-word for suppressing non-whites or “state’s rights” was a code word for racism. But it was as much liberal property as if they had a copyright on it.
I used it in the Mantra, you and I hammered at it:
“Anti-racism” is a code word for anti-white” and suddenly, after almost half a century, Pat Buchanan used the term code word.
When I spent a few years proclaiming that political correctness was a religion, Ann Coulter wrote a book about liberalism as a religion. All clues are subtle. All clues can be explained away or ignored. But my entire effort has been based on such clues.
And those clues indicate that I exercise enormous power.
Nick Griffin, head of the British National Party, had a serious problem. The BNP had been denied a back account. A back account in Europe is a wholly different matter from here, and I lack the space to explain this chiasmic difference here. So I told Nick I would do something about it.
At the next convention, Nick explained to me learnedly that the British Government had discovered that it would be better for the BNP to have an account in the UK than one they could not monitor. After years of problems with this, it so happened that the problem was solved after he asked me for help.
I tried to get Nick to appreciate what my contacts had done, because there is one man in particular who is a genius at this stuff who stuck it to the British banking regulators. He didn’t knock himself out. He just made some calls saying that he could set up a US account for the BNP with connections that would put them totally out of British surveillance – there are LOTS of people who stay specifically out of British surveillance as I had to in Rhodesia – and the Brits decided Nick now had contacts they could not live with.
If you have spent your life in this business this was not a major leap. But the BNP has NOT spent its life in this. So the year after Nick public ally begged for help on this matter it had been forgotten. He told me, in all seriousness, that the Brits and simply changed their minds. Nick genuinely did not know who he had been talking to when he asked ME for help.
A word in the right place, knowing which interests counterbalance others, this is power.
No, Alan B., I did not ask you to keep up with the latest literature on genetics. My point was exactly the opposite of those who recommend tomes. My point was to NOTICE PATTERNS, not to “keep up with the literature.”
I would not fit into Jared Taylor’s group, for example, for a very good reason. Joe Sobran and Jared and the rest are making an impression on national media. This is not the way I work. The way I work requires one to stop reacting and philosophizing and get into the simple logistics of real power, really convincing people.
No one is going to listen to me in that kind of detail. But what I say rubs off. Different people pick up the code word bit, the leftism is a religion bit. Commenters pick up on some questioning of basics.
It is painful to watch people get the point and then lollyland off into their own usual stuff. But I have watched my plants ripen in the oddest places, because they are work, because they are needed.
What I have learned and done is essential to the salvation ahead.
No one can understand that but me. That is what I gave my life to, and that is enough.
*********SILLY!*********
I remember when President Carter was talking about the “fact” that “scientists had proven”
that there was an over 99% similarity between the genes of humans and chimpanzees. He
stated scientists had proven there was a percent of a percent difference in genes between
races.
I remember when “Modern anthropologists have proven that all races are the same in inherited
abilities” was repeated everywhere. I know that the doctrine is that races do not exist,
but I keep repeating that, in order to be a professional forensic pathologist you have to be
able to do two things:
1) Swear on oath that you have been able to determine the RACE of a murder victim from a few
desiccated remains and
2) Swear on oath that race does not exist.
To repeat, I remember when President Carter was talking about the “fact” that “scientists
had proven” that there was an over 99% similarity between the genes of humans and
chimpanzees. He stated scientists had proven there was a percent of a percent difference
in genes between races.
So now we have
Genetic Breakthrough That Reveals The Differences Between Humans
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/science_technology/article2007490.ece
The differences between human INDIVIDUALS are one to several percent, at this last count.
So now we can all begin to e-mail each other that they were wrong.
They are ALWAYS wrong.
Oh, God, Bob, you are going to get us into TROUBLE. They are right sometimes, and I will spend the next week finding out where they were actually right.
That makes a monkey out of YOU, Bob! YOU something said that was not correct and nobody will ever believe you again!
Oh, whoop-de-doo!
Fifty years of this crap and counting.
Now let’s get back to breathlessly telling each other that the Great Scientists were wrong!
Oh, whoop-de-DOO!
Joe O’Rorke told me learnedly that I shouldn’t say the Great Scientists were SILLY. No one would take ME seriously if I did that.
I remember when the Nazi Death Camps were I Germany. I remember Andy Rooney being shocked at how many young people didn’t believe in the Holocaust so he said he had been in Germany and he had SEEN them.
Well, it turned out later that none of the DEATH camps were in Germany. They were all carefully placed behind the Iron Curtain by the Nazis where no one after the war could examine them.
Can anyone understand why I am so SICK of this game?
EVERYBODY is a respectable conservative now. When yet another piece of pure bullshit like this, which was the Scientific View a week ago, everybody starts searching to see if it was JEWS who faked it.
Or they give us some halfass quote from the Bible or they some philosopher.
Or they make some general observation on the incorrectness of scientists or learned opinion or whatever.
Mainly they are trying to keep up with today’s headlines and forgetting everything that happened yesterday. That is RESPECTABLE opposition, no matter whether it is about Jews or the Book of Ezekiel or the latest breakout book.
And it all goes away.
I am DESPERATELY tired of trying to get a few people to simply write the Mantra down, to remind people of what is happening right out there in plain sight all the time, in our faces.
No, I am NOT going to thank every person who writes a two-sentence report about where he put the Mantra. I got sick of being the only one on that a long time ago, and when I was silent a few days here, only one report came in. I am SICK of being the only person who NOTICES, in yet another example of even the University of London publishing a study that says that intelligence is important in human beings, and having no one notice the Oxfam point.
I am tired just thinking about this Iran trip. It reminds me of so many others. And I am still BEGGING a FEW people to wake up and look around.
For each one person who must be begged into noticing reality, there are a hundred who are chomping at the bit about how there is evidence that somebody in the news is a JEW.
Whoop-de-doo! WHOOP-de-doo! Whoop-de-DOO!
WHOOP-DE-DOO!!!!
Man, if that don’t bring on the revolution, what will?
Iran or Not?
Posted by Bob in How Things Work on 11/24/2006
I probably will not go to Iran.
But the problem with reading what I write is that one must read what BOB WHITAKER writes, not rush in with all the information you have on a situation and use me as a sounding board for you to disgorge it. That is why we use the Mantra.
I have talked to people about it, and they pour forth all the information about the crisis with Iran that I can see on any news network. They are not listening to what I am saying. The fact that there are big problems with where I am going is routine.
Now, here is what MY problem is.
I would not go to LONDON on am e-mail that was signed “The Secretariat.” I am getting a government runaround. “The Secretariat tells me to call the Embassy, in this case the Iranian Interests Section at the Pakistani Embassy since we have not had diplomatic relations with Iran for a generation.
For all the shouts of terror about having my head lopped off on TV, what concerns me is that I am a former government employee and professor who is dealing with a government aqnd a bunch of professors.
You will recall that the invitation said:
“Dear Robert Whitaker,
You are cordially invited to attend the Conference in Tehran on 11-12
Dec. 2006.
We would provide you with visa, round ticket and accommodation.
Please contact the embassy of I.R of Iran for the arrangements.
You are kindly requested to confirm your attendance in conference and
also
inform us about your flight details as soon as possible.
Regards
Conference Secretariat”
I figured that I would contact the Interests Section and someone would take responsibility for this guest. But so far they want me to contact the “Conference Secretariat,” which is like trying to push a string, a string halfway around the world.
Gang, I have already done that far, far too many times when I was younger and stronger. This is a very practical matter. I need to be treated as a guest. I have spent far too many miserable days and nights half in and half of countries while waiting for some bureaucrat to come through. More to the point, nothing is accomplished.
I could have trouble getting out of Iran, not for some dramatic reason, but somebody simply isn’t at the office.
The interests Section is supposed to call me back Monday. If I get nothing but cold type, I’m not going anywhere.
Iran Invitation
Dear Robert Whitaker,
You are cordially invited to attend the Conference in Tehran on 11-12
Dec. 2006.
We would provide you with visa, round ticket and accommodation.
Please contact the embassy of I.R of Iran for the arrangements.
You are kindly requested to confirm your attendance in conference and
also
inform us about your flight details as soon as possible.
Regards
Conference Secretariat
ME:
I called Kelso about this, and he volunteered to do that staff work.
Nobody else has gotten this specific invitation yet, so I am honored by it.
I assume that “Please contact the embassy of I.R of Iran for the arrangements.” means OR I.R of Iran, since Iran has an International Representative but no Embassy here.
I do not quote e-mails without authorization, but this one is so impersonal, “Conference Secretariat” is not the sort of signature that singles one out, that I think I can announce it to the family.
John ASHBROOK’S Methods
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses, History on 11/23/2006
Ok, richard, let me give you a couple of insides on how to stop things in the House.
John had four or five congressmen who took turns being in the House ALL the time. If you ever read the Congressional record on the House side, you will constantly see the phrase, “”Without objection, we will dispense with the reading of the minutes” or “Without objection” we will do this or that.
The costs to a member who DOES object are staggering. Everybody there is running for reelection all the time, or else they are in leadership positions and are trying to get something done. Everybody needs to get back to their home districts. With 435 members, the most precious thing in the House is TIME.
But John made it very clear that if anything were proposed relating to a Martin Luther King holiday, he and his coterie would jam House business solid untit it was off the floor. He jammed other legislation that way, but he alone always denounced MLK onthe Floor, and when he died the MLK Holiday was passed within weeks.
Since I was the best known staffer for John Ashbrook, this made me delightfully unpopular.
So how did John survive the rule that a congressman who was that hard core and stopped the business of the House wouldn’t be ostracized?
The reason was that everybody was terrified of John Ashbrook. You can back a respectable conservative down, but John was not reasonable, John was not respectable.
You can hold the nastiest mob in the world at bay with a shotgun, because somebody has to take the first blast. Nobody wanted John’s first blast.
Three times the Republican legislature of Ohio tried to redistrict John out of his seat. His majorities kept growing. His last reelection took place in a redrawn district which had been seventy percent Democratic. He won 73% of the vote.
Another method John used was also based on his happiness at being disliked. “Give me the last three days of the session,” John said, “And you can have the rest.” At the end of the session, everybody needed to get home. After each redistristricting John needed to get home. He faced one tough reelection campaign after another. But John would hold them there when EVERYBODY, not least conservatives, wanted to “give a little” so they could get back to their districts.
But in conference committee and on the floor, John discovered something wonderful. He wouldn’t let them go home, so THEY would be the ones to “give a little.” Understand this term “a little” in the sense Everet Dirksen talked about inhis famous quote, ” a billi0n here, a billion there, pretty soon it adds up to real money.” That billion was nothing to senators like Dirksen who were playing politics, but it was what John was there for.
John gave me an honored place in this game. I was considered New Right and hard core, and nobody seems to check history, so it was assumed by some that I was responsible for John’s irrational behavior. Lord, how I wish they had been right!
When a staffer would hear that I was behind some holdup — John was doing this DECADES before I got there — the staffer would call me about being “reasonable.” I would then give him a short lecture about how I kept telling John, though I admired the man deeply and loved him personally, that I felt John was a just a little bit of a wimp.
John referred to me as “My pet redneck.” He was SO delighted to have somebody who had a reputation for making HIM a loose cannon. I don’t think I have ever been happier in any role I played in politics.
John and I did not constitute a combination any rational person would expect to back down, and they had to go home SOMETIME.
There were more tactics that would require more explanation than any of us want, like amendments that could delay things.
I spent twenty-four hours a dayfor two days formulating amendments to a farm bill I knew nothing about. I HAD to stop House business until the weekend. The Parliamentarian can simply declare that an amendment is not relevant to a bill and declare it out of order, so I had to learn the whole history of this farm bill and put in amendments that WERE relevant.
Naturally, the leadership wanted to stop us from adding amendments. But the process of STOPPING you from adding amendments, if properly handled, can drive the leadership nuts.
The point is that this is not a torchlight parade. The point is that this is REAL power and REAL billions of dollars.
You can back them down, but you have to know what you are doing. Nobody is scared of a screamer. Everybody is scared of a loose cannon who knows the game.
Once I was at Trader Vic’s Restaurant with John when House Speaker O’Neal came in. John told the waiter to take him a drink at his expense. The waiter came back and said, “That’s the first and last thing I will ever get from John Ashbrook free.”
It was.
richard and ASHBROOK
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 11/23/2006
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Bob, I seem to remember you were going to tell us how John Ashcroft prevented a Martin Luther King holiday for years before he died. Let’s hear it!
Comment by richard
ME:
Richard, if you cannot tell the difference between John Ashbrook, a friend to whom I was deeply loyal, and that sewer rat Ashcroft, I will wait until you catch up.
I’m not really all that upset. I mix names all the time, and John Ashbrook dies a quarter of a century ago, so “Ashbroft” comes to mind. But the next time I screw up one of YOUR names, maybe you can remember that I took this so lightly
Granted that my friend John would spin in his grave if he heard himself mixed up with Ashcroft, but with things the way they are, he simply can’t spin any faster.
Freedmen’s Slaves
Basic logic can be fun.
I read that a higher percentage of blacks in the slave states owned slaves than the percentage of whites who owned slaves. At first I wondered if that was propaganda, but then I realize that, if you deal in simple logic, it is quite likely.
Very few whites owned slaves, maybe ten percent. And slaves were concentrated in areas like low-state South Carolina. In other words, slave owners were clustered where there were lots of slaves.
So where were most of the slaves who bought their freedom? They were in the slave belt where, as in the Roman Empire, slaves constituted the single biggest item of property, probably more than real estate. Blacks who had the ambition to buy their freedom would often go on to accumulate property.
Political Correctness has it that all a black man would do after buying his own freedom would be buy his family’s freedom. There is a true and ironic story about a black woman who owned her husband. She was an ardent Confederate and he was rooting for the Union.
But the simple logical fact is that there were more slaves where free blacks lived, because that was where blacks lived. Basic logic can be fun.
Welcome, Ian Santiago!
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 11/19/2006
Ian, please forgive me for ignoring your comments for the moment, and concentrating on the flood of memories your name, genuine or not, brings back.
In the 1950s our friends in Cuba included one who became a friend of mine. He had pale skin, red hair, and fought for Franco in the Spanish Civil War. I went down there to Cuba when I was about ten or twelve years old and visited his family. I forget why.
But he happened to be in our house when Castro suddenly took over the Cuban government on January 1, 1959. A few months later, his brother, an aviator, was shot down trying to escape. Their crime was that they had set up businesses in Cuba that gave Cubans the highest standard of living they have ever had.
I wish I could give you his name, but his family is still in Columbia, SC. He escaped with his family to work on our brick plant. He was enormously grateful to us and we were the ones who really benefited from his work and intelligence.
That’s how white folks work things out.
He was from Majorca and he could sing “The Horst Wessel Song” in Spanish. We would give each other the fascist salute when we saw each other, quite a thrill for a 18-year-old who was honored to be dealing with a real warrior. G. Gordon Liddy is right about one thing for sure, NOBODY could be counted on back then like the anti-Communist Cubans. One of my greatest advantages in intelligence was that they knew about me well before I started to work with them.
Once again, I have to apologize to Ian. Your NAME brings back a flood of memories, none of which you need to IDENTIFY with.
When I was in international aviation negotiations, the head of the Civil Aviation in Spain was Emilio O’Connor. He was black-haired, but nobody could mistake him for anything but a Northern European, a Basque, or a Finno-Ugrian. Brown Hispanic he definitely wasn’t. He descended from some Catholic Irish aristocrats who were dispossessed in Ireland because they would not give up their Catholic faith, so they went to Spain.
And down in Saint Augustine, Florida, there are people with Spanish names who have been there since 1535, seventy years or so before my family got here. They are as Southern as I am, and that’s pretty damned Southern. When blacks tried to use one of their motel swimming pools in 1963, they dropped an alligator in to keep them company.
“Hispanic” is about the nastiest insult anybody ever devised. Lots of blacks are named Whitaker, but nobody confuses me with them. They are not referred to as Anglo-Saxon. But “Hispanic” makes every white person with a Spanish name a colored person.
I don’t LIKE that.
lagergeld, welcome!
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 11/19/2006
Mr. Whitaker you are yet again right-on. Ghana has a racially exclusive immigration policy as well known as the “right of abode law,” where any black from the worldwide diaspora can live and even- tually gain citizenship in Ghana.
Comment by Lagergeld
Dave
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 11/19/2006
I am getting sick of brats like Peter and Dave and Brian writing what I wish I had written.
As soon as I find somebody to get my teeth out of the glass and point my wheelchair in the right direction, I’m going to bite the hell out of all of you.
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Brian,
When BW said: “When a professional thinker looks at anything, he first looks at WHY it does what it does. This is the only sense in which I am conservative”, I almost fell out of my chair when I read that.
You cannot imagine the impact a statement this statement has on me. You see, from the time I was your age a read and studied ALL the radical literature: Marxist, Freudian, Libertarian, Rightwing, and KKK, whatever.
The reason I did this is because I believe in Johann Goethe’s dictum: “In life, nothing less than everything will do”.
Because of all my reading, I know that no one has ever boiled down the very essence of the subversive attitude as BW has done in this post. He has boiled it down to what it really is!
In doing so, if you really understand the meaning of BWs post, BW gave you the entire world. That’s all, just a little gift, the entire world.
It is knowing how to evaluate for REAL KNOWLEDGE is what is truly important, and REAL KNOWLEDGE resides in the real WHY of things, things that are mostly unconscious to the broad swath of humanity.
I try to make money in the financial markets. Here’s a challenge. Read everything you can on WHY the dollar is worth what it is worth in the international markets.
What you are going to find is that you will read endlessly confusing BS. Endlessly. You will come across thousands of “experts” claiming all kinds of expertise and experience on the subject.
The problem is no one (assuming they know the secret) is going to give it away because knowing the secret makes you a more skilled competitor.
Their attitude is, “If you don’t have the brains to figure out the secret for yourself, you don’t deserve to know”.
The “secret” is no big deal: The value of dollar in the international markets is determined by the rate of change in overall corporate earnings. That is only meaningful if it is important to you.
But my point is that none of the “experts” clued me in. I had to figure it out for myself, just like everybody else.
But knowing that is to know the real WHY of the dollar’s value.
Accordingly, no professor is going to tell you the real WHY of the University. Why should he? He makes his living by you NOT KNOWING that.
Accordingly, the University has no courses for BW to teach.
Comment by Dave
Brian
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 11/19/2006
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Dave,
Sheep sicken me, but I like to have faith in fellow members of my generation. If the ones I knew are any indication, that’s all they are going to have.
When I was in elementary school everyone told me that middle school would be much better. I believed them but it was miserable.
When I was in middle school everyone told me that high school would be much better. I believed them but it was only slightly less miserable.
Now they tell me that college will be much better. The rest of my generation believes them; they garner a swift one-finger salute from me. Fooled me twice, won’t let it happen a third.
Not a single opportunity was gained by 13 years of mandatory schooling. Many, a number that will forever be unknown, were lost. A healthy white attitude will surely leave you with your tail between your legs in those institutions. The schools and the library only a short walk from my home are a total joke but this, the Internet, is the greatest educational tool around. Still doesn’t beat experiencing life though.
Of course we know this and I’ve danced around the question. How do you inform an 18 year old about college? If he’s a wolf in waiting, explain what the system is. Use his hatred of the system. Talk about opportunities lost. Remember that all those years of schooling most likely have made him think he knows it all. Show him he doesn’t. He was shortchanged, tell him what could have been and still can be. In short if he isn’t angry. Make him angry.
It was a long journey, but that’s how I ended up here.
-Brian
More Basics
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 11/19/2006
If immigrants are so knowledgeable and hard-working, why don’t they go to the third world where they are NEEDED?
In Africa, millions of Indians live and work and have a far, far higher standard of living than Indians do in India. More important to a humanitarian, they create a large number of jobs for starving Africans.
All those ambitious, hard-working Mexicans would be a real blessing in Africa. S would all those Vietnamese who come here and all those Indonesians who head for the Netherlands.
There are two reasons those people don’t go where they are needed:
1)They can’t get in and no one mentions it, least of all “humanitarians”; and
2)They want the United States or the Netherlands or nothing and nobody mentions it, least of all “humanitarians” whose only interst is gfetting them into white countries, all white countries, and ONLY white countries.
BASICS, gang, BASICS.
Staff Catches Hell
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 11/19/2006
A national columnist once reported that the two hardest people to work for on Capitol Hill were Bob Dole, out of 100 senators, and John Ashbrook, my boss, out of 435 congressmen. Someone asked me how I put up with it. This was my reply.
“John (Ashbrook) has some choices when he is frustrated and has to let it out.”
“First, he can blow up at his financial supporters, in which case I lose my job.”
“Second, he can go irrational with other congressmen, in which case he can’t get things done and I lose my job.”
“Third, he can blow his top at constituents, in which case I lose my job.”
“Fourth, he can cuss me out, in which case I keep my job.”
“I pick option four.”
It would have been better if John had been perfect, but he saw how bad things are and sometimes he just blew his top. Ideally he wouldn’t have needed that outlet, but the job of being Jesus Christ is already taken, so he was not always the nicest of men.
And I was more worried about his losing HIS job than I was about mine. To prevent that, I would take anything he could hand out.
Robert Dole was an entirely different animal from John. As a moderate Republican, he couldn’t are less how bad things were. I can explain to you in a few words why Dole was such an S.O.B.
Robert Dole is masty little man who needed somebody to beat the hell out of him a few times. But he was a nasty little man who had gotten an arm crippled in World War II. This meant that nobody could punch him in the mouth for his insults, be they contributors, fellow senators, or constituents.
Dole’s handicap also made him a “proven hero,” so nobody could say he was being a bully.
Dole had a bullying license, and he used it to the hilt. His fellow senators were afraid of him, and that was one reason he got elected to the leadership.
Robert Doles was member in good standing of the Greatest Generation.
Alan B.’s Handsome Apology
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 11/19/2006
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Bob, I respect your view point on this. I did promise to follow through with this, I hesitated before I wrote those words, so again your right Bob. A promise is like an oath, its a show of good faith and so far I have let myself and the cause down. I will report back by ths Saturday, I will have accomplished my mission or I will admit defeat, and bare the shame letting our cause down.
Comment by Alan B
ME:
Just don’t beat yourself up over it.
I was proud of Mark hopping all over you for it. It is an awful feeling for me to be the only one to take this seriously and not give a damn whether anybody likes me for it or not. An active comrade like Mark expects a lot of you and he has the right and the DUTY to kick your ass.
But you will also find, if you stay in this for a while, that if someone OUTSIDE the family jumps on you, you will have to pull Mark off of them before he tears their throats out.
In the end, this incident gave me a chance to make a valuable point:
Don’t promise, REPORT.
Alan B, you are going to make a lot more mistakes. Just learn from it.
From here on, this is to everybody, not just Alan B.
The whole point of having an experienced old bastard like me around is for me to tell you how reality worked out for ME. No matter how experienced I am, my background is limited until they make me God, and that job is filled.
I hate to use the “a” word twice in one artricle, but it is true that the term “follow up” and the term “being a pain in the ass” are interchangeable. I follow up a LOT. Most of my career has been as a senior staffer to busy people and dealing with other busy staffers like myself. We follow up and we follow up and we up follow, ad infinitem.
In my experience, most organizations die this way:
“Well, you didn’t call me about that.”
“I thought you would call ME about that.”
I believe we do not get reports because we are not doing anything, as Mark hints. In my experience, people who are doing anything this challenging find out something useful to say about it. Remember you are not just reporting to me, you are reporting to people less experienced than yourself.
I have spent decades in hardcore professional political work. I think you can understand how much ice the words, “But, Bob, surely you believe ME!?” cuts and how many times I have heard that phrase. If I seem a bit cynical about this, it is because I have a right to.
Nationalsalvation Added to Mantra
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 11/19/2006
I should have done this a long time ago, but just thought of it. All that is changed is the additional link:
” Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”
“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
http://whitakeronline.org
http://www.nationalsalvation.net/
Alan B.
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 11/19/2006
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Thanks for the advice, I am not giving up, I am studing the situation, I will proceed forward when the timing is right. Believe me when I tell you this, with this so called hate literature hype going on in town and the spineless jelly fish white leadership that bends to the black communities will, I could lose my job and reputation in this fucked up backasswards world of PC we live in. So, I will proceed with caution until I feel its the right moment to proceed.
ME:
I was not so disappointed that Alan B. didn’t deliver. You are not getting paid for this. But I did sense danger when he PROMISED to deliver. I want no more promises from anybody. I’ve been in this game too long.
When a phenomenon is at its beginning, as ours is, people begin to say “When the time is right and I have time to spare I will do something.”
And it dies right there.
I have wasted much of my life waiting for the right time. I have put off what I could have done for that effort “that will mean so much more.”
Marching in a torch-light parade is easy. Showing up at a mall at 8 am is hard.
Put in ONE Mantra in ONE place and forget the Big Project. Alan B., FORGET the literature bit. No one else has done it either.
But please, I want more REPORTS and NO promises.




Thanks, Budarick!
Posted by Bob in Bob, Comment Responses on 11/28/2006
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
To Bob
We all get tired.
We all make mistakes.
I have made so many and it feels so bad when i made them that i found a bottle to crawl into, because a dark cupboard was not small enough.
Bob, you have given us a clear picture of what we need to fight for and some tools how.
I believe you SHOULD have your ego tickled [term Alan B used [if i remember correctly]].
Why?
First of all you EARNED it!
Secondly having an ego is NOT a crime. Don’t let the Jewish psychology bastards tell us it is!
I got no problem honouring Bob. It does NOT make me feel small or jealous. It makes me feel GREAT!
Yea Bob, you will never be the Hitler we NEED.
But Bob, you taught me not to worship Hitler, but rather to find the strength inside myself.
There is no greater fear we have than to stand alone and trust our own authority.
______________________________________________________________________________
To Alan B
I work 5 days a week for 12 hours [including travelling time] earning very little money [which means i can't retire]. Work very hard and i am the best they have. But that is the ONLY reason they have not sacked me, because they DO know of my “activity” and this “activity” is frowned upon by my company which is a big Jewish Multinational which makes political correctness a condition of employment! I arrive home very tired, having to keep my cool dealing with all the low life forms, then have to look after my mother and then i want to raise hell on Earth! I have some time on weekends. But i have a disabled mother to take care of. I am organizing my time to help. It probably won’t be much time, but i will do it.
So i know how you feel. I have been there too.
Sometimes we spit the dummy.
Ultimately we have to find the motivation one way or another. Bob will not exist in his current from forever. Same for me.
But we have one great strength as males. The “buddy system” Bob mentions. There is something about male loyalty and solidarity which is quite extraordinary and can in fact change the world [one reason why the enemy is using feminism to weaken and divide us]. It is in our genes and it does in fact work as history has proved.
And if there is any female here who wishes to be my buddy, you are welcome. I don’t exclude!
Solidarity means we cannot be divided. We may not always agree on details, and we ARE ALLOWED to spit the dummy now and then, and we should KNOW that it will be forgiven after a good kick in the ass.
We cannot dwell on mistakes we made in the past. We must learn from them and move forward and in that process we are going to make MANY MORE mistakes. Some of us are going to fall over. But we ARE going to pick up our buddies and move FORWARD.
If i fall over i want someone here to pick me up!
Bob’s mantra is a very effective device, but it is only one example of similar devices [following Bob's thinking] we can invent and perfect and use in our WAR.
OK, the blow-bag will now stop.
This is BOMB’s Blog!
Kameraden, you can form no concept in your mind what an honour it is for ME to be allowed to post here without being censored or banned. Absolutely NO ONE ELSE gives me that!
NOW TO WORK.
Danke Bob, Danke Kameraden
4 Comments