Archive for November 8th, 2006
timestre
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 11/08/2006
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
When a white American speaks about Europeans, doesn’t he realize he’s speaking about himself?
Comment by timestre
ME:
I am speaking here as a profesional propagandist and not as a social critic. I have heard Norwegian and Danes and Swedes talk about their different national characteristics. The mentality a politician has to deal with in each country is subtlety different in each case. The same is very true from state to state in the US.
In my own family I will speak to one of my own brothers differently from the way I would speak to another brother to convince him of the same thing. It’s all in the family, but not every member of your family is the same.
I married a European woman. I have spoken European languages. I see what strikes me as a difference that might make your job a bit harder.
If it isn’t true, neither of us should lose any sleep over it.
It’s your call.
Tenestre and Adelheim
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 11/08/2006
Part of what Adelheim said below was,
To tenestre again!
I got some criticism. It seemed like they did not understand it. Even the anti-immigration people. Not just the “DUUh” argument. Maybe “melting pot” was not a good idea. Therfore I rewrote it. So what do you think?
ME:
Here is a very American look at Europeans:
IN MY OPINION Europeans have a real problem with any expression of common sense that is NEW to them.
At the Free University of Berlin, in West Berlin, they were completely surrounded by Communist barbed wire and machine guns on every side, but they talked more about the oppression of apartheid in South Africa. If I talked about the Berlin Wall, they sort of goggled at me. This was not what Mommy Professor had been talking about.
Europeans have an ingrained respect for authority. I remember reading A Marxist handout at the University of Vienna that referred to “the revolutionary tradition.”
To an American, including a Communist, total Marxist revolution would not refer to a “tradition.” But to Europeans, it makes perfect sense.
Americans can usually trace anything here back to some mere humans who set it up, but Europeans see everything as having been there more or less forever. They do not invent their own concepts, so when you speak in a way that they are not used to, they are MUCH harder to get through to.
IN MY OPINION
Papillon
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 11/08/2006
There is a common mistake I discussed in a piece called “In other words” earlier. I now find that papillon did NOT make it after I said he might have.
Papillon did EVERYTHING right here. He did put in the Manra and put in comments of his own where appropriate.
But his work reminds me of a lesson we must keep in mind out there in the field:
I worked my butt off on the Mantra and I tested it.
Always sign off with it every time. It leaves no wiggle room except cries of “Heresy!”
” Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”
“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/
Papillon: What Genocide Isn’t
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 11/08/2006
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
I need help. http://tinyurl.com/yzk4mf
ME:
This has come up before.
What Papillon is referring to is this response he got to the Mantra:
Originally Posted by clementine
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
ergo, Racist is a code word for white?
Sorry, I don’t follow your logic.
Genocide against the white race? To what do you refer? Last time I checked, the Imperial Army of Nigeria wasn’t annexing and exploiting any parts of Europe (or anywhere for that matter, mainly because it doesnt exist due to them being to bloody poor.)
I’m guessing that you are trying to imply that there is some sort of conspiracy to destroy the “White” race by means of interracial marriages and mixed race children? And I thought I was paranoid!!
Immigration and assimilation of other cultures may well be a problem, but attitudes like this only help exasperate the situation.
ME:
I am SO relieved Papillon is out that fighting the fight and reporting back and asking for help back here at HQ when he hits a problem.
THAT is what I am here for.
Papillon, try posting this or the equivalent:
Clementine, genocide is not defined by violence, much less military invasion. If you will read the Genocide Treaty, you will find that genocide is any action that is aimed at ending a race or ethnic group. Most of the methods listed do NOT involve killing anybody.
You are stuck on the standard anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews bit.
If you will READ what I wrote, you will see that it SPECIFICALLY points out that the present nonviolent program of genocide against whites would be recognized instantly as genocide if it were practice against the BLACK race:
“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
In case you feel like READING it this time, here is what I said again:
” Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”
“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/
Adelheim
Posted by Bob in Bob, Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 11/08/2006
NOT SPAM.
NOT SPAM.
To tenestre again!
I got some criticism. It seemed like they did not understand it. Even the anti-immigration people. Not just the “DUUh” argument. Maybe “meltingpot” was not a good idea. Therfore I rewrote it. So what do you think?
“Alle snakker om innvandring, integrering og flerkultur. De sier at vi må blande alle folkeslag, slik at alle mennesker til slutt blir det samme folket. Dette blir også kalt smeltedigelen.
Dersom smeltedigelen faktisk var målet, burde også ikke-hvite land ha innvandring, integrering og flerkultur. Men ingen sier at denne politikken er nødvendig for Asia, Afrika eller andre ikke-hvite områder.
Nei, denne politikken gjelder bare for ALLE hvite land og KUN hvite land. Politisk korrekte sier målet med dette er at alle mennesker i hvite land skal bli brune. Som i klartekst betyr at hvite vil slutte og eksistere.
Hva om jeg sa at innvandring, integrering og flerkultur var bra for ALLE afrikanske land og KUN afrikanske land? Og dette ville ende med at alle mennesker i afrikanske land ville bli ikke-afrikanere. Som i klartekst betyr at afrikanere vil slutte og eksistere.
Hvor lang tid ville det ta noen å innse at jeg ikke snakket om innvandring og integrering fordi jeg ville ha flerkultur, eller for å gjøre alle til det samme folket? Det jeg egentlig snakket om var å integrere afrikanske mennesker ut av eksistens.
Og hvem ville ikke sett at dette var et folkemord mot afrikanere dersom de opphørte å eksistere? Og hvor lang tid ville det ta en fornuftig afrikaner å legge merke til dette? Og hvilken afrikaner ville ikke ha protestert mot dette?
Men hvis jeg forklarer denne åpenbare sannheten om folkemordet mot mitt folk, hvite mennesker, hvor vi integreres og assimileres ut av eksistens, så er politisk korrekte enige om at jeg er en nazistsomvildrepeseksmillionerjøder.
De sier de er anti-rasistiske. Det de er, er anti-hvite.
Anti-rasist er et kodeord for anti-hvit.”
Comment by Adelheim
ME:
Book or no book, this encourages me more than you can easily imagine.
When you have fought it out alone as much as I have, having two intelligent commenters working it out on their own is an enormous relief.
You do NOT have to send me, in Mark’s words, “complimentary comments,” to encourage me. Praise beats the hell out of silence, but criticism is what I need. I am not Jehovah, I do not need unedning praise.
What I need to know is that you are reading this, thinking about this, and, above all, WORKING on this out there.




Papillon
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 11/08/2006
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
I’m not sure what you are saying here, Bob. I cannot locate the piece entitled “In Other Words”. And what is 255?
If you are asking whether I quoted the mantra in full, yes, I did. If you are asking whether I tied it in with a few self-penned words that related specifically to what was being discussed, yes, I did that too.
ME:
In other words, you did exactly what you were supposed to do.
Again, good work. I hope myy reply helps. If you need anything else, that’s what I’m here for.
I counted the words in the Mantra and got 225. I’ll correct the misprint.
No Comments