Archive for November, 2006
A Thousand Bits of “Getting It”
Since you have effort and dedication invested in me, I want to point out to you that I was the only person on Stormfront who has received an invitation to attend that invitation, including those who thought they were going and told me about it. This is inexcusable of those sponsoring the convention, but it also authenticates a lot of the things I have been telling you about my background.
Most of my life is deep cover, so it is nice to have my background verified from a source that is so hard for us all even to contact. When you run into names like David Duke and Paul Fromm and Joe Sobran and Pat Buchanan there is no doubt who they are. My whole modus operandi for a lifetime makes it necessary for me to toot my own horn all the time, and I can’t even toot too loudly or too specifically.
This was all right when I operated alone. Not fun, but all right. But now I am trying to get people to take me seriously in the company of people with names INSIDE the movement. What makes it worse is that the last thing I want to do is COMPETE with any of them. But David and Paul and the others have me in the shade because their names and their heroic, I said heroic, history, are KNOWN.
I seem to have done nothing but sat safely inside the establishment. So this recognition from people inside the Iranian establishment, a place government agents can’t influence, gives me a major leg up. If I haven’t been one hell of heretic, a heretic well known among those who have access to files, this coincidence would not have taken place.
I solve big problems very quietly. The problem is that I cannot be absolutely sure that the pressure I put in the right place was the determining factor. But some of you are beginning to notice things like Buchanan using the term “code word.” That was a liberal term conservatives NEVER used, never used for FORTY YEARS.
Liberals were always saying that “crime” was a code-word for suppressing non-whites or “state’s rights” was a code word for racism. But it was as much liberal property as if they had a copyright on it.
I used it in the Mantra, you and I hammered at it:
“Anti-racism” is a code word for anti-white” and suddenly, after almost half a century, Pat Buchanan used the term code word.
When I spent a few years proclaiming that political correctness was a religion, Ann Coulter wrote a book about liberalism as a religion. All clues are subtle. All clues can be explained away or ignored. But my entire effort has been based on such clues.
And those clues indicate that I exercise enormous power.
Nick Griffin, head of the British National Party, had a serious problem. The BNP had been denied a back account. A back account in Europe is a wholly different matter from here, and I lack the space to explain this chiasmic difference here. So I told Nick I would do something about it.
At the next convention, Nick explained to me learnedly that the British Government had discovered that it would be better for the BNP to have an account in the UK than one they could not monitor. After years of problems with this, it so happened that the problem was solved after he asked me for help.
I tried to get Nick to appreciate what my contacts had done, because there is one man in particular who is a genius at this stuff who stuck it to the British banking regulators. He didn’t knock himself out. He just made some calls saying that he could set up a US account for the BNP with connections that would put them totally out of British surveillance – there are LOTS of people who stay specifically out of British surveillance as I had to in Rhodesia – and the Brits decided Nick now had contacts they could not live with.
If you have spent your life in this business this was not a major leap. But the BNP has NOT spent its life in this. So the year after Nick public ally begged for help on this matter it had been forgotten. He told me, in all seriousness, that the Brits and simply changed their minds. Nick genuinely did not know who he had been talking to when he asked ME for help.
A word in the right place, knowing which interests counterbalance others, this is power.
No, Alan B., I did not ask you to keep up with the latest literature on genetics. My point was exactly the opposite of those who recommend tomes. My point was to NOTICE PATTERNS, not to “keep up with the literature.”
I would not fit into Jared Taylor’s group, for example, for a very good reason. Joe Sobran and Jared and the rest are making an impression on national media. This is not the way I work. The way I work requires one to stop reacting and philosophizing and get into the simple logistics of real power, really convincing people.
No one is going to listen to me in that kind of detail. But what I say rubs off. Different people pick up the code word bit, the leftism is a religion bit. Commenters pick up on some questioning of basics.
It is painful to watch people get the point and then lollyland off into their own usual stuff. But I have watched my plants ripen in the oddest places, because they are work, because they are needed.
What I have learned and done is essential to the salvation ahead.
No one can understand that but me. That is what I gave my life to, and that is enough.
*********SILLY!*********
I remember when President Carter was talking about the “fact” that “scientists had proven”
that there was an over 99% similarity between the genes of humans and chimpanzees. He
stated scientists had proven there was a percent of a percent difference in genes between
races.
I remember when “Modern anthropologists have proven that all races are the same in inherited
abilities” was repeated everywhere. I know that the doctrine is that races do not exist,
but I keep repeating that, in order to be a professional forensic pathologist you have to be
able to do two things:
1) Swear on oath that you have been able to determine the RACE of a murder victim from a few
desiccated remains and
2) Swear on oath that race does not exist.
To repeat, I remember when President Carter was talking about the “fact” that “scientists
had proven” that there was an over 99% similarity between the genes of humans and
chimpanzees. He stated scientists had proven there was a percent of a percent difference
in genes between races.
So now we have
Genetic Breakthrough That Reveals The Differences Between Humans
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/science_technology/article2007490.ece
The differences between human INDIVIDUALS are one to several percent, at this last count.
So now we can all begin to e-mail each other that they were wrong.
They are ALWAYS wrong.
Oh, God, Bob, you are going to get us into TROUBLE. They are right sometimes, and I will spend the next week finding out where they were actually right.
That makes a monkey out of YOU, Bob! YOU something said that was not correct and nobody will ever believe you again!
Oh, whoop-de-doo!
Fifty years of this crap and counting.
Now let’s get back to breathlessly telling each other that the Great Scientists were wrong!
Oh, whoop-de-DOO!
Joe O’Rorke told me learnedly that I shouldn’t say the Great Scientists were SILLY. No one would take ME seriously if I did that.
I remember when the Nazi Death Camps were I Germany. I remember Andy Rooney being shocked at how many young people didn’t believe in the Holocaust so he said he had been in Germany and he had SEEN them.
Well, it turned out later that none of the DEATH camps were in Germany. They were all carefully placed behind the Iron Curtain by the Nazis where no one after the war could examine them.
Can anyone understand why I am so SICK of this game?
EVERYBODY is a respectable conservative now. When yet another piece of pure bullshit like this, which was the Scientific View a week ago, everybody starts searching to see if it was JEWS who faked it.
Or they give us some halfass quote from the Bible or they some philosopher.
Or they make some general observation on the incorrectness of scientists or learned opinion or whatever.
Mainly they are trying to keep up with today’s headlines and forgetting everything that happened yesterday. That is RESPECTABLE opposition, no matter whether it is about Jews or the Book of Ezekiel or the latest breakout book.
And it all goes away.
I am DESPERATELY tired of trying to get a few people to simply write the Mantra down, to remind people of what is happening right out there in plain sight all the time, in our faces.
No, I am NOT going to thank every person who writes a two-sentence report about where he put the Mantra. I got sick of being the only one on that a long time ago, and when I was silent a few days here, only one report came in. I am SICK of being the only person who NOTICES, in yet another example of even the University of London publishing a study that says that intelligence is important in human beings, and having no one notice the Oxfam point.
I am tired just thinking about this Iran trip. It reminds me of so many others. And I am still BEGGING a FEW people to wake up and look around.
For each one person who must be begged into noticing reality, there are a hundred who are chomping at the bit about how there is evidence that somebody in the news is a JEW.
Whoop-de-doo! WHOOP-de-doo! Whoop-de-DOO!
WHOOP-DE-DOO!!!!
Man, if that don’t bring on the revolution, what will?
Iran or Not?
Posted by Bob in How Things Work on 11/24/2006
I probably will not go to Iran.
But the problem with reading what I write is that one must read what BOB WHITAKER writes, not rush in with all the information you have on a situation and use me as a sounding board for you to disgorge it. That is why we use the Mantra.
I have talked to people about it, and they pour forth all the information about the crisis with Iran that I can see on any news network. They are not listening to what I am saying. The fact that there are big problems with where I am going is routine.
Now, here is what MY problem is.
I would not go to LONDON on am e-mail that was signed “The Secretariat.” I am getting a government runaround. “The Secretariat tells me to call the Embassy, in this case the Iranian Interests Section at the Pakistani Embassy since we have not had diplomatic relations with Iran for a generation.
For all the shouts of terror about having my head lopped off on TV, what concerns me is that I am a former government employee and professor who is dealing with a government aqnd a bunch of professors.
You will recall that the invitation said:
“Dear Robert Whitaker,
You are cordially invited to attend the Conference in Tehran on 11-12
Dec. 2006.
We would provide you with visa, round ticket and accommodation.
Please contact the embassy of I.R of Iran for the arrangements.
You are kindly requested to confirm your attendance in conference and
also
inform us about your flight details as soon as possible.
Regards
Conference Secretariat”
I figured that I would contact the Interests Section and someone would take responsibility for this guest. But so far they want me to contact the “Conference Secretariat,” which is like trying to push a string, a string halfway around the world.
Gang, I have already done that far, far too many times when I was younger and stronger. This is a very practical matter. I need to be treated as a guest. I have spent far too many miserable days and nights half in and half of countries while waiting for some bureaucrat to come through. More to the point, nothing is accomplished.
I could have trouble getting out of Iran, not for some dramatic reason, but somebody simply isn’t at the office.
The interests Section is supposed to call me back Monday. If I get nothing but cold type, I’m not going anywhere.
Iran Invitation
Dear Robert Whitaker,
You are cordially invited to attend the Conference in Tehran on 11-12
Dec. 2006.
We would provide you with visa, round ticket and accommodation.
Please contact the embassy of I.R of Iran for the arrangements.
You are kindly requested to confirm your attendance in conference and
also
inform us about your flight details as soon as possible.
Regards
Conference Secretariat
ME:
I called Kelso about this, and he volunteered to do that staff work.
Nobody else has gotten this specific invitation yet, so I am honored by it.
I assume that “Please contact the embassy of I.R of Iran for the arrangements.” means OR I.R of Iran, since Iran has an International Representative but no Embassy here.
I do not quote e-mails without authorization, but this one is so impersonal, “Conference Secretariat” is not the sort of signature that singles one out, that I think I can announce it to the family.
richard and ASHBROOK
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 11/23/2006
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Bob, I seem to remember you were going to tell us how John Ashcroft prevented a Martin Luther King holiday for years before he died. Let’s hear it!
Comment by richard
ME:
Richard, if you cannot tell the difference between John Ashbrook, a friend to whom I was deeply loyal, and that sewer rat Ashcroft, I will wait until you catch up.
I’m not really all that upset. I mix names all the time, and John Ashbrook dies a quarter of a century ago, so “Ashbroft” comes to mind. But the next time I screw up one of YOUR names, maybe you can remember that I took this so lightly
Granted that my friend John would spin in his grave if he heard himself mixed up with Ashcroft, but with things the way they are, he simply can’t spin any faster.
Freedmen’s Slaves
Basic logic can be fun.
I read that a higher percentage of blacks in the slave states owned slaves than the percentage of whites who owned slaves. At first I wondered if that was propaganda, but then I realize that, if you deal in simple logic, it is quite likely.
Very few whites owned slaves, maybe ten percent. And slaves were concentrated in areas like low-state South Carolina. In other words, slave owners were clustered where there were lots of slaves.
So where were most of the slaves who bought their freedom? They were in the slave belt where, as in the Roman Empire, slaves constituted the single biggest item of property, probably more than real estate. Blacks who had the ambition to buy their freedom would often go on to accumulate property.
Political Correctness has it that all a black man would do after buying his own freedom would be buy his family’s freedom. There is a true and ironic story about a black woman who owned her husband. She was an ardent Confederate and he was rooting for the Union.
But the simple logical fact is that there were more slaves where free blacks lived, because that was where blacks lived. Basic logic can be fun.
-
You are currently browsing the archives for November, 2006
Bob’s Books
Bob's first book - 1976
A Plague On Both Your HousesBob's second book - 1982
THE NEW RIGHT PAPERSBob's deadliest book - 2004
Why Johnny Can't Think:
America's Professor-PriesthoodWhy Johnny Can't Think ebook zip
pwrd: Phu=9Ad5
John ASHBROOK’S Methods
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses, History on 11/23/2006
Ok, richard, let me give you a couple of insides on how to stop things in the House.
John had four or five congressmen who took turns being in the House ALL the time. If you ever read the Congressional record on the House side, you will constantly see the phrase, “”Without objection, we will dispense with the reading of the minutes” or “Without objection” we will do this or that.
The costs to a member who DOES object are staggering. Everybody there is running for reelection all the time, or else they are in leadership positions and are trying to get something done. Everybody needs to get back to their home districts. With 435 members, the most precious thing in the House is TIME.
But John made it very clear that if anything were proposed relating to a Martin Luther King holiday, he and his coterie would jam House business solid untit it was off the floor. He jammed other legislation that way, but he alone always denounced MLK onthe Floor, and when he died the MLK Holiday was passed within weeks.
Since I was the best known staffer for John Ashbrook, this made me delightfully unpopular.
So how did John survive the rule that a congressman who was that hard core and stopped the business of the House wouldn’t be ostracized?
The reason was that everybody was terrified of John Ashbrook. You can back a respectable conservative down, but John was not reasonable, John was not respectable.
You can hold the nastiest mob in the world at bay with a shotgun, because somebody has to take the first blast. Nobody wanted John’s first blast.
Three times the Republican legislature of Ohio tried to redistrict John out of his seat. His majorities kept growing. His last reelection took place in a redrawn district which had been seventy percent Democratic. He won 73% of the vote.
Another method John used was also based on his happiness at being disliked. “Give me the last three days of the session,” John said, “And you can have the rest.” At the end of the session, everybody needed to get home. After each redistristricting John needed to get home. He faced one tough reelection campaign after another. But John would hold them there when EVERYBODY, not least conservatives, wanted to “give a little” so they could get back to their districts.
But in conference committee and on the floor, John discovered something wonderful. He wouldn’t let them go home, so THEY would be the ones to “give a little.” Understand this term “a little” in the sense Everet Dirksen talked about inhis famous quote, ” a billi0n here, a billion there, pretty soon it adds up to real money.” That billion was nothing to senators like Dirksen who were playing politics, but it was what John was there for.
John gave me an honored place in this game. I was considered New Right and hard core, and nobody seems to check history, so it was assumed by some that I was responsible for John’s irrational behavior. Lord, how I wish they had been right!
When a staffer would hear that I was behind some holdup — John was doing this DECADES before I got there — the staffer would call me about being “reasonable.” I would then give him a short lecture about how I kept telling John, though I admired the man deeply and loved him personally, that I felt John was a just a little bit of a wimp.
John referred to me as “My pet redneck.” He was SO delighted to have somebody who had a reputation for making HIM a loose cannon. I don’t think I have ever been happier in any role I played in politics.
John and I did not constitute a combination any rational person would expect to back down, and they had to go home SOMETIME.
There were more tactics that would require more explanation than any of us want, like amendments that could delay things.
I spent twenty-four hours a dayfor two days formulating amendments to a farm bill I knew nothing about. I HAD to stop House business until the weekend. The Parliamentarian can simply declare that an amendment is not relevant to a bill and declare it out of order, so I had to learn the whole history of this farm bill and put in amendments that WERE relevant.
Naturally, the leadership wanted to stop us from adding amendments. But the process of STOPPING you from adding amendments, if properly handled, can drive the leadership nuts.
The point is that this is not a torchlight parade. The point is that this is REAL power and REAL billions of dollars.
You can back them down, but you have to know what you are doing. Nobody is scared of a screamer. Everybody is scared of a loose cannon who knows the game.
Once I was at Trader Vic’s Restaurant with John when House Speaker O’Neal came in. John told the waiter to take him a drink at his expense. The waiter came back and said, “That’s the first and last thing I will ever get from John Ashbrook free.”
It was.
3 Comments