Many economic studies have shown that British royalty is a money-making proposition. Queen Elizabeth had a tax-free salary (an undisclosed agreement with the Exchequer now requires her to pay some taxes, amount unknown). That salary was, the last time I looked, fixed at twenty million dollars a year.

But the Queen’s salary is like the president’s salary. Room and board come free, as does all the rest. Besides that, the amount of property Prince Phillip has is estimated at about half a billion dollars, so you can guess what the actual monarch has.

And the Queen does not live in a castle any more than the president lives in the White House. She lives in a set of modern apartments with air conditioning and heat INSIDE the castle. Queen Victoria kept trying to get some good steam heated apartments and never quite succeeded, because back then it was harder to install that in the castles and she had to live in one of them.

The reason the Exchequer finally had to make a secret agreement with the Queen to pay some taxes on her income was because she made an error I understand. When there was a fire at Windsor Castle, she assumed the taxpayers would pick up the tab. Normally they would, but this time there was an outcry. This caused all the stuff about the Queen not paying taxes to come up in the media.

Actually, I doubt seriously if Queen Elizabeth would be seriously upset if she had to live on a mere million a year. When a Prince of Wales is shaking hands, he uses his left hand, because the right one gets sore. He also has to wear a urine tube like an astronaut so he won’t miss anybody. He stands there for hours.

Most billionaires occasionally go out to a MacDonald’s or in Britain a Wimpy’s. The Queen can’t. Do you think she LIKES those boring dumpy clothes she has to be seen in?

And the most “private” suppers are all-too-well attended. And every servant must be thanked and complimented. I have been to a few embassy and White House meals. I can’t imagine doing that for LIFE. If you gave me a choice between doing that day after day, year after year, or eating at some cheap restaurant every day, I’d take the Soul Food.

No, the Queen wouldn’t mind going down to a mere million or so a year. But if she started living and dressing normally the PEOPLE would raise hell. The TOURISTS would raise even more hell. Economic studies have long since shown that the tourism the monarchy brings in is several times as much as the highest estimate of the cost of the whole Royal Family.

Norway, Belgium, the Netherlands, Sweden and Denmark, under socialist governments, played it cool. In Sweden the king gets a million bucks a year out of which he has to maintain the old castles. As a result nobody is really aware that any of those countries HAS a monarchy. So the tourists don’t come to gawk.

Gawking pays.

I do not resent Catholic prelates having expensive residences and limousines and bright outfits. The Catholic Church is based on a monarchical view. It is out-of-date, but the thing that attracts people to the Catholic Church is PRECISLY that it is so out-of-date.

The two oldest institutions on earth, by far, are the Catholic Church and the British Monarchy. So I don’t go in making fun of them. I don’t agree with either of them on many things, but that is NOT my point.

When your average person or a Politically Correct moron or a college graduate talks about anything, he quotes from Marx or Mommy Professor about how it should.

Here is a basic. NOTE IT CAREFULLY:

When a professional thinker looks at anything, he first looks at WHY it does what it does. This is the only sense in which I am conservative. I squeeze all the juice I can out of learning what an institution or a person has to offer in practical terms. That is for MY benefit. I only criticize what impinges on what MATTERS, in my case race.

The moron goes in with his mouth moving. The professional goes in with his BRAIN in action.

It may have seemed to some that I was “going Stormfront” when I reprinted the article below on the Japanese researcher who declared that African starvation was a result of African IQ. There was something in that article that I hoped someone would notice, but it may still be a bit advanced.

Note that the main attack on the research came from Oxfam, a British organization which was originally devoted to feeding the starving. It was taken for granted that an Oxfam spokesman had a legitimate dog in this fight.

Which brings us, for God’s sake, gang, back to BASICS. Oxfam is an organization which is supposed to feed starving children for under a dollar day. Why is any of Oxfam’s business WHY people are starving? If people are starving because they are dumb or because there has been a disaster makes no difference.

Look at the spokesman for Oxfam. Oxfam like all such outfits will say children are starving because they lack money, but I guarantee you there is person who will never miss a meal because of Oxfam:

That spokesman will live a good life and retire at Oxfam’s expense. Yet Oxfam keeps demanding money for its mission of feeding the hungry. The chances are ten thousand to one that that spokesman will die of obesity rather than starvation.

These are BASICS, gang!

The entire Politically Correct establishment is paid for out of charity donations and educational funds, private and public. Every nickel they get, plus another nickel for the cost of collection, comes out of charity and educational funds that could be spent somewhere else.

Every nickel some sociologists gets for declaring whites evil and guilty comes out of funds that could be earmarked for real research, little things like curing leukemia. But the Politically Correct establishment never gets questioned abut this.

If you THINK about it, what in the HELL is someone from Oxfam doing pushing white guilt?

But you DON’T think about it, and that is the problem. Today we take it for granted that anyone in charity or education is paid to be a spokesman for the Politically Correct agenda. Nobody would EVER ask why Oxfam isn’t out feeding people. Other people than the spokesman, I mean.

LEARN TO RETHINK OUR ASSUMPTIONS, THE ONES WE NEVER CONSIDER!!!!!!

That is precisely what respectable conservatives get paid NOT to do.

That is what the Mantra is all about, but it took me YEARS to get anybody to even LOOK at it!

If you look at “History Does not Recognize Nations” below, some may extrapolate. When we were expanding, we formed new nations, new political divisions.

Now, thanks to The Greatest Generation, we are in full retreat.

This is nothing new.

Erasmus supported Martin Luther at the beginning. Luther at first was looking for a Reformation, a change in the entire church. But when it became clear that Protestantism was leading to a split in the church, Erasmus turned against him. Erasmus supported Rome.

Meanwhile, what were Erasmus’s REAL religious views? On his death bed, he refused to make confession or to ask for the Last Rites the Catholic Church said were essential to salvation. In other words, Erasmus had no religious views. So why did he back Rome?

Like many others, Erasmus took this stand because he did not want a split in what was then known as Western Christendom. Western Christendom had driven Islam out of Europe by 1492, and Spain had lots of help from other countries in doing that. But what if Christendom broke into pieces?

It did split, then it split again, nations became supreme. The relatively tiny area of Northwestern Europe split along religious lines, then the Protestant Netherlands was at war with Protestant England and Catholic countries came to blows, even as the religious wars killed people by the millions.

And the splits split. America drove out Britain, the Confederacy almost made its own nation. And all the time we got stronger. By the time the Greatest Generation took over, we ruled the world, divided as we were.

Now we must retrench. There are nations within us of which we are not yet aware. We will have to dump part of our race and depend on a very tiny proportion of it. After the Counterreformation, Catholic countries simply sank into stagnation. The enormous Spanish Empire did nothing but bring in gold which was swallowed up by Northern Europe. By the twentieth century France was the only Latin Catholic country that made the slightest bit of difference, and it got stomped when wars came.

The one fact no historian ever mentions is that France was a great power under Napoleon because of its gigantic population. In 1800 France was by far the most numerous people in Europe. The outnumbered all of the Russias combined. This was not a small part of the white population in Germany trampling over everyone else twice the way they did in 1914 and 1940. If Germany had had the relative population France had in Europe in 1800, Hitler would have two hundred million Germans to start with!!!

We will unite and retrench. Those who stay with the old ways will go the way of those who built their nationhood on the Latin culture and the Roman Church.

A person who moans all is lost is an idiot because he thinks he is a prophet. A person who tries to predict what would happen in the time of Erasmus would have been an idiot. There are too many unexpected developments coming for us to make SPECIFIC predictions of any kind.

But one thing is clear. History tells us that those who feel a splitting of the order is death are never right. Whether you are a prophet of The New World Order or a Prophet of Doom, what you are is a damned fool.

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

Like many kids I put effort in attempting to figure out the secret to hypnosis, but my attempts to figure it out flummoxed me.

Years later, a TV entertainer gave away the secret, not on TV, but in testimony at a murder trial.

The man is known as “Kreskin” and goes by the stage name of “The Great Kreskin”.

He was testifying for the defense. The purpose of his testimony was to inform the court of why testimony obtained under the influence of hypnosis is not reliable.

This is what Kreskin told the court: “For the court to accept testimony obtained under influence of hypnosis is to commit the same error the subject of hypnosis commits.”

Kreskin continued: “I am one of world’s most expert hypnotists and I will tell you the hypnotist’s secret: There is no such thing as the hypnotic state. That is the con of the hypnotist. The subject, no matter how skeptical, is under a fear that the hypnotic state might exist. It is that fear that is the hypnotist’s ally.”

Then Kreskin said: “Hypnosis is all suggestion and the manipulation of human fear. That is why anything anyone does or says under the influence of a hypnotist is unreliable. Hypnosis in its entirety is a fraud, that’s why we entertainers love to use it.”

What an enlightenment that was to me. Here was “ The Great Kreskin” telling the bald face truth about his craft for the sake of justice in a court of law.

I suddenly saw that the hypnotists’ secret was to understood how vulnerable humans are to lies because of fear.

That is why the PC crowd is so much under the influence of multiculturalism. Their fear is being associated with “evil racism” and it trumps their rationality, making them subject to the hypnotic suggestions of multicultural orthodoxy.

And that is why BW’s mantra is so critical: It forces rational examination, thus breaking the hold of the hypnotic manipulators over their subjects.

In being confronted by the mantra, fear causes PC antis to struggle for an exit, but there is none. This awakens them out of their trance, a trance induced by fear based manipulation.

This is what makes BW such a genius. He understands minds. He knows how to insinuate influence into the world.

This is the stuff many in the world of political consultancy dream of, but never achieve.

They are all too much under the influence of the college educations for that.

Comment by Dave —

I keep getting the complaint that commenters have never heard of a “race problem.”

When you are in a war, you use what works. As I said before, the same commentators who sit around saying that intermarriage is the solution to the race problem will tell Duke or Jared Taylor they never said anything of the sort.

If they haven’t heard of a race problem, have they ever heard the word “assimilation?” I am a bit worried no one has brought this up before now. I don’t think you can let anybody go saying they don’t understand your message when you do the Mantra.

DON’T LET THEM GET OFF THE SUBJECT. Saying they never heard of a race problem is just one more way to do that. Has anybody met anyone who claims they never heard of assimilation.

GET OFF THE DEFENSIVE!

” Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE problem. Everybody says

this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and

ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or

Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote

assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY

white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if

hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black

countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am

talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black

man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the

white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a

naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

Good observation Edwin. And each time they come up with another weird one, they have changed holds.

I once owned a pit bull dog. He caused some difficulties, but I learned from him.

The pit bull dog does not make a sound when he attacks. The fight is not personal. Before he sprints to his foe, he pauses stock still, wheels spinning, as he chooses his hold. He has an instinctive ability to balance strengths — which have to be taken out — and weaknesses — which are easy to take out. Whatever hold he chooses he keeps until thrown off. He is only thrown off when he lacks experience. Pretty grim.

My bull dog could hike with me anywhere and climb slippery rocks and some trees. One day I stupidly took him off the leash when I was running back down a mountain on a new trail. At one switch back, he froze, and I saw his wheels spinning. I knew what that meant.

What I didn’t expect was a horse on the other side, his owner beside him.

Before I could tackle him he was off like a shot. This was his first (and only) chance at a large animal. He grabbed the horse on his fleshy thigh. The horse threw him off twice and the dog flew in an arc about ten feet and landed with a loud thud. The third time I tackled him. The dog was fine, the horse badly hurt. I paid the vet bill and was lucky that was it.

A bad thing it was, but it was impressive to watch a disciplined professional (dog) in action.

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

Fantastic!!!

Shari and Lord Nelson are actually using the Mantra! Do you realize this will be the first revolution of it’s type using the internet as the mouthpiece? And we are the pioneer-patriots who are in the trenches fighting it out!!! Keep up the fight, keep posting if you already are, and if you haven’t started I urge to do so immediately.

Newsgroups.
News articles with discussion boards.
Email lists.
Blogs.
Instant messenger contacts.
Chat rooms.
Personal webpages you own.
The list goes on and on and it can be done anonomously if need be.

Remember, a few postings a day, everyday, will add up. I can liken it to compound interest. One of us posts ten times a day. That’s 70 posts a week, 280 posts a month. ONE convert reads the Mantra, visits WOL, and begins identical posting activity. 280 now turns into 460. Within a few months we get 2 more converts. Now 280 has turned into 1,120. And it just keeps going.

If all you can post the Mantra is one time a day then do that. That’s 365 posts a year and how many converts do you think that will result in? I personally don’t know but I’d wager it would be a several. How about five posts a day? That’s 1,825 posts annually.

And keep on telling us on WOL where you’re posting and how often. We’re in a war for the survival of the white race. Turn off the t.v. and post the Mantra — PLEASE !!!!

Comment by Mark

You can almost gauge your effectiveness with the Mantra by checking how often your opponent mentions a figure or tries to draw you into a discussion of history. The more esoteric they start to sound the more helpless they are – desperately trying to get out of the vice you have them in.

Comment by Edwin

ME:

I didn’t learn this in Kindergarten, but I did read the book before I reached my teens. It was called “White Fang” and it was about a heroic Alaskan dog. His first evil master put him in fights to the death in the betting ring with other dogs. White Fang was fast and strong, and he could kill anything on four feet.

Until he met a bull dog.

The bull dog got his massive jaws onto White Fang’s neck and held on. White Fang slung him around and slammed that bull dog on the ground, but the bull dog just kept his hold and inched toward White Fang’s jugular vein.

The crowd boohed. They had come to see a slash-and-blood dight and this bulldog was spoiling it.

But that bull dog had only one interest in his life, and that interest was White Fang’s jugular vein.

Since White Fang was a valuable piece of property, even his evil master called off the fight before he was killed. No one minded because the fight was no fun.

But the bull dog won and White Fang lost the only battle he ever did lose.

Don’t please the crowd. Don’t wow ‘em with your quotations. We have one interest here: the enemy’s jugular vein.

I asked Lord Nelson for a report:

Lord Nelson, we need you to give us some feedback on what happens when you use the Mantra nose-to-nose. You need to help get us from from theory to practice.

Comment by Bob

His response:

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

Of course I don’t stand on a soap box quoting the mantra word for word, but I slip bits in, in normal everyday conversations.
For example, if someone mentions immigration even in a positive way, I will look confused and say:

(yeah but its strange how its, always white countries and ONLY white countries).
Then I will casually point out how Japan is the second richest country in the world and is less over crowded then the Netherlands and yet, I don’t see any liberals demanding mass African and Muslim immigration to that country, etc etc.

Surprisingly this is much easier than over the Internet because most everyday people agree with these points.
The average White, even if they go along with the present Religion, (multicult) still does not think of themselves as a meaningless social construct.

However, the moderators of every mainstream English speaking website are fully train up, indoctrinated, hard core marxist antis. (They could not be moderators otherwise).
And they have the power to alter or delete your posts and ultimately ban you.

Its pretty obvious when a Mod. describes Whites being bred into extinction as simple evolution, that you are NOT, dealing with a normal or rational person.

While using the mantra in conversation is useful and often good FUN, it is of course the Internet we need to use for best effect.
Here are a some things that I have found useful when debating on mainstream chat forums:

1. NEVER, identify yourself has being associated with any particular group or movement.

If you do you will quickly be attacked for everything regarding that group instead of what YOU, are actually saying, and be labeled out of the debate.

You can be damn sure that while every Mod. is a fully indoctrinated priest of the multicult, they will NEVER, admit to this.
They have been taught that its more effective to pretend to be just non political members of the public, who are simply against RACISM, this also protects them from being attacked in the same way.

Level that playing field by being just a non political person who is simply against GENOCIDE, then quote the mantra and REPEAT it.

2. If someone else in that forum is on your side, you can expect to receive friendly PMs from Mods. and other key members, telling you what a nice person you are, and how its that other guy who is so mean, and causing all the trouble.

This is simply a divide and conquer tactic and your Allie is probably receiving the same PMs about you.
This may sound paranoid but trust me, from the grass roots, to the top, these people really are that well organized.

3. Make your point then post the mantra one last time before going to the NEXT, website.

Remember if a professional politician appears on TV. he knows his job is to convince the viewers, NOT, to convert the interviewer.

4. Always be aware that your adversary is a White person who believs (even if they wont admit it) that their race and ONLY their race must be replaced, in order to effect diversity, and a Utopian multiculti wonderland.

In other words: they are THE DUMBEST F..KS ON THE PLANET.

5. One thing I have found VERY, effective is when the anti has been cornered into admitting they have no problem with Whites becoming a minority in the particular country you are discussing, you must immediately ask them which race of people they think will be replacing us.
And what makes them think this race will share the antis views.

They are never ready for this one, and when they fumble the answer, REPEAT, the question.

Hope this is useful.

Comment by Lord Nelson —

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

Here is something very simple to add if anyone challenges genocide: International Jurists determined in 1960 that China committed “genocide” in Tibet just by [i]shutting down Tibetan monasteries and religious schools.[/i]

Add to that the fact that there are more than 100 million aliens in the USA (1 in 3 inhabitants), California went down from 98% white in the 1930’s to about 40% white today, the Associated Press online projects that at current rates whites will be a minority by 2043, the UK Government project that Britons will be a minority in Britain by around 2060.

If Communist China committed genocide according to international law by shutting down schools, then how is the largest invasion in the history of the world not?!

Comment by Pain —

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

More commentary on Bob’s Mantra.

There is an advantage to saying “everybody” and “genocide.” It leads to control of the argument. People have never heard of such before and they think it is outrageous so they think it will be an easy win to debate. They are thinking that it is not just politically incorrect, but outrageously incorrect. Believing it an easy win, they will keep coming back to the word “genocide.” Each time they do allows you to add something new to the debate and constant repetition of the concept genocide.

Thus even when you do not respond, they are repeating what we want over and over again. They may think they have won — by repeating out word genocide. This is how getting them to adopt our language is so valuable.

Another fun tactic is the withholding of proof until later. Simplifying remarks tends to make it stand out and sound outrageous. Maybe there’s a fact or a figure which really proves our argument. They will deny the fact. Wait. They will say, “See you can’t prove it.” Then they will commit there entire argument to that fact which they think you cannot prove. Once they have, come back with the proof. Then they have to change tactics, which they will again and again.

This is the joy of the internet. Years ago, you would have had to clip every article you read with scissors and you would have to take notes from every you book read to prove anything. Now there’s Google.

Even so, Bob’s way is best. Stick to facts that are obvious so you don’t have to prove anything. This is called prima facie evidence, by the way. It’s used in court.

Facts and figures from the internet should never become a way to justify yourself. Bob’s right: we should never justify ourselves. Keep statements simple and you won’t have to. But facts and figures can be thrown in for some fun — toillustrate the obvious.

Comment by Pain —

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

This exchange reminds me of a time when I was teaching my teenage son how to fight. Besides the usual boxing techniques, I showed him how to get a man down on the ground, how to go for the throat — litterally, how to destroy a man’s “jewels,” and an explanation of how to insert one’s fingers inside a man’s eyeballs for ultimate harm. The focus of this lesson was to show hiim how to save his life if in a street fight with a real adversary.

He responded by saying, very childishly, that I didn’t “fight fair.”

The left is accusing us of not fighting fairly because we use the term white genocide — which is our best verbal street fighting phrase. We could do what respectable conservatives do — castrate ourselves by fighting “by the rules.” Or we can go for the throat and let blood fly. I prefer to win — even if it means getting down and dirty in a verbal sense.

BTW, who has been posting the Mantra lately? Please speak up on here and don’t be shy!