Archive for December, 2006
The Toughest Guy
Alan B. informs me that he was only joking when he said he envied Brian the appointment I gave him.
Alan B. shot my ego trip down mercilessly.
But I didn’t let it get to me. A couple of hours under the bed in fetal position and I was just fine.
I’m TOUGH.
In fact, if I win the lottery or something, I am going to pay to get Tom Brokaw to write a book about me called The Toughest Guy. That’ll make it true. And I won’t be the one who said it. Brokaw did.
The Servile Theme
The World War II generation brought back to America the old servile attitude: “This is a government of laws, not of men.” The preamble to the American Constitution was exactly what the Kings men did not want: “We the PEOPLE of the United States of America… and OUR Posterity.”
There was a sense of ownership before World War II that is hard for me to explain today. When the Federal government intruded, it was a personal thing. WE were responsible for being sure no white woman got attacked in OUR territory.
Contrasted to this, I remember how odd New York television programs looked. From Superman to cowboys, they showed the bad guys lynching evildoers, and the evildoer was always innocent and should have been governor. What struck me as odd was that, as I looked at the rabbits who had come home from World War II, I could not imagine any of them taking ANY law into their own hands.
Basic training in WWII was aimed to make a rabbit out of a man. Then half of them went on to college under the GI Bill and learned that you had to obey and regurgitate to get that degree. I did not meet ANY products of World War II who would sanction any independent action of any kind.
Today, if your child is rape, the jury will kill you if you take the revenge any male would take. The idea that they wouldn’t is as alien as the America before the Tyrants’ Greatest Generation took over.
When the first member of the WWII Generation became president, his inaugural speech said, “Aaask not what your country can do for you, aaask what you can do for your country.” You could not put the servile spirit more simply and more clearly. In 1789 we formed a government to serve US. In 1961 “The Greatest Generation” reformed it to a government we had to serve.
The FBI denied the existence of organized crime and did what the World War II generation wanted it to do. It concentrated on infiltrating and destroying anyone who resisted integration. The World War II Generation contained a lot of segregationists, but all of them said the FBI was right. Like respectable conservatives, any lynch mob the Feds formed they wanted to LEAD it.
Today this servile attitude is embodied in gun control. Listen to someone who is demanding gun control and you will hear that old servile theme, “All Power to the Authorities. Only the Authorities should have guns.”
Thanks Again, Dave!
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 12/30/2006
I have quoted this comment by Dave before, but this time I want to thank him for it personally:
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Well, I don’t about that one, taking on that role. But Simmons gets to the very heart of things in his comments about BW taking on too much by thinking it is his duty to save the entire white race.
You see my problem is coping with the very fact I suspect it may be true, that it may actually be true that BW does bear that responsibly.
Now that sounds preposterous, but is it?
I have empathy for that fact that someone like BW may get up in morning, look himself in mirror, and say to himself, “Darn it all, if I don’t do it, it is not going to get done, and unfortunately, it’s me that’s got to do it.”
The problem is that God doesn’t pull punches, and at times in course of human affairs, the whole damn thing DOES ride on one person’s shoulders.
Now I know a lot of people don’t believe that, but I can’t help thinking of the old Navy advertisement trying to lure young (and dumb) engineering grads into the Naval Officers Corps: “In the Navy, you get responsibility fast!!!”
That’s called truth in advertising, because I fast forward in my mind and see this young dumb kid who bought into Navy’s come-on on the deck of some Naval vessel manning one of those one-time use only machine guns that are your only hope of shooting down an incoming Exocet missile.
Here’s the arithmetic: You have got ten seconds to shoot that sucker down from time you see that missile on the horizon and one burst of machine gun fire to do it and if you fail, you and everybody else on board die and horrible and violent death.
I wish to God life were not like that, but unfortunately it is.
Comment by Dave
ME:
You can see from my article on the Epitaph of the group that calls itself The Greatest Generation how much I respect people who decide they are unique on their own. At the same time, it is an unpleasant fact of life that no one thinks on the basic level the way I do. I condemn them for saying they are absolutely unique and all future generations should be taxed to testify to their greatness, yet I myself can be accused of saying much the same thing: I am unique.
Since I think in basics, this is not the kind of contradiction a debater could make of it. I am saying I am right and they are silly. That is why Dave is not my Tom Brokaw. Dave gets nothing for this. He is simply announcing reality as he sees it. To say that Brokaw got something out of “The Greatest Generation” would be the understatement of the decade.
It took me many years to realize just how much rested on me. The whole concept of anti-white instead of racial justice, the whole concept of societal property rights, hell, even the desperation when they needed the weekend to save the Hubble Telescope. These seemed so obvious to me. It was painful when I had to slowly, repeatedly spend decades drilling the importance of these basics into the heads of a few, and in each case find some way to get them OUT.
Yes, Dave, you are the only person I have ever read who actually understands what it feels like to look in the mirror and say, “My God, Bob, they really, truly, sincerely, honestly DO NOT GET IT.” And Dave knows that what I do not get is the self-important glow that those who are called The Greatest Generation get. I feel CHEATED.
I spent a lifetime trying to get the simplest things st4raight. Every year of that lifetime could have been spent talking over concepts with other top-intelligence types, learning and exchanging. Instead I have had fifty years elbow deep in intellectual muck, combing the bottom for a piece of solid truth here and there.
I am long past hating Jews. I am BORED with them. I was BORED with them thirty years ago. They are as predictable as liberals and neoconservatives and respectable conservatives. Can you empathize with what it feels like to spend decades reading commentaries, and knowing from the first sentence everything that clown is going to say?
When I was a boy I used to work in the brick kilns. Back then every brick had to be handled singly through every stage of the process. So I would be in a suffocating kiln where the heat from burning the brick was still there picking up four bricks and throwing them to the next man to be stacked, then throwing a group of five brick to the next man to be stacked, then throwing five bricks to the next man to be stacked, and so on and on and on as people literally passed out around. But I did it from childhood. What got me was the BOREDOM.
It turns out that that brick hacking was a necessary preparation for the rest of my life. Now I read the same old worship of IQ. Now I read the same old bitches. Now I read what the neoconservative Jew has to say, “Gee, I love America. If there just weren’t so many white gentiles cluttering it up, what we could make of it!”
I am reading “conservative opinion” about Iraq, which is the same thing as “conservative opinion” in Vietnam.
Four brick, five brick, over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over, ad nauseum. I HATE it. I am SICK of it. But there is no one else to do it.
Thanks, Dave.
What Your Psychology Professor Can’t Tell You
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, How Things Work on 12/30/2006
In one of the Dr. Lekter movies, Lekter says the agent is not as smart as he is. The agent replies something like, “No, but I have a great advantage over you.
“What is that?” asks Lekter.
“You’re insane.”
It is a general believe that psychopaths are smart. Actually, the ones who GET AWAY with being psychopathic are intelligent. The average white trash ort non-white psychopath in the penitentiary will be there all his life, expect for periods when judges can get him back out to maim people.
It is important to make these distinctions. For example, I am caught between people who denigrate IQ tests and people who worship IQ tests. My big-time psychologist friend said to me that he knew IQ tests showed heredity to be the overwhelming factor, but, as a psychologist, he knew there were terrible flaws in those tests.
He then pointed out that, after all, it was psychologists who developed those tests in the first place, so he should know.
My reply was, “Yes, but even a dumbass psychologist can find out whether somebody is retarded or normal.”
My dream is that you will develop a talent for BASIC thinking that, after you read the simple sentence above, would make you think of everything I say about that.
Finding actual mental retardation is all IQ tests were developed to do. Idiot, moron, and imbecile are LEGAL, not medical, terms. IQ tests were developed to distinguish between those who required legal protection as retarded and normal people. An idiot has an IQ of 0 to 30, an imbecile from 30 to 50, a moron from 50 to 70.
But because IQ tests confirm their point, some people WORSHIP them.
But analogy tests are better at telling who is SMART, so Mensa uses IQ and gives one an Oriental result: problem-solving is intelligence. Mensa is, after all, a Yiddish word for a German Mensch.
IQ gets you off of race. If someone speaks French, uses deodorant, and has an adequate IQ, it is easy to ignore the color of his skin. But REALITY doesn’t. As one person put it beautifully, “Whites innovate, Orientals stagnate, blacks degenerate.”
That will never be allowed in a peer review session, but that is the truth.
The fact is that, if they use a stick of deodorant every single week, brown skinned people lack something basic. Like intelligent psychopaths, one naturally assumes that a smart, one who has learned to fit into our world, is just one more of US. Remember, even most PSYCHOPATHS don’t know they’re psychopaths.
Reality is not simple. Reality is not complicated. Reality doesn’t use big words and reality doesn’t use small words. Reality comes FIRST. A reality is a reality.
A single experiment is worth a hundred expert opinions.
Shari and Teaching With Humor
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 12/30/2006
Not Spam
Not Spam
A joke: Child says to teacher ” This multiplication table thing, has it been peer reviewed?”
Comment by Shari
ME:
The best way to spread a basic point is with humor.
But one should hit basics any way one can. I feel very lonely doing it.
For example, if someone defends peer review, I ask them, “What is the difference between peer reiew and a self-appointed bureaucracy?”
And then there is the question no respectable conservative EVER asks, “What IS racism?”
I hope this kind of thinking doesn’t get frozen with my head at Alcor.
Epitaph for a Generation
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, History, How Things Work on 12/30/2006
Someone told me that they saw an episode of The Simpson’s where Tom Brokaw — in cartoon, of course, but using his own name — was shown talking to a bunch of old WWII vets, including Homer’s father. He was telling them how great they were and they were shouting, “More, Tom, more!”
I haven’t seen it and I find it hard to believe anyone but me would have the affronter to call down twelve million WWII vets for adopting that name, The Greatest Generation. But on the other hand, I haven’t heard anybody use that term seriously in a long, long time.
As I said, I know as a writer that Tom Brokaw did not say that. He wrote it for an audience and it sold like hot cakes — to the group that wanted to be called The Greatest Generation. I was surprised when no one challenged me when I said, in writing and in person, that they called THEMSELVES The Greatest Generation. Everybody seems to know exactly what I mean.
And that would be a fitting epitaph for the whole bunch of them:
“They called themselves The Greatest Generation.”
Only with this last, ultimate overreaching did it begin to become clear just what a sick mentality, just what a spoiled-child mentality, this generation had. When the WWII Generation took over, the white man strode the earth like a Colossus. By the time these moronic cowards finally are going to their graves and whatever awaits them thereafter, white men apologize for their very existence, and champion its end.
A young Henry Clay invented the term “Founding Fathers” about 1811. Neither Washington nor Adams nor Jefferson or any of the rest of the Founding Fathers ever used it thought many of them lived for decades after the term became common. No gentleman would call himself a Founding Father.
Hell, no ADULT would give HIMSELF a vainglorious moniker like that!
Until the one that gave away everything the Founding Fathers won.
First of all, the generation that called everybody else spoiled was itself spoiled rotten. I knew many of them who, to all intents and purposes, died on V-J Day. For the rest of their lives all they talked about was how weak everybody else was, how they had proven their courage once and for all and never had to get out and battle for any cause. People of my age who had enemies taking the white man’s world found a vacuum in the older generation that should have continued the fight and held our place. They had learned to OBEY, and they insisted that Real Heroes, them, OBEYED anything they were told.
As I keep repeating, there were some of them who had decent opinions, but they NEVER stood up for them. I saw endless rows of paper-hat soldiers from WWII saying they fought a war for integration and for open borders, but I never heard ONE of the pape4r hats CONTRADICT them in public.
A Company Traitors and a Legion of Cowards finally went too far in declaring themselves The Greatest Generation.
The World War ONE Generation was given a raw deal by the government when that war ended. The Bonus March of 1933 was well known in 1945, and the professional advocates of Veterans’ benefits used that example endlessly to get more and more and more for the group that Saved the World by giving a third of the earth’s population to Stalin and Mao-Tse-Tung.
No one seems to have noticed the connection between the hippies and the World War II Generation, or between the Jews’ behavior and the WWII Generation.
Hippies said the world owed them a living. Their fathers said exactly the same thing, but their fathers said the world owed them a living because they fought World War II. But their fathers also told them, or never contradicted the statement that, Communists were the good guys. You can’t give a third of the world to somebody without implying they’ve got virtue.
So the hippies simply took it for granted that Communists were at least as good as America, especially an America that was waging a war it would neither fight nor get out of in Vietnam. This policy was entirely the product of Kennedy’s Best and Brightest. Today’s neoconservatives and National Review which worships them say they still believe exactly what Kennedy’s Best and Brightest believed.
So we are now in a new Vietnam.
Now back to the hippies. The hippies had been told by their daddies that the Communists were the good guys. There was no war for them to fight, but the world owed hippies everything just like it did their daddies.
The Jews came out of World War II with a story that made their paranoid existence heaven. All white gentiles WERE out to get them. Any white gentile who wanted the survival of his race was just out to get the Jews. That had been the Jewish theme long since. All white gentiles as enemies was the theme that made Communism possible. Communism was overwhelmingly Jewish-led, which led to the Nazis (even a Jewish author or two has admitted this recently).
But the World War II Generation insisted that the Nazis came out of nothing but white gentile Hate. It was the only way to justify what they did. So in 1945 Jews were, unkosher as it sounds, in Hog Heaven.
So the Jews and the World War II Generation hunted down “War Criminals” together. It turned out that every single one of the twelve million American uniformed personnel had personally liberated a Death Camp in Germany.
A few decades later, it was admitted that there were no Death Camps in Germany. The Death Camps were safely behind the Iron Curtain where they could not be investigated.
But like The Greatest Generation, the Jews have gone too far. They have made America not reviled but ridiculed as a giant Israeli puppet. No one in the World War Generation dared propose a condemnation of the attack on the USS Liberty by Israel at one of their beat-your-scrawny-chest conventions. And the suppression of free speech is beginning to cost them, as the release of David Irving just a week after the Holocaust Convention and David Duke’s pointing straight at European Holocaust laws prove.
“They called themselves the Greatest Generation.”
No epitaph for millions of moronic cowards could be more appropriate.
Dave, Elizabeth and Nobody Do My Work For Me
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses, History, How Things Work on 12/30/2006
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Since I read financial and economic commentary constantly, I have no problem seeing what BW means about “the BASE” and what confusion results through mistaken notions that are fundamental. For example, I just finished reading an essay by a “celebrated academic” premised on the idea that Islam has impeded capital formation because Islamic religious trusts allow only for the accumulation of and retention of real estate interests and morally prohibit unequal profits.
The idea is that the corporation and unlimited executive pay is responsible for the prosperity of “the West”, in contrast to the “Islamic East” that prohibits such organizational forms.
It is astonishing that anyone takes this nonsense seriously, yet academics are paid to produce it. Worse, they actually believe it.
What can I say? I just thank God I am not some poor student, tumbling in perplexity, assuming something important is going on.
Academic orthodoxy truly is primitive. It is astounding so many are lost in it and don’t even know that they are only pretending to be grownup human beings.
Comment by Dave — 12/27/2006 @ 11:48 pm | Edit This
There’s always new stuff coming out about earlier times — but academic orthodoxy blocks much of this. One example is “No Europeans found North America before 1492.” I was a little girl when archaeologists found the remains of the Viking settlement at L’Anse aux Meadows, on that Canadian island. I could go on and on about academic orthodoxy in history and geography (especially climate)…
Comment by Elizabeth — 12/29/2006 @ 12:35 pm | Edit This
Dave and Elizabeth made interesting observations about getting trapped in academic orthodoxy, a uniquely self-perpetuating series of interlocking myths, which will lead to our downfall.
One of the points made by the students of failed societies, like Joseph Tainter, is that they become overly wedded to one worldview – and the world changes. The handful of people who are truly present and responsible at the Creation of the next social order SEE that the Old Order can not hold.
Take Vladimir Putin, who, to my thinking, is the foremost statesman on the planet right now. He, and those who ally with him, saw that the JEWISH structures of the Soviet Union were a series of parasitic social overlays that focused on stripping the Russian society of their living heritage, and the natural resources of an Empire away from the people who serve, to the peole who rule. Thus, as the inevitable collapse became imminent, the Oligarchs – six JEWS and a shabbas goy front man – literally stole the immense natural and intellectual wealth of the Soviet Union for less than a penny on the dollar.
Putin, and his associates, saw this as the ideal moment to ignite the Russian spirit, and speak to the Russian soul; his identification with LIVING “Christian” forms of worship “is not by accident,” and, still facing what the Mind sees as tremendous obstacles, SEES, with the Spirit, what is possible for the Russian people – IF they can successfully cross a tremendous Abyss.
To their credit, they, raised in a society controlled by Wordists, looked PAST the Words to the spiritual dynamic forces that gave them life. They then threw off the intellectual bondage of archaic models of Reality (that the Wordists have mastered), and chose to create a new, more honest social order, pretty much from the ground up.
What we worship as “economic theory” seems to be really little more than intermediate price theory writ large, with the Wordist Inversion that the matters of Substance – the spiritual foundation of the lives of the people – have become subordinate to the matters of Form – market clearing prices, at any cost, in service to corporate forms.
The Islamist model works extremely well, because it is inherently organic; its value as an economic tool is that is is a TOOL – a Means to an End – and that End is subordinate to the health, organic social ordering of society.
Simply stated, the Islamic model resembles our Cooperatives to a degree, with one big exception; rather than having the dead mechanistic hand of interest as the sole determinant of risk, and thus, value, their social order replaces it with a series of organizations that are the constructive equivalent of partnership system. This requires all parties to the arrangement approach it with a much stronger awareness of the risks and rewards inherent in the enterprise, but, unlike what our system has become, all of the skills of all of the parties are joined in a common purpose, and no one gains MECHANISTICALLY at the expense of another.
It is our duty, as the CREATIVE RACE, to not be bound by the dead hand of archaic tradition, and to remember the Great Insight of Peter Shank concerning our RACIAL Enemies:
The JEWS took over this country without firing a shot; they did it by controlling the pictures you see, and the words you hear; from that, the Institutions that control the social ordering of Society were easy prey.
Following Shank’s lead, I have a simple test for the degree to which Wordism has taken over an Institution – I just look at the degree to which the Institution serves the Bureaucracy – the Church serves the Priesthood, for example – and it becomes obvious as to how much the dead hand of archaic Ideals rule the day.
Look at it this way – TO WHAT DEGREE DOES THE INSTITUTION ACTIVELY REWARD POLICIES AND PRACTICES THAT ARE THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF ITS STATED GOALS?
To THAT degree, the dead hand of Wordism softly, silently, triumphs, even as softly, silently, termites triumph over the living tree.
Overcoming THAT is our daily battle, for our families, and our daily duty, on behalf of our RACE – RACE, writ large, as the dynamic living bridge between FAMILY and CULTURE.
Comment by Nobody
Pain
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses, History on 12/30/2006
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
The Romans built in white, shining marble. They painted and gilded highlights and particular architectural features. Art historians have known this for at least a hundred years, and yet art history text books still show buildings colored to match the drab ruins of today.
It once was thought that the buildings were wholly unadorned and that the statues were too. Then someone, probably a German, began rooting around in the hair of a famous Greek kouros. He found in the deep crevasses golden blond pigment. This kouros became known as the Blond Boy. But since we know that Greek society and art was based on an ideal of neat, tidy perfection, it is safe to assume that all or most all their marble statues were colored the same: glowing white skin, bright golden hair.
The Greek preferred bronze, and anyone who has spent some time with Brasso knows you can polish bronze to innumerable hues of gold, yellows, tans, and pinks. Yet Greek bronze statues in art history books are always greenish black, as if the Greeks kept their greatest works of art buried and corroding in wet earth.
Comment by Pain
Brain’s Appointment
Posted by Bob in How Things Work on 12/29/2006
Brian reported to me that this site was down on
Bobs...@yahoogroups.com
which is one reason he set up that group.
Brian, please check and be sure I got the above address right. Is S supposed to be capitalized, etc.?
James Kelso takes care of us by having all the technical details and contacts there at hand, so I would have called him. But I asked Brian to call him for me. Brain did so.
Since I’m the Fuhrer around here, I have appointed Brian to call Kelso as our Reich minister umber was loss get, “Reich Minister for What Goes Wrong.”
We are getting there. We have writers like Dave who can make and expand on my point, and if the thing goes kerblooey, we don’t have to sit and wrong our hands until His Majesty King Robert the Fuehrer has called Kelso. This thing is well on its way to running itself.
SHAZAM! BOOM! History
Atheistic historians are at one with the biblical literalists who say that everything originated in the Middle East. Most Bible literalists seem to think that God will be upset if everything historical, from writing to the opposable thumb, was invented within walking distance of Jerusalem. Atheistic historians, insist that it was more than walking distance. Everything happened to be invented with a couple of hundred miles of where Christian, Jewish and Moslem religionists had been digging for a couple of millennia before.
The probability that everything would have come from exactly where all those diggers had been digging for millennia is a bit remote, but no one thinks of that. The fact that atheistic professors and fundamentalists are a working team is ignored in the dazzle of ways in which modern priests of Political Correctness distance themselves from priests of the earlier faiths.
One of the major ways Political Correctness separated itself from other religious history was by rejecting any SHAZAM! BOOM! theories. So the six day creation was rejected as absurd because it caused a sudden creation of the earth while evolution provided a slow, majestic, respectable movement, bit by bit.
So Atlantis was laughed at because they said it went down in a flood in a day. Historians tortured the information till it screamed and came up with the Minoan earthquakes and the like. This made them intellectuals, while the other religions were just a bunch of superstitious rubes.
We are now finding, more and more, that many things in history DID happen suddenly. The whole civilization of an area bigger than today’s France went under in one day. Soon after that agriculture and other sciences took a Great Leap Forward outside of that drowned valley.
We had all concluded that the dinosaurs were destroyed in one huge cosmic disaster. Now we find that dinosaurs were dying off steadily before that meteor hit. The meteor was the last straw, if that’s the right word for something that size.
But the BASIC rule here is that we must STOP, once and for all, deciding an idea is sophisticated because it happens fast or slow, whether it reflects Acceptable Opinion or not. We must forget all the crap about The Literature and Peer Review and Judicial Opinion. Those are the results of power and propaganda, and they are Truth, the enemy of truth.
A thing is true if it WORKS. One experiment is worth a hundred Expert Opinions.
SHAZAM!
When Gomer Pyle used to say “Shazam!” as his exclamation, even back in the 1960s on the Andy Griffith Show, the older people would smile and youngsters would have no idea why he did that.
You see, in the very early 1950s there was a comic book with a superhero called Captain Marvel in it. When a new comic book company started the new Captain Marvel, and another started one called “Shazam.” They were entirely different.
Captain Marvel actually outsold Superman for a while. I believe those who owned Superman sued and got Captain Marvel stopped as plaguerizing on their earlier superhero.
So when I hear “Shazam!” I think of
Shazam!
Then BOOM!
When the boy who became Captain Marvel wanted to become the adult superhero, he would shout “Shazam! The next frame of the comic book would be a lightening bolt with BOOM! written under it. In the next frame Captain Marvel would replace the boy, whose name I forget.
All this is, of course, vital to information for you. To add for indispensable information, let me add that Shazam meant something like Solomon for Wisdom, Hercules for strength, Achilles for courage, and so forth.
I remember Captain Marvel especially because when I had to fill out forms for security clearance, I had to give EVERY organization I had EVER belonged to, and so I started with The Captain Marvel Club, which came before the Boy Scouts.
Hicks With PhDs
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, History, How Things Work on 12/27/2006
One thing Nobody made clear in his article below was what I mean when I keep repeating, “This is SIMPLE. It is NOT EASY!”
If you go back to basics, you have to change your whole world view, your whole picture of the world.
I meant that LITERALLY. Let me show you some examples:
What gets me is that all the Neanderthal men I see in documentaries are dressed as if they were in the Bahamas in July. But they are being chased over SNOW. What they have on is what I supposed you would call Neanderthal Chic, an animal skin with their arms and most of their chests bare. This is to show they were primitive, of course.
Which brings me to another subject along the same lines. Every time I see a movie about The Real Rome, it looks like it was filmed in a particularly rundown section of Spanish Harlem. All the buildings are gray and worn, every statue is gray stone.
When I walked along in Washington, DC and saw the Capitol and other buildings in The Classic Style, I often laughed to think that an ancient Roman or Greek wouldn’t believe what RUBES those guys were who built them!
You see, what the rubes saw around them in Rome and Greece a couple of centuries ago were the bare ruins of classical buildings. They were, indeed, gray stone. So when they built “classical buildings, they used grey stone. By the same token, when they found ancient sculpture, it was plain gray stone, so Michelangelo and all the rest made what they thought were classical sculptures that were gray stone.
In ancient Rome or ancient Greece, if an architect had produced a plain gray stone public building he would have been committed to a madhouse. If a sculpture had carved a plain GRAY stone statue he would have put in the same asylum. But when you watch what claims to be EDUCATIONAL television shows on BBC like “I, Claudius,” the Emperor is in his garden surrounded by gray stone sculptures.
There is a reason for this. Just as Neanderthal Chic tells us the guy is primitive, gray stone tells us the statue or building is Classical Like-It-Was buildings or statues. The real statues back then looked almost exactly like a wax museum today. Can you imagine trying to stage a Like-It-Was version of dramatic scenes from Classical time with a bunch of what looked like brightly-colored wax statues all around?
Can you imagine a play which shows the Like-It-Was Roman soldiers coming up to a brightly-colored building, through a street full of brightly-colored buildings? Can you imagine showing a Neanderthal man dressed in a complete suit of clothes that would keep him warm?
It wouldn’t look REAL.
This, as Nobody points out, is the story of almost everything today. The BASE is wrong. We assumed so long that the worn-out, gray buildings we see were the REAL Rome that we cannot, even on educational television, be presented with the real thing. It was a long, long time after statues that had been worn to the gray base stone were first time to the nineteenth century when traces of color were found — or NOTICED — on a few of them.
We got the BASE wrong. So we began as hicks and we will STAY hicks until we look at the BASE. And nobody gets paid to look at the base. People get paid to “keep abreast of The Literature.” Dr. Strawmeyer’s last article talked about the shape of the nose on that gray stone statue, so if you want to be published, you have to make a slightly novel observation about the nostrils.
In every area, that is what our present society does.
Nobody CARES about the Democratic victory in the House in 2006. No one cares who the next president will be except those who make a living on talking about it. The BASE is wrong. And no one will look at the BASE.
No one but us.
Nobody Hits a Homer!
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 12/27/2006
Like any real teacher, I go absolutely delerious when a student states what I have to say better than I can.
IT HAPPENED!
“Nobody” says:
A somber observation.
Bob is talking about something that takes a LOT of work; it is, literally, a new model of perception that begins with the obvious – most of what we were “taught” is WRONG, and, to a remarkable degree, the exact opposite of “The Truth” – and moves to “The Truth” – all truly great human endeavors are based on RACE, writ large, as the living bridge between Family and Culture. At least, that’s what I think his big take-home message is.
This requires a shift in mental conception on a par with forming a new religion, a new social order, the list just goes on; it is fundamentally foundational stuff, and most people simply cower in impotent helplessness as the shift in conceptualization required to form an entirely new mindset.
I must give Whitaker full marks; all true Cultures have at their fouhding some spiritual conception that is very different from what came before, and from that comes a new religion, and from that comes a new social ordering on all levels, in the realms of Culture, Politics, and Economy.
He has hit on our biggest stumbling block – JUDEOChristiantity as a tool for JEWISH RACIAL CONTROL over what Christianity would become in practice.
This presents, in turn, our greatest opportunity – the Reformation of Christianity (remember what happened the last time THAT took place!) and, from that, a new social order, built daily, one minute at a time.
Ironically, so many models have been refined by our RACIAL Adversaries, the demonic JEWS, that we need merely adopt and adapt the best of them – what works – and Reform i, into what will work better, for US – “US” being defined RACIALLY, in terms of our Posterity.
Note the tremendous efforts put forward to remove the RACIAL component from Christianity; deliberately turning it into a universal faith. while remaking that faith over into what is most convenient for the Damn JEWS to control, at all points.
I suspect the simplest way to develop this mindset is to frame all questions in the Light of ONE QUESTION – Will this make the world a better place for my posterity, in general, and my grandchildren, in particular?
You will recognize this, of course, as our version of the One JEWISH Commandment – “Is it good for JEWS?”
That ONE Commandment came from their conception that God’s Covenant with the JEWS was a Covenant that was not made to any single JEW; rather, it was a RACIAL Covenant, and ONLY applies to the members of the RACE, acting RACIALLY.
Fortunately, their acting RACIALLY simply means parasitic behavior, and not Creative behavior.
By simply organizing our conceptions to go around them, and thus, neutralize them, as the model of NSDAP Germany proves (”NO!” to payment of reparations) frees up an enormous amount of energy to be put into more productive endeavors.
A useful conception might start with JUDAISM – which is our REAL Enemy, and the JEWS are merely nodes through which the process of Judaism operates – as being THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF CHRISTIANITY.*** You missed my putting quotes around present “Christianity. Saving our race is the Golden Rule).
Go from there.
Bob is talking about something that takes a LOT of work; it is, literally, a new model of perception that begins with the obvious – most of what we were “taught” is WRONG, and, to a remarkable degree, the exact opposite of “The Truth” – and moves to “The Truth” – all truly great human endeavors are based on RACE, writ large, as the living bridge between Family and Culture. At least, that’s what I think his big take-home message is.
This requires a shift in mental conception on a par with forming a new religion, a new social order, the list just goes on; it is fundamentally foundational stuff, and most people simply cower in impotent helplessness as the shift in conceptualization required to form an entirely new mindset.
I must give Whitaker full marks; all true Cultures have at their fouhding some spiritual conception that is very different from what came before, and from that comes a new religion, and from that comes a new social ordering on all levels, in the realms of Culture, Politics, and Economy.
He has hit on our biggest stumbling block – JUDEOChristiantity as a tool for JEWISH RACIAL CONTROL over what Christianity would become in practice.
This presents, in turn, our greatest opportunity – the Reformation of Christianity (remember what happened the last time THAT took place!) and, from that, a new social order, built daily, one minute at a time.
Ironically, so many models have been refined by our RACIAL Adversaries, the demonic JEWS, that we need merely adopt and adapt the best of them – what works – and Reform i, into what will work better, for US – “US” being defined RACIALLY, in terms of our Posterity.
Note the tremendous efforts put forward to remove the RACIAL component from Christianity; deliberately turning it into a universal faith. while remaking that faith over into what is most convenient for the Damn JEWS to control, at all points.
I suspect the simplest way to develop this mindset is to frame all questions in the Light of ONE QUESTION – Will this make the world a better place for my posterity, in general, and my grandchildren, in particular?
You will recognize this, of course, as our version of the One JEWISH Commandment – “Is it good for JEWS?”
That ONE Commandment came from their conception that God’s Covenant with the JEWS was a Covenant that was not made to any single JEW; rather, it was a RACIAL Covenant, and ONLY applies to the members of the RACE, acting RACIALLY.
Fortunately, their acting RACIALLY simply means parasitic behavior, and not Creative behavior.
By simply organizing our conceptions to go around them, and thus, neutralize them, as the model of NSDAP Germany proves (”NO!” to payment of reparations) frees up an enormous amount of energy to be put into more productive endeavors.
A useful conception might start with JUDAISM – the JEWS are merely nodes through which the process of Judaism operates – as being THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF WHAT IS NOW CALLED “CHRISTIANITY.”
Go from there.
If You Think I’m Hard on YOU …
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 12/26/2006
I was very frank about what I really think in the last piece, which may strike you as being rough. If you think that, look at a piece I just put in the Sustaining members section on Stormfront:
— Running Home to Mommy
Every time Kelso announces a new membership level, somebody groans about how so many of registered members have dropped out.
But it seems that about twice a week when I go to the Sustaining Members section, I see another lead thread that says, “Somebody was mean to me, so I’m taking my marbles and I’m going home!”
People who sign up for SF are not go-along-get-along types. In my decades in the movement, I have seen more people get upset at trifles and march out than I have seen people who were still with us two years later.
The wonder is that we have all these people, whose very qualification for being here is that they don’t go along with massively enforced popular opinion, still with us. Until Sustaining Members stop running home to Mommy, I don’t have much use for the “Where do they go?” stuff.
Mark, the Alamo, Thermopylae, and Me
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 12/26/2006
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Bob, this is all good and well and Peter’s sharpshooter-like remarks are on target and Painfully insightful and jammed pack with forethought and good honest white intent as usual; but who the hell has been posting the Mantra lately? Anyone? Or have we given up the assault and taken to the trenches with cards and brandy and dreams of scantily clad women? I mean, just who the hell is manning the fort anyway?
Comment by Mark
ME:
Mark, you and I are fighting the more usual version of the Alamo and Thermopylae and Valley Forge. It was easy to be in World War II when everybody was being called, but how did the few at the Alamo manage to hold out to the death when they knew that their fellow Texans were not helping them because THEY “had lives.”
These are the times that try men’s souls. Every week I read one or two SF Sustaining Member posts that say, “I am a brave warrior, but somebody was mean to me so I’m taking my marbles and going home.” So if anybody wants to be offended, let me give them the chance.
One of the few posts I have rejected was old guy complaining about being asked to account for his blog entries. It went on about how tough a life he had led. He could have posted the Mantra twenty times with less effort.
I am sure that Shari and Elizabeth and others routinely drop money into the collection plate at their respective churches which is a tiny percentage of the amount that church spends fighting capital punishments or demanding race-mixing in diversity programs or backing Israel. But if one asked them to give our cause as much in a year as they drop into the collection plate in a week they would be appalled.
Someone says he is always putting the Mantra in. I doubt it, because if he were he would be getting some feedback that he couldn’t resist repeating here.
I may be wrong about all of this. But I was a professor and I used to tell my students, “Forget the excuses. I not only know them all, I’ve USED them all.”
So what can I do about it? The rational thing for lone warriors to do is to go home. I asked people to double up with you and no one did.
But I am looking for intellectual heirs, and I am finding and making some here. I need to get ideas out. So I concentrate on that. I use what I’ve got and it took me YEARS to get THIS group.
I would prefer that people made our battle at least on of their top ten priorities, but they won’t. This is Bob and Mark’s problem, the one the World War II Generation never had to face, the problem keeping up one’s MORAL courage. During WWII there were draft dodgers but they were universally despised or in prison for opposing the war.
As opposed to this rally-round-the-flag WWII stuff, which is relatively easy, a REAL fight, the fight in which you make history, is the one where you have to be there alone, and keep on fighting as if your people were not just lying there like broken dolls.
That is the way most important fights are REALLY won. It is NEVER the people who want to wait for a torchlight victory parade who win the REAL fights. The Swamp Fox, Francis Marion, was made a brigadier general, but at one point his entire army consisted of eight men getting eaten alive by mosquitoes in the swamp. I am sure their family was telling them, as mine told me, decade after decade, that I was a damned fool to keep doing this.
Going out and fighting for your people when they refuse to fight for themselves, or join the other side, is irrational and shows that one isn’t Truly Shrewd.
The Truly Shrewd person has a life. He never joins in until people like us have made the movement.
But Mark, those of us who do this despite everything are the ONLY people who make history. We are the ONLY people who have power.
Those who learn here will eventually teach. One has to settle for what one has, and this is the best I have ever been part of. Keep hitting them, Sarge, some may actually DO something sooner rather than later.
But they should not think they are fooling me, and you should not think I don’t know what I’m doing.
Following the POINT
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 12/25/2006
What led to the Al Parker episode was an observation I made which is very important. But in the excitement of discovering that Al Parker wanted us to assimilate with NICE nonwhites, so the important point I made was forgotten. That is what happens all the time.
By all means, let me know how what I said connects to the latest news, but GO BACK and see if what BOB observed might be worth consideration on its own later. I got paid to know the latest news, but I also noticed the underlying consistencies no one else noticed. I notice when one piece of Political Correctness directly contradicted another. Others kept each piece of information carefully and safely in its own context.
The very important observation I mentioned was, as usual, bringing together two points others would not consider TOGETHER: the astounding number of psychopaths in our society and the Politically Correct view of skin color. I pointed out that two percent of the people who look just like us are psychopaths, and we don’t know it until too late. Ted Bundy was the very epitome of the friendly, outgoing young man of high intelligence. His best friends were lawyers, who dealt with psychopaths in court all the time.
Now here is the point. If you cannot tell that a person who has his entire evolutionary history in common with you, how do you then turn right around and insist, “No matter what the color of the skin, all humans think and feel alike.”
The world is not that convenient.
Now damn it, THINK about that!
CL
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 12/24/2006
This got me thinking about the book _Black Sea Sketches_ I got from “Chronicles” a few years back. The author, William Mills, mentions in passing that the bottom of the Black Sea is still fresh water (I’m going from memory). The first I’d ever heard of this was in some of Zecharia Sitchin’s stuff. He mentioned it as proof of the validity of “great floods,” particularly THE GREAT FLOOD. I didn’t make much of it at the time, but immediately took notice when Mills made the same comment in a “respectable” publication. (I suppose there are different levels of respectability, eh?) Anyway, Sitchin also makes a big deal in his cosmology about Mount Ararat. I actually couldn’t find it on the map until I read him–not that I’d been looking. I forget which one, but the view of Ararat from one of the Caucasus capitols is one of the most beautiful scenes on Earth. The picture is on the net somewhere. I wish I had a page reference from Mills’excellent book, but alas it has no index.
A Black Sea home is consistent with a lot of things, including the well known arrival of European peoples from the nebulous “Central Asia.” It also squares with the “Chinese” mummy discoveries. It never made sense to me that we would all and only have gone west.
Comment by CL — 12/20/2006 @ 10:32 pm | Edit This
To continue this stream of consciousness, let me also observe that when the Central Asia exodus is mentioned (which isn’t often), along with a complete lack of specific starting point (and thus complete lack of archeology, which is inexplicable) is a complete lack of reason. What passes as “explanation” is that we were run-out by some nasty pre-historic Ghengis Khan types. This is nonsense not just in retrospect, but in light of the logistics necessary to carry out such a move.
The Black Sea would fit all of this to a T.
Comment by CL — 12/20/2006 @ 10:45 pm | Edit This
Re Black Sea freshwater–
It’s the salt water at the bottom with some freshwater at the top (density, duh). I now think Mills was saying that there are freshwater fossils aplenty there–and that’s what was news to me.
Comment by CL
ME:
This is the kind of thinking that makes me happy. What I said reminded CL of some BASICS that had not geled in his mind.
I have a special problem here. If I were a Wordist trying to leave my WORDS to you, this would be easy. I would just quote Chapter 5, Verse 2 of Whitakerism. But hwat I really want is exactly what your entiure education has been dedicated to making you reject as a reflex action.
COMPLETE that line of thinking that you didn’t complete. Tie together things that do not tie together.
It was called THINKING FOR YOURSELF, and I am honestly terrified that it will die out with me.
And that last sentence made me tie two things together that others would not think of. We have been speaking of ourselves as a wolf pack. When my time as lead wolf is over, I want to be sure this pack is ready to he sicced on the “intellectuals.”
I want all the mental predation back in you that they leached out. You will be looking for the truth, the whole truth, and NOTHING BUT the truth. You will smell the stink in Truth. When you hunt the truth you hunt down our enemies.
Shari
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 12/24/2006
Not Spam
Not Spam
This is absolutely fascinating. For one thing, no I’ve never come across it before. Things that I have been mulling over are these. St. Paul, we are told, was planning on going to Asia, but in a dream, a man from Macedonia appeared to him saying come over here and help us, so he went west. Acts something. I think there are reasons why history has gone the direction it has and it was Europe that became Christendom. And the Jews have always been trying to find a way there but stay apart.
Comment by Shari
ME:
Yes, I remember a short statement that the disciples were not to go to the East, but I read it when I did not know what “The East” meant to every literate person in that age and to no theologian today. You reminded me of it.
Paul was specifically forbidden to go where his own thinking came from!
And this, Paul B. should explain why I study THE GENERAL OUTLINES of religious thinking so closely. The theologians are lost in the forest, and the other people study tree bark and lichen. They discover a piece of lichen and build a church on it.
But if you step back and look at the general outline, you will see that St. Paul was considered a blessing by the Apostles, especially by Peter, when he first appeared, and for a reason that is straight out of AD 2007. Peter had heard the words of Christ, but here was a SCHOLAR, a Roman Citizen, who would attest to the truth.
And with Paul the intellectual came the disease that comes with scholars. Jesus had even cut the Ten Commandments down to two, but Paul imposed what whole intellectual Wordism of his day in the name of Christ. From absolutely NOWHERE he brought in the ideal of sterility from the dying and degenerate Zoroastrian faith. He took the infant Christ and turned him into a bitter old man.
Which, as I say, is news straight out of 2007 AD. Academia is carrying the poisons of Wordism to each new generation. If Christ had wanted book-fed, sophisticated Pauls to teach Intellectual Truth, he would not have said, “For thou art PETER, and upon THIS rock I will build my church.” Jesus’ Palestine was crowded with Scribes and Pharisees and every other version of Paul you could imagine.
Jesus hand-picked his disciples, carefully chosen men not one of whom was a scholar. He told them “I can make you fishers of men.” He said over and over and over and over and over to them the same words Doctor Bob, co-founder of Alcoholics Anonymous, said on his deathbed to Bill W: “Keep it SIMPLE.”
Jesus said again and again and again, “Keep it SIMPLE.” Be good. Love God. Be as good to your neighbor as you would be to yourself, which meant you should treat yourself well. As Pain points out, nobody can apply this today, least of all the churches.
A century after the death of Christ, men were out in the desert starving and thirsting and whipping themselves in his name. It never occurred to them that, if that was right and Jesus’ teachings were right, then they should be out torturing others.
According to a combination of St. Paul and the Golden Rule, the greatest “Christians” in history were Ghenghis Khan and Mao-Tse Tung, with Pol Pot getting big honors for how much he did with less.
But who is going to COMBINE the self-torture that began with St. Paul’s intellectual disease caught from degenerate Zoroastrianism with the Golden Rule? Where would you PUBLISH it?
OF COURSE you haven’t heard it before, Shari. Do you think I find this stuff in books?
Now some crotcheting from a crotchety old man to the rest of you: Don’t sit around grousing about whether or not you are a Christian. I don’t CARE. I am not a priest of any religion, least of all Ayn Rand’s militantly atheistic Objectivism.
That kind of stuff is a big deal with priests and followers of Ayn Rand, but I am not trying to give you a Wordism, I am trying to get your nose to the intellectual grindstone.
Don’t bitch at me about bringing up old ideas you aren’t interested in because you are enlightened. I don’t mind those comments, but they mean your mind is in a RUT.
My kind of thinking will die with me unless you folks get to BASICS.
KEEP IT SIMPLE.
Lesson One
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 12/24/2006
What I have to teach is my way of thinking. It is not Whitakerism, it is not the Final Truth. What it is is a highly educated man with tons of experience who has developed a way of thinking that is distinct and works in certain ways. That is the first lesson in thinking I have to teach here:
We are not Orientals with a Master who teaches Immutable Truth. I am a white man who hopes you mutate the hell out of what I say. The Oriental Master wants to be eternally right. A white teacher wants to teach you what he’s got. But if it stops that, the Honorable Tse-Wang is delighted, but I will have failed completely.
Let me give you an example. Copernicus was as wrong as the Old Testament cosmography he contracted. Whereas the Church declared that the Old Testament said the earth was the immovable center of the universe, and all else revolved around it, Copernicus was just as insistence that the SUN was the immovable center of the universe. So the battle between the Church and Copernican cosmology was a battle between two absurdities.
But Copernicus led to the end of the Old Testament nonsense. And since Copernicus based his ideas on entirely on the idea that he was reporting observable facts, he opened the door to Newton and the Hubble Telescope. Copernicus would have been delighted, just disappointed that he didn’t live to see more of the truth revealed.
So what I have to offer to you is something much more precious than some Indian Guru or some Master of Wisdom in the Orient. It is a building block, and you are expected to keep moving.
This is a MUCH harder lesson to learn than simply quoting some Book of the Bible or some form of Wordism.
This leaves ALL the burden on YOU. Most people prefer just to “get it right,” to learn to repeat words that will protect them from thinking on their own. It’s SCARY to think on your own. You don’t have some priest to go to and reassure you you are right.
And that is why people seek out Doctor so and so or Father so and so or some line in the Old Testament. There is no way for you to know whether you are building on sand or on rock. That is an aloneness we have all been taught to avoid.
But that is also the aloneness that Lawrence Brown described as “the burden and the glory of Western Man.”
That’s lesson one.
Peter aka Pain
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 12/24/2006
1. NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
So Bob,
Have you noticed an increase in wordism among the people? or a rise in loyalty to institutions instead of what the institutions are supposed to do? or a loyalty to institutions as a distraction from the one issue of the age: race?
I some of my relatives claim loyalty to Jesus while turning a blind eye to the genocide our race faces — as if Jesus would approve of genocide. These people would say following Christ leads them to believe that thieves should be behind bars. But the far bigger problem of race has them running away in fear.
I think this means that their faith is weak. They think that there is nothing good they can do, so they do nothing good. They forget that Jesus came into our history to make things right, now. They know that Jesus commanded them to do good and to resist evil, but they somehow think this does not apply to the big issues.
But the big issue — race — is far more important than stopping thieves.
Comment by Pain —
ME:
“These people would say following Christ leads them to believe that thieves should be behind bars. But the far bigger problem of race has them running away in fear.”
Peter, you hit your second homer, and this is critical to me. You are reflecting the WAY OF THINKING that I have to give you. This is such a basic way of looking at things:
“But the far bigger problem of race has them running away in fear.”
That no one would see it in a hundred years. We end up arguing with anti-white religionists, but we always recognize them as representing religion because on the lesser issues they are obsessive and they wear those collars.
But, as C.S. Lewis said in “Screwtape Proposes a Toast” the best way to take a soul to Hell is a way with no turnings, no big decisions. The road to Heaven, to quote another source, is strait and narrow. The road to Hell down which these religionists are marching is wide and easy. Those 1940s bishops who started pushing interracial marriage knew very well what they were doing to future generations. But since they were preaching all the other good stuff, and they couldn’t be bishops unless they went along with it, they had no decision to make. The other people wearing miters were in the lead, so the road must lead where they should go.
So when Peter points out “Christians” cannot apply one of the grand total of two commandments Jesus gave them to the most important issue, they are NOT sincere Christians. They just believe, and I am NOT joking here, they just believe that God won’t NOTICE.
This is the WAY OF THINKING I am desperately trying to inculcate here. I am ridiculously delighted when someone states it this way and avoids the comments on today’s headlines.
Shari
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 12/22/2006
Not Spam
Not Spam
Somehow the idea of choosing your children sounds so cold, although I’m not sure that’s what you mean. I have an idea that more white women will choose to take time to breastfeed because they WANT to rather than rush to a very important job. But not like the ninnies who try to make some political statement that they ought to act like the third world.
Comment by Shari —
ME:
The future always sounds cold. The idea of our sitting here talking to people we have met out of intellectual interest instead of lifelong town acquaintance or family ties would sound very odd to our forebears. The idea of having an instrument in your house on which anybody could ring a bell at you and demand your attention at any time was considered a major intrusion for a long time.
In the future, the idea of a couple of people having kids because they didn’t take precautions and having the boys half-castrated in our time will give us the kind of look bear-baiting gives the Middle Ages. The concept of two people determining their future children, not for the children, but because they are “in love” with each other will look childish crap it is. In other words, the future will begin to look at SOMETHING, at least ONE OR TWO things, from the future CHILDREN’S point of view.
Life is not just nurture. The children’s point of view also includes GENETICS. That is what the Traditional Values clowns absolutely refuse to discuss. At least a bigotted father gives some considertion tot he fact that his grandchildren could be ugly, unnatrural looking mulattoes. No Traditional Values type could care less about that. All that matter is that the coupel thinks it’s In Love and get a church ceremony.
Cold? There is nothing more deep freeze than what passes for a heart in Traditional Vlaues advocate. They love their rules and they couldn’t care less about humans. Anyone who gives a moment’s thought to the Golden Rules is labelled a Humanists because these Traditional Values types are too stupid to tell the difference between Wordist humanists who care as little about people as they do and people like me.
Right now the entire choice of children depends on how two people get along together, what kinds of “feelings”
they have for each other. That is all that matters. The children get no consideration at all except as a by-blow of a romance. And this is true even if the romance has a man in a dress waving his hands over the couple.
“Warm” and “cool” relations today have this thing that if a guy wears a dress and waves h is hands, it’s all good, and the “marriage” can be a sterile one, sterility agreed on by both parties.
One good that may come from all this gay marriage business is that we FINALLY begin to realize that one rigid, single kind of marriage will not do in a society if it plans to produce another generation.
I saw a pretty white girl and just one more black guy holding hands the other day and I was thinking that all that mattered to anybody but the children would be the guy that put on the dress and waved his arms. The children and their children and THEIR children and THEIR children must live with BEING the results that make no difference at all to somebody whose only concern is Traditional Values.
In earlier times a man had every right to beat his OWN wife at will. In our time, everybody has the right to have a relationship and, yawn, drop some kids if they feel like it.
Shari, if you saw today’s wonderful Traditional Values world as I do, “cold” would be a mild word for it.
Al Parker’s Graceful Exit
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 12/20/2006
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
I think I’m going to take a break from the “movement” for a while. I apologize for not thinking well enough before posting on this blog – especially since you caught me saying, “all is lost” when other folks are trying to do some work.
Comment by Al Parker
ME:
You gave a good warning here about the sloppy thinking on reace that is so common, and you didn’t blow your top when I called you on it, big-time.
If you think about it and come to the conclusion that race is not negotiable, come on back.
Peter Pain Hits the Big Leagues!
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses, History on 12/20/2006
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Don’t forget that before the Black Sea flood, two thirds of the current sea’s surface area was a fresh water lake. Maybe we were amphibious.
Comment by Pain
ME:
I never heard of that most of the ocean was ever fresh water. If that’s true, that’s very important to me.
But your saying we were amphibious is VERY important.
There seems little doubt that we were water beings at one point. Human babies born in water hold their breath and swim to the top. The interesting thing is that THOSE babies don’t cry when they are born. It is a beautiful way to give birth, and a small number of women choose it. But circumcision shows us that vanishingly few people care about any agony they inflict on infants, so, despite the success of this method and the happiness of hte newborn, it will always be a tiny minority.
Dr. Leakey’s wife, after his death, kept talking about the semiamphibious phase of human evolution, but anthropologists almost literally shouted her down. They said it wasn’t worth going into because it couldn’t be tested. They never say that about racial equality theories.
But that semiamphibious phase is dhown by the fact that we not only lost our hair, but the tiny hairs we do have (We have as many hairs as an ape, but they are tiny) are pointed in the directions most convenient for swimming. That probably happened when the hairs were still large and were a real hindrance in the water.
As you know, dolphines developed their big brains in water, and it is very likely we did, too. I forget the long list of traits that prove it, but there is no doubt we were a water being for a long time.
Now THIS is what I mean by BASIC thinking. Peter took what I said about traveling on the coasts and expanded it into an area I knew about but did not connect up. This is the sort of basic deductions that MUST live on after I die.
Parker Again
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, How Things Work on 12/19/2006
“NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Well, I guess what I was asking was, what do we do since we have already experienced partial genocide? Will whites be committed to ungenociding themselves? And that question can’t be answered here and now.
Comment by Al Parker
ME:
So if one of your squad gets killed, the whole group should commit suicide?
But the reason I quote this is because it is theme of a number of people.
Actually the land that Romans called Africa, at the southern of the Empire, was whiter than Italy is today. “Nubians” were captured on raids OUTSIDE the Empire. There are some very few people, like Syrians, who are unquestionably white down there, but almost everywhere there they now are definitely colored.
But after that happened there were ten times as many white people on earth as there were before. If you were to use that logic, the world in 1900 would have seen the demise of whites as natural. In 1900, Indians were referred to as The Vanishing American, blacks’ death rate had doubled since the end of slavery and their population was diminishing as a percentage of America.
The future in 1900 looked white.
By 2000 the opposite became the case. Demography is a branch of economics, and no economist takes any long-term demographic prediction seriously. It has been barely thirty years since the movie Soylent Green was made, and there were roughly a hundred other books like it. All the demographic literature of the time said that Americans were multiplying so fast the day would come soon when they were LITERALLY cheek-to-cheek.
The only long-term demographic prediction I know of that was right was made by Adam Smith in The Wealth of Nations. He said America would outnumber England soon. But Smith did not even MENTION immigration. He pointed out that the NATURAL increase in our population doubled it every twenty-five or thirty years. It never even occurred to him that America was a Nation of Immigrants, or ever would be.
We talk about the “replacement rate.” But, as a Dean at a Medical College just said when I brought up the question, it is unlikely that anybody born today will die before he is ready to. No matter how hard “pro-life” fights it, the human body will soon be modular, including the brain.
Also, the present system of pregnancy will soon be as optional as breast-feeding. People will CHOOSE their children. So to save our race we may just need to convince a lot of people that the end of our race is evil. I remember when the unofficial motto of our entire society was, “The white race is the cancer of history.” As we are ACTUALLY overwhelmed, that kind of saying is less popular every day.
But the bottom line, the ONLY bottom line, is that people who think they are Wise and Practical as prophets of doom are just plain silly. You don’t have the vaguest idea what the world will look like fifty years from now.
Reality COUNTS. CONCEPTS COUNT.
Silly-ass groans make me tired.
If you are hit in battle and you spend all your time bemoaning the guy who got killed, you can lose the whole squad.
That is no way to fight a war. A sergeant who does THAT should be put on disability as soon as possible.
-
You are currently browsing the archives for December, 2006
Bob’s Books
Bob's first book - 1976 
A PLAGUE ON BOTH YOUR HOUSES
Bob's second book - 1982 
THE NEW RIGHT PAPERS
Bob's deadliest book - 2004 
Why Johnny Can't Think
America's
Professor-Priesthood
How to Go With It
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 12/30/2006
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
I notified Brian who notified you Bob, just to get the story straight. I am glad it’s back up
this had me concerned since AOL already blocks storm front.
Comment by ALAN B.
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BobsUnderGroundSeminar
That’s is the correct site and nothing needs to be capitalized.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BobsUnderGroundSeminar
I put the capitals in to retain the “BUGS” acronym while cutting graduate to shorten the address (later explanation for a mistake). I can correct it if desired, a feature of yahoo allows me to change the address of the group.
Thank you for the appointment! The last member of my family to be appointed anything was my great grandmothers cousin, he was placed in command of the Reich Air Ministry’s development wing.
JOIN THE BACK UP SITE: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BobsUnderGroundSeminar
-Brian
Comment by Brian — 12/29/2006 @ 8:43 pm | Edit This
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Bob if you or Brian are unavailable who else can we contact, I just assumed you were aware that the blog was down. I am glad I contacted Brian sinse he did a great taking over for Bob and calling kelso. I must admit I am a little jealous, oh well Brian is a better solider thatn I am so he does deserve a special place up in the ranks.
Comment by ALAN B.
ME:
ALAN B., you always hear “If I had but known how such a little thing would make history.” But you seem to realize that the way of thinking I am presenting here is GOING to make history. So Alan B. says up front that he is jealous because my face shined upon Brian.
I will have to go a long, long way to beat THAT for a compliment!
But the BASIC point Alan B. brings up here is, as usual, paramount.
I used to work with Bob Hoy on populist projects, along with my wife, who later figured me out and divorced me. When Hoy was trying to deal with a group and not tick them off, he would say, “Well. I’m with you on this, but Whitaker may not be. I’ll have to check it out with him.”
In the many cases where Hoy HAD to agree with the group he was in contact with, Whitaker would be the villain who said NO.
In the many cases where I had to agree with the group I was in contact with, it was this Big Guy Hoy who said NO. The point is that the battle, not our egos, is the ONLY focus. If WOL breaks down call Kelso at 561-351-4424.
Unfortunately what you are jealous of will not be affected. I cannot make you Brian’sd replacement. Brian likes his new Ministry, and the latest news reports show he has surrounded it with storm trooperwho have special training in Shooting Alan B And All His Minions.
5 Comments