Archive for December 8th, 2006

LibAnon, There is no Whitakerism

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Your answer is that Jews can indeed be white, but they can’t be trusted. That’s a good answer, but I phrased my question in the wrong way.
What I’m getting at is this: how do we institutionalize genetic morality, and can this be done simply on the basis of skin color? We’ve already agreed that it can’t. Not only must the whites be separated from the browns, but the loyal must be separated from the traitors. Then we get into the classic problems of institution-building, familiar to anybody who has ever run a business, a platoon, a religion, or a political party: credos, mission statements, founding myths, mascots, demonologies, patron saints, heresies, and (most of all) a set of terms upon whose definitions all agree, starting with “us” and “them”.
I’m bringing up the institutional question because I suspect that it’s either a weak point in your thinking or in mine. You seem to be an enemy of all institutional trappings (clear thinkers usually are), but I believe they’re indispensable, especially to a race like ours in which the instinct of self-preservation is, as you point out, weak or absent.

Comment by LibAnon

ME:

The fundamental difference in our thinking is that my basic premise is a very, very unusual one. I believe that institutions are like work tools, that is, they are a product of the people, designed for particular uses at particular times. You see institutions as one of the determinants of the future of humanity.

The future of humanity is entirely a matter of genetics and race. It doesn’t matter if a white society is libertarian or Nazi, because that will pass. For humanity’s future all that matters is what COLOR they are.

Institutions bother me not in the least unless they affect race. Worrying about institutios is like building my world on a partciular method of agriculture. There is no doubt we will have to have food and there is no doubt we will have to have institutions, but I do not address methods of raising food here.

WHITE people will eat well. Dark people will starve. That’s all I need to know.

I am not going to write down here what tools carpenters need to develop in building houses or what institutions each country needs to deal with its particular problems. I AM going to say that if they are WHITE, they will develop the tools and institutions that will keep humanity from turning into a miserable, stagnant brown anthill.

Institutions are a dime a billion. But the instant a person starts to build his thinking on institutions, his attention deviates from race. My aim is to destroy all traitors within our race and to preserve our race. Now comes the critical word:

PERIOD.

Any tool, be it a saw, a gun, or an institution, that keeps us white is good. Any tool, be it a saw, a gun, or an institution, that makes us nonwhite is bad.

We have our race to save. Screw homemaking tips.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

4 Comments

LibAnon

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
“History is repeating itself. I have been this way before.”
I believe that this recurring “plague on both your houses” pattern in your career, and the consequent isolation, results logically from your definition of race. If I recall correctly, you define “white race” as “white skin”. Although that definition is admirably non-Wordist, the logical consequence is that you must consider most Jews, at least most of those who reside in the United States, to be white. That, I think, is the real issue: not whether Jews are angels or devils, but whether they’re white. And to that question there really ARE only two viable answers: yes or no. If your own answer is “no”, and I believe that it is, then your definition of “white race” needs more work.

Comment by LibAnon

ME:

I can’t believe you can’t figure that out for yourself!

White Jews are enemies because they are TRAITORS to my race. I don’t care if you demand the end of my race in the name of Jesus, as most people today do, or in the name of Moses.

As you damned well know, Dante’s Inferno said that the worst part of Hell was SOLID ICE. It was the Tenth Circle, the worst of all. But what few people notice is that that part of Hell was RESERVED for only one class of people: Traitors. Dante had an old European mind. Many a time Norsemen would die around the body of their leader rather than surrender. Loyalty was the highest virtue of our blood.

Treason is the worst crime to our blood.

That is why it can honestly be said that anti-Semites can HATE Jews, whereas the idea that the average segregationist HATES blacks is utterly puzzling to him. They don’t HATE smallpox viruses or mad dogs or “dumb niggers.”

I find a Jew who LOOKS like a Jew harder to hate than an anti-white Jew who looks more like ME. An obvious alien is different, by definition, and that is my natural way of thinking. The more alien he is the less a traitor he is.

A white traitor is a disease. He is a disease if he betrays us in the name Islam or Christ or Political Correctness or Judaism or Vegetarianism. The disease was located largely in New England and among the Jews, but it has metasticized, it was cancer of one part of the body but it has spread to others.

Tell me, which do you like better, an original cancer or one that metasticized? I have no preference at all.

In practice, the fact that a person is a Jew means I do not TRUST him not to be my race’s enemy.

EVER.

But at Joe Sobran’s house I met one of his closest allies who was anti-Semitic is a thoroughly religious Catholic way. I distrust that type in the same way, thought not as much, as I do Jews. It turned out that he was anti-Jew and anti-white.

He was white.

That does not change the definition of the word “white.”

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

6 Comments

What Jews DIDN’T Do

The British Governor of India ended the practice of burning Hindu wives alive when their husbands were being cremated. Even back then protests sounded Politically Correct. “You are interfering in our customs.”

The Governor replied, “No, I am not interfering in your customs, I am simply practicing ours. In our culture, if a man burns a woman alive we hang him by the neck from a gibbet. So if you build the structures for your custom of burning women, we will simply build our gibbet beside it.”

Apparently the ancient and honored practice was not worth the price and the practice of suttee ceased. By the way, the Brits also did away with the customary thugees who strangled people.

But both suttee and thugee had one thing in common: You killed somebody else, not yourself.

Suicide in old Japan was an apology for a mistake. In post-War Japan a son who had failed the examinations that determined his entire future would often commit as public a suicide as possible, and his family would gain face by it and celebrate it.

I know a lot about Africa, and I have never heard of a suicide cult there.

Then there is Aryan suicide. The Old Norse sayings, the words of wisdom before the arrival of Christianity, contain many, many statements discouraging suicide. One of the reasons Christianity prevailed in the Indo-European world is because it sends the suicide straight tot Hell forever.

Hinduism did much the same thing for white India. Hindus are not dedicated to Nirvana. That is a notion we brought with us. The ideal of the Hindu is oblivion Both the Hindu and the Buddhist speak of The Wheel of Life, but what we are protected from understanding is that the Wheel of Life is not come wonderful philosophical piece of poetry like the Druidic egg. The Wheel of Life is the curse, the Hell, from which Hinduism and Buddhism seek to rescue humanity.

“Christianity” in the West seeks self-destruction in a different way, a non-violent way. But you are just as dead in the end. “Christianity” seeks sterility via chastity. What St. Paul said was “It is better to marry than to burn.” This does not, despite what commenters may say, constitute a rousing twenty-one-gun salute to the institution of marriage.

When a ship fires a twenty-one-gun salute to the Commander in Chief as he comes on board, it does not mean, “Well, we can either be burned alive or we can have you on board, so we have decided to let you get on.”

I was appalled when some of my commenters maintained that St. Paul was just preaching Family Values. His advice was to UNMARRIED women. It stated in the plainest language anyone can muster, 1) It is better for an unmarried woman to remain chaste for life, even as Paul did, BUT, if she MUST have sex, do it within wedlock, “It is better to marry than to burn.”

That is NOT an announcement of Family Values. It reflects the mentality I have seen all my life among liberals and respectable conservatives. I can quote the Mantra, which is their prescription for white suicide as the solution to the race problem, and they, like those commenters, will try to find a way to doublethink their genocide out of existence.

Buddhists are big on chaste monks. They a re seeking to end all human existence, that is their ideal. So was St. Paul. And this is a basic tenet of Political Correctness: do away with your race, humans in general are an evil inflicted on the world.

The Jews did NONE of this. New England was the center of American anti-Semitism at the time when sterility and self-hatred, from New England school marms to those who rooted for the Indians against white people in the West, rook root there on American soil for the first time.

Jesus taught that ones should treat others as one would treat oneself. It does not take a logician, if he is not brainwashed, to figure out that Christ expected on to treat oneself decently. But with St. Paul and later Mani, this ceased to be a doctrine of doing others good and became a monomaniacal, fanatical dedication to giving oneself the most horrible tortures imaginable, compared to which a quick suicide would be the mercy that oblivion is to a Hindu.

And that, in turn, came from the degenerate form of Zoroastrianism. Two thousand years before Islam took Persia, Zoroaster said that there was a force for good and a force for evil. The force for evil was the god of THIS world, and we must fight that evil in the name of the god of the NEXT world, Ahura-Mazda.

It took a long time for Aryans to turn Zoroaster’s championing of the good into a demand for suicide. But by the collapse of Z Persia, Z was thousand years old, and as brainwashed and degenerate as “Modern Christianity” today. It went from Zoroaster’s very specific preservation of the Aryan race, VERY specific, to the last Z shah Islam drove out being a mulatto.

Christianity took less than a century to go from Jesus love to Paul’s self-hatred. The reason for this is basic, obvious, and therefore utterly ignored. There was one great empire that was the equal of Rome and that was in constant contact with Rome. It was the one the Magi came from, Persia.

Millions of words of commentary had transformed Zoroaster’s demand that men fight for goodness into a demand for total self-destruction. If the god of THIS world is evil, said the theologians, then THIS world was evil. So it must END.

That is NOT what Zoroaster said, any more than Christ said it, but in the first century after the birth of Christ every learned man knew that theology. It is no accident that the semiliterate St. Peter was a married man and the scholar Paul was chaste for life. No one then asked why Christ should demand human sterility because everybody then already knew.

No one asks the same question today because we take it for granted that SEX is evil. But that is NOT what St. Paul or the Buddhists or degenerate Zoroastrianism were aiming at. Today sex is the big deal because we had to reinterpret what St. Paul stated baldly and plainly and what Manichaeism has said ever since: that LIFE ITSELF is the enemy, not sex.

So how did Aryans end up with this constant tendency toward self-destruction?

The answer is basic and simple. No animal asks whether life is worth living if it is healthy and not in agony. It simply stays alive.

Orientals do not commit suicide because they question the value of life itself. They do it for dramatic purposes, and as a sacrifice. But they are not great on concepts anyway. They had gunpowder and turned out some fireworks. They had movable type and printed some playing cards with it. They had life and did not question it.

Aryans DO question it. We are UNIQUELY cursed with the ability to make giant leaps in comprehension. Gun powder got us on a road that had us on the moon in half a millennium. The printing press QUICKLY caused the Reformation.

The Spaniards have a saying, “If life were worth living, we would not need so many philosophers.” Hinduism, Buddhism, Zoroastrianism and the bastard “Christianity” Z brought us all seek self-destruction, of yourself and of your race.

To prevent Aryan from committing suicide, you have to make it worth while. Guilt is the weapon all of the above faiths have used to turn the Aryan mind against its own existence.

And this is another basic. The Aryans ability to empathize and feel guilt is also unique. Our conceptual ability, our making of giant leaps intellectually, makes us able to throw off the animal inability to ask whether life is worthwhile. But without that conceptual ability the world is doomed to an endless anthill of brown-skinned misery.

Our conceptual ability is precious, but so is our empathy. But that same empathy is used to our destruction. Guilt kills us genetically.

Our two greatest qualities, not the Jews, are fundamentally responsible for the fact that our philosophers, our Wordists, always find the guilt-suicide mix an easy sell. America has watched New England use it long before there was any appreciable number of Jews on this side of the Atlantic. We gave both New England and the Jews that sword.

If you bleed in the water, there will ALWAYS be sharks to take advantage of it.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

4 Comments