Archive for January 1st, 2007

The Big Time IS Choosing Your Staff

I wrote on Stormfront about how Iran probably got its TOTALLY free speech approach from me, the strategy that got David Irvin released via David Duke on TV here.

Rieman relied to me on Stormfront:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riemann
I did not know that you were involved until I read this post. What I did notice at the time this all took place was the emphasis placed on Freedom of Speech, which I thought at the time seemed like a remarkably prescient strategy

So I replied to him:

I cannot prove this. I am sure that a hundred people in Iran are taking credit for it. I made a very good living for decades by giving practical political advice, so I’m good at it.

Having been senior staff myself, this is how I think it went down. One of the senior staff of the President of Iran figured that if President Reagan deided to get my advice on dealing with Americans, the President of Iran might benefit, too.

If David Duke were elected president and gave up eating, sleeping, exercise and everything else, he would only have the 168 hours there ARE in a week to do things himself. Hiring and listening to staff is absolutely basic in the big leagues.

If David made me staff, I would spend hundreds of hours on an issue he SHOULD be thinking about, if his time were infinite, and I would spend hours crafting a decision paper for him that contained less than one word per hour I spent on the project. He would need five minutes to do hundreds of hours of work by checking “Go with it” on the paper.

When Pat Buchanan was appointed Head of White House Communications, I recommended someone for his staff. He told me he wasn’t going to HAVE any staff. I certainly like Pat, and supported him until he became a pure theologue, but it was clear to me that he was purely a protest candidate because he had no experience hiring and using staff.

Yes, I am prejudiced on this subject since high-level staffing was my profession. When you are listening to anybody, you need to take that sort of thing into account.

.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

5 Comments

Lord Nelson

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

I can feel a change happening on stormfront thanks to the mantra.
More and more stormfronters are attacking antis for being “anti white” and the antis don’t like it.
Our enemies would love us to talk endlessly about black crime, and der uber race, but we all know they are just sick fools promoting GENOCIDE against the White race.
That’s the truth and it puts them on the defensive.

Prometheus, who is obviously a contributor here uses the mantra and the basics of the mantra eg. anti racist=anti White etc. in all his posts to great affect.
And I see others picking this up.

If its making a difference on Stormfront it can make a real difference in the outside world were it really counts.
I believe more then one person repeating the mantra on a mainstream forum can have a huge impact,
and I would be happy to join others if they have a place in mind.

Lets keep it up and a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to everyone.

Comment by Lord Nelson

ME:

Making the point is everything. There are no points for “almost.” I havew spent a life time in debate, and I cannot empahsize enough how important this precise amalysis by Lord Nelson is.

How can I say it? The debate has changed from the poor non-whites to the anti-whites.

You know they are evil, but you must say EXACTLY why they are evil. And we are making them say anti-white
rather than mistaken, evil rather than the other side of some argument.

Repetition and the Mantra makes the whole argument entirely different.

Thank you, Lord Nelson.

I could not imagine a better theme upon which to bring inthe new year.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

10 Comments

Simmons — Bingo!

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

It is about asking the right questions which PC and “respectabalism” cannot survive.

Comment by Simmons

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

2 Comments

David Irving Makes This a Happy New Year!

David Irving Makes the New year a Happy One!

——————————————————————————–

David Duke went to the Iran Conference on the Holocaust and came back to raise hell with O’Reilly and Wolf Blitzer and the rest about people like David Irving being political prisoners of Political Correctness in Europe.

A week or so after David returned from Iran, after some sixteen months of a three-year sentence in Austria for underestimating the number of Jews killed in the Holocaust, David Irving was released.

I am sure that someone in David Irving’s defense team could explain this in terms of developing news on that front. But I have been in this hard-core political and legal world a long time. I WROTE laws, you know.

The idea of imprisoning a man for expressing a disagreement about history is insane. But NO ONE was going to make Irving’s case PUBLIC. David Duke did.

Just before irving was released.

So within a week after David came back from Iran, nose-to-nose with all the respectable conservative lynch mob that wanted to keep that “respectable” label by leading the lynch mob against all “Holocaust deniers,” David Irving was released.

David Irving will NEVER give David Duke credit for this.

God knows, David Irving will never give ME any credit for this.

But I remember the first time I met David Duke in Moscow. The first thing I noticed was that Dr. Duke was, by signs ye heathens know not, the kind of professional politico who would hire me. We felt right at home with each other.

A little explanation: a professional politico trusts nobody but his staff. But he’s GOT to have a staff. I am a professional staffer. I am also a Southerner, an older Southerner than Dave. Dave has had no reason to trust anybody, but he took my loyalty for granted from the word Go.

Which means Dave knows what he is doing.

DUH!

Long before the conference the Iranians invited me, subject to a complete draft of my speech. As usual, I asked Kelso to review my speech and he gave me the advice I needed. By the time it went to Tehran, it was perfect.

The ONLY point the speech made, by the time Kelso finished with it, was that it was crazy for the West to talk about crushing Iran for freedom when we had political prisoners like David Irving.

They invited me to Iran and they said they would pay for the trip, get the visa, and set me up in a fine hotel. I did not accept, and that is a different story.

So I had a submitted a speech to Theran that got me an invitation cum laude. I set a theme in my speech that both Dr. Duke and the President of Iran used. My theme was that it is crazy for the West to talk about invading or bombing Iran for freedom of speech if they openly imprisoned the David Irvings for disagreeing with their version of history.

Now it is quite possible that David and Iran COULD have set that theme without encouragement from me. It COULD be that David would have abandoned the mass of information he has about Zionist rule over our politics.

Instead, Duke did not let Blitzer take a breath without being accused of suppressing all disagreement. David Irving was his prime example.

When David got to Tehran, the theme was already “Champions of free speech are welcome here!” Iran was already requesting countries to which attendees would return not to prosecute them.

Given the speech I gave them, that COULD have been a coincidence.

So let’s go through a complicated chain. David took my advice, which the Iranians, who really DO have problem dealing with West, had also taken. But I had made the advice on target by having Kelso check me out.

So we find David “dependent” on me and me “dependent” on Kelso. You could say that Iran just took my advice because I had a hell of a lot of credentials about understanding a culture they do NOT understand.

Or Iran figured this was pretty good stuff. Maybe the people who rule Iran are smart.

In other words, if you want to, you could say everybody was a patsy.

You could translate this a different way. You could say that David knows what makes sense and he knows who to trust. He is aware that I know the game very, very well. I am smart enough to realize that Kelso is a great consult.

Iran took a look at my-Kelso’s advice and said, “Makes sense.”

In the end, who deserves praise for the release of David Irving on that suspiciously coincidental day? David Duke, who led the charge about the hypocrisy of “free countries” that imprison heresy in history? Me, whom David and Iran MAY have used as a highly professional staffer should be used?

Or David?

Or, as Irving’s defense team may say, was it a coincidence that he was released by their strategy right after Duke made this international news?

The credit is not as important as the LESSON. I knew Pat Buchanan (though he speaks to me no more). My problem with his being president was that he had never HIRED STAFF. You cannot be the Chief Executive of anything unless you know how to hire and use staff.

I was essential to Dave. Kelso was essential to me and I am essential to Kelso. You may think we fight each other all the time, but when it comes to the essentials, we are a team.

As of midnight, January 1, 2007 David Irving is free.

And I am sure I speak for David Duke, James Kelso, and I sure as hell speak for ME when I say;

Congratulations, David Irving, you have made this a HAPPY NEW YEAR!

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

1 Comment