Archive for February, 2007

Stalin Did Something BAD!

One time in his life, Joseph Stalin actually had a JOB! He only did it once, and he only worked for a short time, but that destroyed his virginity forever. The only place where virginity gets renewed is in the Islamic Paradise.

That was Stalin’s unique crime as a Champion of the Working Class.

Go through the whole list, Lenin, Trotsky, Malenkov, NONE of the Leaders of the Working Class ever held a JOB. None of them would have been known which end of a shovel to hold onto. Ted Kennedy is the Champion of the Working Class in America.

You show me somebody who praises the Working Class and I’ll show you somebody who has not had an extended talk with any working person in at least a decade. Jane Fonda talked about how great Communism was. She said that if we really knew what Communism was, we would get down on our knees and pray to God (WHO!?) for the dictatorship of the proletariat.

How often has Jane Fonda ever sat and LISTENED to a working stiff?

Yes, Stalin was our Great Ally in World War II. But his name is soiled forever in the eyes of True Idealists.

5 Comments

Shari and the Lesson of Direct Mail

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
I sent the mantra to 12 people that I know personally. I got replies from exactly no one. Well damn, I don’t care. They have been told.
Comment by shari

ME:

Shari, most people think that twelve mail outs and no replies is bad. But the grassroots conservative movement, back when liberals absolutely controlled ALL media, as based on direct mail.

Here’s the way it works.

1) You rent a random three thousand names off of somebody’s much bigger list. That is enough to make a statistically valid test of that general list. If you were a conservative interested in prayers in schools, you might rent three thousand off of a list of a hundred thousand who have given money to support some other conservative religious cause.

2) If you get a TWO PERCENT RETURN on that list, it is a wild success. That means not one in twelve, but one in fifty. You almost always lose money on a test.

3) Now you decide to go ahead and rent the whole hundred thousand because you only lost about half the money you spent on the test. Why on earth would you do this, knowing it will cost you money?

Because when you mail the whole hundred thousand, you can expect two thousand people to respond. Actually two percent is ridiculously high, but this is for basics.

You have now found, by the only way then possible, two thousand people who are interested in YOUR cause and will give you money. You put those two thousand on your OWN “house list.” These are people you can appeal to from time to time and you will get a ten to twenty percent return from them.

4) You mail your house list to fund your organization, but you keep testing other lists.

When conservatism was a grass roots movement, this was about the only way groups survived. Now the neos have brought in the usual big Jewish money which has control and conservatism gives the finger to the grassroots.

But dealing in direct mail teaches you that people don’t respond to even small group mailings more than we do. I get a HUGE number of things that I read, but I respond to very, very few.

My local newspaper has a circulation of at least a hundred thousand. They print almost every letter to the editor that is not blatantly Politically Incorrect. People who read the editorial page send in maybe a half a dozen letters a day. Call that a response rate of one in ten thousand. Cut out the repeat offenders and it is down to on in twenty or thirty thousand.

But every day the newspaper keeps putting out editorials anyway.

You will note that when I get comments here I am a happy old bigot.

Now you know why.

4 Comments

THREE NO SPAMS!!!!!!!!!

For the first time in the history of The Blog People, I went to comments and there was NO Spam.

THREE comments arrive at my door. Can you imagine how you would feel if, one day, your mail consisted of nothing but PERSONAL replies?

What if we were like the leftists, and put the manra into EVERY note, every e-mail, and we didn’t give a damn if anyone was offended by it or not?

Some would decide you are nuts. Others would do the same thing.

WHICH group MATTERS?

Be inconsiderate. Be aggressive.

As Sarge says, DO it!!!

1 Comment

Disaster is Our Element, Part Two

“May you live in INTERESTING times.”

So goes the Chinese curse. Nobody is interested in good times. When you read about them, they are boring. Have you noticed how fairy tales END with, “And they lived happily ever after.” No fairy tale describes this “happily ever after” period. It wouldn’t have been safe to do that.

You have just told fairy tale to children who enjoy the concept that Hansel and Gretel were about to be baked alive in an oven and who are now cheering the fact that a hungry old woman died in that agony instead. You then proceed to bore them to death with a description of the day-to-day uncluttered, uneventful life of uncomplicated happiness that Hansel and Gretel lived for the next fifty years, day by day.

I shudder to think that those kids would do to you. You had damned well better be sure there is no fire on the stove.

Compared to the fourteenth century outbreak of the bubonic plague, we live in BORING times.

No one will forgive me for pointing out, on balance, that Plague outbreak was a good thing. For the next two centuries, people in Europe lived MUCH better because of it. But those were BORING times.

You see, back then the population did not bounce back from a disaster. “A woman’s place is in the home” comes from the fact that a woman back then had to spend her entire life having and raising children just to keep the population stable. We have more fun blaming all this on a plot by men to suppress women, and the fact that it isn’t true never kept any documentary from having a guy with a British accent from pronouncing this Politically Correct point of view in the ad for Politically Correctness that comes at the end of every documentary.

Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth, the Plague created a population deficit that remade the economics of the time for two centuries. With so many whole villages wiped out, owners of land had to pay the remaining peasants unheard-of wages. The old sharecropper system completely collapsed all over Europe.

Yes, the Intellectuals tried to stop all this by Planning. They got together and set wages. But, as in the Soviet Empire, it just didn’t WORK. Back then they couldn’t even build a Berlin Wall to keep the workers from escaping.

All this brings us back to Global Warming. There are three positions on Global Warming and the Global Freeze it is supposed to lead to:

!) Liberalism: There will be Global Warming and Freezing so we must have Intellectuals take over the world and plan everything;

2) Respectable Conservatism: Yes, if this were the truth Liberal Intellectuals should rule the world, but it’s not true:

And mine, which nobody but The Blog People hear:

3) So what?

Here comes the Politically Correct narrator:

“Oh, God, Bob! Unlike me, you do not appreciate the HUMANITY here! I feel the pain that only a True Intellectual can appreciate!”

I will agree, because they bore me too much to do anything else, that only Intellectuals like Rousseau, who never saw a savage, Noble or not, in his life, can really appreciate Human Suffering more than I can, thought I have seen and SMELLED starvation.

As I say, all this Politically Correct hysteria bores me so much that I am happy to stipulate what this London-bound narrator with his Politically Correct ad at the end of every documentary says just to shut him up.

Yes, British Accent, only you and the Intellectuals understand Human Suffering.

OK?

Repeat:

OK?

No Comments

Disaster is Our Element, Part One

I was watching a documentary about The Little Ice Age. They discussed the Black Plague and how it may have been so bad because people were weak and hungry from the change of weather. So far, so good.

They talked about how the Intellectuals of the age reacted to the Plague by burning witches. We have seen the same reaction when Soviet economic plans kept failing. Obviously this couldn’t be the fault of the Perfect Economic System run by Intellectuals, so it had to be “wreckers,” tens of millions of them, who were sabotaging the Perfect Economy.

Those who burned witches in earlier centuries were pikers. They killed a paltry few thousand witches. “Soviet Power” killed its witches by the tens of millions.

But every documentary must end with an ad for Political Correctness. This one ended by saying that if we have global warming it will be worse, because we have a lot more people on earth than they did in earlier centuries.

When somebody says something this dumb, I can laugh or I can cry. As Basso Profundo advises, I have spent too much of my life raging and moaning. So I’ll smile, though you might hear a bit of tooth-grinding in the background.

How in heaven’s name can anybody say that we are less able to handle a fifty or hundred-year crisis today than Communists or earlier witch-burners were? I quoted the Politically Correct advertisement from another documentary that said that half the population lived on the coast, and if sea level went up over the next half century, they would all drown.

There are two positions on global warming:

1) Liberals say that every white country must stop economic development to stop it;

2) Respectable conservatives say it ain’t gonna happen.

As an evil racist, let me add a third point of view:

3) So what?

If there is global warming occurs, with global freezing after it, we will turn up our air conditioners and then our heat, year by year.

Back to Peak Oil, which by now I may understand. Air conditioners and heat up will require more energy. So we will produce more energy. Just as people will move out of coastal areas as they go under water, we will produce the energy. We can do that now with nuclear power, but in fifty years that will be primitive.

Speaking of primitive, all the Political Correctness ads at the end of documentaries feature the fact that agriculture will be screwed up. Will we all starve? No, we will develop hydroponics. Like Peak Oil, we don’t develop hydroponics now because it is cheaper and easier to take the cheap stuff we can get from the soil, be it oil or wheat.

But are we all going to die because developing something else is expensive? I doubt it. If we spent the money we put out now protecting Israel’s interests in Iraq on atomic power plants and hydroponics, we would have more good and fuel than we do today.

A good example is what happened with rubber during World War II. You can still see movies from abut 1942 and 1943 when people were fighting over old tires. The Japanese had overrun the rubber-producing areas of Southeast Asia and, even in the other panics of the early World War II period; the total absence of rubber caused a panic.

That crisis had been forgotten by 1945. A synthetic rubber was produced. It was a very bad rubber at first, very brittle. But by 1950 NOBODY would have gone back to natural rubber.

It is too bad our documentary-makers couldn’t be in the 1942 period. They could have pissed and moaned about our artificial white society had depended on exploiting the poor Southeast Asians for rubber, and we were going to PAY THE PRICE. They would say that our only salvation was to ration rubber and turn Rubber Planning over to the Intellectuals.

Of course, having a Kyoto Conference on Rubber in 1942 might be a bit awkward, but there is always a place for Intellectuals to meet and Plan Things.

6 Comments

Way to Go, cl!

It might be helpful if someone followed-up with a reply.

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php/whitakers-latest-schuldhunger-367811.html

Comment by cl

ME:

I see one reply so far. Is that one of the Blog People?

Come on, gang! Let’s not leave cl hanging the way we did Mark!

No Comments

Papillon

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

I don’t think I have ever posted one of your essays, but I post the mantra so much that I’m surprised someone has not whacked me over the head and said “DAMNIT WOMAN, STOP POSTING THAT THING. WE HAVE READ IT ENOUGH!”

I just don’t bother to report back on here with a “look at me, aren’t I so wonderful by doing something so simple as cutting and pasting words that aren’t even my own”. I mean, why brag about that? The answer to that seems to be that it makes you feel better, but I’m telling you, it feels awfully unnatural.

Papillon

ME:

Papillon, you made a common mistake:

You were so concerned about the social lesson you have been taught about not being a braggart that you completely forgot the fact that Ole Bob may NEED to hear what you just wrote.

It helped a lot.

Please see if you can help Mark and cl out.

2 Comments

Mderpelding and Schuldhunger

I don’t repeat what mderpelding says out here a lot. What mderpelding says always has three vital elements:

1) A beginning;

2) A middle;

3) An end.

What you see is what you get. You may think it’s good or ridiculous, but it’s all right there.

I like that.

My brother told me he had caught up with the Blog but he said apologetically, “I didn’t read the comments.” That was satisfying to me because he had read the Blog enough to realize that I KEEP saying that you haven’t read it if you haven’t read the comments.

I know the comments are being read because commenters are talking to each other. And the commenters are answering each other in the terms of THIS BLOG. I will come down hard on anybody who wanders from the point.

Mderpelding brought up a point I need to expand on:

NOT SPAM

NOT SPAM

Have you ever questioned WHY global warming HAS to be the fault of whites?
Have you ever questioned WHY third world poverty HAS to be the fault of whites?
Have you ever questioned WHY the third world must be integrated with us and ONLY us?
Us whites, that is.
In our world, we usually only accept responsibility for that which we can CONTROL.
Do you see where the real “white supremacists” are?

Do You See?
Really……………….
Who insists that global warming IS the fault of the west?
Who insists that third world poverty IS the fault of the west? (imperialism)
Who insists white countries and ONLY white countries benefit from “Diversity”?

White Supremacists. Of course.

Ironic, ain’t it?

Comment by mderpelding

ME:

During the nineteenth century whites found ways to end starvation for the first time in human history. We ended diseases that had always been considered a part of life.

No white man ever did anything bad that every other race had not done before. Everybody who had the people had always enslaved others. While we were developing our guilt complex about blacks in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, blacks in Africa were taking land from the Hottentots and committing genocide against them. That’s what strong people ALWAYS did to weak people.

There was only ONE unique characteristic of whites. They found ways to make life BETTER without enslaving others. They found ways to gain a new level of wealth without whipping it out of the hides of conquered peoples.

No one had EVER done that before.

So what was our reaction?

We told each other that we were rich but other people were poor. By “poor” we meant they were in the same miserable condition they had always been in. We whites were HUNGRY for guilt. We wanted to feel BAD about anything we had done that was good.

A commenter mentioned Weltanschauung to me, “world view. There are German words like Gestalt that have been adopted into general discussion. Schadenfreude, the joy a lowly person feels at something awful that happens to more fortunate people, is a German word that is better than some English translation.

That word is Schuldhunger, “a Hunger for Guilt.” It is the disease of Germany today. It is the essence of “ianity” as opposed to Christ. It is the basis of genocide against whites:

“Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem? I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

http://whitakeronline.org

But I want to introduce a German word that nobody needs today more than Germans do.

2 Comments