B. U. G. S.

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

Bruce says:

I’ve been thinking about your mantra approach lately. It has merit, but I think
your choice of wording is flawed. Basically, it has a 1960s ring to my ear that
hints a need for refinement. For instance, in the crowds I’ve been exposed
to, I just never hear someone use the exact term “race problem”. Perhaps in some
other region or other times they did, but I always hear about the need to solve
the RACE RELATIONS problem or the need for MORE DIVERSITY or a more INCLUSIVE
society. Those are the Pavlovian code words I hear constantly. I seldom hear the
slander of nazi get slung, but often hear the slurs of racist, bigot or xenophobe.
For the mantra to be most effective, it has to strike with all its deprogramming
effectiveness against the emotionalist code words actually used by the universities
and media. The following is my attempt to make a modern sounding paraphrase. Rip it
up all you want:

”Purveyors of PC “wisdom” love to talk about this RACE relations problem and need for “inclusiveness” and “diversity”. They use the dreaded slurs of racist and xenophobe against anyone who opposes wide open borders or the so called assimilation via the “melting pot” of intermarriage.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan ought to prove they are “inclusive” by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“The PC crowd in every white country says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am an evil hate mongering bigot.”

“They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.”

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

“Those who scream “hate” the loudest harbor the darkest hatred.”

ME:

Bruce has NAILED IT DOWN. The first sentence is the one that younger people and non-Americans object to. Foreigners didn’t HAVE a “race problem” when WE were talking about it. They imported it WHOLE!

But the first sentence of the PRESENT Mantra we are using is perfectly understandable.

Because it is simple one assume that writing the Mantra it was easy. It WASN’T! It took YEARS to hammer it out! You would be astounded to know how much work and experimentation went into that Mantra that seems so obvious it sounds like I just tossed it down on paper one day.

But the first sentence is its problem AND its strength. Nobody SAYS that outside the US and young people don’t SAY that any more. But does anybody have the slightest difficulty in UNDERSTANDING it? In fact, that first old-fashioned sentence gives them something to pick at. It keeps their interest in what otherwise would be an obvious, devastating statement aht they want to get away from ASAP.

If you can hold somebody to talking about that first sentence for ten minutes, they will NEVER forget the Mantra! That is more important than making Bob look Up To Date or Sophisticated.

That is the sort of thing only a pro at propaganda would even NOTICE. Does it make ME look good or does it make the POINT?

Keep in mind that we are not developing a Whitakerism here. The Mantra is for you to try out for yourself and YOUR target audience. But keep in mind the difference between whether they are impressed with YOU, in which case they’ll forget your POINT veryquickly, or by your POINT, which may INCLUDE you.

I didn’t get paid for propaganda because it was easy.

Your first sentence strikes me as taking attention from the rest of the Mantra. But I am NOT your target audience. TRY both versions. SEE which on gets your point across. This is the fun side of our war. Slaving out the Mantra alone was not fun for me, but testing it was.