Archive for February, 2007
Simmons: WE ARE DEPROGRAMMING A CULT!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by Bob in Bob, Coaching Session, How Things Work on 2/13/2007
1. NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
The “Mantra” would work best if the target audience is already questioning the powers of PC. We are deprogramming a cult and first we must get the herd to start questioning the authority of its priesthood and then we add our layer to their freshly cleansed belief system. Anyway it’s about power, and let me state unequivocally that the first normal sounding candidate to come out and question PC will garner more power than they know what to do with.
ME:
“We are deprogramming a cult…”
Those words opened up my whole life before me. They are the five most important words I have ever READ!!!!!!!!!!
BASICS, GANG, BASICS!
Just because it as so BIG I did not see liberalism, respectable conservatism, Marxism, all as a simple CULT Political Correctness is NOT puzzling.
I look back over more than fifty years of dazed faces repeating the same stuff. And the stuff was:
I have learned the Truth! All that I thought was good is bad. Above all, everything I thought was beautiful is ugly.
Rev. Moon’s Universalist Church DEMANDS interracial marriage. The ONLY link between members must be the Reverend Moon, not race, tradition or anything else.
Watch time I talk to a Political Correct type he forgets everything I said the day before. He has that blank look I have seen in brainwashed POWs, like something is being said that hurts, because it upsets careful and hard-won programming.
I have been reading biographies of Stalin, and it always strikes me as surrealistic that grown men could dedicate their lives to a CULT. It is easier to see behind the Iron Curtain. Letter after letter to Stalin worried whether the writer was being, quote, “politically correct,” unquote, seventy years ago.
But I saw the Hare Krishna and the Moonies at their height, out on the street hustling money and always ACTIVE, exactly the way Politically Correct people are today. You can get ten thousand PC whites on the street easier than you can get a hundred real white working people.
Who knows what the Monies might have become? But they did not know they were up against an earlier Moonie Movement a thousand times as powerful as they were.
Those five words, “We are trying t o deprogram a cult” represents the BASIC thinking I keep begging for. But even my begging for this showed how critical it was that someone SAY THOSE FIVE WORDS.
The one thing every Cult says is “NO BASICS.” Basics are everything a cult crushes. The basics are all in the cult, you must be programmed. And programmed we are. And I am out here on the outside begging people to think BASICS, which is EXACTLY like telling people in Jonestown to declare BASICS.
PLEASE take this lesson to heart. Please THINK about it. Please TALK about it.
My whole life has been lived almost incredibly much as an outsider. THAT is the reason I have completely escaped the programming. We tend to be outsiders, though that is certainly not a fixed rule. But I thought it was the RESULT of our personalities. It may also be the CAUSE of it.
I made an excellent living in politics, and there is no more insider vocation than that. But I was psychologically self-made.
THINK about this. Don’t JUST regurgitate some opinions, thought they are welcome. Think over your life this way. This could tell you a lot about YOURSELF.
Sillier Than Houris
One thing “Christians” love to do is make fun of Islam because its Heaven includes a bevy of renewable virgins for every man, the houris.
Let us now look at what the ian heaven consists of. According to the Old Testament derivation, heaven is where the saints spend all of eternity shouting praises of God. No women for the men, no men fo rhte owmen, no food, no wine, nothing but song. And the songs are nothing but praise, explaining to God Almighty that he is Special.
If you’re going to make fun of somebody else’s Paradise, you have to be willing to take some discussion of your own.
As I rmemeber it, the reason Jesus gave us The Lord’s Prayer began with the statement, “It is enough that you calla fish a fish.” He then proceeded to show how one simply told the Father what one wanted: daily bread, forgive us IF we forgive others, and show us the way.
End. Schluss. Fini. It is enough to calla fish a fish.
Jesus NEVER ONCE told people to Read More Bible. And Jesus MEVER OINCE said “Praise God!”
That is STRICTLY Old Testament and pagan stuff. God KNOWS who he is.
There is little in the accepted biblical text more obviously nailed on than, ath the end of hta discourse about calling a fish a fish, the word: “For thine is the Kingdom, hte Power and the Glory Forever.” It’s beautiful,but it is absurd. But later writers could not let Christ get away with no PTL.
And that, boys and gfirls, is sillier than houris.
Pain’s Other Point
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses, History on 2/12/2007
Cathar just means “Puritan.”
English Reformers and loyalists to Rome actually used the term along with “Precisianist” (in the 39 Articles) and other terms. I am sure they remembered the Albigensian Cathars who fought English knights in France 400 years before and that the comparison was deliberate.
“The Puritans did not condemn reproduction, which is the essence of Catharism.”
You are right, the Puritans favored reproduction but not what caused reproduction. The Cathars condemned reproduction but they populated large communities in the south of France. They each were sexually austere, and this leads to the sterility you speak about.
ME:
My understanding is that nobody is sure the Albigensians were Cathari. That is assumed. But the Ian Church was always good at wiping out traces of opposing theologies.
By the way, Alexander Whitaker’s Cambridge professor father was a major go-between for the Anglican Church and the Puritans. He was a very, very low church half-Calvinist himself, but inside the Established Church.
During a political campaign, one of my co-workers was a guy studying to be a very, very High Church Episcopal priest and he HATED Alexander Whitaker. He was the first person I ever met who knew who Alexander Whitaker was, since like all pre-Pilgrim history, this part of Jamestown is totally ignored.
American Episcopal churches have been overwhelmingly Low Church since the beginning. That is because Alexander Whitaker WAS the beginning.
Bruce: Mantra Needs Work
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses, How Things Work on 2/12/2007
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Bruce says:
I’ve been thinking about your mantra approach lately. It has merit, but I think
your choice of wording is flawed. Basically, it has a 1960s ring to my ear that
hints a need for refinement. For instance, in the crowds I’ve been exposed
to, I just never hear someone use the exact term “race problem”. Perhaps in some
other region or other times they did, but I always hear about the need to solve
the RACE RELATIONS problem or the need for MORE DIVERSITY or a more INCLUSIVE
society. Those are the Pavlovian code words I hear constantly. I seldom hear the
slander of nazi get slung, but often hear the slurs of racist, bigot or xenophobe.
For the mantra to be most effective, it has to strike with all its deprogramming
effectiveness against the emotionalist code words actually used by the universities
and media. The following is my attempt to make a modern sounding paraphrase. Rip it
up all you want:
”Purveyors of PC “wisdom” love to talk about this RACE relations problem and need for “inclusiveness” and “diversity”. They use the dreaded slurs of racist and xenophobe against anyone who opposes wide open borders or the so called assimilation via the “melting pot” of intermarriage.”
“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan ought to prove they are “inclusive” by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”
“The PC crowd in every white country says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”
“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am an evil hate mongering bigot.”
“They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.”
“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
“Those who scream “hate” the loudest harbor the darkest hatred.”
ME:
Bruce has NAILED IT DOWN. The first sentence is the one that younger people and non-Americans object to. Foreigners didn’t HAVE a “race problem” when WE were talking about it. They imported it WHOLE!
But the first sentence of the PRESENT Mantra we are using is perfectly understandable.
Because it is simple one assume that writing the Mantra it was easy. It WASN’T! It took YEARS to hammer it out! You would be astounded to know how much work and experimentation went into that Mantra that seems so obvious it sounds like I just tossed it down on paper one day.
But the first sentence is its problem AND its strength. Nobody SAYS that outside the US and young people don’t SAY that any more. But does anybody have the slightest difficulty in UNDERSTANDING it? In fact, that first old-fashioned sentence gives them something to pick at. It keeps their interest in what otherwise would be an obvious, devastating statement aht they want to get away from ASAP.
If you can hold somebody to talking about that first sentence for ten minutes, they will NEVER forget the Mantra! That is more important than making Bob look Up To Date or Sophisticated.
That is the sort of thing only a pro at propaganda would even NOTICE. Does it make ME look good or does it make the POINT?
Keep in mind that we are not developing a Whitakerism here. The Mantra is for you to try out for yourself and YOUR target audience. But keep in mind the difference between whether they are impressed with YOU, in which case they’ll forget your POINT veryquickly, or by your POINT, which may INCLUDE you.
I didn’t get paid for propaganda because it was easy.
Your first sentence strikes me as taking attention from the rest of the Mantra. But I am NOT your target audience. TRY both versions. SEE which on gets your point across. This is the fun side of our war. Slaving out the Mantra alone was not fun for me, but testing it was.
Pain Needs to Instruct Us Some
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 2/12/2007
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Cathar just means “Puritan.”
English Reformers and loyalists to Rome actually used the term along with “Precisianist” (in the 39 Articles) and other terms. I am sure they remembered the Albigensian Cathars who fought English knights in France 400 years before and that the comparison was deliberate.
“The Puritans did not condemn reproduction, which is the essence of Catharism.”
You are right, the Puritans favored reproduction but not what caused reproduction. The Cathars condemned reproduction but they populated large communities in the south of France. They each were sexually austere, and this leads to the sterility you speak about.
There were many splinter groups that fit under the Puritan umbrella. Most stayed loyal to England, but the Pilgrims abandoned England for Holland before setting sail to the New World.
Are you linking them to their descendants who abandoned the Union for Empire?
Comment by Pain —
ME:
“Are you linking them to their descendants who abandoned the Union for Empire? ”
The less important point here is my reply to y9our question: No, Pain, if I meant that I wold have SAID it.
INFINITELY more important is that you have grabbed what I said and run with it. This is what I LIVE for!
Go ahead and expand on this point for us! It doesn’t have to be profound, and it doesn’t HAVE to be but a few sentences., though more is welcome. We need demonstrations here of how to BUILD on my points.
“The Most Important Presidential Race in History”
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 2/11/2007
I have experienced fourteen presidential elections, I think it is. I remember hearing the 1948 results on the radio, but I didn’t really experience that campaign. In every single one of them, more than once, speakers would announce, “This is the most important decision America has ever had to make.”
And, for that speaker and at that time, it was.
I find it totally unproductive to talk about politics to anybody who thinks a presidential race is important. I just saw what I suppose was a repeat Saturday Night Live sketch about Hillary making a speech for her candidacy for the presidency and Obama walking in and taking all the attention and worship. I have said from the word Go that Hillary didn’t stand a chance because she has all the charm of a robot.
If your game is presidential politics, your game is NOT power politics. The president has no power. He is the face which represents whatever is in vogue at the moment. The fate of American policy in Iraq may be decided in a McCain-Obama race, but Iraq makes no difference at all to history. But the election of 1972 was about American policy in Vietnam. McGovern was absolutely destroyed at the polls, and by 1976 his side had won and America had withdrawn from Vietnam.
One famous joke from the 1964 election was, “They told me that if I voted for Goldwater, America would end up in an Asian War. Sure enough, I voted for Goldwater and we DID end up in an Asian War.”
I will mention politics only insofar as it relates to POWER.
An Intellectual Spring Cleaning
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 2/11/2007
In recent piece, I explained to you how hard it was to argue our side on campus back when Ex Oriente Lux was in power and anybody was laughed at who didn’t know that “Modern anthropology had proven all races are equal in innate abilities.”
As that began to collapse, partly due to our efforts, all debate on racial issues on campus began to be suppressed by violence and firing of tenured professors. It is IMPORTANT to realize a rule that, if we saw it in any other society, would be obvious to us:
Our ruling religion is like any other religion. When the argument goes against it, it resorts to any means at its disposal.
ANY means.
PLEASE NOTE I have just made two very important points that are relevant to our future. I do NOT need comments about how mean they are or some other things you would have said had I never been born. The reason I am being so crotchety about this is that every times someone goes off on his taped line I have to go back and repeat the whole thing from the bottom. I am BUILDING here, and if you throw in the wrong material it knocks down the structure.
SO …. having established WHY they use these means not only tells us we are winning, but it also makes it critical that we STOP regarding THEM as all-powerful. If they were all-powerful, then they would not hesitate to have squashed us. And every time somebody goes into the “They are just going to …” crap I get TIREDER. This is fifty years of tired talking, gang.
LET ME REPORT THAT I AM ECSTATIC THAT MY EXPERIENCED COMMENTERS ARE NO SELDOM MAKING THIS MISTAKE OR OF SAYING THINGS ***HERE*** THAT THEY WOULD HAVE SAID HAD I NEVER BEEN BORN.
Back to “their” power:
Who ARE “they?” “They” are the people who are stuck in the 60s. They are the Jews, mostly REFORMED Jews, not the ones in the curls and funny hats we love to have pictures of, whose only aim is destruction.
THOSE are our enemies. Most of them are OLD. On the other side of any issue, you will find that there is more and more restlessness with them. “Conservatives” today have gone back to their pre-1960 stand of being nothing but liberals forty years out of date.
It would be funny if it weren’t real: Just as 60s liberalism is being repudiated on the left, it is becoming the Gospel of the right. That is why you don’t fit in with the conservatives any more. They’re back to being conservatives, which means they are back to being the champions of the last wave of radicalism.
It is frustrating that I still have to use the word “liberal” to be understood. But if you are not off on some bellyache that you would be on if I had never been born, you would see WHY. As I have ALSO said here until I almost throw up having to say it again, language is USAGE. “Conservative” is a generic term for anyone who opposes the latest Political Correctness. And the latest PC is libservatism, the MELDING of Fox and CNN, the standard liberal-”respectable conservative” debate.
So what usage calls “conservative” is opposition to ANY PC fad. What paid commentators call conservatism is Bush. What the MEDIA calls conservatives are half of the “they.” Media “conservatives” are what keeps PC ALIVE.
Understanding what I have just said requires a LOT of rethinking. There is simply no room in the same mind for twentieth century thinking and Bob’s thinking. Medicine only got rid of bleeding for pneumonia when it REJECTED Galen and the Latin and Greek and started thinking in terms of what WORKS.
PERIOD.
It’s time for a mental spring cleaning.
mderpelding
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses, How Things Work on 2/10/2007
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
My stuff comes from Your stuff.
I would like permission to use your
intellectual property.
Anything I say is my responsibility.
But…
I learned from you.
So, if a release is needed,
you have got my e_mail address:
mder...@epix.net,
or…
mder...@aol.com.
Thank you.
Comment by mderpelding
ME:
I have to be careful what I say here for legal reasons. You don’t have to worry about getting permission to use my stuff, even though it’s copyrighted. I don’t mind the COMMUNISTS using it if they don’t cut and paste or change it. But I’ll use their asses off if they quote me out of context for their own purposes or to damage me or for some other reason which from my point of view does me damage.
So don’t worry about it. If you are going to use huge slices of my stuff FOR OUR PURPOSES, which I sincerely hope you will, you do so not only with my permission, but with my gratitude. My problem is that this is done too little, not too much.
No, it only bothers me that any comrade would HESITATE to use my stuff. Even if you screw up horribly with it, the worst that can happen in a real world court room is that you would have to apologize. Our enemies use the legal system as a weapon against us. If I had their resources, I would do the same thing to them, but not to prevent them from having free speech, which is the way they use it against us. They need that, because they have no case. We only need to be allowed ot present ours.
So you don’t have to ask my permission for any or all of my material if you are honestly on our side. Only the copyright holder can make trouble, since this is civil, not criminal, law. And the only way anybody on either side will get me into court for any real damages is if they really, openly, honestly use what I say against me or mine. Believe me, you cannot do that without meaning to.
I wish I could give blanket permission, but, in any serious sense, anybody who is not a dedicated enemy of me and mine has it.
Pain
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses, History on 2/10/2007
The Puritans may have read and studied Calvin, but technically they were not Calvinists. A more accurate word used by their more sane contemporaries was “Catharist.”
ME:
This is my understanding of the situation. Somebody else’s theology doesn’t interest me except academically, so I’m open to correction:
The Pilgrims were not Puritans. Much of the early history of their tiny Massachusetts Bay Colony was trying to keep from being taking over by Puritan Massachusetts. Thet called themselves Calvinists, too, but not all Calvinists are the same.
Catharists are a whole different kettle of fish. I think you have been lsitenging to people who want to impress you. When such people want to condemn anythig they don’t really know about, they use the intellectual-sounding word “Gnostic.”
Catharist sounds good, too, but it refers to a form of Manichaeism. The Puritans did not condemn reproduction, which is the essence of Catharism.
IMO.
I am interested in theology because some of the best politics and political argument in history has been funneled into religion. Most of our modern political arguments have appeared in a recognizable form (if you know what you are looking for, which is what I do) as theological debate.
Even an atheist should know his Bible. I don’t worship Zeus or Hermes, but I sure as hell know who they are.
Do It! USE My Stuff!
If anyone wants to use any or ALL of my writings in zip or any other form, all you have to do is ask my permission, an e-mail will get a quick response, since I am anxious for you to do this. You can get my permission by a note, even for ALL of my stuff.
There is a reason I must be contacted, and it is not to ask HOW you plan to use it. One must legally maintain control for practical reasons or I would issue blanket permission irght now. But our enemies could use THAT.
If you can make money on it, bless your little heart and go to it. I’m fixed for life, I don’t need it.
“I’m fixed for life.” I know how hard many of you are working just to keep food on the table, so I LOVE to rub that in.
Close!
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 2/9/2007
Somebody wrote:
Not Spam
NOT SPAM
Christ against christianity. Now that has a nice ring to it.
ME:
ALMOST perfect, and you made me think of the perfect one:
Christ versus ianity
PS: Since I wrote that, I’ve been thinking about it. Christ versus Christianity has its own message, and may be better in some cases.
Dave
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 2/9/2007
Name: Dave
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
“Investors form a crowd whose collective action reflects a key aspect of man’s nature as a social animal: He is strongly induced to adopt the feelings and convictions of the group.”
“In a realm such as investing, in which SO FEW ARE KNOWLEDGEABLE, the TENDENCY TOWARD DEPENDENCE IS VIRTUALLY IMPULSIVE.”
“As a result, market decisions are steered not by the rational decisions of individual minds, but by the peculiar collective sensibilities of the herd. The pervasive dependence among its members produces an emotional interpersonal dynamic that, like all feedback mechanisms, has form.”
Comment by Robert Prechter
I urge our readers to consider Prechter’s statement very carefully, as it should be generalized beyond the investment arena to the political culture as a whole.
It explains WHY “regimes” such as Political Correctness are able to gain such astonishing ascendancy in the face of all reason.
But it also explains WHY people like BW have huge influence.
Aldous Huxley was fond of repeating: “Want to solve your problems? Learn a new way of seeing.”
But Huxley omitted Prechter’s insight which explains the REAL REASON “the multitudes” are so sheepish: Their ignorance compels them to imitate others in the hopes that those they imitate know more than they.
Accordingly, a singular “seer” such as BW, can transform an entire culture.
These things move fast for entire eras have a habit of dying suddenly.
New worlds get born overnight.
Don’t underestimate the insights posted to this blog. They are more important than you imagine.
Real War and the Masturbation Generation
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, History, How Things Work on 2/9/2007
Our entire concept of war comes from the group that calls itself The Greatest Generation. They were tossed into a conflict smarter people had long since predetermined, and as kids they didn’t actually get caught running away when the guns went off. That is, the third of them who ever HEARD a hostile shot fired.
They have therefore spent sixty yeras marveling at their own bravery. Theya re in love with themselves to an extent that one can honestly say that a whole generation of Americans has spent sixty years in masturbation mode. And THAT, boys and girls, is where we get the idea of what WAR is. So it seemed odd that I said below that whites lose large numbers to miscengenation, as happens in any all-out war.
Clauseewitz said that diplomacy was war by other means. He was a military man, so he looked at shooting war as the basic. Actually World War II was decided by people in coats and ties long before the first Greatest Generation type ever put on the costume he touches himself over. By the time he got to the point he worships, the WAR was already decided.
WAR is the life-and-death struggle. It doesn’t matter HOW you are destroyed. The fact that blacks feel their inferiority to an incurable extent is seen in how they demand black guys get blond girls. That is their bottom-line demand. That is the Jews’ bottom-line demand. That is what integration was all about. WAR has nothing to do with costumes or gunfire. Even in the case of the costumes and rifles, war is seldom a matter of racial survival, in any sense of that term.
Get off the gunfire crap. Forget the Masturbation Generation. We are in a far more serious war than any of those that were declared throughout history.
The Lesson of the Death of the Yankee Nation
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 2/9/2007
On principle, New England opposed the admission of every state after the first thirteen. They only favored the admission of slaveless status when they were overthrowing the Southern slavocracy. But in the end it was New England’s alliance with the West in the anti-South coalition and the Republicans Party that destroyed the only competitor for ruling America that the Northeast ever had.
It paid off handsomely. Right up to the 1930s the Lodges and other New England top dogs ruled Republican politics, which meant they ruled the country. The payoff in power was handsome, and the payoff in money was stupendous. All industry was confined to the Northeast by railroad rates that made it impossible to ship manufactured goods north AND EAST.
But the Yankee Nation got paid LONG before it actually took the country over completely. It is often mentioned that the US Government had a SURPLUS and no debt in Jackson’s day. No one will EVER tell you WHY.
At the very beginning of Our Glorious and Beneficial Union the Yankee Nation made a deal that no Jewish pawnbroker could ever hope to find a goy dumb enough to swallow. Until World War I the Federal Government was financed almost entirely from tariffs. You might say, “Lord! Those Southerners were DUMB! The Yankees got the Federal Government and even patronage jobs FREE!”
And people who finally get THIS through their heads will NEVER realize that that was the LEAST of the deal. The Yankee Nation did not ONLY get exempted from Federal taxation, but they got even MORE than the entire Federal budgets by means of those tariffs. You see, in order to avoid tariffs Southerners had to pay whatever price Northern industry decided to sell its products at. Every extra percentage point tariffs went up paid New England many millions of dollars.
Can you imagine anybody dumb enough to allow that? That was Our Glorious Union from the word “Go!” It’s a wonder that, stupid as we were, we lasted as long as we did.
When the Glorious Union was Saved, all restraint went off of tariffs. And all industry was in the Northeast due to discriminatory rail rates. So Republicans jacked up the tariffs and Northeastern monopolies jacked up their prices.
With what Jews would call, “such a DEAL! Why did the Yankee Nation die off? It dies off by doing exactly what America is doing today. Wealthy families produced New England school marms and Emily Dickinsons and other sterile females. Meanwhile, as the profits of industry skyrocketed, they needed cheap labor, Irish, Polish, Italian and so forth.
The last representative of the Yankee Nation, Henry Cabot Lodge, lost his Senate seat to a guy name Kennedy in 1952. When he ran for vice president in 1960 they lost to the same John Kennedy.
You will play hell finding any sign of The Yankee Nation in New England. They made SUCH A DEAL that they forgot about controlling their OWN territory. The Jews are so desperate to destroy whites that they have doomed themselves, too. But it always bothers me that anti-Semites are unteachable about REAL American history. They are right about Jews, but they are blind to the fact that the Jews are NOT new. The Yankee Nation hated the white race and other Americans with a blindness that destroyed them before most Jews got here.
As Alan points out, Southerners are the only nation left in America. As the country becomes swamped with minorities, only we will be able to deal with them. The Yankee-Jew approach only works as long as no one tosses their power-group out. As long as Yankees kept their image as The Only True Patriots, they survived. But they could only live off others, and when they could not, the nation died. They got so tied up in ruling that they lost track of their own existence, just as Jews have.
Once again, the example of Sauron comes to mind. He put most of his power in The One Ring to rule others. When the Ring was destroyed, he fell. There was time when the South needed 65-IQ labor from Africa.
Now the mulattoes are not the same and they are not needed. But ALL the work we needed African slaves for is now done by machines. In short, our nation does not have to dominate to survive. Try to imagine Israel living on its own resources and with no cheap Arab labor.
Every part of the white race will lose huge numbers to miscegenation. Such is the nature of all-out war. But we are the ONLY group of whites who can lead the way to survival.
Alan
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 2/9/2007
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
New England’s culture is muti-faceted, a hodpodge of various flavors all lumped together, they process nothing unique that can define who they are as a group. PC and other radical and destructive social trends flourish is a land made up of people of nothing. In New England the intellectuals point out how modern and sophisticated they are, we are evolve, we change they say. Those who do not share in this enlightenment are labeled rednecks, hillbillies, inbreds, etc, intellectuals worship words anything of substance is feared by the wordiest cults.
Southern culture is attacked and ridiculed because it is real, its is “Homogenous”, Southern Culture is, “UNIQUE”. Southern culture developed in a geographic region that was harsh in climate and not adaptive to traditional farming techniques, the people who toughed it out in the South were those who believed in individual freedom, hard work, creativity and perseverance. In the South, cotton became king and it was worth a kings ransom, towns became cities and trade was strong, they made something out of an area that many seen as worthless. Southerners rich and poor share what they have, it’s the esscience of who they are, it is truly theirs, it is “Kinship”, felt by those who exist in a real culture, no wordiest intellectual nit wit would understand something of substance, that’s to be feared.
Comment by Alan
ianity and Evolution
We all know that every emotion you have gets exploited for money. That has been the case throughout human history. Never forget that it was the shamans who INVENTED this. Whether the Oldest Profession is prostitution or shamanism is entirely a matter of definitions. By the time Christ appeared, Judaism had long since developed a perfected place for their shaman or high priests could get the maximum money and power. As far as he COULD without getting stoned to death on the spot, this was EXACTLY what Jesus repeatedly and specifically denounced.
He finally said “No man comes to the Father but by ME.” And he said it to JEWS. If he HAD said he came to replace the Law he would have murdered on the spot. But, by saying that to the JEWS he did make the high priest the same as any other shaman.
That was fine until the church became big BUSINESS and big POWER. Then the Church began to look more and more fondly on that wonderful setup the High Priests had developed to maximize money and power. If you can tell any fundamental difference between today’s Curia bureaucrats and the Puritan despots, and the one the High Priests had in Jesus’ day, please let me know what it is.
It’s called parallel evolution. There were enormous similarities between the MARSUPIAL saber toothed tiger and the Mammalian saber-toothed tiger, but they were less kin to each other than a whale is to mouse. The same conditions, in the case of evolution or human nature, cause the same results. A bureaucrat of the Temple, one of the scribes Jesus denounced, would have been right at home in the Vatican today or in a Puritan pulpit.
Only Christ was different. But ianity remains the same old thing as its Judaic ancestor.
Nothing upsets a religious professional like the idea of taking his Temple privileges away from him. It is no coincidence that the original church of the Calvinist Pilgrims is now a Unitarian Church, entirely ianity with no Christ at all.
Gee, Bob, What Say We Do a Book Together?
Somebody gave me some points on SF and said they would love to read a book of collections of my writings. He asked if such a book was likely. In the Ole Bob tradition of giving long, meticulous and detailed responses, my reply is No.
At fairly predictable intervals, I get enthusiastic proposals from people who tell me how great my writings are and how they would love to collect them for the generations. They are using a very good strategy. The best way to start getting published is to ride in on the name of someone who is already publishable. That is EXACTLY what I did to move up to a major publisher with The New Right Papers.
But once I explain to them that I am now slightly less publishable in America than David Duke is in Israel, their enthusiasm collapses, as it should. It was good gambit, and it failed. Very few people who are not New York Jewish break into publication if they don’t try gambit after gambit and can paper their walls with rejection slips.
So there won’t be any book. This is NOT new in real history. Historians are always busy doing two things:
1) Trying desperately to find out more about the minds who actually predicted and influenced today and were lost in the rush of nonentities who were fashionable at the time and;
2) Getting on Larry King and talking about how the fashionable authors of today will be remembered in the future.
1) and 2) are their JOBS.
So I put my ideas into people like you. If someone wants to do a dissertation on me when my ideas take hold and I have long since topped paying for internet space for my ideas, they’ll have to do another dissertation.
It’s no big deal. Personal publicity means little to me since I retired, except where it helps my ideas spread. By the time they realize what I did, neither personal publicity nor anything else will have any priority for me at all.
Not Speaking and Denunciation Societies
I was remembering that one hallmark of Communist societies was that nobody, not even a waitress, would smile at you. And by “me” I don’t mean just a Westerner becasue he might be a spy.
What a SILLY idea!
But you did NOT smile at strangers. In old Russia smiles were as normal as in any other rural society outside New England. But when the Communists came in, you could literally DIE in the Gulags if you looked too familiar with somebody they were tracking. Their idea was to get EVERYBODY, and it was better to arrest a hundred — to supply free labor in Siberia, after all — than to miss one. So every expression, every peson a peroson being followed spoke to, was likely ot be picked up and precious few of those ever made it back home.
Russia was what I might call a Denunciation Society. But so was New England. Your shades were not to be closed at night, which wa a regulation laid down only for slaves in the South. You were to be watched at all times, and that was the CREED of New England. You were personal responsible for anyone you spoke to. If a stranger came into town and he happened to be a Quaker, he would be hanged (oneofhte few New England traditions I approve of) and you would be lucky to get your teth knocked out in pillory.
So in New England the height of society is “The Lodges speak only to the Cabots and the Cabots speak only to God.” In the South not speaking is considered trashy. But until after the Civil War, when we beecame the Bible Belt in reaction to defeat, there wasno denunciation society in the South. There was an amazing output of open denunciations of slavery in the Deep South, even, right up till the War, though most of those who denounced the institutions, like Robert E. Lee, fought on our side.
The Internet Versus the Bookies
Posted by Bob in History, How Things Work on 2/8/2007
“As dead as network TV” was one expression I heard on a sit-com.
Books are deader. They keep growing in sales a bit, but in comparative terms, which is all that counts, the publishing industry is dead in the water in hte area whta interests ME, which is POWER. It used to be that a book led the way for a new fashionable idea, the magazines and New York press gave them proinence, then Mommy Professor gave them to Mommy Teacher and so forth.
Now ideas do not come from books. In fact, by the time you see a book on a subject you are reminded how far behind the publishing industry is. It is hard to imagine HOW far behind they are. Let’s start with network news, which I haven’t seen in months. They led off with a story that we have all heard a dozen times that day.
You got it on cable and you got it on the net. By the time the Rathernuts get to it it is like seeing a rerunof You Are There from the early 50s. And that is a delay of hours. Publishing is a delay of MONTHS. And it is getting WORSE, not better. Mainline publishing is the only form of commmunication that is actually getting slower.
And there is NO fresh blood on the idea front. It wasn’t exactly flowing before, butnow you have to have an agent to submit aq book. What is worse, agents used to take money to read your manuscript, so at least you could BUY your way into a try for a modest sum. Now they don’t even do that. Established authors only.
Of course I never had to pay for it myself.
I mean an agent reading my MS.
New authors do break into novels, where the money is, but that has always been notoriously difficult and still is. That is a bit more open because it is the life blood of publishing, the cash cows like Stephen King. But idea books are not payers. An idea is what the publishing bureaucracy, thousands of them, at least ten of whose names do not end in stein and two of whom do not live in New York or California, decides on.
If this sounds extreme, I refer you to the one time my name appeared in the New York Review of Books. Every author’s name published inside had his name onthe cover. The cover that time was hilarious. Every name there sounded like something made up in a Nazi hit piece, so Jewish that it would sound extreme in a synagogue.
And there, somewhere near the middle, was Robert Walker Whitaker, the kind of name New Yorkers think only happens in a YIDDISH hit piece!
In 1981, the only reason I did The New Right Papers was to get a major publisher for my contribution to put my idea of Societal Property Rights before hte public. So I did a whole book so I could FINALLY counter the standard conservative line that borders should be open “to the free movement of goods, capital AND LABOR” to which both Buchanan and Sobran then subscribed.
I wrote a whole book to get two words into the mainstream where even political commentators would see them:
“Labor VOTES.”
It took two years of effort to get my first book published, and that only because the time had come. In 1974 William Rusher had FINALLY come to the conclusion that conservatives could NEVER win while they kept faith with their octogenarian moderate wing, and they would have to dirty their hands and get the “Wallace vote” that no one was going after, and that, becauesof tradition, fell to the Democrats. So he did the Foreward to A Plague on Both Your Houses, which got it published.
By a MINOR publisher.
So getting ideas to the public was like shooting with a muzzle-loader. It took FOREVER and luck to get anything into the only place where ideas were introduced, up at the New York end of the barrel. The rest ofhte loading took forever, too, as you poked the concept in in interview after interview about abook you had b een desperately tired of when you sent in the galleys.
Now the muzzle-loader is competing with a machine gun. And I don’t mean the old 600 rounds per minute WWII stuff and that every M-16 delivers. I mean those things that fire 15,000 to 20,000 .50 rounds per minute and make excellent artillery. And that is good way to think of the spread of ideas today:
Te publishing industry and its minions are still jamming a concept down the barrel and firing their one shot a year, which leds to the New York Times which leads to Dan Rather or whoever the Edward R. Murrrow is right now.
Meanwhile the internet is throwing lead, not by the minute, not by the second, but by the millisecond.
“As dead as network TV, as rotten as publishing.”
Peter?
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 2/7/2007
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
That is a good point. But typographical errors aside, true spelling errors tell me the person does not read or write much to know how to spell words. Some are forgivable like writing “per say” instead of “per se” — but some of the misspelled words are not uncommon — they just don’t SEE the words written to know how they are spelled. For example, someone who writes “I would of” instead of “I would have.” Though, granted, I suppose someone can be educated just as well verbally.
Spell checkers – like the one now built into Firefox, which I use on Bob’s blog – can catch most ugly spelling errors, but not grammatical errors.
Comment by Peter
ME:
Why should they read or write much? I want them to THINK. I spent thirty years watching the William Buckley talk about “Dialectic Materialism versus the Apologetics of Saint Thomas Aquinas” while I could not get them to MENTION the Berlin Wall and the fact that EVERY Communist country HAD one. That was for us peasants.
I side the peasants. The peasants elected Reagan in the end. The peasants brought down the USSR in the end, because they didn’t get lost in books and saw The Evil Empire for what it was.
You see literate people. I see Mommy Professor’s products.
Frenglish
From my “Partisan Dictionary” in the Southern Partisan about thirty years ago:
Englishman — n — A German trying to be a Frenchman
Germans call the German language today “Denglish.” It adopts more and more American words. I was talking to a guy in Moscow who was taking his PhD in German, and he was complaining about this to me, in German. Two minutes later he used the word “renten.” As you can see, “renten” comes from American, “to rent.” The proper German word is “mieten.”
I am a naturally forgiving person, so in less than an hour I stopped kidding him about this.
The Germanic English of 1066 has been replaced by our present Frenglish. Much of it is harmless, but most of it is truly destructive. You see, along with French we adopted the whole attitude that anything Germanic is lowah claaass. It is considered very upper claaahss to say “Merde!”, but the Germanic-derived word s*** requires all those stars.
But the hatred of Germanic has a much, much, greater cost. Medical students spend much of the time they should be learning about medicine in learning the tortuous route the English language took to avoid ANYTHING Germanic. So in order to describe parts of the human body, those parts must be translated into Latin, or, worse, Greek, and then spoken in a way I am dead certain no Roman or ancient Greek would have recognized. It is a wholly artificial language made up for the express purpose of being hard to learn and impossible for the average person to understand.
When non-German speakers look at German, it seems to consist of long, long words. We associate long words with incomprehensibility, since that is what they are used for in English.
As a matter of fact, I do know of a single long word in the German language, one that showed up a lot when I was translating brick-making stuff into English in the 1950s, “Temperaturwechselbeständigkeit.” Looks LONG, doesn’t it? But it is several short, easily comprehensible words put together to describe something:
Temperatur — I don’t think that needs translating
Wechsel – change
bestand – withstand
ichkeit — this is a standard ending which denotes that what went before is a description.
The word in English is “refractory.” But how in heaven’s name could a person tell, from “refractory,” which I assume is some tortured Latin word, what one is talking about?
Britain had absolute dominance in industry about 1820. Half the manufacturing on the planet earth took place on that one little island, totaling half the size of the Black Sea Valley. Germany, despite its ridiculous European economic policies, pulled up beside Britain by the dawn of the new century. America, of course, had outstripped them both hopelessly by then.
How did Germany do it? The British had industry, but looked down on it. The Uppah Claaahss “went to University” and learned Latin and Greek. The German upper class took technical courses, and laughed at a grown man wasting his life studying dead languages. The only reason the Frengish survived at all was America.
The Germans did not even bother to Latinize their technical language. If you were smarter than the peasants, you didn’t need to hide behind some cheating like that.
The big excuse for Frenglish and Latin and Greek is that they are supposed to be “universal.”
Wake up and smell the coffee! Eastern Europeans and the rest of the world are absolutely mystified by this obsession with French and dead languages. They speak ENGLISH as the universal language, and they are deeply pissoi-d off that they have to learn that pretentious crap when they are trying to do something serious.
It takes a long, long time for reality to catch up with crap, oops, sorry, le crapois, like that. The internet is moving us toward phonetics. Something else will have to come along to force us to say temperaturechangewithstanding instead of digging into graveyards to come up with les crappois like “refractory” or a whole medical vocabulary nobody needs.
Internet Phonetics
You may note that I don’t correct spelling errors of commenters. That is because, in my opinion, the Internet is producing phonetic English. I do not remember the last time I had any difficulty understanding, even reading at full speed, what a commenter was talking about.
In England, the purpose of language is largely to tell you what claaaahss a person is. Among the colonials over here, spelling tells you whether a person is educated in terms of our established religion. Many and many a PC cannot think, but by God he can SPELL.
This impresses me the same way a lawyer in a black dress or a drunk in a costume impresses me. But I am not alone. I remember that ten or twelve years ago, there were regular complaints in the chatrooms and Newsgroups about someone’s spelling. Now I don’t see ANY of that.
We may be solving a problem the English-speaking world has had for centuries. And it is a problem people like me have all the time: I want to see how a word is spelled, but I can’t look it up because it is in alphabetical order and I can’t FIND it because I can’t SPELL it.
If you are Buckley and you get PAID for not thinking, all this and words no one else uses and untranslated French phrases are fun and impress the hell out of the illiterates in the press corps and on campus. But for those of us who specialize in THINKING words are just tools, and we do not want to read twelve pages of instructions before we put down what we are thinking.
Spelling, like English English, is a matter of claaahsss. You show you have gone to Cambridge or gotten a full dose of Mommy Professor here by repeating the spelling prescribed by some dictionary.
I consider myself an aristocrat, but the last reason for that is that I can lord it over comrades who don’t spend their lives over a friggin’ dictionary.
And PLEASE don’t make the comment you would have made if I had never been born. READ what I wrote. Somebody is going to say, “But that way lies CHAOS!!!!” I started off by saying I have not had a single problem understanding what a person was saying because of his spelling.
That way lies sanity, not chaos.
I Just Cut Out ALL Our Comments!!!!!!
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 2/7/2007
If you sent in a comment since the last batch I approved, I just wiped it. And some of them were really GOOD!
I normally go through, hit “approve” on the ones that have NO SPAM NO SPAM on them, then hit the go button with that, then go back and comb the spam for a new by who doesn’t know to put NO SPAM NO SPAM, make that if there are any for approval. The I hit the “Mark all as spam” and flush the rest.
But Attention Deficit will have its way. As I went over the first time, I got interested in the comments and FORGOT to hit approve. For some reason, I then hit “Mark all as spam” and flushed them. I must not get interested in the comments BEFORE I do the mechanical work or the attention deficit robot takes over.
I am very sorry. That is an apology but that is also a statement. PLEASE try to remember what you wrote and write it again.
You can keep a copy of your comment just by copying it and pasting it on your notes. You can even send them to yourselves by e-mail. I any case, try to remember that you are dealing with disabling ADHD and act accordingly, because your comments are what keeps me going.
Thanks, troops.
Costumes
I begged you folks to look at basics. I thought you MIGHT think of costumes, aka, uniforms.
OK, damn it, I’ll do it for you.
No one explains why General Patton wore those two silver-plated revolvers. I don’t remember this exciting episode in his life mentioned in the movie Patton.
Before World War I, Patton was the last man to have a real, old-fashioned gun fight. In fact, it was larger than life. He was along when the Mexican raiders came in, back in the Pancho Villa days, and there were – REALLY – a lot of them and one of him. He had his guns on and he faced them on foot as they came in on horseback.
He killed them. Their leader, a famous bandit, dropped his gun and Patton waited while he picked it up and fired wildly at Patton.
They are still trying desperately to show that the men at the Alamo acted just like a bunch of panicky New York Jews would have acted. But Patton’s gun fight, which would have made a hell of part of the movie, had to be just ignored completely.
That’s why Patton wore two six-guns to the end of his days. He EARNED them. Hollywood likes to make it look like he was just an overaged cowboy. In the real world, an overaged cowboy is anybody who is above the rank of colonel and wears a costume, a.k.a., “uniform.”
Dwight D. Eisenhower never heard a hostile shot fired in his life. But, as General Douglas MacArthur, not one of Ike’s worshippers, said, “He was the best staff man I ever had.” Eisenhower was an EXCELLENT staff man. He was one of the finest bureaucratic decision-makers of his time.
But why did he have on a costume?
In “Attack of the Killer Tomatoes,” the President is conferring with the uniformed services. One guy has on an army uniform, another a Navy uniform, another an Air Force outfit, and then one has on a Boy Scouts uniform. It actually took me a full minute to catch onto the joke here. That is how accustomed even I am to costumes being called “uniforms.”
But, as I keep pointing out what seems an endless number of times, I am trying to get you to QUESTION the most basic assumptions. This does NOT mean that I am able to catch them instantly myself. Which is why I am looking for intellectual partners, not disciples.
Why SHOULDN’T the head of the Boy Scouts be there?
One of the mainstays of every tyranny is the worship of a costume. When the President swears to uphold and defend the Constitution, he never says what he means: “I will uphold and defend the latest decision of the United States Supreme Court.” But if you study Constitutional Law, at public expense, you will find it consists entirely of Federal Court decisions.
And what do ALL of these federal judges have that sets them apart from the mere mortals who are presidents and senators and congressmen. They ALL wear DRESSES.
Why can’t you defend yourself with a gun? Because it is generally accepted in America, and ABSOLUTELY accepted in almost all of Europe, including Canada, that no one should be allowed to have a gun but someone who is wearing a government-sanctioned costume.
Policemen have a consistently low IQ (two were rejected for the job because their IQs were too high), a suicide rate that is out of sight, and a rate of alcoholism in the same range, while they are armed to the teeth all the time. But they got COSTUMES.
The pro-gun crowd WORSHIPS law enforcement, so they are the first to drop on their face in front of those uniforms.
Before the bitching starts that this is too long, let me cut it off.




richard and Simmons on “Pain Says Mantra Needs Work”
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 2/12/2007
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
I think this is an excellent new edition! It solves some of the problems I’ve had with people who say, “I’ve never heard anyone saying those things”.
Like a classic song that gets covered in a hundred different styles, the Mantra will find its audience in many differing versions.
Comment by richard
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Personally I have more fun with the Columbo method of persistent questioning. I view PC as a cult that works by force of personality and vehemence than facts or logic, hence my questioning clobbers the cognitive dissonance. I think of myself as the Aryan Therapist, and it makes my life fun as heck breaking down the prejudice of PC and instilling doubt about its metaphysical powers before I set the “patient” on a different course. I should recommend to the beginners hear to sound off at American Renaissance’s message board, because honestly the postings there are little but a bitch session as if Bob never existed. They could use some help.
Comment by Simmons
3 Comments