Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

AFKAN Defends Yockey

Posted by Bob on March 16th, 2007 under Coaching Session


NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

Bob wrote:
*snip*
But Rand and Marx and Yockey actually BELIEVE that the Freedom or Economics, or Great Culture they are groveling in front of has a LIFE of its OWN. Unlike the most ignorant illiterate South American Catholic, they honestly believe that this work of man’s hands is the be-all and end-all, that that product is the determinant of history.

Boys and girls, you CANNOT get dumber than THAT. *end*

in reply:
We “CANNOT get dumber than that?”

Let’s try.

Essentially – and I read The Muqaddimah* (Rosenthal translation) in school, and still have my copy in the attic – I’m defending Yockey on this.

Yockey understood the deeper issues – that words, manipulated as they are by the likes of Rand and Marx – and saw that none of “this” came from Nothing – there was a Source, and there is a hierarchy between us and Him.

My definition of the linkages between RACE and CULTURE are rather explicit; absent the RACE through which it can work, CULTURE remains inchoate, and useless. In this world of Form we can work with the abstract ideals – and Ideals – of our CULTURE, which ONLY our RACE can do with any degree of success.

I don’t see this as a process of human passivity at all. Simply put, the Culture-Soul proposes, and our RACE disposes. In turn, our RACE proposes, and the Culture-Soul…proposes. WE are the vehicles through which the Culture-Soul acts in world before us.

There is an old saying – “Life is God’s gift to you. What you choose to make of it is your gift to God.”

That’s why RACE is so important; the Culture-Soul CREATES the fabric from which the RACE is constructed, and we, acting collectively, form objects with that fabric, ranging from the most abstract to the most mundane.

What gives sense and meaning to all of our efforts is RACE, writ large.

This is a bit of an abstraction, and we all know plenty of “White people” who are not worth the powder to blow them to Hell. Yet, CIVILIZATION is a process that the Whute RACE, and ONLY the Wite RACE, can carry forward.

The most causal review of the Ruins of Detroit reveal a painful truth:

When the White RACE leaves, we take CIVILIZATION with us.

That unique process of creating, and sustaining, CIVILIZATION, is something that only our RACE can do; it is a reflection of the interaction between the members of our RACE who can hear the Teaching of the Culture-Soul, and transform it in their hearts, their souls, and their lives.

Every night, before I go to bed, I open my copy of Imperium and read Chapter One, “Perspective,” as a reminder that we are far more than what we see before ourselves in the mirror.

Much more.

The fulfillment of that is our Responsibility to our RACE.

* From Bob: Ibn Khaldoun’s book

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by Pain on 03/16/2007 - 1:28 pm

    NOT SPAM
    NOT SPAM

    Afkan is right and the reason is very simple.

    Culture is behavior and thus a gauge of WHO we are.

    People produce a culture.

    Compare the different peoples of the world two hundred years ago after they had lived thousands of years apart. White were self-sufficient, wore beautiful clothing, lived in beautiful mud-and-stud and stone homes and cities, wrote and read awesome literature, sung and heard sublime music in church, heard beautiful music and saw awesome plays in theatres, heard great folk music on the streets, and risked their lives to save their communities in war.

    Contrast that with the fecal ant-colony of the Far East, the landscape-burning and tribe-murders of the Red man, and the people-eating of Africa and Malaysia.

    Culture is our way of life.

    What does the way the races lived apart three hundred years tell us about each of them?

  2. #2 by Dave on 03/16/2007 - 1:35 pm

    NOT SPAM
    NOT SPAM

    Discussions such as these dance around real world issues having to do with reality of racial nobility and its real and continuing role in the world.

    Consider, for example, India since 1948, the racial nobility of India took great pains to hide behind political correctness.

    That is why you have such extreme sensitivity to the big tourist draws in India.

    The truth of these edifices dare not be openly researched because any discussion leads directly into an open recognition of the racial nobility that rules India.

    Here in the West, a similar phenomenon occurred.

    Since WWII, there has been nothing more heretical that coping to the notion that there exists a racial nobility among white people.

    Racial quality distinctions among white people themselves dare not be mentioned, and discussions of the differentials among the various branches of the white race itself are off limits.

    It is all dismissed with “we are all just to mixed up to make heads or tails out of this”.

    Same argument in India.

    Instead mysticism is required to cover up the bald faced truth, so archeology is banned at the tourist draws or discussions remain at very low levels of discourse involving Nazi mysticism or something.

    But there is racial nobility and that racial nobility takes great pains to sustain itself, here, in India, and in many other areas of the world also.

    This is a most secretive topic and it leaks out in odd ways such as in the oddity of Baywatch and its popularity.

    It leaks out in the big tourist draws of India.

    It leaks out in the absurd celebrity industry focusing on the British royal family.

    But we are entering an era of a rebellion against the big cover-up worldwide.

    It is ironic that the eventual return to open acknowledgement of white supremacy by whites themselves will lead to the discord of intra-racial differentials.

    You cannot acknowledge racial difference and make it extra-race only. It is intra-race also.

    A new world is being born, and perhaps a future industry in genetic manipulations waits where the issue of racial nobility will openly express itself.

  3. #3 by Peter on 03/16/2007 - 2:46 pm

    NOT SPAM
    NOT SPAM

    USE THIS VERSION

    “A major difference between a little man and big man is that a big man makes big MISTAKES.”

    Ibn Khaldoun talk about the rise and fall of dynasties.
    Spengler and Yockey talk about the nature of civilizations.

    Khaldoun is like our talk about the rise and fall of political parties.
    Spengler and Yockey talk about our race.

You must be logged in to post a comment.