Archive for March 25th, 2007

Nuts

As I pointed out before, I once had a letter in Science Digest that attacked a recurrent theme in the media. Every couple of months all the magazines, including SD, would announce that “the earliest man has been found at …” They would ten have a set of comments from experts saying WHY mankind evolved right where the latest discovery had been made.

I criticized this in one letter to SD, and the thing simply STOPPED. No one but me noticed that the media started treating each new discovery as the LATEST new discovery. I wrote a letter to the Washington Times pointing out that, if one said, as that Moonie paper always did, that a wall at the Mexican border was the same as the Berlin Wall, then they were saying that it was the same to be inside the DC jail as outside it.

You see, the DC jail does not allow anyone outside IN, and it does not allow anyone INSIDE out. But those inside the jail feel they get the poorer deal. Those who are forced to remain IN a country are not the same as the entire population of the world which would LIKE to be in richer countries.

The paper, AND the Washington Post, abruptly stopped saying that.

As I discussed in my latest book, at least once a week you would hear a liberal commentator saying that for every time a person defended his home with a gun, a brave and fearless criminal took it away from the householder and shot him FORTY-THREE times. This came straight from the Northeast, whence all truth flows, and no policeman dared to contradict it.

Then, down in Florida, a career police officer said he had never even HEARD of a brave criminal taking the gun and using it against the householder. This letter got quoted all over the country by people whose livelihoods did not depend on a Northeastern police official. This line, which had been absolute Gospel a month earlier, disappeared absolutely.

Our local newspaper is a liberal rag in a chain. They were fighting to get people to vote for a change in the state constitution that would remove the ban in interracial marriage. They pointed out it had been struck down by the Supreme Curt anyway. I wrote several letters, emphasizing the Mantra, which they would not publish.

Why not, if an argument is so weak?

My list is long, long, long. Was Hitler the ONLY person who thought children card what they looked like or if they were smart? Points like that, in the real world, DO intimidate. As I say, my friends don’t realize how effective I am, but my enemies sure as HELL do. A simple statement can intimidate.

Our regular participants are a handful. If you listen to Rush Limbaugh, you will find that he recognizes a number of HIS millions of listeners. Participants are always few. And I didn’t know that the British censor was one of them. Hell, our censors alone make up a population, and most of them are just bureaucrats. They will repeat what they hear.

A good line is like a good joke. It spreads itself.

Now if you see the world as ruled by a tiny clique of stone-faced men marching in lockstep, none of this makes any sense at all. It also means you haven’t been out there much.

“Look how BIG they are. Look how TINY we are!” That is the enemy’s propaganda. You can lose EVERYTHING by listening to it. If that were the whole story, no society would EVER change.

This idea made a lot more sense forty years ago. But now technology is shifting underneath the establishment. Was there ever a group of more powerful stone-faced men than the Soviet Empire? Every, I mean EVERY, Soviet Expert LAUGHED at the idea it would fall in the last century.

I helped it happen.

But the Mourners act like it never happened.

Owning CBS is simply not what it used to be. And it was never what the Mourners THOUGHT it used to be. But the Mourners can undermine your resolve.

I never met a Mourner who ever ACCOMPLISHED anything.

And if you think about it, you can see why.

This lesson is not limited to politics. If you want to be failure in life, be a Mourner. Go try to get a job at a firm and tell them up front, “Your product will never sell.” Go out and try to accomplish something after telling yourself how big the world is and how small you are.

My explanation here is getting below the level of 2+2=4. But the Mourner would say, “Yes, 2+2 IS 4 for now. But it won’t be tomorrow!”

Listen to him, ad then try to learn arithmetic.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

3 Comments

www.nationalsalvation.net

www.nationalsalvation.net

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

2 Comments

On the Game

I was astounded by a poll which showed that 97% of white women prefer white men. I would have thought that, in speaking to a stranger, at least 70% of white women, who spend a major portion of their time in the beauty shop and a major portion of their money on cosmetics, would have said what they always say: Looks are not important.

Some time back a poll showed that the overwhelming majority of women wanted pretty children but did not care what their husbands looked like. As far as I can tell, it is required that one say that Hitler was the only person in history who thought children might care what THEY looked like.

All that is supposed to matter to the next generation is not that they look like a bunch of the mulattoes and browns who go crazy over blonds in Brazil. It’s fine with OJ Simpson’s daughter that she looks like the type of woman her father wouldn’t touch with a ten-foot pole as long as Poppa was IN LOVE at the time that that guy in a dress waved his arms over the mixed couple.

All this is as sane as a privet bush in your ear, so I was astounded when 97% of white women actually stated their preference for white men. In an insane world, sanity sounds WEIRD.

But half of the white women did say they would marry a nonwhite if the nonwhite made a LOT more money. The pollster even worked out the trade-off. If he has a million a year, hubby can be a chimpanzee.

Which reminds me of an exchange Bernard Shaw was supposed to have had at a party. A woman was talking abut the glories of being rich, so he said, “So you would do anything for a million pounds, even go to bed with me?”

She replied that of course she would.

Shaw then said, “Will you got o be with me at the going rate on the street, say, ten shillings?”

The woman was shocked, “What do you think I am, a prostitute!?”

Shaw replied, “We’ve already established what you are. We are now negotiating the price.”

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

4 Comments

The Old Conspiracy Crap

AFKAN and Mr. Webb gave me about the same comment today. Like the guy who sent the PM saying he would deign to speak to me if I gave the right answer, they want to know WHO is the group that is running the world. Mr. Webb says it’s someone called the media and AFKAN says it’s the Jews.

I have been where a lot of power is, and the world just isn’t BUILT that way.

I have said before that if you want lots of financial advice, just go to a bar, find a guy who is nursing his rink because he can’t afford another, and buy him lots of liquor. He will tell you all abut money. He will tell you all the people with money have a conspiracy gong. He will tell you how, if he had some money, he would quickly to a billionaire.

Advice from people who actually HAVE money, and especially those who MAKE money, is a little harder to come by. It also is not as appealing as the broke drunk’s advice was. The broke drunk has 1) a quicky formula or 2) He explains why it isn’t your fault you’re not rich.

In other words, he tells you why 1) it’s easy, or 2) it’s hopeless. Either way, it takes the burden completely off of you.

People who have actually had to deal with either money or power cannot sympathize with you if you think it’s hopeless, and are not about to tell you it is easy.

Speaking of easy, I am getting bored with Mr. Webb’s substituting insults for thoughts. He has not had one single useful concept and every post includes a personal insult. I am good about allowing this kind of childish behavior, but I am not going to keep on flouting my tolerance at the expense of ideas.

Something else you will not gain money or power by doing is substituting nastiness for thought.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

4 Comments