Lord Nelson says:

You may like to know coach, that British libraries have banned access to your website on their computers. (Congratulations)

ME:

Congratulations, indeed!

I think I am good at this, or I wouldn’t be up here in the pulpit. One result is that we look smaller than we are. I have spent a lifetime getting around censors, saying just what is undeniable. No one gives me credit for the fact that for over a quarter of a century, I have the only mainline book that attacked intermarriage as genocide against whites.

Buchanan FINALLY wrote his, as I had been urging him to do for a long time, and it was a best-seller. But if I understand its conclusions, everything will be all right if we all become little brown Traditional Values Catholics.

But the Canadians only seized my last book because Eric Fromm had it on him, and they held it for two months and couldn’t find anything in it they could actually ban. All this makes us look like small potatoes compared to Stormfront and Duke’s books. In other words, the very reason I don’t get credit for my ideas, the very reason we don’t get publicity, is the same strategy that makes us so much more effective than anyone else.

My ideas slide through into the mainstream media.

Though I don’t own them.

Institutions Like the Media

One commenter says institutions are all corrupt. Anther says fiddle-faddle, that is absurd. This is an excellent example of getting away from what I THINK I have to teach you. There is nothing illegitimate about this debate. It just doesn’t belong HERE, because “All institutions are perverted” and “All institution are not perverted” is an argument you can have anywhere, and here it distracts from a type of thinking that requires concentration.

In fact, as I say, this is a perfect EXAMPLE of why this kind of thinking requires so much concentration. What we are used to obsessing over is beside the point, and this is a good example of what we are used to obsessing over.

Mr. Webb insists that I understand how powerful a force the media are against us. I make a distinction that I think is critical. I see the media as an institution that is in the hands of the wrong kind of thinking. The universities are the same.

AFKAN keeps talking about the Devil Jews. I keep having trouble with that for exactly the same reason that I have trouble with Mr. Webb. It is certainly not that I disagree with them. Jews and the media and the universities declared war against my race, against the South, against everything I care for.

I expect every commenter to KNOW that. I explain it very simply to anyone who doesn’t. I don’t need a thick book to do it, as you will see if you read my comments in the antis section of SF. I’ve been doing it all my life.

I expect you to know that or absorb that. I also take it for granted that you can READ. I also take it for granted that you can use a computer. This is not the place where we try to convince each other this is true. That seems to be what all pro-white sites spend all their time doing. Here we are talking abut WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT.

All I get from AFKAN’s general, I say general — his specifics are useful – condemnation of the Jews is what everybody here already knows. Someone sent me a Personal Message (PM) on Stormfront, after I had done them a favor. The PM said it was testing whether I was worth talking to or not.

Whether or not this person would deign to talk to me was based on this question: Do I understand who the REAL enemy is? Needless to say, he got no reply.

Mr. Webb says he will deign to read the blog until I say the media is unimportant. He wants me to say the media are a serious problem. That’s easy to answer, and the insult is easy to take, I’ve had plenty of those all my life. And while Stormfront PMers are expendable, blog commenters are important.

To say the media are a problem is the greatest understatement since the Jews started telling God Almighty that he was something special. They seem to think God needs eternal reassurance.

But I don’t see the point of spend all time massaging what seems to be the fragile ego of a being who is both omniscient and omnipotent. Jesus never said “praise God” a single time.

If AFKAN can explain to me what good his “Devil Jew” bit does, I’ll be right there joining him. If Mr. Webb can tell me how to take over ownership of the media, I’ll be his first recruit.

If not, I’d like to know what good all this hammering on the obvious is doing, because our resources here are very limited and I am making the because of them I know how.

It is certainly not true that you have to own the media t rule. The media, like all businesses outside of Comrade Armand Hammer’s circle, were under the complete control of conservatives while the New Deal took over. The Nazis were chronically, and desperately, short of money. Communists could always organize a mass rally, the total Nazi vote in1928 was down to 200,000.

To me, the question is not who the villains are, but what WE need to do.

In the present situation, the Mantra is infinitely more effective than one more exposure of Jewish power or another attempt to buy up CBS.

Now I can pose Dave’s uncomfortably accurate assessment of me, now that the piece below, “Shari, Ask Sarge,” will show how I agree with him in a way.

Dave:

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

MrWebb,

Bob’s Blog is about one simple, profound, and true idea: EVERY institution, without exception, is a racket. “White nationalism” is no less a racket than “political correctness”. Anti-Semitism is no less a racket than Judaism. A plague on ALL those houses! Bob says.

The only true power in the world is the ability to grasp this truth. The only power ANY racket has over ANYBODY is the power the ignorance of its victims grants it. A racket that is SEEN THROUGH has no power, by definition. The worldly power you’re speaking of is, quite literally, an illusion. See through it, and it’s gone.

And in this, Bob is profoundly correct. He has seen behind the curtain. He has paid for this insight with blood. He has paid for this insight with loneliness.

What Bob doesn’t understand is that no more than a TINY group of people will ever understand this. He understands even less that probably no more than a tiny group of people SHOULD understand this, even if that were possible. The masses must be LED. That’s what they want, and that’s what they need. For these, illusions are necessary. All you can hope for is that the illusions by which they live are good for them, not bad.

Nothing horrifies Bob more than the thought of LEADING his people in order to save them. Bob wants a group of people he doesn’t HAVE to lead. Bob wants a group of people who would spit in his face if he even TRIED to lead them. Bob thinks that his crucial, true, hard-won insight, that any so-called worldly “power” or “authority” is nothing more than an ILLUSION and a FARCE, can be spread to the masses like a gospel. He thinks it can be popularized. He thinks it can be spread by spamming newsgroups with mantras. But he’s wrong. There is no royal road to what Bob knows. Anybody who wants to know what Bob knows must pay the price Bob paid. Bob can’t pay it for us, as much as he’d like to. Bob isn’t Jesus.

Bob desperately believes we Aryans are too good to be led by ANYBODY, much less himself. And that’s a great compliment. But he’s wrong. What’s more, it’s an injustice. It’s like leaving a tiny baby in a desert, explaining to the baby that anything of his own flesh and blood should be capable of fending for itself.

A race is not defined by skin color. It is not a mass of people with a certain mix of haplotypes. Rather, a true race is a tiny, burdened, race-bearing nobility that is willing to rule, with love and benevolence, over its kinfolk. If that nobility abdicates this responsibility with the excuse that any such leadership is a fraud and shouldn’t be necessary and is below the dignity and intelligence of everybody involved, then only one thing will happen. The abandoned task of leading that people will be eagerly taken up by its racial enemies, and that people will be led to their physical extermination. That is, of course, what is happening to our people now.

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

So often you write something that I was “just saying the other day” I have realized the ” both sides” are missing it and I realize the natural corruption of institutions. I just wish I had a better grasp of what to look AT. Most of my hope comes from looking at the corruption and seeing that it is too ludicrous for words and can’t last.

But seeing beyond that, I haven’t yet. So many people that I know, and frankly, the only ones I know personally are white, are just bone tired. But even that exhaustion says something. I think they would turn off the damned basketball games in a minute if they saw something else.

Comment by shari

ME:

This is where my institutional memory serves you EXTREMELY well. While others here may be old enough to remember what I do, they have not been in the middle of this battle decade after decade. As you guessed, the exhaustion you describe is WONDERFUL for us.

No one BELIEVES any more. It is time for those of us who THINK to fill the vacuum.

All through history, people BELIEVED. Everyone in Islam was convinced that his belief was the only one, thought they were all fully aware that tens of million of others believed in their own faith just as deeply.
When a Janissary, robed and chaste, fell back from killing a Knights Templar, equally robed and chaste, with one arm gone, he knew very well that that Knight Templar had been just as sure of his faith as had the Janissary. But it didn’t dent his faith.

That, by the way, is where the title “El Cid” comes from.

In the 1950s, almost all the non-sociopaths BELIEVED. Some were unreconstructed Rebels, some were disciples of Mommy Professor, but everybody BELIEVED.

Back then, a professor was SOMEBODY. A priest was SOMEBODY. Each had followers, each had believers.
The flood of information today is not new. But it is unprecedented. When the printing press first hit Europe, it turned our whole world upside down.

All social animals seek a leader and a belief. Without it we get the Lone Wolf Syndrome. One of the basic keys to understanding dogs is to realize is that they are far more social animals than WE are. A lone wolf dies very quickly.

A dog that acts like a hyperactive child is usually cured by the trainer making it clear to him that YOU are the master. Dogs cannot stand a Randian world. They want to take orders.
The human reaction to this same situation is discouragement. It is exhaustion. They feel in their inner being that, as they grow up, there will always be an authority, a pecking order, a TRUTH they can take for granted and go on with their lives.

Which drives us nuts. Really, they just want to find their pack and go on with their lives. America has never been as happy or as energized as it was right after Pearl Harbor or at the beginning of the first Gulf War or on September 12, 2001, when everybody knew who the enemy was.

Now let’s go back to my institutional memory. In the 1950s everybody had a PACK. Communists, Mommy Professorites, rednecks, Objectivists, Tridentate Catholics, stomping preachers, each was a self-assured camp. Only the ones who simply couldn’t decide seemed WEARY.

If you will, at long last, LOOK at my entries in the antis section, you will see that mine is the ONLY approach that no one can DEAL with. My concepts are at home in the information flood. My concepts are the ONLY ones that were DEVELOPED FOR the information flood.

What makes you and Pain and Brian and other of our regulars here tired is that your pack is too SMALL. You have the Lone Wolf tiredness, but it is ENTIRELY different from the one you describe.

Once you have been here a while, you know you will never be able to join another pack with the uncompromising loyalty you really want.

Others feel exhausted because every Absolute Faith they look into gets shot down. Only blacks and Orientals have the luxury of a pack. Information does not get in their way.

Naturally the question is, how can we deal with the Oriental hordes when there are so few of us?

Ask the Sarge. That is how sergeants were invented. They used to be called centurions.

I am not opposed to art. I am not opposed to music. I am not opposed to words. I am not opposed to institutions.

But if you decide that all races are equal because you like African art, I am opposed to that. If you decide your daughter should marry a black because some blacks are good singers, I am opposed to that.

None of this is hard to understand. But when I say that institutions are bad when they are substituted for racial loyalty, I am opposed to it, people get very confused. One commenter said that “e the People of the United States “ordained and established a constitution,” so I should not object to institutions.

What I LIKE about this statement is that it is blog statement, no frills, no fancy stuff, no attempt to cite endless histories to make it look like the writer is thinking Deep Thoughts. It is right or it is wrong.

And that precious word:

Period.

This is a PLAIN statement of a confusion that a lot of people have about Wordism. Just because you have an institution does not mean you have Wordism. Wordism is the fatal disease that every institution gets, and will get until we are fully aware that it IS a disease and what its symptoms are.

I am not opposed to art. I am not opposed to music. I am opposed to words. I am not opposed to institutions. But in the case of the Preamble to the United States Constitution I am reaffirming that the PURPOSE of the institution: to provide the blessings of liberty for OURSELVES and OUR descendants. I certainly do not object to an institution that does THAT.

But what is the Constitution today? The Constitution is the document used by judges when they OVERRIDE the peoples’ interests. When it was decided by California voters that they did not want to provide welfare for people who were NOT “We the people of the United States” the Supreme Court overruled them in the name of the Constitution.

Due to Wordism, the Constitution is doing exactly what it was set up toe avoid doing. Courts have picked out the words they want and made our Constitution into an institution which is an enemy of we the people and our posterity. This happens to all institutions eventually.

Whales gather barnacles. That does not make me anti-whale. People get diseases. That does not make me anti-people. Institutions get Wordism. That does not make me anti-institution.

I wish that, when you read my stuff, you would think of me as trying to lead you through tangled undergrowth. Normally, in he important ones, I go over the usual “two sides” you have been presented with all your life, and then make a point that, if you follow ME closely,

The problem is that, as I go through the usual clutter of ideas you are used to, I hit every hot button you have had inserted in you over your whole lifetime. But Bob’s Blog is useless if it is just a discussion of what you are used to.

One person wrote the usual point about how we have to control the national media. I don’t think he is a regular reader, or he would have gotten one of my major points: That if we accept that some people are after money, some fame, some offices, and we are after POWER. He is simply going back over the same old ground he is trained to go over. I teach that owning things is not the key to POWER.

In the last piece, “The Hook, I went through the history of the ianity that has substituted itself for Christ. But the point was that this is an example of how we confuse Christianity in the West wither with all that the West is, or, on the other extreme, as the cause of all our troubles.

I am glad to have the comments, and I was the one who says that I often don’t answer your questions but make the points you make me think of. Pain got my point best. One commenter was offended by my using ‘hook-nosed.” I am with him. I am desperately tired of statements about The Evil Jew. But in this case, it was just another example of the fact that, if I have to choose between good taste and a good pun, I will choose the pun, Boredom is a reader’s worst enemy.

Come on, now, how could I be writing about The Hook, then the Jews, and not throw “hook-nose” in there? All of this distracts from what Bob’s Underground Seminar IS. If you were able to go through my writings and extract the usual hot point “both sides” out of it, you would have a long series of critical observations. “Both sides,” in the end, have nothing to do with what I am teaching here.

I started “The Hook” talking, not abut Christianity, but about Communism. There is a hook in EVERY side of EVERY issue you are exposed to. The institution you love most has a hook in it. The institution you hate most has a hook in it. You have to see THE HOOKS to see the truth.

Randian total freedom and Marx’s “dictatorship of the proletariat” are the same thing from my point of view. But you are trained to regard them as “both sides.” To me, the Catholic priesthood and the Calvinist priesthood and the Politically Correct priesthood are the same thing, though they regard themselves as complete opposites, and everyone is trained to do that.

You are expected to have your own world-view. But you are in THIS class to get what the Prof has to TEACH you, not to agree with every example he gives.

I want YOUR comments, but I want you to read the piece and say, “What is BOB saying here?” My short summations are more important than all the lead-in to it. The lead-ins you can get ANYWHERE.

My theology you can get anywhere. My prejudices you can get anywhere. You are HERE for a reason, and what makes my job so difficult is that this is the ONLY place where the aim is NOT indoctrination. The point here is to go over the familiar and then cut through the bullshit and give you a rational approach. That means REPEATING the bullshit. But if you get wrapped up in THAT, you lost the path completely.

I will often say, “This is the conservative viewpoint. This is the antireligious viewpoint.” I oversimplify both because I would bore you to death if I went into all I know abut both and made it exact.

By the time I get to MY point, which is the only that makes this reading worthwhile to you, most readers are lost back in my descriptions of where we are. Back Bay Grouch and Elizabeth are analyzing my comments about priests abut how they get along with THEIR priests. By the time I get to MY point, I am almost alone.

So when I wrote abut the Masturbation Generation and how they, like Catholic bishops, are ashamed of how they let the sergeants molest them or their comrades, all I got was a discussion of the military or the Catholic Church as homosexual outfits. I had to repeat over and over and over and over that this had nothing to do with what I was saying.

I describe what we usually think about on any given issue and you are still correcting me about THAT, since that is what you know about already. So while I am describing how Rand and Marx are similar, you are welcome to give me information abut Rand and Marx, but you should also be looking for what ***I*** am saying here.

A good example of this is that Back Bay Grouch will think I just criticized his talking his relationship with his own priest. I am NOT. I read it several times and I NEED it. That is what you are USED to hearing about. That is NOT what I am saying.

When I describe Rand and Marx or respectable conservatism and liberalism or Toynbee versus Yockey, I am concentrating on telling you that, while your eyes have been fixed on the battle between THEM, you are so obsessed with THAT that you cannot see that that is NOT where the truth lies. They are both arguing abut nonessentials that are important to THEM, and they are in full agreement that the truth is not where it REALLY is.

I am trying to get you to raise your eyes and see the truth.

Mark’s job is not fun. He hops on all of us, including, me. So when he gets to compliment somebody, it is a special treat:

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

This is the kind of useful information we can use! Peter is a storehouse of information —
and something we don’t see around here or elsewhere in the white nationalist movement:
ACTION.

God bless you, Peter!

The rest of you — use these links to your advantage. Take the fight to the enemy and don’t
become discouraged when you meet resistance. In a decade or two the white will be all but
extinct if census figures are accurate. The time is NOW and your effort is not just needed —
it’s PARAMOUNT!

Mark

ME:

And Papillon is trying to keep the ball rolling with some more PRACTICAL info:

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

The Seventh Annual Weblog Awards http://2007.bloggies.com/ have just been released. In the
category of politics, the winner was http://www.wonkette.com/ with these blogs as “nominees”
(though I’m not sure what that means):

http://www.dailykos.com/

http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/

http://www.instapundit.com/

All of the above sites would have large readerships, but even more at the moment due to the
awards.

Papillon

Comment by Peter — 3/13/2007 @ 2:30 am | Edit This

NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM

Another resource which I don’t think has been posted here is Technocratic:

http://technorati.com/

Use it to search weblogs by keyword and for links. It also has its own general news section
and blogs.

Papillon

ME:

Dave wrote a piece recently WHICH I CANNOT FIND, in which he not only said the blog needs to get back to more elevated subjects, but he WROTE on a subject. That is 180 degrees from senile bitching from young or old.

Dave, I need your piece again.

Now, from Papillon (ladies first), Peter and Mark and Dave, we have a picture of what I need from YOU. We have to develop the ideas and we have to SELL the ideas. We have to do it all and we CAN do it all.

But on the action and intellectual sides in this case – though I’m sure their roles will reverse often – Mark and Dave show us what is needed. We need to stay in action ALL THE TIME (Mark) and we need to keep this site interesting and productive a la Dave.

BUT I AM NOT ASSIGNING ROLES HERE! I do not want any specialists here who are helpless in other roles. Mark provides intellectual food, but he went in when we were getting too theoretical and I expect Dave to know when he needs to do some ass-licking on his own.

Peter is the best generalist we have. The point is that nobody JUST bitches at Bob, which you need to do. But if I am writing what is needed, don’t flutter around like a mother hen doing the broken-wing act: WRITE. If I am letting laxity set in, KICK ASS.

And above all, DO SOMETHING!

Every now and then, as just now, I let things slide a little while, and it irritates the crap out of me that comments STOP. That is when we NEED for you to come in like Dave did.

If we get in our ivory tower, don’t just bitch at ME, do like Mark, take the onus on yourself, and KSA.

THIS Mommy Professor ain’t raising no Talking Dolls and he ain’t taking whining from wimps.