Archive for March, 2007
Al Parker
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 03/26/2007
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
While this is an interesting post, I don’t think it has a solid point. You seem to dislike it when people marry for love and when people marry for money. You say they should marry solely for aesthetics. But aesthetics is something you get used to — that’s why it’s discussed as only as a mere preference. You get used to what your partner looks like — this is why ugly people look less ugly as you become more familiar with them. The parents don’t seem to care what their children look like since they are acquainted with them from birth. And I have never any non-white say, “I wish I were white.”
Just for fun, I searched Google: 898 results for “I wish I were white” — 253 or so results for “I wish I were black” and 248 for Asian to put it in context.
If you grow up looking a certain way, you cannot imagine looking differently, nor would you seriously want to, unless you were a Semite in the Third Reich.
P.S. Are the browns in Brazil really going crazy over the blonds in Brazil because they are blond or because they look “exotic”? (Like the inverse of what we think of exotic here).
–Al Parker
ME:
All the old carp n one package.
“You seem to dislike it when people marry for love and when people marry for money. You say they should marry solely for aesthetics. ” Yes, and if you criticize Jews, you are a Nazi, right? I said that if you sell out yur race, you are prostituting yourself. Mney isnot forever, miscegenation is. We are talkng about women who prefer white looks but are wlling to have permanently ugly ofspring for money.
Think a litt,e there, Al.
And the old one abut how exotic is beautiful! I’ve heard THAT one all my life! Bay Watch was a worldwide favorite, whoever was exotic. There is no evolutinary justification for blodnes except to compete on looks. Peacock males would not have that fan if they were fighting for bare survival against other species.
Thank a little, there, Al.
“If you grow up looking a certain way, you cannot imagine looking differently, nor would you seriously want to, unless you were a Semite in the Third Reich.”
You just pointed ut that people WANT to be white.
Are you thinking AT ALL, Al?
Nuts
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 03/25/2007
As I pointed out before, I once had a letter in Science Digest that attacked a recurrent theme in the media. Every couple of months all the magazines, including SD, would announce that “the earliest man has been found at …” They would ten have a set of comments from experts saying WHY mankind evolved right where the latest discovery had been made.
I criticized this in one letter to SD, and the thing simply STOPPED. No one but me noticed that the media started treating each new discovery as the LATEST new discovery. I wrote a letter to the Washington Times pointing out that, if one said, as that Moonie paper always did, that a wall at the Mexican border was the same as the Berlin Wall, then they were saying that it was the same to be inside the DC jail as outside it.
You see, the DC jail does not allow anyone outside IN, and it does not allow anyone INSIDE out. But those inside the jail feel they get the poorer deal. Those who are forced to remain IN a country are not the same as the entire population of the world which would LIKE to be in richer countries.
The paper, AND the Washington Post, abruptly stopped saying that.
As I discussed in my latest book, at least once a week you would hear a liberal commentator saying that for every time a person defended his home with a gun, a brave and fearless criminal took it away from the householder and shot him FORTY-THREE times. This came straight from the Northeast, whence all truth flows, and no policeman dared to contradict it.
Then, down in Florida, a career police officer said he had never even HEARD of a brave criminal taking the gun and using it against the householder. This letter got quoted all over the country by people whose livelihoods did not depend on a Northeastern police official. This line, which had been absolute Gospel a month earlier, disappeared absolutely.
Our local newspaper is a liberal rag in a chain. They were fighting to get people to vote for a change in the state constitution that would remove the ban in interracial marriage. They pointed out it had been struck down by the Supreme Curt anyway. I wrote several letters, emphasizing the Mantra, which they would not publish.
Why not, if an argument is so weak?
My list is long, long, long. Was Hitler the ONLY person who thought children card what they looked like or if they were smart? Points like that, in the real world, DO intimidate. As I say, my friends don’t realize how effective I am, but my enemies sure as HELL do. A simple statement can intimidate.
Our regular participants are a handful. If you listen to Rush Limbaugh, you will find that he recognizes a number of HIS millions of listeners. Participants are always few. And I didn’t know that the British censor was one of them. Hell, our censors alone make up a population, and most of them are just bureaucrats. They will repeat what they hear.
A good line is like a good joke. It spreads itself.
Now if you see the world as ruled by a tiny clique of stone-faced men marching in lockstep, none of this makes any sense at all. It also means you haven’t been out there much.
“Look how BIG they are. Look how TINY we are!” That is the enemy’s propaganda. You can lose EVERYTHING by listening to it. If that were the whole story, no society would EVER change.
This idea made a lot more sense forty years ago. But now technology is shifting underneath the establishment. Was there ever a group of more powerful stone-faced men than the Soviet Empire? Every, I mean EVERY, Soviet Expert LAUGHED at the idea it would fall in the last century.
I helped it happen.
But the Mourners act like it never happened.
Owning CBS is simply not what it used to be. And it was never what the Mourners THOUGHT it used to be. But the Mourners can undermine your resolve.
I never met a Mourner who ever ACCOMPLISHED anything.
And if you think about it, you can see why.
This lesson is not limited to politics. If you want to be failure in life, be a Mourner. Go try to get a job at a firm and tell them up front, “Your product will never sell.” Go out and try to accomplish something after telling yourself how big the world is and how small you are.
My explanation here is getting below the level of 2+2=4. But the Mourner would say, “Yes, 2+2 IS 4 for now. But it won’t be tomorrow!”
Listen to him, ad then try to learn arithmetic.
www.nationalsalvation.net
Posted by Bob in Bob, Coaching Session on 03/25/2007
www.nationalsalvation.net
On the Game
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, How Things Work on 03/25/2007
I was astounded by a poll which showed that 97% of white women prefer white men. I would have thought that, in speaking to a stranger, at least 70% of white women, who spend a major portion of their time in the beauty shop and a major portion of their money on cosmetics, would have said what they always say: Looks are not important.
Some time back a poll showed that the overwhelming majority of women wanted pretty children but did not care what their husbands looked like. As far as I can tell, it is required that one say that Hitler was the only person in history who thought children might care what THEY looked like.
All that is supposed to matter to the next generation is not that they look like a bunch of the mulattoes and browns who go crazy over blonds in Brazil. It’s fine with OJ Simpson’s daughter that she looks like the type of woman her father wouldn’t touch with a ten-foot pole as long as Poppa was IN LOVE at the time that that guy in a dress waved his arms over the mixed couple.
All this is as sane as a privet bush in your ear, so I was astounded when 97% of white women actually stated their preference for white men. In an insane world, sanity sounds WEIRD.
But half of the white women did say they would marry a nonwhite if the nonwhite made a LOT more money. The pollster even worked out the trade-off. If he has a million a year, hubby can be a chimpanzee.
Which reminds me of an exchange Bernard Shaw was supposed to have had at a party. A woman was talking abut the glories of being rich, so he said, “So you would do anything for a million pounds, even go to bed with me?”
She replied that of course she would.
Shaw then said, “Will you got o be with me at the going rate on the street, say, ten shillings?”
The woman was shocked, “What do you think I am, a prostitute!?”
Shaw replied, “We’ve already established what you are. We are now negotiating the price.”
The Old Conspiracy Crap
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 03/25/2007
AFKAN and Mr. Webb gave me about the same comment today. Like the guy who sent the PM saying he would deign to speak to me if I gave the right answer, they want to know WHO is the group that is running the world. Mr. Webb says it’s someone called the media and AFKAN says it’s the Jews.
I have been where a lot of power is, and the world just isn’t BUILT that way.
I have said before that if you want lots of financial advice, just go to a bar, find a guy who is nursing his rink because he can’t afford another, and buy him lots of liquor. He will tell you all abut money. He will tell you all the people with money have a conspiracy gong. He will tell you how, if he had some money, he would quickly to a billionaire.
Advice from people who actually HAVE money, and especially those who MAKE money, is a little harder to come by. It also is not as appealing as the broke drunk’s advice was. The broke drunk has 1) a quicky formula or 2) He explains why it isn’t your fault you’re not rich.
In other words, he tells you why 1) it’s easy, or 2) it’s hopeless. Either way, it takes the burden completely off of you.
People who have actually had to deal with either money or power cannot sympathize with you if you think it’s hopeless, and are not about to tell you it is easy.
Speaking of easy, I am getting bored with Mr. Webb’s substituting insults for thoughts. He has not had one single useful concept and every post includes a personal insult. I am good about allowing this kind of childish behavior, but I am not going to keep on flouting my tolerance at the expense of ideas.
Something else you will not gain money or power by doing is substituting nastiness for thought.
The Appeal of Defeatism
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 03/24/2007
I cannot tell exactly what Mr. Webb IS saying. He seems to be upset that 1) I am not saying the media are all-powerful, and that 2) for that reason, we are doomed.
Why is it that people fight so desperately or defeatism? I don’t mean that some are discouraged from time to time; I mean that some people in our movement are nothing less than defeatist fanatics. Their entire energy goes into saying how hopeless it all is. If you say anything encouraging, they react as if you had called their mother a whore.
All this comes, of course, in the form of dedication to the cause. I think that is sincere. The defeatists want someone to blame for their frustration. Mr. Webb talks about the media, but he is really blaming me. I am his demon in human shape, on whom he can take out all his hates and frustrations. This is, I realize after decades of dealing with this phenomenon, routine. Defeatism is always personal. It comes with personal insults and fury.
S the first appeal of defeatism is that it gives a chance to take your anger out on someone who will LISTEN to you. You join with other pro-whites, so you are part of the crowd. Then you blame THEM for what makes you furious.
The second appeal defeatism has is that you don’t have to DO anything. You just show that you FEEL for the Cause, and you have been betrayed by it. But since all is lost, the last think you are obligated to do is act.
Defeatism is appealing for third reason. It is easy to argue. “Look how big they are and how small we are.” Yu then quote every single argument THEY make on this point.
“The enemy’s best asset is not the troops in his own ranks but the defeatists in yours.”
In Ben Franklin’s Autobiography he talks about a man in Philadelphia he called The Mourner. No matter what happened, the Mourner said all was lost. Franklin said he was happy The Mourner paid twice as much for the house he wanted because he had been predicting the whole city was lost when he could have bought it.
? to Mr. Webb
NOT SPAM
NOT SPAM
Mr. Webb,
When a theater begins to fill up with smoke, all it takes is ONE clear-headed person to organize an orderly evacuation and thereby save everybody’s life. This has happened many times.
If no clear-headed person is present, however, then hundreds die. The really sad thing is that far more of them die from being trampled by their panic-stricken fellow audience members than from the actual smoke and flames.
Now, Bob himself may not be the best one to organize an orderly evacuation. As he has told us many times, he is by profession a staffer, not a leader. But Bob, who made his living doing the thinking for some powerful leaders, COMPLETELY understands the power that ONE CLEAR HEAD can have in a crisis situation. And a few clear heads are exactly what he’s trying to create here.
Mr. Webb, we’re all sitting together in a dark, crowded theater right now. And it’s starting to fill up with smoke. And you’re sitting in your seat screaming “Fire burns! Smoke suffocates! This theater is a firetrap! You are all idiots for not understanding these things!” But we do understand those things, actually. We learned things like “fire burns” quite early in life, thank you. Our focus now, however, is on how to get everybody out of the theater alive. The best way to start is by thinking, not screaming.
ME:
Thank you. VERY well done.
MR WEBB:
not spam
not spam
How utterly schizophrenic can any one human being get? In the first four paragraphs of his piece Bob Whitaker says MrWebb is unutterably correct in his analysis and he is thoroughly mistaken. What kind of unmitigated crap is that, Whitaker? A man is not right and wrong at the same time regardless of your ideation.
I don’t have to tell you how to neuter the Mainstream media/Corporate media, Mr. Whitaker. I will leave that up to the genius that you say you are. I will leave it up to you and your imagination to figure out how you might defeat this enemy who promotes the genocide of your race. I would like to think that a genius such as yourself would not expect me to tell you point by point on this blog how to go about the task. For the love of God, man, use what passes for a brain when you talk to your superiors! You want instructions here on this blog? Oh, sho’nuf cousin, cummin right up! Put another way, whose side are you on anyway, man?
I pointed out who your essential enemy is and where he may be found and you want to trivialize this and minimize it. I now seriously wonder whose side you are on notwithstanding all your protestations to the contrary. You want to get into various trivia about your race and its superiority to all other forms of human life on the planet and you want to talk about how your race is about to be extinguished but you don’t want to spend any time addressing the sources of the genocidal bombardment. It is these sources that must be attacked on a daily basis. Talking this endless nonsense on your blog about all kinds of pointless crap goes nowhere. You need to make it a lot more simple for people and attack the basics of that which is attacking you. You can start with the Mainstream media/Corporate media which is daily attacking you and those whom you refer to as “my people.”
“Hammering on the obvious.” It is not obvious to most people in the USA that the White Race is under attack and it is certainly not obvious to them that the Mainstream media/ Corporate media is the major weapon of choice leading to their demise. You may think, Mr. Whitaker, that it is obvious to the overwhelming majority of Americans but it is not at all obvious to them. You should know that political propaganda doesn’t work that way. I think you do know that. Whose side are you on?
You’re a winner, Whitaker. You don’t even want to know who the villains are. It’s not even important to identify the enemy. You are one hell of a leader.
“It is certainly not true that you have to own the media to rule.” That is a Whitaker assertion. Well, who presently owns the media, who is presently ruling and where are we going? Oh, you are a winner, Whitaker. Who owns the media, who rules America and where are we going? Whitaker would have you believe that there is no connection. If you’re dumb enough to buy that keep reading this blog. There’s a lot more doodoo where that came from. This must be the guy who wants to save the White Race from genocide. Yeah. Right. Looks like it.
Yeah, the Mantra gonna save ya. Oh, the Mantra is so effective that it defies the imagination.
Another analysis would be that the Mantra is analogous to the power of a fart in a windstorm. The windstorm, by the way, is the Mainstream media/Corporate media. Whitaker won’t tell you that. MrWebb will.
MrWebb
-
You are currently browsing the archives for March, 2007
Bob’s Books
Bob's first book - 1976
A Plague On Both Your HousesBob's second book - 1982
THE NEW RIGHT PAPERSBob's deadliest book - 2004
Why Johnny Can't Think:
America's Professor-PriesthoodWhy Johnny Can't Think ebook zip
pwrd: Phu=9Ad5
Poor Baby!
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 03/26/2007
not spam
not spam
Oh, well, there is always Dave and Mark and Simmons. That’s the best “ole bob” is going to get. Bob knows it. Angry people. He counts himself lucky to get you angry people. Thinking people won’t be found on this blog. I dare say they won’t be welcome. My experience here says they won’t be welcome. Only lockstep, heel-clicking yes men need apply. I noticed that. Some time ago. Every time I introduced a serious idea that might make a little bit of sense I have found that there is a small cadre of knuckledraggers that attack not my ideas but me personally. That tells me that there is no one in Bob’s camp who has any independence of mind. Well, that makes sense. There is a lot of misinformation on this blog. The same old weak arguments about “defeatism” and “surrender” are hoisted up the moment anything is introduced that may make just a little bit of sense. This blog is like a highway to nowhere.
MrWebb
ME:
Poor baby! You are not only unappreciated, you are less apreciated than you describe. Not only do I not appreciate your “new” ideas, I have yet to SEE one. Bitching about the media was old when I was a boy, defeatism is as old as treason, and personal insults are as old as primates.
Every anti-white always tells us his “new” ideas. He honetly thinks he thought of them, and they are always the same crap we have heard since Kindergarten. Maybe you honestly believe you have said something I haven’t heard since I reached my teens, but I can’t see anything like that in your writings.
8 Comments