Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Nelson
I guess this thread will run forever, personally if I was an anti I would be embarrassed by now.
“All you have to do is, put forward an argument that does not amount to the out populating of ALL White people, in their own countries”
Will any anti ever pass this challenge????
Come on Antis!
ME:
Don’t feel THAT obligated.
This is an example of what I keep repeating on the blog. He thinks he is being a True Intellectual, he is qouting Mommy Professor’s line and doesn’t even recognize how routine it is.
We are not arguing with HIM. He gives us an invaluable opportunity to make the REAL point over and over to a LOT of people. Meanwhile he honestly believes everybody is impressed with his brilliance. You can’t BUY a stooge like that!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Nelson
I guess this thread will run forever, personally if I was an anti I would be embarrassed by now.
“All you have to do is, put forward an argument that does not amount to the out populating of ALL White people, in their own countries”
Will any anti ever pass this challenge????
Come on Antis!
#1 by Lord Nelson on 04/29/2007 - 7:11 pm
That thread gets more and more interesting, and it gives many lessons.
Antis either argue that we compete with non White birth rates to keep what is ours, (that’s a lot of sex) or they say the White race does not exist.
And that really is all they have????????????????????????
To think the ethnic cleansing of a whole race of people, is based on something so WEAK and SHALLOW!
I can’t be the only one to see this?
Their own ideology is biting them in the arse so hard its embarrassing to watch.
I say everyone join in the fun, and encourage the antis to take the challenge.
#2 by richard on 04/30/2007 - 7:07 am
This doesn’t fit on this thread, but I wanted to tell you something that happened recently. I was working with the BNP on a local council in England, and they were planning to call for the abolition of the council’s ‘Black and Minority Local Government Workers Association’. The reasoning was that it was wrong for the nonwhite workers to have their own group while the whites don’t.
I was going to support their call, but then I thought , ‘What would Bob do?’. I realised that the answer wasn’t to abolish the nonwhite group, but to establish a white group. So now the BNP councillors are going to call for a White British Local Government Workers Association to be set up alongside the nonwhite one.
The shift from being ‘anti them’ to being ‘pro us’ is a very significant one, and I think it will have a big effect on their level of support. May 3rd is the local council elections date, so keep an eye out.
#3 by Mark on 04/30/2007 - 7:48 am
Good work Richard — I don’t know if Bob caught the signifigance of your post, but I sure as hell did! It’s actions like these that take our people out of the stereo-typed, knee-jerk reactions we’ve all been conditioned to (thanks to jew t.v.). It bothers me how many of us automatically act like the cardboard characters the media portrays us as. What you’ve done is broke the mold and proved we are more than what jew t.v. portrays us as.
#4 by Tim on 04/30/2007 - 1:40 pm
Lord Nelson,
I spent some time a while ago on this blog commenting on this so-called birth rate argument. Here is what I wrote:
“This low birthrate argument is garbage from a survival standpoint. Name ONE White tribe that has EVER out bred a NON-White tribe? Did the Greeks outbreed the Persians? Did the Spaniards outbreed the South American tribes? Did the founding fathers outbreed the Indians and then give themselves affirmative action to disenfranchise them? LOL. That is NOT how this works. We are not the aggressive breeders. We are the herd thinners! Sure we need to increase White Birth Rates. But NOT as much as NON-Whites need to decrease birth Rates and all the Liberals Know it!
When this comes up I always say the following: “Al Gore said the biggest threat to the enviroment is the third world birthrate”. I happen to agree with him. So why should the white tribes surrender our land to people who are just going to come here and over populate us as well? How will that be good for the enviroment or the indigenous european tribes? It won’t be. You just don’t have the balls to say it. While you are too busy soothing your guilt by trying to Genocide your own tribe. Your should be doing what is best for the enviroment. Who is going to solve these problems when we are gone? China?”
That usually gets them riled up (or just shuts them up). But preserving the European tribes is about preserving the enviroment. We are not the over breeding seals in Northern California. We are actually the White Sharks. 80% of any white tribes survival is going to be based on defense. Only 20% of our survival is birthrates. We would have been dead long ago trying to outbreed non-whites. Our survival strategy is so advanced our whole entire edge of ‘technological innovation’ runs quickest down our survival trajectory……DEFENSE. Look at all those weapons White Tribes build. Every Non-White tribe stands in LINE to buy the White tribes weapons. Why is that? ……Lets not forget RACE is REAL
We do need to increase the White Birth rate. But NOT nearly as much as we need to decrease the Non-Whites birthrates. Nature is out of balance. We will probably end up consolidating the White tribes some where on this planet. Right now we are too spread out in my opinion.
happy easter
Tim”
Bob, I just realized that the concept of “OUR BIG WHITE TRIBE” did not just jump into my head a couple posts ago. I am getting used to saying it. OUR TRIBE.
#5 by shari on 04/30/2007 - 3:02 pm
My grandmother was the 10th of eleven. She said women used to have a baby every two yrs. and sometimes they got MAD and had one EVERY year. I don’t think that many would go for the every year paln, but I bet a lot would go for 3,4,or 5 if they weren’t “raising” them alone, which they really can’t do, or having to hustle them off to daycare as two incomes are needed just to keep going. But that day is coming too, I think.