Archive for April, 2007
Correction
Hugh Gaitskell did NOT win that election. I saw him walk in and that stuck to my mind. I WAS rght about his being an early Tony Blair in that, as Labor Party leader, he fought to get rid of the nationalization of industry parts of the Labor platform.
But Churchill DID give me HALF of that V for Victory sign.
Would I lie to you? I was in politics!
Tell Me Again There’s no Rebellion!
This may be helpful: http://www.rsf.org/rubrique.php3?id_rubrique=542
Comment by Papillo
ME:
It’s called “Handbook for Cyber Dissidents”
Web Censorship “Bypass” Unveiled!
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 04/25/2007
A Political Practitioner Looks at Churchill
Winston Churchill was the offspring of a lady born and raised in Virginia and an up-and-coming young man in British politics. The overwhelming tragedy he was raised with was that his young father resigned from Government in protest and was never allowed back in. That preyed on his mind the rest of his life.
He was hero in the Boer War. As a young man before World War I he entered Parliament and was so famous he was regularly cartooned in Punch. Churchill first gained a high position in Government during World War I. In that position his only accomplishment was in conceiving and pushing through one of history’s greatest military blunders, the attack on Gallipoli.
This, too, preyed on his mind. But Churchill could never really blame himself for that pointless slaughter.
In the 1930s Churchill was right where his father had been. He retired from politics, painted, wrote and was quietly going nuts.
Chamberlain’s Conservative Party, to which Churchill switched when his own and his father’s Liberal Party died, was in power. The only way for Churchill to get power again was to join the anti-Chamberlain forces inside the ruling party. He took over the leadership of the War Party against Chamberlain’s Appeasement. There was no other way for him to get out of the back benches.
The strategy worked. Churchill avoided his father’s fate by becoming leader of the fanatical War Party.
Comment in Lord Nelson’s Thread on SF
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 04/24/2007
Another standard Mommy Professor argument used here, and thousands of times before by the antis, is “How can I be anti-white? I’m white.”
It’s called treason, and if you know any history, there is nothing new about it.
Trappist monks have only recently got rid of the self-torture they were famous for. It is not at all unusual for people to mistake self-hatred for virtue.
Mommy Professor taught antis that the highest virtue was to be an enemy of your own kind. That is the essence of leftism and of the forms of Christianity, from the sickest branches of Calvism to the Trappists, that we are outgrowing in the new age.
Join us in the twenty-FIRST century.
Aryan Numerals
I have discussed at length what rubes the “sophisticates” are when it comes to sculpture. Even the US Capitol Building is a bad joke. It has the gray stone look the Pantheon has TODAY. Meanwhile “sophisticates” make fun of the colorful statues of saints in Catholic churches.
We have long since known that, if a person from the days of ancient Greece were to walk into a Catholic Church, those statues would look very normal to him. He would be appalled by the Capitol building with its absurd colorlessness.
Another example of rubes with PhDs if the term “Arabic numerals.”
We learned that real classic sculpture was colorful in the nineteenth century, but this fact has not filtered down to Mammy Professor yet. We learned in the nineteenth century that the Arabs got the ingenious numerical system we use today, the one that replaced Roman numerals, from India.
The India they got it from was the one where Buddha had “eyes the color of the lotus,” bright blue, and when the Indian who brought kung-fu to China was said to have drilled a hole in a wall with his BLUE eyes. They each called themselves Aryans, from the highest castes of the race the caste system, called naryu, or “color,” was designed to preserve.
What we use are ARYAN numerals, not Arabic numerals
Pain
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses, History on 04/24/2007
This sounds like Spengler. His examples of civilizations ending included those civilizations that changed from one to another without anyone noticing. The Roman Empire became the Byzantine Empire, but the people there still called it the Roman Empire. The North changed from the chaos of the heroic era to Western Civilization without any die-out of Nordics.
The changes moving us from the old age to the new already happened. The New Age is that of race. The Germans who died successfully keeping Communism out of Western Europe and the Anglo-Saxon continents knew this, and reading Spengler, they said they could be the last of the old age or the first of the new. History will date the dawning sometime in the 20th century.
But it happened in such a way that nobody noticed.
The drama and the torch-light parades have already happened. One quarter billion whites died in the war that communism lost. It has been smooth going since.
Comment by Pain
ME:
Pain, as you know, Spengler and Yockey are joined at the hip. But I think you are one of the few who have read them AND Lawrence Brown’s (Yes, I talked to him, too.) MIGHT OF THE WEST.
Someday I would like you and/or others compare Brown with the other two.




Robbie
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses, History on 04/26/2007
It seems that the anti mantra of non-whites “doing the jobs Americans{white people] won’t do is beginning to falter. I also have noticed and commented to people about how you no longer hear talk about “how hard a workers the Mexicans are” anymore. Just a few years ago everyone was saying that, but I haven’t heard anyone say it for quite some time. Notice that they [Mexicans] are getting fancier ll the time, too. It used to be that you saw them driving beat up junkers, now I see them driving new four wheel drives and Mustang GT’s and such, and buying cartloads of DVD players and TV’s and stereos, etc. It is just a matter of time till they will be demanding more and more money and less and less work. Then we will see how much these businessmen and contractors who are now working them at slave wages love them. Same goes for the “high tech” workers of Bill Gates. I suspect that he will soon be seeking “diversity” somewhere where it will not cost as much.
Comment by Robbie
1 Comment